Peer review of laboratory reports for engineering students

References

• Berry, D. E., and K. L. Fawkes. 2010. “Constructing the Components of a Lab Report Using Peer Review.” Journal of Chemical Education 87 (1): 57–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. M. 2013. “Using a Collaborative Critiquing Technique to Develop Chemistry Students’ Technical Writing Skills.” Journal of Chemical Education 90 (6): 751–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M. J., and H. Harper. 2013. “Student Writing: Strategies to Reverse Ongoing Decline.” Academic Questions 26 (3): 285–295.
   Google Scholar
• Cartney, P. 2010. “Exploring the Use of Peer Assessment as a Vehicle for Closing the Gap Between Feedback Given and Feedback Used.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 551–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., and C. MacArthur. 2011. “Learning by Reviewing.” Journal of Educational Psychology 103 (1): 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. 2010. “Developing the Ability for Making Evaluative Judgements.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (3): 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley, E. F. 2002. “Creating the CDIO Syllabus, a Universal Template for Engineering Education.” 32nd annual conference on Frontiers in Education (FIE 2002), Boston, November 6–9, (2) F3F:8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W., and V. L. P. Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., R. Koestner, and R. M. Ryan. 2001. “Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again.” Review of Educational Research 71 (1): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., and H. Kyngäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1): 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. London: Routledge-Farmer.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2007. “The Place of Peers in Learning and Assessment.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term, edited by D. Boud and N. Falchikov, 128–143. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S. 2004. “Likert Scales: How to (Ab)use Them.” Medical Education 38 (12): 1217–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klir, G. J., and B. Yuan. 1995. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Chapter 1: From classical (crisp) sets to fuzzy sets: a grand paradigm shift.
   Google Scholar
• Lantz, B. 2013. “Equidistance of Likert-Type Scales and Validation of Inferential Methods Using Experiments and Simulations.” The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 11 (1): 16–28.
   Google Scholar
• Leydon, J., K. Wilson, and C. Boyd. 2014. “Improving Student Writing Abilities in Geography: Examining the Benefits of Criterion-Based Assessment and Detailed Feedback.” Journal of Geography 113 (4): 151–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliesköld, J., and S. Östlund. 2008. “Designing, Implementing and Maintaining a First Year Project Course in Electrical Engineering.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (2): 231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., and W. Baker. 2009. “To Give Is Better Than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (1): 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, R. A., J. M. Pearce, and C. Baik. 2014. “Peer Review in Higher Education: Student Perception Before and After Participation.” Active Learning in Higher Education 15 (2): 157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, C. S., A. Patil, and P. Mertova. 2009. “Re-engineering Graduate Skills – a Case Study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (2): 131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, G. 2010. “Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the “Laws” of Statistics.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 15: 625–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. 2011. “Peer and Self-assessment in the First Year of University.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (5): 493–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O’Donovan. 2010. “Feedback: All that Effort, but What Is the Effect?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, C., M. Price, and B. O’Dononvan. 2003. “Improving Students’ Learning by Developing Their Understanding of Assessment Criteria.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (2): 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. P., and V. Sampson. 2013. “Argument-driven Inquiry: Using the Laboratory to Improve Undergraduate’s Science Writing Skills Through Meaningful Science Writing, Peer-Review and Revision.” Journal of Chemical Education 90 (10): 1269–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M., and J. Williams. 2014. “Critical Evaluation as an Aid to Improved Report Writing: A Case Study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 39 (3): 272–281.
   Google Scholar
• Weurlander, M., M. Söderberg, M. Scheja, H. Hult, and A. Wernerson. 2012. “Exploring Formative Assessment as a Tool for Learning: Students’ Experiences of Different Methods of Formative Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (6): 747–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar