The role of peer review in identity development for engineering education researchers

References

• Alise, M. 2007. “Disciplinary Differences in Preferred Research Methods: a Comparison of Groups in the Biglan Classification Scheme.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. G. 1999. “‘Academics’ Motivation and Self-Efficacy for Teaching and Research.” Higher Education Research and Development 18 (3): 343–359. doi: 10.1080/0729436990180305
   Google Scholar
• Barnacle, R., and I. Mewburn. 2010. “Learning Networks and the Journey of ‘Becoming Doctor’.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (4): 433–444. doi:10.1080/03075070903131214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoes, K. 2011. “Practices of Brokering: Between STS and Feminist Engineering Education Research.” Unpublished PhD diss., Virginia Tech, Department of Science and Technology Studies, Blacksburg, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Beddoes, K. 2012. “Using Peer Reviews to Examine Micropolitics and Disciplinary Development of Engineering Education: A Case Study.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, doi:10.1080/01596306.2012.745735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M. 2007. “Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods.” Journal of Engineering Education 96 (2): 91–102. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., and J. Bernhard. 2011. “The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as an Internationally Connected Field of Inquiry.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (1): 14–47. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00003.x
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., E. P. Douglas, and C. T. Amelink. 2009. “Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 98 (1): 53–66. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., and R. Streveler. 2014. “Preparing Engineering Educators for Engineering Education Research.” In Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, edited by A. Johri, and B. Olds, 457–475. New York: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. 2001. “Conceptions of Research: A Phenomenographic Study.” Studies in Higher Education 26 (3): 271–285. doi: 10.1080/03075070120076255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brew, A. 2006. Research and Teaching: Beyond the Divide. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, E. P., M. Koro-Ljungberg, and M. Borrego. 2010. “Challenges and Promises of Overcoming Epistemological and Methodological Partiality: Advancing Engineering Education Through Acceptance of Diverse Ways of Knowing.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (3): 247–257. doi: 10.1080/03043791003703177
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M. 2002. “”The Paradox of Peer Review: Admitting too Much or Allowing Too Little?”.” Research in Science Education 32 (2): 241–255. doi: 10.1023/A:1016082229411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, A., and K. Willey. 2013. “Exploring the Impact of Peer Review on the Development of Engineering Education Researchers.” Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Gold Coast, Australia, December.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, A., K. Willey, L. Jolly, and G. Tibbits. 2012. “Peering at the Peer Review Process for Conference Submissions.” Proceedings of the frontiers in education conference, Seattle, USA, 3-6th October.
   Google Scholar
• Hardre, P., A. Beesley, R. Miller, and T. Pace. 2011. “Faculty Motivation to Do Research: Across Disciplines in Research-Extensive Universities.” The Journal of the Professoriate 5 (1): 35–69.
   Google Scholar
• Jesiek, B. K., L. Newswander, and M. Borrego. 2009. “Engineering Education Research: Discipline, Community, or Field?” Journal of Engineering Education 98 (1): 39–52. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, L., G. Tibbits, K. Willey, and A. Gardner. 2011. “Conferences, Reviews and Conversations About Improving Engineering Education.” Proceedings of the research in engineering education symposium, Madrid, Spain, October.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, L., K. Willey, and A. Gardner. 2012. “Quality in Engineering Education Research: Arriving at Consensus.” Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Melbourne, Australia, 3–5 December.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, L., L. O’Moore, and L. Jolly. 2012. “Mad as Hell and Not Taking It Any More?: Job Satisfaction Amongst Engineering Educators in Australian Universities.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Melbourne, Australia, 3–5 December.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. 2008. “Addressing the Supply and Quality of Engineering Graduates for the New Century”. A Report Prepared for the Carrick Institute for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, M., and E. P. Douglas. 2008. “State of Qualitative Research in Engineering Education: Meta-Analysis of JEE Articles, 2005-2006.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (2): 163–175. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00965.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., and B. Stierer. 2009. “‘Lecturers’ Everyday Writing as Professional Practice in the University as Workplace: New Insights into Academic Identities.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (4): 417–428. doi: 10.1080/03075070902771952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., and B. Stierer. 2011. “Changing Academic Identities in Changing Academic Workplaces: Learning from Academics” Everyday Professional Writing Practices.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (6): 605–616. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.560380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L. 2012. “Shining a Light on Doctoral Reading: Implications for Doctoral Identities and Pedagogies.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (4): 351–361. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2012.728875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., and C. Amundsen. 2011. “Making Meaning of Diverse Experiences: Constructing an Identity Through Time.” In Doctoral Education: Research-Based Strategies for Doctoral Students, Supervisors and Administrators, edited by L. McAlpine, and C. Amundsen. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., C. Amundsen, and M. Jazvac-Martek. 2010. “Living and Imagining Academic Careers.” In Becoming an Academic: International Perspectives, edited by L. McAlpine, and G. Akerlind. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., C. Amundsen, and G. Turner. 2013a. “Constructing Post-PhD Careers: Negotiating Opportunities and Personal Goals.” International Journal for Researcher Development 4 (1): 39–54. doi: 10.1108/IJRD-01-2013-0002
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., C. Amundsen, and G. Turner. 2013b. “Identity-Trajectory: Reframing Early Career Academic Experience.” British Educational Research Journal, doi:10.1002/berj.3123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., M. Jazvac-Martek, and A. Gonsalves. 2008. “The Question of Identity: Negotiating Roles and Voices in Evolving Academic Systems.” In Changing Identities and Voices in Higher Education, edited by R. Barnett, and R. Di Napoli. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., and L. Lucas. 2011. “Different Places, Different Specialisms: Similar Questions of Doctoral Identities Under Construction.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (6): 695–706. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.570432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., and G. Turner. 2012. “Imagined and Emerging Career Patterns: Perceptions of Doctoral Students and Research Staff.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 36 (4): 535–548. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2011.643777
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K. C., and M. Pasupathi. 2012. “Processes of Identity Development: Where I Am and How I Got There.” Identity 12 (1): 8–28. doi: 10.1080/15283488.2011.632363
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R. 2013. “‘It’s Not a Hobby’: Reconceptualizing the Place of Writing in Academic Work.” Higher Education 66 (1): 79–91. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9591-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. 2002. “Editorial Power/Authorial Suffering.” Research in Science Education 32 (2): 215–240. doi: 10.1023/A:1016030212572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W. B., R. E. Johnson, and J. K. Bosson. 2009. “Identity Negotiation at Work.” Research in Organizational Behavior 29: 81–109. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. 2008. “Being an Academic Today.” In Changing Identities in Higher Education: Voicing Perspectives, edited by R. Di Napoli, and R. Barnett. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. 2003. “Disparate Academic Environments: An Emergent Framework of Socialization.” The Qualitative Report 8 (3): 408–434.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, K. 2002. “The Multiple Faces of Peer Review in Science Education.” Research in Science Education 32 (2): 135–156. doi: 10.1023/A:1016017809846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K., L. Jolly, G. Tibbits, and A. Gardner. 2011. “Investigating Research Quality and the Review Process: Some Suggestions for Improvement.” Proceedings of the 39th annual SEFI conference, J. Bernardino and J. C. Quadrado (eds), Lisbon, Portugal, September 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B., P. Wankat, P. Neto, and C. Tiago. 2014. “Is Engineering Education Research Global? The Answer may Surprise you.” 121st ASEE annual conference & exposition, Indianapolis, USA, 15–18 June.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, F. 1990. “Factors Influencing Research Performance of University Academic Staff.” Higher Education 19: 81–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00142025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar