Using argumentation as a learning strategy to improve student performance in engineering Statics

References

• Almudi, Jose Manuel, and Mikel Ceberio. 2015. “Analysis of Arguments Constructed by First-Year Engineering Students Addressing Electromagnetic Induction Problems.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (1): 215–236. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9528-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, Christa S. C., and Baruch B. Schwarz. 2007. “The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (3): 626–639. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydeniz, Mehmet, Aybuke Pabuccu, Pinar Seda Cetin, and Ebru Kaya. 2012. “Argumentation and Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Properties and Behavior of Gases.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10 (6): 1303–1324. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9336-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brose, Andrea, and Christian H. Kautz. 2011. “Identifying and Addressing Student Difficulties in Engineering Statics.” Paper presented at the meeting for American Society for Engineering Education, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. doi: //peer.asee.org/18073
   Google Scholar
• Conner, AnnaMarie, Laura M. Singletary, Ryan C. Smith, Patty Anne Wagner, and Richard T. Francisco. 2014. “Teacher Support for Collective Argumentation: A Framework for Examining How Teachers Support Students’ Engagement in Mathematical Activities.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 86 (3): 401–429. doi:10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Winter, Joost C. F., and Dimitra Dodou. 2010. “Five-Point Likert Items: t-Test Versus Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 15 (11): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Döhrmann, Martina, Gabriele Kaiser, and Sigrid Blömeke. 2014. “The Conceptualization of Mathematics Competencies in the International Teacher Education Study TEDS-M.” In International Perspectives on Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs and Opportunities to Learn, edited by S. Blomeke, F. J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser, and W. H. Schmidt, 431–456. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0432-z.
   Google Scholar
• Duschi, Richard A., and Jonathan Osborn. 2002. “Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 38 (1): 39–72. doi:10.1080/03057260208560187.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, Sibel, and Rosa Villamanan. 2009. “Cool Argument: Engineering Students Written Arguments About Thermodynamics in the Context of the Peltier Effect in Refrigeration.” Educación Química 20 (2): 119–125. doi:10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30018-1.
   Google Scholar
• Eskin, Handan, and Feral Ogan-Bekiroglu. 2013. “Argumentation as a Strategy for Conceptual Learning of Dynamics.” Research in Science Education 43 (5): 1939–1956. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9339-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton, Mark, Merce Garcia-Mila, Constanza Villarroel, and Sandra Gilabert. 2015. “Arguing Collaboratively: Argumentative Discourse Types and Their Potential for Knowledge Building.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (3): 372–386. doi:10.1111/bjep.12078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, Ellice A., Jorge Larreamendy-Joerns, Mary Kay Stein, and Catherine A. Brown. 1998. “You’re Going to Want to Find Out Which and Prove It: Collective Argumentation in a Mathematics Classroom.” Learning and Instruction 8 (6): 527–548. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00033-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foutz, Timothy L. 2018. “Collaborative Argumentation as a Learning Strategy to Improve Student Performance in Engineering Statics: A Pilot Study.” American Journal of Engineering Education 9 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, James H., and Julia M. Williams. 2008. “Using Writing Assignments to Improve Self-Assessment and Communication Skills in an Engineering Statics Course.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (4): 515–529. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00997.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haron, Habibah Norehan, Hafizah Harun, Rosmah Ali, Kamilah Radin Salim, and Noor Hamizah Hussain. 2014. “Self-Regulated Learning Strategies between the Performing and Non-Performing Students in Statics.” In Paper presented at 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 802–805. doi:10.1109/ICL.2014.7017875.
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, Robert G. M., Timothy J. Nokes, Kurt VanLehn, and Sophia Gershman. 2009. “The Design of Self-Explanation Prompts: The Fit Hypothesis.” In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, edited by N. A. Taatgen and H. van Rihn, 2626–2631. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Honicke, Toni, and Jaclyn Broadbent. 2016. “The Influence of Academic Self-Efficacy on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review.” Educational Research Review 17: 63–84. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, David H., and Young Hoan Cho. 2011. “Fostering Argumentation While Solving Engineering Ethics Problems.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (4): 680–702. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00032.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulatunga, Ushiri, Richard S. Moog, and Jennifer E. Lewis. 2013. “Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-led Sessions.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (10): 1207–1231. doi:10.1002/tea.21107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzinger, Thomas A., Peggy Van Meter, Carla M. Firetto, Lucas J. Passmore, Christine B. Masters, Stephen R. Turns, Gary L. Gray, Francesco Costanzo, and Sarah E. Zappe. 2010. “A Cognitive Study of Problem Solving in Statics.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (4): 337–353. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01067.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNair, Lisa, and Chris Venters. 2012. “Work in Progress: Using Writing-to-Learn Methods to Improve Conceptual Knowledge in Engineering Statics.” Paper presented at IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE) Seattle, Seattle, WA, October 3–6. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462525
   Google Scholar
• Montfort, Devlin, Shane Brown, and David Pollock. 2009. “An Investigation of Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Related Sophomore to Graduate-Level Engineering and Mechanics Courses.” Journal of Engineering Education 98 (2): 111–129. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01011.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. Michael. 2008. “Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation, and Learning: Preface and Literature Review.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 (3): 345–359. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olakanmi, E. O., and M. Doyoyo. 2014. “Using Structured Examples and Prompting Reflective Questions to Correct Misconceptions About Thermodynamic Concepts.” European Journal of Engineering Education 39 (2): 157–187. doi:10.1080/03043797.2013.833177.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, Rod. 2010. “Making Problem-Solving in Engineering-Mechanics Visible to First-Year Engineering Students.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 16 (2): 123–137. doi:10.1080/22054952.2010.11464045.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, Paul R., David A. F. Smith, Teresa Garcia, and Wilbert J. McKeachie. 1993. “Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).” Educational and Psychological Measurement 53 (3): 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, Alina, Richard C. Anderson, and Li-Jen Kuo. 2007. “Teaching and Learning Argumentation.” The Elementary School Journal 107 (5): 449–472. doi:10.1086/518623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, Victor, and Douglas B. Clark. 2008. “Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions.” Science Education 92 (3): 447–472. doi:10.1002/sce.20276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaharoun, Awaluddin Mohamed, Marlia Puteh, and Hafizah Harun. 2012. “Does Motivation Affect Students’ Understanding and Performance in Engineering Statics?” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 56: 191–203. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.646.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Michelle K., Francis H. M. Jones, Sarah L. Gilbert, and Carl E. Wieman. 2013. “The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 12 (4): 618–627. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steif, Paul. S. 2004. “An Articulation of the Concepts and Skills Which Underlie Engineering Statics.” Paper presented at IEEE Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Savannah, Georgia, October 20–23. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2004.1408579
   Google Scholar
• Steif, Paul S., and John A. Dantzler. 2005. “A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis.” Journal of Engineering Education 94 (4): 363–371. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00864.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steif, Paul S., and Anna Dollar. 2005. “Reinventing the Teaching of Statics.” International Journal of Engineering Education 21 (4): 723–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steif, Paul S., and Mary Hansen. 2006. “Comparisons Between Performances in a Statics Concept Inventory and Course Examinations.” International Journal of Engineering Education 22 (5): 1070–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steif, Paul S., Jamie M. Lobue, Levent B. Kara, and Anne L. Fay. 2010. “Improving Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk About Salient Problem Features.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (2): 135–142. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01050.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streveler, Ruth A., Thomas A. Litzinger, Ronald L. Miller, and Paul S. Steif. 2008. “Learning Conceptual Knowledge in the Engineering Sciences: Overview and Future Research Directions.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 279–294. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00979.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stump, Glenda S., Jonathan C. Hilpert, Jenefer Husman, Wen-ting Chung, and Wonsik Kim. 2011. “Collaborative Learning in Engineering Students: Gender and Achievement.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (3): 475–497. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00023.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, Lauren, Ruben Solorza, and Cinzia Fissore. 2018. “Providing Opportunities for Argumentation in Science Exam Settings.” Journal of College Science Teaching 47 (3): 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, Stephen E. 2003. The Uses of Argument (updated ed). New York: New York Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511840005.
   Google Scholar
• Venville, Grady J., and Vaille M. Dawson. 2010. “The Impact of a Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (8): 952–977. doi:10.1002/tea.20358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Aufschnaiter, Claudia, Sibel Erduran, Jonathan Osborne, and Shirley Simon. 2008. “Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Case Studies of How Students’ Argumentation Relates to Their Scientific Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (1): 101–131. doi:10.1002/tea.20213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, James F. 2006. “Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems.” In Arguing on the Toulmin Model, edited by David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij, 303–311. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Edward, and Robert L. McDonald. 2000. “Writing in Engineering Courses.” Journal of Engineering Education 89 (4): 481–486. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00555.x.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Robert E., and Edwin A. Locke. 1987. “The Relation of Self-Efficacy and Grade Goals to Academic Performance.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 47 (4): 1013–1024. doi:10.1177/0013164487474017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, Anat, and Yehudit J. Dori. 2003. “Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are they Mutually Exclusive?” Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (2): 145–181. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar