University teachers’ perspectives on the role of the Laplace transform in engineering education

References

• Baillie, C. 2006. “Threshold Concepts in Engineering Education: Exploring Potential Blocks in Student Understanding.” International Journal of Engineering Education 22 (5): 955–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie, C., and J. Bernhard. 2009. “Educational Research Impacting Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (4): 291–294. doi: 10.1080/03043790902987311
   Google Scholar
• Berge, M., and A. Weilenmann. 2014. “Learning About Friction: Group Dynamics in Engineering Students’ Work with Free Body Diagrams.” European Journal of Engineering Education 39 (6): 601–616. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.895708.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, J. 2010. “Insightful Learning in the Laboratory: Some Experiences from Ten Years of Designing and Using Conceptual Labs.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (3): 271–287. doi:10.1080/03043791003739759.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, J., and A.-K. Carstensen. 2002. “ Learning and Teaching Electrical Circuit Theory.” Paper presented at the PTEE 2002: physics teaching in engineering education conference, Leuven, June 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, J., A.-K. Carstensen, and M. Holmberg. 2010. “Investigating Engineering Students’ Learning – ‘Learning as the Learning of a Complex Concept.’” Paper presented at the IGIP-SEFI conference, Trnava, September 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, J., A.-K. Carstensen, and M. Holmberg. 2013. “Phase as a Key Concept in Physics and Electrical Engineering.” Paper presented at the SEFI annual conference, Leuven, September 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 1996. “Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment.” Higher Education 32 (3): 347–364. doi: 10.1007/BF00138871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 1999. “What the Student Does: Teaching for Enhanced Learning.” Higher Education Research and Development 18 (1): 57–75. doi:10.1080/0729436990180105.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., and C. S.-K. Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, S. 2004. “Engineering Education and the Pedagogy of Awareness.” In Effective Learning and Teaching in Engineering, edited by C. Baillie, 9–23. New York: RouthledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, S. 2008. “Learning and Teaching Engineering Mathematics for the Knowledge Society.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (3): 381–389. doi: 10.1080/03043790802090232
   Google Scholar
• Booth, S., and Å. Ingerman. 2002. “Making Sense of Physics in the First Year of Study.” Learning and Instruction 12 (5): 493–507. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., and J. Bernhard. 2011. “The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as a Globally Connected Field of Inquiry.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (1): 14–47. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00003.x
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, J. 2004. “Capabilities-driven Curriculum Design.” In Effective Learning and Teaching in Engineering, edited by C. Baillie, 36–47. New York: RouthledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Carberry, A. R., and A. F. McKenna. 2014. “Exploring Student Conceptions of Modeling and Modeling Uses in Engineering Design.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (1): 77–91. doi:10.1002/jee.20033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, A.-K. 2013. Connect: Modelling Learning to Facilitate Linking Models and the Real World through Lab-Work in Electric Circuit Courses for Engineering Students. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertation No. 1529.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, A.-K., and J. Bernhard. 2004. “Laplace Transforms – Too Difficult to Teach, Learn and Apply, or Just Matter of How to Do It.” Paper presented at the EARLI sig#9 conference, Gothenburg, August 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, A.-K., and J. Bernhard. 2008. “Threshold Concepts and Keys to the Portal of Understanding: Some Examples from Electrical Engineering.” In Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines, edited by R. Land, E. Meyer, & J. Smith, 143–154. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, A.-K., and J. Bernhard. 2009. “Student Learning in an Electric Circuit Theory Course: Critical Aspects and Task Design.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (4): 389–404. doi:10.1080/03043790902990315.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, A.-K., and J. Bernhard. 2012. “Make Links: Overcoming the Threshold and Entering the Portal of Understanding.” Paper presented at the Threshold Concepts Conference, Dublin, June 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, A.-K., and J. Bernhard. 2016. “Make Links: Overcoming the Threshold and Entering the Portal of Understanding.” In Threshold Concepts in Practice, edited by R. Land, E. T. Meyer, & M. T. Flanagan, 209–220. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Comenius, J. A. 1657. “Didactica Magna [in Latin].” In Opera Didactica Omnia, edited by J. A. Comenius, 5–190. Amsterdam: Laurentii de Geer.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dray, T., and C. A. Manogue. 2005. “Bridging the Gap between Mathematics and the Physical Sciences.” In Preparing Future Science and Mathematics Teachers, edited by D. Smith & E. Swanson, 39–41. Bozeman: Montana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Edström, K., and A. Kolmos. 2014. “PBL and CDIO: Complementary Models for Engineering Education Development.” European Journal of Engineering Education 39 (5): 539–555. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.895703.
   Google Scholar
• Eisen, A., A. Hall, T. S. Lee, and J. Zupko. 2009. “Teaching Water: Connecting across Disciplines and into Daily Life to Address Complex Societal Issues.” College Teaching 57 (2): 99–104. doi:10.3200/CTCH.57.2.99-104.
   Google Scholar
• Finelli, C. J., S. R. Daly, and K. M. Richardson. 2014. “Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (2): 331–361. doi:10.1002/jee.20042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Sampayo, M. 2006. Engineering Problem Solving: The Case of the Laplace Transform as a Difficulty in Learning Electric Circuits and as a Tool to Solve Real World Problems. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertation No. 1038.
   Google Scholar
• Grubbström, R. 1967. “On the Application of the Laplace Transform to Certain Economic Problems.” Management Science 13 (7): 558–567. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.13.7.558
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, M., and J. Bernhard. 2008. “University Teachers’ Perspectives on the Role of the Laplace Transform in Engineering Education.” Mathematical Education of Engineers Conference – MEE2008, Loughborough.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J. J. 1987. “Towards a Theory of Symbol Use in Mathematics.” In Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, edited by C. Janvier, 159–195. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kautz, C. 2011. “Development of Instructional Materials to Address Student Difficulties in Introductory Electrical Engineering.” Paper presented at the SEFI annual conference, Lisbon, September 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Künzli, R. 2000. “German Didaktik: Models of Re-presentation, of Intercourse, and of Experience.” In Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition, edited by I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts, 41–54. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, C. J. 1992. “Is Teacher-reflected Epistemology a Source of Conceptual Difficulty in Physics?” International Journal of Science Education 14 (1): 111–121. doi:10.1080/0950069920140110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E., M. Prosser, K. Trigwell, P. Ramsden, and J. Benjamin. 2000. “What University Teachers Teach and How They Teach It.” Instructional Science 28 (5): 387–412. doi:10.1023/A:1026559912774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1975. “On Non-Verbatim Learning: 1. Level of Processing and Level of Outcome.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 16 (1): 273–279. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1975.tb00193.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography: Describing Conceptions of the World around Us.” Instructional Science 10: 177–200. doi: 10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1988. “Phenomenography: Exploring Different Conceptions of Reality.” In Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution, edited by D. M. Fetterman, 176–205. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 2015. Necessary Conditions of Learning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., U. Runesson, and A. B. M. Tsui. 2004. “The Space of Learning.” In Classroom Discourse and the Space of Learning, edited by F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui, 3–40. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 1976. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning I – Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 115–127. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulhall, P., and R. Gunstone. 2008. “Views About Physics Held by Physics Teachers with Differing Approaches to Teaching Physics.” Research in Science Education 38 (4): 435–462. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9057-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niss, M. 1994. “Mathematics in Society.” In Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline, edited by R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträßer, & B. Winkelmann, 367–378. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62 (3): 307–332. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollak, H. O. 1979. “The Interaction between Mathematics and Other School Subjects.” In New Trends in Mathematics Teaching, edited by ICME, 232–248. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., E. Martin, K. Trigwell, P. Ramsden, and G. Lueckenhausen. 2005. “Academics’ Experiences of Understanding of Their Subject Matter and the Relationship of This to Their Experiences of Teaching and Learning.” Instructional Science 33 (2): 137–157. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-7687-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and M. G. Bowen. 2001. “Professionals Read Graphs: A Semiotic Analysis.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 32: 159–194. doi: 10.2307/749672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelt, E. J. H., P. A. Luning, M. A. J. S. van Boekel, and M. Mulder. 2015. “Constructively Aligned Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Engineering: What Do Students Perceive as Contributing to the Learning of Interdisciplinary Thinking?” European Journal of Engineering Education 40 (5): 459–475. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.987647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straesser, R. 2007. “Didactics of Mathematics: More Than Mathematics and School!” ZDM Mathematics Education 39 (1): 165–171. doi: 10.1007/s11858-006-0016-x
   Google Scholar
• Streveler, R. A., T. A. Litzinger, R. L. Miller, and P. S. Steif. 2008. “Learning Conceptual Knowledge in the Engineering Sciences: Overview and Future Research Directions.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 279–294. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00979.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundlöf, A., A.-K. Carstensen, L. Tibell, and J. Bernhard. 2003. “ Real Models in Modelled Reality: Epistemic Confusion When Communicating Science?” Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association conference, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, September 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Tiberghien, A. 1999. “Labwork Activity and Learning Physics – an Approach Based on Modelling.” In Practical Work in Science Education, edited by J. Leach & A. C. Paulsen, 176–194. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser. 2014. “Qualitative Variation in Constructive Alignment in Curriculum Design.” Higher Education 67 (2): 141–154. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9701-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., M. Prosser, and F. Waterhouse. 1999. “Relations between Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching and Students’ Approaches to Learning.” Higher Education 37 (1): 57–70. doi:10.1023/A:1003548313194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vince, J., and A. Tiberghien. 2002. “Modelling in Teaching and Learning Elementary Physics.” In The Role of Communication in Learning to Model, edited by P. Brna, 49–68. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Winkelman, P. 2009. “Perceptions of Mathematics in Engineering.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (4): 305–316. doi: 10.1080/03043790902987378
   Google Scholar