390
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The conceptual nuances of technology-supported learning in engineering

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 802-821 | Received 29 Oct 2020, Accepted 16 Aug 2022, Published online: 25 Aug 2022

References

  • Adlong, W., D. Bedgood, A. Bishop, K. Dillon, T. Haig, S. Helliwell, et al. 2003. “On the Path to Improving Our Teaching: Reflection on Best Practices in Teaching Chemistry.” In HERDSA Annual International Conference 2003 (pp. 1–11). HERDSA.
  • Auret, L., and K. Wolff. 2017. “A control Systems Approach to Improving Final Year Engineering Students’ Conceptual and Contextual Grasp of Dynamic Systems.” In Cape Town: Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the South African Society for Engineering Education.
  • Balakrishnan, B., and P. C. Woods. 2013. “A Comparative Study on Real lab and Simulation lab in Communication Engineering from Students’ Perspectives.” European Journal of Engineering Education 38 (2): 159–171.
  • Balamuralithara, B., and P. C. Woods. 2009. “Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: The Simulation lab and Remote lab.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 17 (1): 108–118.
  • Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique (Vol. 5). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Blackie, M. 2014. “Creating Semantic Waves: Using Legitimation Code Theory as a Tool to aid the Teaching of Chemistry.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 15: 462–469. doi:10.1039/c4rp00147h.
  • Booysen, M., and K. Wolff. 2021. “Exclusion from Constructive Alignment Unmasked by Emergency Remote Teaching.” In Proceedings of the REES-AAEE. Conference. December 2021. Perth, Australia.
  • Brown, C., and L. Czerniewicz. 2010. “Debunking the ‘Digital Native’: Beyond Digital Apartheid, Towards Digital Democracy.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (5): 357–369.
  • Currant, N., B. Currant, R. Whitfield, and P. Hartley. 2008. Defining ‘Generation Y’: Towards a New Typology of Digital Learners.” In EFYE Conference Proceedings (pp. 60-66).
  • Czerniewicz, L., N. Agherdien, J. Badenhorst, D. Belluigi, T. Chambers, M. Chili, et al. 2020. “A Wake-up Call: Equity, Inequality and Covid-19 Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning.” Postdigital Science and Education 2 (3): 946–967.
  • De Jong, T., M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia. 2013. “Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education.” Science 340 (6130): 305–308.
  • Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. “Design-based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 5–8.
  • Dorfling, C., K. Wolff, and G. Akdogan. 2019. “Expanding the Semantic Range to Enable Meaningful Real-World Application in Chemical Engineering.” South African Journal of Higher Education 33 (1): 42–58.
  • Faulconer, E. K., and A. B. Gruss. 2018. “A Review to Weigh the Pros and Cons of Online, Remote, and Distance Science Laboratory Experiences.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19 (2): 155–168.
  • Feisel, L. D., and A. J. Rosa. 2005. “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1): 121–130.
  • Gonzalez, C. G. 2015. “Environmental Justice, Human Rights, and the Global South.” Santa Clara Journal of International Law 13: 151–196.
  • Hodges, C., S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, and A. Bond. 2020. “The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning.” Educause Review 27. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remoteteaching-and-online-learning.
  • Hsu, Y.S. (2008). Learning About Seasons in a Technologically Enhanced Environment: The Impact of Teacher-Guided and Student-Centered Instructional Approaches on the Process of Students’ Conceptual Change. Science Education. 92(2), 320–344.
  • Hsu, H. Y., Y. Li, S. Dugger, and J. Jones. 2021. “Exploring the Relationship Between Student-Perceived Faculty Encouragement, Self-Efficacy, and Intent to Persist in Engineering Programs.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (5): 718–734.
  • IAU. 2020. COVID-19 Global Impact Survey. France: International Association of Universities.
  • IEA. 2013. “Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies.” International Engineering Alliance.
  • Kozulin, A. 2002. “Sociocultural Theory and the Mediated Learning Experience.” School Psychology International 23 (1): 7–35.
  • Kruger, K., K. Wolff, and K. Cairncross. 2021. “Real, Virtual or Simulated: Approaches to Emergency Remote Learning in Engineering.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 30: 93–105. doi:10.1002/cae.22444.
  • Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lynch, T., and I. Ghergulescu. 2017. “Review of Virtual Labs as the Emerging Technologies for Teaching STEM Subjects.” In INTED2017 Proc. 11th Int. Technol. Educ. Dev. Conf. 6-8 March Valencia Spain (pp. 6082–6091).
  • Magana, A. J., M. L. Falk, C. Vieira, M. J. Reese Jr, O. Alabi, and S. Patinet. 2017. “Affordances and Challenges of Computational Tools for Supporting Modeling and Simulation Practices.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 25 (3): 352–375.
  • Magana, A. J., D. Vasileska, and S. Ahmed. 2011. “Work in Progress—A transparency and scaffolding framework for computational simulation tools.” In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. S4G-1). IEEE.
  • Maton, K. 2013. “Making Semantic Waves: A key to Cumulative Knowledge-Building.” Linguistics and Education 24 (1): 8–22.
  • Maton, K. 2014. Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a Realist Sociology of Education. London: Routledge.
  • Pott, R. W., and K. Wolff. 2019. “Using Legitimation Code Theory to Conceptualize Learning Opportunities in Fluid Mechanics.” Fluids 4 (4): 203. doi:10.3390/fluids4040203.
  • Pott, R., K. Wolff, and N. Goosen. 2017. “Using an Informal Competitive Practical to Stimulate Links Between the Theoretical and Practical in Fluid Mechanics: A Case Study in Non-Assessment Driven Learning Approaches.” Education for Chemical Engineers 21: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2017.08.001.
  • Pyatt, K., and R. Sims. 2012. “Virtual and Physical Experimentation in Inquiry-Based Science Labs: Attitudes, Performance and Access.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (1): 133–147.
  • QS Intelligence Unit. 2018. “The global skills gap in the 21st century.” Institute of Student Employers.
  • Quinn, L., ed. 2019. Re-imagining Curriculum: Spaces for Disruption. Stellenbosch: African SUN Media.
  • Rahmawati, D., E. Hidayanto, and R. B. Anwar. 2017. “Process of Mathematical Representation Translation from Verbal Into Graphic.” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 12 (3): 367–381.
  • Rootman-le Grange, I., and M. A. Blackie. 2018. “Assessing Assessment: In Pursuit of Meaningful Learning.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19 (2): 484–490.
  • Schwartzman, S., R. Pinheiro, and P. Pillay, eds. 2015. Higher Education in the BRICS Countries: Investigating the Pact Between Higher Education and Society (Vol. 44). New York: Springer.
  • Shay, S. 2012. “Conceptualizing Curriculum Differentiation in Higher Education: A Sociology of Knowledge Point of View.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 34 (4): 563–582.
  • Smith, A. C., and E. N. Brown. 2003. “Estimating a State-Space Model from Point Process Observations.” Neural Computation 15 (5): 965–991.
  • Stock, J. H., and M. W. Watson. 2016. “Dynamic Factor Models, Factor-Augmented Vector Autoregressions, and Structural Vector Autoregressions in Macroeconomics.” In Handbook of Macroeconomics (Vol. 2), edited by John Taylor, Michael Woodford, and Harald Uhlig, 415–525. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Trevelyan, J. 2014. The Making of an Expert Engineer. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • WEF. 2018. The Future of Jobs Report. Switzerland: Centre for the New Economy and Society.
  • Wheelahan, L. (2007). “How Competency-based Training Locks the Working Class out of Powerful Knowledge: A Modified Bernsteinian Analysis.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 28 (5): 637–651.
  • Winberg, C. 2012. “‘We’re Engaged’: Mechanical Engineering and the Community.” In Reconceptualising Tribes and Territories in Higher Education: Practices in the 21st Century, edited by P. Trowler, V. Bamber, and M. Saunders, 142–155. London: Routledge.
  • Winberg, C., M. Bramhall, D. Greenfield, P. Johnson, P. Rowlett, O. Lewis, et al. 2020. “Developing Employability in Engineering Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Engineering Education 45 (2): 165–180.
  • Winberg, C., P. Engels-Hills, C. Jacobs, J. Garraway, and S. Winberg. 2016. “I Take Engineering with me': Theory and Practice in an Engineering Curriculum.” Teaching in Higher Education 21 (4): 398–414. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1160045.
  • Wolff, K. 2015. “Negotiating Disciplinary Boundaries in Engineering Problem-Solving Practice.” PhD diss., University of Cape Town.
  • Wolff, K. 2018. “Researching the Engineering Theory-Practice Divide in Industrial Problem Solving.” European Journal of Engineering Education 45 (2): 181–195. doi:10.1080/03043797.2018.1516738.
  • Wolff, K. 2020. “Teaching cannot Live on Technology Alone.” Retrieved from Mail & Guardian: https://mg.co.za/opinion/2020-11-17-teaching-cannot-live-on-technology-alone/.
  • Wolff, K. 2020. “From Principle to Practice: Enabling Theory-Practice Bridging in Engineering Education.” In Building Knowledge in Higher Education: Enhancing Teaching and Learning with Legitimation Code Theory, edited by C. Winberg, 180–197. London: Routledge.
  • Wu, F., Fan, W., Arbona, C., & de la Rosa-Pohl, D. (2020). Self-efficacy and Subjective Task Values in Relation to Choice, Effort, Persistence, and Continuation in Engineering: An Expectancy-Value Theory Perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(1), 151-163.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.