References
- ABET. 2011. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. http://www.abet.org/uploadedFiles/Accreditation/Accreditation_Process/Accreditation_Documents/Current/eac-criteria-2012-2013.pdf.
- Allie, S., N. Burgoyne, J. M. Case, B. I. Collier-Reed, T. S. Craig, A. Deacon, D. M. Fraser, et al. 2009. “Learning as Acquiring a Discursive Identity Through Participation in a Community: Improving Student Learning in Engineering Education.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14 (2): 6–14. doi:10.1080/03043790902989457.
- Anderson, L. W., and D. R. Krathwohl. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman. http://digilib.uns.ac.id/pengguna.php?mn=showview&id=21967.
- Bernstein, B. 1975. Class, Codes & Control. Vol. III. London: Routledge.
- Biggs, J., and K. F. Collis. 1982. “Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy.” In A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice. doi:10.1177/089202068700100412
- Crosthwaite, C. 2019. Engineering Futures 2035: A Scoping Study. http://www.aced.edu.au/downloads/Engineering Futures 2035_Stage 1 report for ACED_May_16_2019.pdf.
- Dehing, A., W. Jochems, and L. Baartman. 2013. “The Development of Engineering Students Professional Identity During Workplace Learning in Industry: A Study in Dutch Bachelor Education.” Engineering Education 8 (1): 42–64. doi:10.11120/ened.2013.00007.
- Dreyfus, S. E., and H. L. Dreyfus. 1986. Mind Over Machine. New York: Free Press.
- Engineers Australia. 2013. Australian Engineering Stage 1 Competency Standards for Professional Engineers. In Engineers Australia, Accreditation Board: Accreditation Management System (Issue 3). https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/content-files/2016-12/doc21_p05pe_ea_stage_1_competency_standards_for_pe.pdf.
- Engineers Australia. 2018. Accreditation Management System: Accreditation Criteria User Guide – Higher Education (AMS-MAN-10).
- Gobet, F., and P. Chassy. 2009. “Expertise and Intuition: A Tale of Three Theories.” Minds and Machines 19 (2): 151–180. doi:10.1007/s11023-008-9131-5.
- Graham, R. 2012. Achieving Excellence in Engineering Education: The Ingredients of Successful Change. Vol. 101, Issue March. The Royal Academy of Engineering. http://epc.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Ruth-Graham.pdf.
- Guest, G., K. M. MacQueen, and E. E. Namey. 2012. Applied Thematic Analysis. Sage Publications. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Hr11DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=validity+of+automatic+coding+for+thematic+analysis&ots=Xi4zyKwIuH&sig=0aNyKVAlnU3b6dRmv5ZtZlvw42Y&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=validity of automatic coding for thematic analysis&f=fals.
- Jackson, D. 2016. “Re-conceptualising Graduate Employability: The Importance of Pre-professional Identity.” Higher Education Research and Development 35 (5): 925–939. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1139551.
- Kadi, A., and D. Lowe. 2018. “A New Professional Engagement Program – Outline and Initial Outcomes.” Proceedings of the AAEE2018 Conference.
- King, R. 2008. Engineers for the Future. http://www.altc.edu.au/carrick/go/home/grants/pid/343.
- Kurtz, C. F., and D. J. Snowden. 2003. “The New Dynamics of Strategy: Sense-Making in a Complex and Complicated World.” IBM Systems Journal 42 (3): 462–483. doi:10.1109/EMR.2003.24944.
- Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Maton, K., S. Hood, and S. Shay. 2015. “Knowledge-Building: Educational Studies in Legitimation Code Theory.” Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315672342.
- Meyers, K. L., M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith. 2012. “Factors Relating to Engineering Identity.” Global Journal of Engineering Education 14 (1): 119–131.
- National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academy of Engineering. https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:63792.
- Passow, H. J., and C. H. Passow. 2017. “What Competencies Should Undergraduate Engineering Programs Emphasize? A Systematic Review.” Journal of Engineering Education 106 (3). doi:10.1002/jee.20171.
- Pott, R. W. M., and K. Wolff. 2019. “Using Legitimation Code Theory to Conceptualize Learning Opportunities in Fluid Mechanics.” Fluids 4 (4). doi:10.3390/fluids4040203.
- Pratt, M. G., K. W. Rockmann, and J. B. Kaufmann. 2006. “Constructing Professional Identity: The Role of Work and Identity Learning Cycles in the Customization of Identity among Medical Residents.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (2): 235–262. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786060.
- Sandberg, J. 2000. “Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (1): 9–25. doi:10.2307/1556383.
- Stevens, R., A. Johri, and K. O’connor. 2013. “Professional Engineering Work.” In Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 119–138. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.010
- Trede, F. 2012. “Role of Work-Integrated Learning in Developing Professionalism and Professional Identity.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education 13 (3): 159–167. http://www.apjce.org/files/APJCE_13_3_159_167.pdf.
- Trede, F., R. Macklin, and D. Bridges. 2012. “Professional Identity Development: A Review of the Higher Education Literature.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (3): 365–384. Doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.521237.
- Trevelyan, J. 2013. “Towards a Theoretical Framework for Engineering Practice.” In Engineering Practice in a Global Context, edited by Bill Williams, José Figueiredo, and James Trevelyan, 33–60. London: CRC Press.
- UK Engineering Council. 2014. UK-SPEC: UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence. https://www.engc.org.uk/engcdocuments/internet/Website/UK-SPECthirdedition(1).pdf.
- Willey, K., and T. Machet. 2018. “Complexity Makes Me Feel Incompetent and It’s Your Fault.” In Proceedings of AAEE2018: Australasian Association of Engineering Engineering, 691–697. Hamilton, NZ.
- Winberg, C., S. Winberg, C. Jacobs, J. Garraway, and P. Engel-Hills. 2016. “‘I Take Engineering with Me’’: Epistemological Transitions Across an Engineering Curriculum.” Teaching in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1160045.
- Wolff, K. 2015. “Insights Into Conceptual and Contextual Engineering Problem-Solving Practices in the 21st Century: Some Implications for Curriculum Redesign.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the South African Society for Engineering Education, 189–198. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Karin_Wolff/publication/277877318_Insights_into_conceptual_and_contextual_engineering_problem-solving_practices_in_the_21st_century_some_implications_for_curriculum_redesign/links/5575a7e508ae7536375033dc.pdf.
- Wolff, K. 2017. “Engineering Problem-Solving Knowledge: The Impact of Context.” Journal of Education and Work 30 (8): 840–853. doi:10.1080/13639080.2017.1380299.
- Wolff, K. E., C. Dorfling, and G. Akdogan. 2018. “Shifting Disciplinary Perspectives and Perceptions of Chemical Engineering Work in the 21st Century.” Education for Chemical Engineers 24: 43–51. Doi:10.1016/j.ece.2018.06.005.