560
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Challenge-based instruction promotes students’ development of transferable frameworks and confidence for engineering problem solving

&
Pages 398-416 | Received 28 Jan 2018, Accepted 11 Sep 2018, Published online: 19 Sep 2018

References

  • ABET. 2017. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2016-2017.” http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/.
  • Allie, Saalih, Mogamat Noor Armien, Nicolette Burgoyne, Jennifer M. Case, Brandon I. Collier-Reed, Tracy S. Craig, Andrew Deacon, Duncan M. Fraser, Zulpha Geyer, and Cecilia Jacobs. 2009. “Learning as Acquiring a Discursive Identity Through Participation in a Community: Improving Student Learning in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (4): 359–367.
  • Bandura, Albert. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Macmillan.
  • Bateman, Walter L. 1990. Open to Question. The Art of Teaching and Learning by Inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  • Bielefeldt, Angela R., Kurtis G. Paterson, and Christopher W. Swan. 2010. “Measuring the Value Added from Service Learning in Project-based Engineering Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education 26 (3): 535–546.
  • Borrego, Maura, Jeffrey E. Froyd, and T. Simin Hall. 2010. “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in US Engineering Departments.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (3): 185–207.
  • Carberry, Adam R., Hee-Sun Lee, and Matthew W. Ohland. 2010. “Measuring Engineering Design Self-Efficacy.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (1): 71–79.
  • Collins, Jerry C., and Thomas R. Harris. 2001. “The VaNTH ERC: A Vehicle for Continuing Education in Bioengineering.” Industry and Higher Education 15 (5): 333–339.
  • Cordray, David S., Thomas R. Harris, and Stacy Klein. 2009. “A Research Synthesis of the Effectiveness, Replicability, and Generality of the VaNTH Challenge-based Instructional Modules in Bioengineering.” Journal of Engineering Education 98 (4): 335–348. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01031.x.
  • Dorst, Kees. 2011. “The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application.” Design Studies 32 (6): 521–532.
  • Du, Xiang-Yun. 2006. “Gendered Practices of Constructing an Engineering Identity in a Problem-based Learning Environment.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (1): 35–42.
  • Eliot, Matt, and Jennifer Turns. 2011. “Constructing Professional Portfolios: Sense-Making and Professional Identity Development for Engineering Undergraduates.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (4): 630–654.
  • Engle, Randi A. 2006. “Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (4): 451–498.
  • Fantz, Todd D., Thomas J. Siller, and Michael A. Demiranda. 2011. “Pre-Collegiate Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy of Engineering Students.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (3): 604–623.
  • Felder, Richard M., and Rebecca Brent. 2004. The ABC’s of Engineering Education: ABET, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cooperative Learning, and So on. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
  • Felder, Richard M., Donald R. Woods, James E. Stice, and Armando Rugarcia. 2000. “The Future of Engineering Education II. Teaching Methods That Work.” Chemical Engineering Education 34 (1): 26–39.
  • Fleming, Lorraine N., and Kalynda Chivon Smith. 2013. “Engineering Identity of Black and Hispanic Undergraduates: The Impact of Minority Serving Institutions.” Age 23: 1.
  • Freeman, Scott, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K. Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–8415.
  • Honicke, Toni, and Jaclyn Broadbent. 2016. “The Influence of Academic Self-Efficacy on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review.” Educational Research Review 17: 63–84.
  • Hutchison, Mica A., Deborah K. Follman, Melissa Sumpter, and George M. Bodner. 2006. “Factors Influencing the Self-efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (1): 39–47.
  • Kelley, Todd R., and J. Geoff Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (1): 11.
  • Komarraju, Meera, Jane Swanson, and Dustin Nadler. 2014. “Increased Career Self-efficacy Predicts College Students’ Motivation, and Course and Major Satisfaction.” Journal of Career Assessment 22 (3): 420–432.
  • Kuhn, Deanna, John Black, Alla Keselman, and Danielle Kaplan. 2000. “The Development of Cognitive Skills to Support Inquiry Learning.” Cognition and Instruction 18 (4): 495–523.
  • Lane, Erin S., and Sara E. Harris. 2015. “A New Tool for Measuring Student Behavioral Engagement in Large University Classes.” Journal of College Science Teaching 44 (6): 83–91.
  • Madhuri, G. V., V. S. S. N. Kantamreddi, and L. N. S. Prakash Goteti. 2012. “Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills Using Inquiry-based Learning.” European Journal of Engineering Education 37 (2): 117–123.
  • Martin, Taylor, Anthony J. Petrosino, Stephanie Rivale, and Kenneth R. Diller. 2006. “The Development of Adaptive Expertise in Biotransport.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2006 (108): 35–47.
  • Martin, Taylor, Stephanie D. Rivale, and Kenneth R. Diller. 2007. “Comparison of Student Learning in Challenge-Based and Traditional Instruction in Biomedical Engineering.” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 35 (8): 1312–1323.
  • Meyers, Kerry L., Matthew W. Ohland, Alice L. Pawley, Stephen E. Silliman, and Karl A. Smith. 2012. “Factors Relating to Engineering Identity.” Global Journal of Engineering Education 14 (1): 119–131.
  • Minner, Daphne D., Abigail Jurist Levy, and Jeanne Century. 2010. “Inquiry-based Science Instruction – What is it and Does it Matter? Results from a Research Synthesis Years 1984 to 2002.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (4): 474–496.
  • Palmer, D. H. 2006. “Sources of Self-Efficacy in a Science Methods Course for Primary Teacher Education Students.” Research in Science Education 36 (4): 337–353.
  • Passow, Honor J. 2012. “Which ABET Competencies do Engineering Graduates Find Most Important in Their Work?” Journal of Engineering Education 101 (1): 95–118.
  • Prince, Michael J., and Richard M. Felder. 2006. “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2): 123–138.
  • Prince, Michael, and Richard Felder. 2007. “The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning.” Journal of College Science Teaching 36 (5): 14.
  • Roselli, Robert J., and Kenneth R. Diller. 2011. Biotransport: Principles and Applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Scheer, Andrea, Christine Noweski, and Christoph Meinel. 2012. “Transforming Constructivist Learning Into Action: Design Thinking in Education.” Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 17 (3): 8–19.
  • Schwartz, Daniel L., Xiaodong Lin, Sean Brophy, and J. D. Bransford. 1999. “Toward the Development of Flexibly Adaptive Instructional Designs.” Instructional-design Theories and Models: A new Paradigm of Instructional Theory 2: 183–213.
  • Tate, Kevin A., Nadya A. Fouad, Laura Reid Marks, Gary Young, Eddie Guzman, and Eric G. Williams. 2015. “Underrepresented First-Generation, Low-Income College Students’ Pursuit of a Graduate Education: Investigating the Influence of Self-Efficacy, Coping Efficacy, and Family Influence.” Journal of Career Assessment 23 (3): 427–441.
  • Van Dinther, Mart, Filip Dochy, and Mien Segers. 2011. “Factors Affecting Students’ Self-Efficacy in Higher Education.” Educational Research Review 6 (2): 95–108.
  • Wiggins, Grant P., and Jay McTighe. 2005. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Ascd.
  • Zou, X. T., and B. Y. B. Chan. 2016. “Developing Professional Identity Through Authentic Learning Experiences.” In Research and Development in Higher Education: The Shape of Higher Education. Hammondville, Australia: The Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, Inc.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.