A ‘study and research path’ enriching the learning of mechanical engineering

References

• Aditomo, A., P. Goodyear, A.-M. Bliuc, and R. A. Ellis. 2011. “Inquiry-based Learning in Higher Education: Principal Forms, Educational Objectives, and Disciplinary Variations.” Studies in Higher Education 38: 1–20. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.616584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artigue, M. 2014. “Didactic Engineering in Mathematics Education.” In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, edited by S. Lerman, 159–162. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. 2014. A Design-Based Research: A Methodological Toolkit for Engineering Change, 2nd ed, edited by R.K. Sawyer, 151–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., K. E. Hay, K. Squire, M. Barnett, R. Schmidt, K. Karrigan, and C. Johnson. 2000. “Virtual Solar System Project: Learning Through a Technology-rich Inquiry-based Participatory Learning Environment.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 9 (1): 7–25. doi:10.1023/A:1009416822783.
   Google Scholar
• Barquero, B., and M. Bosch. 2015. “Didactic Engineering as a Research Methodology: From Fundamental Situations to Study and Research Paths.” In Task Design in Mathematics Education - ICMI Study 22, edited by A. Watson, and M. Ohtani, 249–273. Wien: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barquero, B., M. Bosch, and J. Gascón. 2013. “The Ecological Dimension in the Teaching of Mathematical Modelling at University.” Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 33: 307–338.
   Google Scholar
• Barquero, B., M. Bosch, and A. Romo. 2018. “Mathematical Modelling in Teacher Education: Dealing with Institutional Constraints”. ZDM Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0907-z
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, M., I. Florensa, and J. Gascón. 2016. “Study and Research Paths in University Mathematics Teaching and in Teacher Education: Open Issues At the Edge Between Epistemology and Didactics.” In Didactics of Mathematics in Higher Education as a Scientific Discipline – Conference Proceedings, edited by R. Göller, R. Biehler, R. Hochmuth, and H.-G. Rück, 413–417. Kassel: Universitätsbibliothek Kassel.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, M., and C. Winsløw. 2016. “Linking Problem Solving and Learning Contents: The Challenge of Self-sustained Study and Research Processes.” Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 35 (3): 357–401.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. 1997. Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, S. Sutherland, and V. Warfield. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. 1985. La transposition didactique – Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. 2004. “Vers une didactique de la codisciplinarité. Notes sur une nouvelle épistémologie scolaire.” In Journées de didactique comparée. Lyon. http://yves.chevallard.free.fr/spip/spip/article.php3?id_article=45.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. 2005. “Didactique et Formation des Enseignants [Didactics and Teacher Professional Development].” Impulsions 4 (4): 215–231.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. 2006. “Steps Towards a New Epistemology.” In Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, edited by M. Bosch, 21–30. Barcelona: FUNDEMI IQS – Universitat Ramon Llull.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. 2008. “Afterthoughts on a Seeming Didactic Paradox.” In Efficacité &Équité en Éducation, edited by J. Lederman, N. Lederman, and P. Wickman, 1–6. Rennes: Université de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. 2011. “La notion d’ingénierie didactique, un concept à refonder.” In En amont et en aval des ingénieries didactiques, edited by C. Margolinas, 81–108. Grenoble: La Pensée sauvage.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., K. Jackson, and C. Dunlap. 2016. “A Design-Based Research: A Methodological Toolkit for Engineering Change.” In Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. 2nd ed, edited by R.K. Sawyer, 151–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaff, E., and A. Kolmos. 2007. “History of Problem-based and Project-based Learning.” In Management of Change: Implementation of Problem-based and Project-based Learning in Engineering, edited by E. de Graaff and A. Kolmos, 1–8. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C., J. Gascón, and C. Lucas. 2014. “Desarrollo de un modelo epistemológico de referencia en torno a la modelizacion funcional.” Revista Latinoamericana de Investigacion en Matematica Educativa 17 (3): 289–318. doi: 10.12802/relime.13.1732
   Google Scholar
• Frank, M., I. Lavy, and D. Elata. 2003. “Implementing the Project-based Learning Approach in an Academic Engineering Course.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13 (3): 273–288. doi:10.1023/A:1026192113732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, J., and L. Ruiz-Higueras. 2013. “Task Design Within the Anthropological Theory of the Didactics: Study and Research Paths for Pre-school.” In Task Design in Mathematics Education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22, Oxford, UK, edited by C. Margolinas, 421–430. Oxford: University of Oxford http://hal.archives.ouvertes.fr/hal-00834054.
   Google Scholar
• Gascón, J. 2001. “Incidencia del modelo epistemológico de las matemáticas sobre las prácticas docente .” “Incidencia del modelo epistemológico de las matemáticas sobre las prácticas docentes.” Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa 42 (2): 129–159.
   Google Scholar
• Gascón, J. 2011. “The Three Fundamental Problems of A Didactic Problem: The Case of Analytical Algebra.” Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa 14: 203–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijselaers, W. H. 1996. “Connecting Problem-based Practices with Educational Theory.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1996 (68): 13–21. doi:10.1002/tl.37219966805.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Puente, S. M., C. Jongeneelen, and J. Perrenet. 2012. “Design-based Learning in Mechanical Engineering Education.” In Project Approaches to Learning in Engineering Education: The Practice of Teamwork, edited by L. C. de Campos, E. A. T. Dirani, A. L. Manrique, and E. van Hattum-Janssen, 89–108. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, J. 1982. “A Dialogical Model of Teaching.” Synthese 51 (1): 39–59. doi:10.1007/BF00413848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmegaard, H. T., L. M. Madsen, and L. Ulriksen. 2016. “Where is the Engineering I Applied for? A Longitudinal Study of Students’ Transition into Higher Education Engineering, and Their Considerations of Staying or Leaving.” European Journal of Engineering Education 41 (2): 154–171. doi:10.1080/03043797.2015.1056094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, W. 2006. “The 3C3R Model: A Conceptual Framework for Designing Problems in PBL.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 1 (1): 55–77. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1006.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen, B. E. 2014. “How Can Study and Research Paths Contribute to the Teaching of Mathematics in an Interdisciplinary Setting?” Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives 19: 199–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kidron, I., M. Artigue, M. Bosch, T. Dreyfus, and M. Haspekian. 2014. “Context, Milieu, and Media-Milieus Dialectic: A Case Study on Networking of AiC, TDS, and ATD.” In Networking of Theories as a Research Practice in Mathematics Education, edited by A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, and S. Prediger, 153–177. Wien: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A., and E. de Graaff. 2014. “Problem-based and Project-based Learning in Engineering Education: Merging Models.” In Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, edited by A. Johri, and M. Olds, 141–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A., and F. K. Fink. 2006. The Aalborg PBL Model: Progress, Diversity and Challenges, edited by Anette Kolmos, F. K. Fink, and L. Krogh. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz Berrocal, L. 2002. Strength of Materials. 2nd ed. Barcelona: McGrawHill. [Resistencia de materials].
   Google Scholar
• Perrenet, J. C., P. A. J. Bouhuijs, and J. G. M. M. Smits. 2000. “The Suitability of Problem-based Learning for Engineering Education: Theory and Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (3): 345–358. doi:10.1080/713699144.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. J., and R. M. Felder. 2006. “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2): 123–138. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandra, S. 2014. Strength of Materials. 4th ed. Chennai: Airwalk publications.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, W. F., L. D. Sturges, and D. H. Morris. 1999. Mechanics of Materials. 5th ed. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Savery, J. R. 2006. “Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 1 (1): 9–20. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1002.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, L., M. Bosch, and J. Gascón. 2010. “Fitting Models to Data: The Mathematising Step in the Modelling Process.” In Conference of the European Research on Mathematics Education, edited by V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, and F. Arzarello, 2186–2195. Lyon,France: INPR.
   Google Scholar
• Sintonen, M. 2004. “Reasoning to Hypotheses: Where Do Questions Come?” Foundations of Science 9: 249–266. doi:10.1023/B:FODA.0000042842.55251.c1.
   Google Scholar
• Thrane, T. 2009. Design and Testing a SRP-Course on Vector Functions and Movement [Design og Test af RSC-Forløb om Vektorfunktioner og Bevægelse]. Copenhaguen: University of Copenhaguen.
   Google Scholar
• Winsløw, C., Y. Matheron, and A. Mercier. 2013. “Study and Research Courses as an Epistemological Model for Didactics.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 83: 267–284. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9453-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. “Case Study Research: Design and Methods.” Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 26 (1): 93–101.
   Google Scholar