297
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How well do vocational qualifications help prepare technician engineering students for undergraduate study?

Pages 854-878 | Received 16 Jul 2018, Accepted 02 Oct 2019, Published online: 15 Oct 2019

References

  • Alpay, E., and M. E. Jones. 2012. “Engineering Education in Research Intensive Universities.” European Journal of Engineering Education 37: 609–626. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.736953
  • Argles, M. 1964. South Kensington to Robbins. London: Longmans.
  • Baillie, C., and G. Fitzgerald. 2000. “Motivation and Attrition in Engineering Students.” European Journal of Engineering Education 25: 145–155. doi: 10.1080/030437900308544
  • Barrett, D. 2011. “The Cheating Epidemic at Britain's Universities.” The Telegraph, London.
  • Birbeck, R. 1980. “The History and Operation of the Technician Education Council Programmes in Colleges of Technology in the United Kingdom.” International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 17: 293–299. doi: 10.1177/002072098001700403
  • Bogdan, R., and S. K. Biklen. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bourne, R. 1984. “The Rise and Fall of the HNC: Long Live the HNC!” IEE Proceedings 131 (Pt A): 745–748.
  • Boys, C. 2000. The GNVQ Experiment 1991 to 1996 - Lost for Words?. Brighton: University of Sussex.
  • Bryman, A. 2004. Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • BTEC. 1986a. Assessment and Grading - General Guideline. London, Business and Technician Council.
  • BTEC. 1986b. Assignments Help Students to Learn. London, Business and Technician Council.
  • Carr, M., B. Bowe, and E. N. Fhloinn. 2013. “Core Skills Assessment to Improve Mathematical Competency.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36: 608–619. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.755500
  • Carter, J. 2010. “Progression from Vocational and Applied Learning to Higher Education in England.” Bolton, University Vocational Awards Council.
  • Carter, A. 2012. “Assessment-in-Action: A Study of Lecturers’ and Students’ Constructions of BTEC National Assessment Practice, in a College Engineering Programme Area.” School of Education. Bristol, University of the West of England.
  • Carter, A., and A.-M. Bathmaker. 2016. “Prioritising Progression Over Proficiency: Limitations of Teacher-Based Assessment Within Technician-Level Vocational Education.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 41 (4): 460–474. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2015.1135881
  • Case, J., and G. Light. 2011. “Emerging Methodologies in Engineering Education Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 100: 186–210. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x
  • Colley, H., and J. Jarvis. 2007. “Formality and Informality in the Summative Assessment of Motor Vehicle Apprentices: a Case Study.” Assessment in Education 14: 295–314.
  • Cox, W. 2001. “On the Expectations of the Mathematical Knowledge of First-Year Undergraduates.” International Journal of Mathematics Education and Science in Technology 32: 847–861. doi: 10.1080/00207390110067644
  • Crowther, G. 1959. 15-18: A Report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England), Vol. 1. London: HMSO.
  • Department for Business Innovation and Skills.. 2016. Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. London: HMSO.
  • DFE. 2016. Technical and Applied Qualifications for 14 to 19 Year Olds Key Stage 4 and 16 to 19 Performance Tables From 2019: Technical Guidance for Awarding Organisations. London: Department of Education.
  • Dias, D., and M. José sá. 2012. “From High School to University: Students’ Competences Recycled, 17:3, 277-291.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 17: 277–291. doi: 10.1080/13596748.2012.700094
  • Drew, S. 2001. “Student Perceptions of What Helps Them Learn and Develop in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 6: 309–331. doi: 10.1080/13562510120061197
  • Ecclestone, K. 2002. Leaner Autonomy in Post-16 Education: The Politics and Practice of Formative Assessment. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Ecclestone, K. 2010. Transforming Formative Assessment in Lifelong Learning. London: Open University Press.
  • Edexcel. 1996. Quality Update - General Information - Grading in BTEC programmes. Quality Update. London, Edexcel Foundation.
  • Edexcel. 1999. Qualification Report - Centre Visit and Sampling Details. London, Edexcel Foundation.
  • Edexcel. 2002. Edexcel Level 3 - BTEC Nationals in Manufacturing Engineering - Guidance and units, London, Edexcel Foundation.
  • Edexcel. 2003. B013368 – Guidance and units – Edexcel Level 4 BTEC Higher Nationals in Mechanical Engineering – Issue 1. London, Edexcel Foundation.
  • Edexcel. 2007. Edexcel Level 3 BTEC National Certificate and Diploma in Manufacturing Engineering For first teaching September 2007, London, Edexcel Limited.
  • Edexcel. 2010. Edexcel Manufacturing Engineering Level 3 BTEC National Specification from September 2010. London, Edexcel Limited.
  • Edexcel. 2011. Edexcel BTEC Higher Nationals - Manufacturing Engineering Specification Level 4 HNC, Level 5 HND issue 4. London, Pearson.
  • Ely, M., R. Vinz, M. Anzul, and M. Downing. 1997. On Writing Qualitative Research - Living by Words. London: The Falmer Press.
  • Foden, F. E. 1951. “The National Certificate.” Journal of Vocational Education 3: 38–46.
  • Gill, P. 1999. “Aspects of Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Understanding of Mathematics.” International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology 30: 557–563. doi: 10.1080/002073999287824
  • Gipps, G. R. 2007. Analysing Qualitative Data. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Hargreaves, D. J. 1998. “Addressing the Transition to Tertiary Education in Engineering.” European Journal of Engineering Education 23: 79–89. doi: 10.1080/0304379980230109
  • Harvey, L., S. Drew, and M. Smith. 2006. The First-Year Experience: A Review of Literature for the Higher Education Academy. Sheffield: Centre for Research and Evaluation Sheffield Hallam University.
  • Haslegrave, H. L. 1969. “Report of the Committee on Technician Courses and Examinations (The Haslegrave Report).” London, Department of Education and Science.
  • HEFCE. 2007. Pathways to Higher Education - BTEC courses. London, Higher Education Funding Council for England.
  • Holmegaard, H. T., L. M. Madsenm, and L. Ulriksen. 2016. “Where is the Engineering I Applied for? A Longitudinal Study of Students’ Transition Into Higher Education Engineering, and Their Considerations of Staying or Leaving.” European Journal of Engineering Education 41: 154–171. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2015.1056094
  • Jahoda, M. 1963. The Education of Technologists. London: Tavistock Publications.
  • Jolly, W. P., and C. W. Turner. 1979. “The Transition From School to University: Some Experimental Induction Programmes for Engineering Students.” Studies in Higher Education 4: 39–46. doi: 10.1080/03075077912331377081
  • Killen, R. 1994. “Differences Between Students’ and Article Title Lecturers’ Perceptions of Factors Words: Influencing Students’ Academic Success at University.” Higher Education Research and Development 13: 199–211. doi: 10.1080/0729436940130210
  • Kinnunen, P., M. Butler, M. Morgan, A. Nylen, A.-K. Peters, J. Sinclair, S. Kalvala, and E. Pesonen. 2016. “Understanding Initial Undergraduate Expectations and Identity in Computing Studies.” European Journal of Engineering Education 43: 1–18.
  • Lawson, D. A. 2000. “Vocational Education as Preparation for University Engineering Mathematics.” Engineering Science and Education Journal. London, IEE.
  • London Economics. 2013. The Outcomes Associated with the BTEC Route of Degree Level Acquisition (A Report for Pearson). London.
  • Marszal, A. 2013. Post-1992 Universities ‘Offer Longer Teaching Hours’. Telegraph.
  • Maxwell, J. A. 1992. “Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research.” Harvard Educational Review 62: 279–300. doi: 10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826
  • McDowell, L., S. White, and H. Davis. 2004. “Changing Assessment Practice in Engineering: how can Understanding Lecturer Perspectives Help?” European Journal of Engineering Education 29: 173–181. doi: 10.1080/03043790310001633151
  • Medland, E. 2016. “Assessment in Higher Education: Drivers, Barriers and Directions for Change in the UK.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41: 81–96. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.982072
  • Miles, M. B., and M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Ministry of Education. 1961. Better Opportunities in Technical Education: Cwnd 1254. White Paper. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
  • Moor, C., A. Dean, and S. Andrews. 1983. TEC Programmes Evaluated: Student Progress and Employer Perceptions. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.
  • Mustoe, L. R. 2006. “The Mathematics Background of Undergraduate Engineers.” International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 39: 192–200. doi: 10.7227/IJEEE.39.3.2
  • Norris, N. 1997. “Error, Bias and Validity in Qualitative Research.” Educational Action Research 5: 172–176. doi: 10.1080/09650799700200020
  • Pearson. 2014. BTEC Qualifications Fact Sheet (Updated 2014). London: Pearson.
  • Pearson. 2018. BTEC Higher Nationals - (RQF) Assessment & Feedback Guidance for Centres/Tutors. London: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Pokorny, M., and H. Pokorny. 2005. “Widening Participation in Higher Education: Student Quantitative Skills and Independent Learning as Impediments to Progression.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 36: 445–467. doi: 10.1080/00207390500062621
  • Pring, R. 2004. Philosophy of Educational Research. London: Continuum.
  • QCA. 2005. Comparability Study of Assessment Practice - BTEC National Qualifications in Business, Engineering and Media. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
  • Raggatt, P., and S. Williams. 1999. Government, Vocational Markets and Qualifications: An Anatomy of Policy. London: Falmer Press Ltd.
  • Sainsbury, D. 2016. Report of the Independent Panel on Technical Education.
  • Scott, P. 2012. “It's 20 Years Since Polytechnics Became Universities and There's No Going Back.” The Guardian. London.
  • Shaw, C. T., and V. F. Shaw. 1997. “Attitudes of First Year Engineering Students to Mathematics – A CASE STUDY.” International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology 28: 289–301. doi: 10.1080/0020739970280210
  • Smith, D., and J. Bocock. 1999. “Participation and Progression in Mass Higher Education: Policy and the FHE Interface.” Journal of Education Policy 14: 283–299. doi: 10.1080/026809399286350
  • Soeiro, A., and J. S. Cabral. 2004. “Engineering Students’ Assessment at University of Porto.” European Journal of Engineering Education 29: 283–290. doi: 10.1080/0304379032000157240
  • A Star Future Ltd. 2019. Information about international higher education opportunities to British students, parents and advisors. London: A Star Future Ltd.
  • Sutherland, R., and S. Pozzi. 1995. The Changing Mathematical Background of Undergraduate Engineers: A Review of the Issues. London: Engineering Council.
  • Swailes, S., P. Entwistle, and P. Campkin. 1998. “The Performance of GNVQ Entrants on Undergraduate Business Courses.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 22: 211–218. doi: 10.1080/0309877980220210
  • TEC. 1979. TEC 1979 Guidance Notes 8. London: Technician Education Council.
  • Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-Secondary Education and Training can Come to Dominate Learning.” Assessment in Education 14: 281–294.
  • Torrance, H., H. Colley, D. Garratt, J. Jarvis, H. Piper, K. Ecclestone, and D. James. 2005. The Impact of Different Modes of Assessment on Achievement and Progress in the Learning and Skills Sector (London, LSDA for the LSRC). London: The Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  • Townend, M. S. 2001. “Integrating Case Studies in Engineering Mathematics: a Response to SARTOR 3.” Teaching in Higher Education 6: 203–215. doi: 10.1080/13562510120045195
  • Trant, A., and F. Geaney. 2000. “The Changing Status of Vocational Education: A Study Involving Five European Countries.” Irish Educational Studies 19: 257–270. doi: 10.1080/0332331000190121
  • UKGOV. 2018. Get the Facts: AS and A Level Reform.
  • UK Government. 1992. Further and Higher Education Act, Chapter 13. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
  • UKUNI. 2013. Types of UK Universities.
  • Universities UK. 2017. Higher Education in Facts and Figures 2017. London: Universities UK.
  • Valenzuela, D., and P. Shrivastava. 2008. Interview as a Method for Qualitative Research.
  • Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Williams, K. 2005. “Lecturer and First Year Student (mis)Understandings of Assessment Task Verbs:‘Mind the Gap’.” Teaching in Higher Education 10: 157–173. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000337927
  • Wilson-Strydom, M. 2016. “A Capabilities List for Equitable Transitions to University: A Top-Down and Bottom-up Approach, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 17: 145–160. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2014.991280
  • Wolf, A. 1995. Competence-Based Assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Wolf, A. 2011. Review of Vocational Education – The Wolf Report. London: Department for Education.
  • Wolf, A. 2016. Remaking Territory Education: Can We Create a System That is Fair and Fit for Purpose? London: Education Policy Institute.
  • Yorke, M., and L. Thomas. 2003. “Improving the Retention of Students From Lower Socio-Economic Groups.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 25: 63–74. doi: 10.1080/13600800305737

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.