Mapping remote and multidisciplinary learning barriers: lessons from challenge-based innovation at CERN

References

• Adams, Robin S., Tiago Forin, Mel Chua, and David Radcliffe. 2016. “Characterizing the Work of Coaching During Design Reviews.” Design Studies 45: 30–67. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudouin-Lafon, Michel, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2000. “Prototyping Tools and Techniques.” In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, edited by Julie A. Jacko and Andrew Sears, 1–41. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Carleton, T., and L. Leifer. 2009. “Stanford’s ME310 Course as an Evolution of Engineering Design.” Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference–Competitive Design. Cranfield University Press. https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/3648.
   Google Scholar
• Christophersen, Knut-Andreas. 2013. Introduktion Til Statistical Analysis (Introduction to Statistical Analysis). Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, Lee J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, Arthur. 2010. “In Praise of Convergent Thinking.” Creativity Research Journal 18 (3): 391–404. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. 2005. “The Design Process.” http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/ElevenLessons_Design_Council%20(2).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dym, Clive L., Alice M. Agogino, Ozgur Eris, Daniel D. Frey, and Larry J. Leifer. 2005. “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.” Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1): 103–120. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eling, Katrin, Abbie Griffin, and Fred Langerak. 2014. “Using Intuition in Fuzzy Front-end Decision-making: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (5): 956–972. doi:10.1111/jpim.12136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, Gabriela, Hernan Casakin, Yonni Avidan, and Ori Ronen. 2014. “Three Studio Critiquing Cultures: Fun Follows Function or Function Follows Fun?” http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dtrs/2014/Comparing/2/.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Dave, Sunni Brown, and James Macanufo. 2010. Gamestorming – A Playbook for Innovators, Rulebreakers and Changemakers. O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Gumienny, Raja, Lutz Gericke, Matthias Quasthoff, Christian Willems, and Christoph Meinel. 2011. “Tele-board: Enabling Efficient Collaboration in Digital Design Spaces.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 2011 15th International Conference on, 47–54. IEEE. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5960054.
   Google Scholar
• Gumienny, Raja, Lutz Gericke, Matthias Wenzel, and Christoph Meinel. 2013. “Supporting Creative Collaboration in Globally Distributed Companies.” Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 995–1007. ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2441890.
   Google Scholar
• Haungs, Michael, John Clements, and David S. Janzen. 2008. “Improving Engineering Education Through Creativity, Collboration, and Context in a First Year Course.” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/csse_fac/28/.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, Juho, and Ville Isomöttönen. 2015. “Learning Mechanisms in Multidisciplinary Teamwork with Real Customers and Open-ended Problems.” European Journal of Engineering Education 40 (6): 653–670. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.1001818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Penny L., Barbara L. Shwom, Charles Yarnoff, John C. Anderson, David M. Kelso, Gregory B. Olson, and J. Edward Colgate. 2001. “Engineering Design and Communication: The Case for Interdisciplinary Collaboration.” International Journal of Engineering Education 17 (4/5): 343–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurikka, Joona, and Tuuli Maria Utriainen. 2014. “Container Challenge – Protyping Distributed Collaboration.” DS 78: Proceedings of the E&PDE 2014 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, Peter Gorm, João M. Fernandes, Jacek Habel, Hanne Lehrskov, Richard J. C. Vos, Oliver Wallington, and Jan Zidek. 2009. “A Multidisciplinary Engineering Summer School in an Industrial Setting.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (6): 511–526. doi:10.1080/03043790903150687.
   Google Scholar
• Leifer, Larry J, and Martin Steinert. 2012. “Dancing with Ambiguity: Causality Behavior, Design Thinking, and Triple-loop-learning.” Information Knowledge Systems Management 10 (2011): 151–173. doi:10.3233/IKS-2012-0191.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, Tilmann, Raja Gumienny, Birgit Jobst, and Christoph Meinel. 2010. “Is There a Need for a Design Thinking Process?” Proceedings of Design Thinking Research Symposium 8. https://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/fileadmin/hpi/FG_ITS/papers/Design_Thinking/2010_Lindberg_Design.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Bella, and Bruce Hanington. 2012. Universal Methods of Design – 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport.
   Google Scholar
• Meinel, Christoph, Larry Leifer, and Hasso Plattner, eds. 2011. Design Thinking. Berlin: Springer. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, Maicon Gouvêa, Henrique Rozenfeld, Robert Phaal, and David Probert. 2015. “Decision Making at the Front End of Innovation: The Hidden Influence of Knowledge and Decision Criteria.” R&D Management 45 ( March): 161–180. doi:10.1111/radm.12058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, David M., and Marie C. Paretti. 2009. “Identifying Barriers to and Outcomes of Interdisciplinarity in the Engineering Classroom.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1080/03043790802710185.
   Google Scholar
• Rosca, Daniela. 2005. “Multidisciplinary and Active/Collaborative Approaches in Teaching Requirements Engineering.” European Journal of Engineering Education 30 (1): 121–128. doi:10.1080/03043790512331313886.
   Google Scholar
• Skog, Ole-Jørgen. 2013. Å forklare Sosiale Fenomener – En regresjonsbasert tilnærming. 2nd ed. Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, Ralph D. 1992. Managing the Unknowable: Strategic Boundaries Between Order and Chaos in Organizations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, Karl T., and Steven D. Eppinger. 2008. Product Design & Development. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Chunfang, and Paola Valero. 2016. “A Comparison of Creativity in Project Groups in Science and Engineering Education in Denmark and China.” In Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking, edited by Giovanni Emanuele Corazza and Sergio Agnoli, 133–151. Singapore: Springer Singapore. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_9.
   Google Scholar