Learning programming practice and programming theory in the computer laboratory

References

• Bernhard, J., and A. K. Carstensen. 2015, July 13–15. “Analysing and Modelling Engineering Students’ Learning in the Laboratory: A Comparison of two Methodologies.” In The 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES), 620–628. Dublin: Dublin Institute of Technology. ISBN: 9781510815575.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, S. 1993. “A Study of Learning to Program from an Experiential Perspective.” Computers in Human Behavior 9 (2–3): 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(93)90006-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boustedt, J. 2010. “On the Road to a Software Profession: Students’ Experiences of Concepts and Thresholds.” (Doctoral dissertation), Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Box, I. 2009. “Toward an Understanding of the Variation in Approaches to Analysis and Design.” Computer Science Education 19 (2): 93–109.
   Google Scholar
• Cambazoglu, V., and N. Thota. 2013. “Computer Science Students’ Perception of Computer Network Security.” In 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, edited by A. Macau, A. Berglund, and N. Thota, 204–207. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., M. K. Corbitt, H. S. Kepner, M. M. Lindquist, and R. Reys. 1980. “Results of the Second NAEP Mathematics Assessment: Secondary School.” The Mathematics Teacher 73 (5): 329–338. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.73.5.0329.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, T. L., K. Y. Tang, and C. C. Tsai. 2021. “A Phenomenographic Analysis of College Students’ Conceptions of and Approaches to Programming Learning: Insights from a Comparison of Computer Science and Non-Computer Science Contexts.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 59 (7): 1370–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121995950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1925/1988. Experience and Nature. In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN: 978-0809314904.
   Google Scholar
• du Boulay, B. 2013. “Some Difficulties of Learning to Program.” In Studying the Novice Programmer, edited by E. Soloway, and J. Spohrer, 283–299. New York: Psychology Press. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.2190/3LFX-9RRF-67T8-UVK9.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerdal, A. 2015. “Relating Theory and Practice in Laboratory Work: A Variation Theoretical Study.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (5): 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.857652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckerdal, A., A. Berglund, and M. Thuné. 2022. “Students’ Learning Process in the Computer Laboratory.” In 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–6. Uppsala: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962716.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerdal, A., R. McCartney, J. E. Moström, K. Sanders, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. 2007. “From Limen to Lumen: Computing Students in Liminal Spaces.” In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Atlanta USA, edited by R. Anderson, S. Fincher, and M. Guzdial, 123–132. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1288580.1288597.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerdal, A., and M. Thuné. 2013. “Analysing the Enacted Object of Learning in lab Assignments in Programming Education.” In 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, Macau, edited by A. Berglund and N. Thota, 208–211. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.25.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerdal, A., M. Thuné, and A. Berglund. 2005. “What Does it Take to Learn ‘Programming Thinking'?” In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Seattle USA, edited by R. Anderson, S. Fincher, and M. Guzdial, 135–142. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1089786.1089799.
   Google Scholar
• Große-Bölting, G., Y. Schneider, and A. Mühling. 2019. “It's Like Computers Speak a Different Language: Beginning Students’ Conceptions of Computer Science.” In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, edited by P. Ihantola and N. Falkner, 1–5. Koli, Finland: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364527.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, P., and K. Powers. 2005. “Evaluating Assessments of Novice Programming Environments.” In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Seattle USA, edited by R. Anderson, S. Fincher, and M. Guzdial, 99–110. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1089786.1089796.
   Google Scholar
• Hardahl, L. K., P. O. Wickman, and C. Caiman. 2019. “The Body and the Production of Phenomena in the Science Laboratory: Taking Charge of a Tacit Science Content.” Science & Education 28: 865–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00063-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, N. G., J. Olsen, J. L. Thomas, and C. Wieman. 2017. “Value Added or Misattributed?” A Multi-Institution Study on the Educational Benefit of Labs for Reinforcing Physics Content.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 13 (1): 010129. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerman, Å, and S. Booth. 2003. “Expounding on Physics: A Phenomenographic Study of Physicists Talking of Their Physics.” Int. J. Sci. Educ 25 (12): 1489–1508. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerman, Å, C. Linder, and D. Marshall. 2009. “The Learners’ Experience of Variation: Following Students’ Threads of Learning Physics in Computer Simulation Sessions.” Instructional Science 37 (3): 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9044-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, E. R. 2005. “Four Philosophical Models of the Relation Between Theory and Practice.” Philosophy of Music Education Review 13 (1): 21–36. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40495465. Accessed 3 Apr. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, P. 2009. “Challenges of Teaching and Studying Programming at a University of Technology—Viewpoints of Students, Teachers and the University.” (Unpublished doctoral diss), Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-248-195-5
   Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, P., and L. Malmi. 2006. “Why Students Drop out CS1 Course?” In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computing Education Research, edited by R. Anderson, S. Fincher, and M. Guzdial, 97–108. New York, NY: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151588.1151604.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, D. E. 1991. “Theory and Practice.” Theoretical Computer Science 90 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(91)90295-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahtinen, E., K. Ala-Mutka, and H.-M. Järvinen. 2005. “A Study of the Difficulties of Novice Programmers.” ACM SIGCSE Bull 37 (3): 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1067445.1067453
   Google Scholar
• Lidar, M., E. Lundqvist, and L. Östman. 2006. “Teaching and Learning in the Science Classroom: The Interplay Between Teachers’ Epistemological Moves and Students’ Practical Epistemology.” Science Education 90 (1): 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalisti Inquiry. London: SAGE Publications. ISBN 0-8039-2431-3.
   Google Scholar
• Lindwall, O., and G. Lymer. 2008. “The Dark Matter of lab Work: Illuminating the Negotiation of Disciplined Perception in Mechanics.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 17 (2): 180–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400801986082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnberg, J. 2009. Understanding students’ errors in concurrent programming. Licentiate’s thesis, Helsinki University of Technology. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-202104155974.
   Google Scholar
• Luxton-Reilly, A., I. Albluwi, B. A. Becker, M. Giannakos, A. N. Kumar, L. Ott, and C. Szabo. 2018. “Introductory Programming: A Systematic Literature Review.” In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, edited by G. Rößling and B. Scharlau, 55–106. Larnaca Cyprus: ACM Press. https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.11453293881.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 2014. Necessary Conditions of Learning. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN: 9780415739146.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and S. A. Booth. 1997. Learning and Awareness. New York and London: Psychology Press. ISBN: 9780805824551.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., A. B. Tsui, P. P. Chik, P. Y. Ko, and M. L. Lo. 2004. Classroom Discourse and the Space of Learning. New York London: Routledge. ISBN: 9780805840094.
   Google Scholar
• McCune, V., and D. Hounsell. 2005. “The Development of Students’ Ways of Thinking and Practising in Three Final-Year Biology Courses.” Higher Education 49 (3): 255–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6666-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muldner, K., J. Jennings, and V. Chiarelli. 2022. “A Review of Worked Examples in Programming Activities.” ACM Transactions on Computing Education 23 (1): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3560266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F. 2003. “Two Faces of Variation: On Continuity in the Phenomenographic Movement.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 47 (2): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308612.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, D., and H. Niedderer. 2002. Teaching and Learning in the Science Laboratory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 978-90-481-6171-3.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., and J. D. Lehman. 2019. “Using Targeted Feedback to Address Common Student Misconceptions in Introductory Programming: A Data-Driven Approach.” SAGE Open 9 (4), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019885136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragonis, N., and M. Ben-Ari. 2005. “A Long-Term Investigation of the Comprehension of OOP Concepts by Novices.” Computer Science Education 15: 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400500224310.
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. 2014. “Toward an Instructionally Oriented Theory of Example-Based Learning.” Cognitive Science 38 (1): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, A. V. 2019. “Novice Programmers and Introductory Programming.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Computer Education Research, edited by S. A. Fincher, and A. V. Robins. Cambridg: e University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108654555
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., and L. Thomas. 2007. “Checklists for Grading Object-Oriented CS1 Programs: Concepts and Misconceptions.” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39 (3): 166–170. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1269900.1268834
   Google Scholar
• Séré, M.-G. 2002. “Towards Renewed Research Questions from the Outcomes of the European Project Labwork in Science Education.” Science Education 86: 624–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. M., and N. G. Holmes. 2021. “Best Practice for Instructional Labs.” Nature Physics 17 (6): 662–663. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01256-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorva, J. 2013. “Notional Machines and Introductory Programming Education.” ACM Transactions on Computer Education 13 (2): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2483710.2483713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamouli, I., and M. Huggard. 2006. “Object Oriented Programming and Program Correctness: The Students’ Perspective.” In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computing Education Research, edited by R. Anderson, S. Fincher, and M. Guzdial, 109–118. Canterbury United Kingdom: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151588.1151605.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., A. Eckerdal, R. McCartney, J. E. Moström, K. Sanders, and C. Zander. 2014. “Graduating Students’ Designs: Through a Phenomenographic Lens.” In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research, edited by Q. Cutts, B. Simon, and B. Dorn, 91–98. Glasgow UK: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632320.2632353.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., C. Zander, C. Loftus, and A. Eckerdal. 2017. “Student Software Designs at the Undergraduate Midpoint.” In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, edited by G. Rößling and I. Polycarpou, 34–39. Bologna Italy: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059016.
   Google Scholar
• Thota, N., and A. Berglund. 2016. “Learning Computer Science: Dimensions of Variation Within What Chinese Students Learn.” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 16 (3): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2853199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuné, M., and A. Eckerdal. 2019. “Analysis of Students’ Learning of Computer Programming in a Computer Laboratory Context.” European Journal of Engineering Education 44 (5): 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1544609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umapathy, K., A. D. Ritzhaupt, and Z. Xu. 2020. “College Students’ Conceptions of Learning of and Approaches to Learning Computer Science.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 58 (3): 662–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119872659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Aufschnaiter, C., and S. von Aufschnaiter. 2007. “University Students’ Activities, Thinking and Learning During Laboratory Work.” European Journal of Physics 28: 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/S05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley, J., A. Settle, and A. Luxton-Reilly. 2021. “Novice Reflections on Debugging.” In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, edited by P. Cutter, A. Monge, and J. Sheard, 73–79. Virtual event: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432374.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P. O., and L. Östman. 2002. “Learning as Discourse Change: A Sociocultural Mechanism.” Science Education 86 (5): 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., L. Paquette, J. D. Pinto, and A. X. Fan. 2023. “Utilizing Programming Traces to Explore and Model the Dimensions of Novices’ Code-Writing Skill.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 31 (4): 1041–1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar