Comparing national policies on institutional profiling in Germany and the Netherlands

References

• Altbach, P. G. 2011. “Rankings Season is Here.” International Higher Education 62: 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Altbach, P. G. 2013. “Advancing the National and Global Knowledge Economy: The Role of Research Universities in Developing Countries.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (3): 316–330. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.773222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral, A., M. J. Rosa, and D. A. Tavares. 2009. “Supra-national Accreditation, Trust and Institutional Autonomy: Contrasting Developments of Accreditation in Europe and the United States.” OECD Higher Education Management and Policy 21 (3): 15–32, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M., P. Benneworth, H. de Boer, L. Cremonini, B. Jongbloed, and H. Vossensteyn. 2010. Profiling and Funding - An International Comparative Study. Enschede: CHEPS University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung). 2013. Zwei Länder, zwei Kulturen, eine Universität - Erste Studierende an der Türkisch-Deutschen Universität in Istanbul / Wanka: “Wichtiger Baustein der Internationalisierungsstrategie”, Press Release as of 24.07.2013, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• CHE. 2009. The CHE University Ranking, Gütersloh: CHE (http://ranking.zeit.de).
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., and N. C. Liu. 2008. “Examining Major Rankings According to the Berlin Principles.” Higher Education in Europe 33 (2/3): 201–208. doi: 10.1080/03797720802253686
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H. 2010. “Defining and Monitoring Academic Standards in Australian Higher Education.” OECD Higher Education Management and Policy 22 (1): 1–17, Paris. doi: 10.1787/hemp-v22-art2-en
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, F., B. Curvale, and F. Henard. 2010. “Quality Convergence Study - A Contribution to the Debates on Quality and Convergence in the European Higher Education Area.” ENQA Occasional Papers No. 7, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S., and K. Glaister. 1996. “Spurs to Higher Things? Mission Statements of UK Universities.” Higher Education Quarterly 50 (4): 261–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.1996.tb01706.x
   Google Scholar
• Destatis – Statistisches Bundesamt der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 2011. “Hochschulen.” Accessed June 6, 2011. www.destatis.de
   Google Scholar
• DFG. 2011. Excellence Initiative at a glance, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Doiz, A., D. Lasangabaster, and J. Sierra. 2012. “Globalisation, Internattionalisation, Multilingualism and Linguistic Strains in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 2011: 1–15 doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.642349.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Progress in Higher Education Reform across Europe, Governance and Funding Reform, Vol. 3, Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2011. “Population Data Europe 2010.” Accessed May 31, 2011. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/guip/themeAction.do
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., and P. Weingart. 2010. “Die Exzellenzinitiative im internationalen Kontext.” In Die Exzellenzinitiative – Zwischenbilanz und Perspektiven, edited by S. Leibfried, 233–258. Frankfurt/New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gloger, A. 2011. “Rohstoff Bildung.” Quartera 1: 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, M. 2010. “Die Exzellenzinitiative und ihre Folgen.” Leviathan 38: 369–387. doi: 10.1007/s11578-010-0091-9
   Google Scholar
• Henard, F. 2010. Learning Our Lesson - Review of Quality Teaching in Higher Education, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Hornbostel, S. 2008. “Evaluation der Exzellenzinitiative: Gibt es objektive Kriterien für Exzellenz?.” In Making Excellence: Grundlagen, Praxis und Konsequenzen der Exzellenzinitiative Making Excellence, edited by R. Bloch, A. Keller, A. Lottmann, and C. Würmann, 49–64. Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Horstschräer, J. 2012. “University Rankings in Action? The Importance of Rankings and an Excellence Competition for University Choice of High-ability Students.” Economics of Education Review 31 (6): 1162–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, B. 2004. “Summative Assessment of Portfolios: An Examination of Different Approaches to Agreement Over Outcomes.” Studies in Higher Education 29 (3): 395–412. doi: 10.1080/03075070410001682646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B. 2009. “Steering the Dutch Academic Enterprise: Universities’ Responses to Project Funding and Performance Monitoring.” In The Research Mission of the University. Policy Reforms and Institutional Response, edited by P. Clancy, & D. D. Dill, 95–131. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B. 2010. “The Netherlands.” In National Innovation and the Academic Research Enterprise, edited by D. D. Dill & F. A. van Vught, 286–335. Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B., and H. Vossensteyn. 2001. “Keeping up Performances: an International Survey of Performance-based Funding in Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 23 (2): 127–145. doi: 10.1080/13600800120088625
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F., and H. Vossensteyn. 2005. “Targets and Tools in Dutch Access Policies.” Higher Education Quarterly 59 (3): 187–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2005.00291.x
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. M. 2007. “Quo Vadis Doctoral Education? New European Approaches in the Context of Global Changes.” European Journal of Education 42 (3): 307–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00308.x
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. M., and U. Lanzendorf. eds. 2006. Reforming University Governance. Changing Conditions for Research in four European Countries. Bonn: Lemmens.
   Google Scholar
• Kempen, B. 2011. “In der Freiheit liegt eine phantastische Chance.” Forschung & Lehre 05/2011, 1–3 (o.p.).
   Google Scholar
• Kerres, M., A. Hanft, and U. Wilkesmann. 2010. “Lifelong Learning an Hochschulen - Neuausrichtung des Bildungsauftrages von Hochschulen.” Das Hochschulwesen 6 (58): 183–186.
   Google Scholar
• Klumpp, M. 2011. “Higher Education between Steering and Autonomy in Germany and Europe after Bologna – Can this State-state, State-university and University-individual Problem be Solved by Standardization?.” Conference paper 3rd RESUP Conference Paris, 27.-29. January 2011, Paris, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Klumpp, M., and I. Rybnikova. 2009. Studienformen – Eine empirische Forschungserhebung in Deutschland. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
   Google Scholar
• Klumpp, M., and U. Teichler. 2008. “German Fachhochschulen – Towards the End of a Success Story?” In Non-university Higher Education in Europe, edited by J. B. Ferreira, M. de Lourdes Machado, and R. Santiago, 117–145. Frankfurt a.M./New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kohtamäki, V. 2011. “How do Higher Education Institutions Enhance their Financial Autonomy? Examples from Finnish Polytechnics.” Higher Education Quarterly 5 (2): 164–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00475.x
   Google Scholar
• Kosmützky, A. 2012. “Between Mission and Market Position – Empirical Findings on Mission Statements of German Higher Education Institutions.” Tertiary Education and Management 18 (1): 57–77. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2011.617466
   Google Scholar
• Leibfried, S. 2010. “Galerie aus der Vogelperspektive.” In Die Exzellenzinitiative – Zwischenbilanz und Perspektiven, edited by S. Leibfried, 11–24. Frankfurt/New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lepori, B., J. Huisman, and M. Seeber. 2012. “Convergence and Differentiation Processes in Swiss Higher Education: An Empirical Analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 2012: 1–22, doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.647765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maassen, P., and F. A. van Vught. 1988. “An Intriguing Janus-head: The Two Faces of the New Government Strategy for Higher Education in the Netherlands.” European Journal of Education 23: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. 2010. “National and International Rankings of Higher Education.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by P. Peterson, E. Baker and B. McGaw, 546–553. Volume 4. Elsevier: Oxford. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00843-5
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie OCW. 1985. Nota Hoger Onderwijs: Autonomie en Kwaliteit (HOAK). [White paper Higher Education: Autonomy and Quality]. Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, vergaderjaar 1985-1986, kamerstuk 19 253, no. 1-2., 's-Gravenhage: Staatsuitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie OCW. 1988, 1990, 1992, 2000, 2007. Ontwerp HOOP [Higher Education and Research Plan of 1988, 1990, 1992, 2000, 2007], Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap, Zoetermeer/Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie OCW. 2006. Voortgangsrapportage Wetenschapsbeleid 2007 [Progress report Science Policy 2007], Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap, Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie OCW. 2011. Kwaliteit in verscheidenheid: Strategische Agenda Hoger Onderwijs, Onderzoek en Wetenschap [Diversity in Quality: Strategic Agenda Higher Education, Research and Science], Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap, Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• MIWF (Ministerium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen). 2011. “Ziel- und Leistungsvereinbarungen.” Accessed June 6, 2011. http://www.wissenschaft.nrw.de/hochschulen_und_forschung/hochschulrecht/Ziel-_und_Leistungsvereinbarungen/index.phpon
   Google Scholar
• Morris, H. 2011. “Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World Class Excellence.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 741–742. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.617636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusche, D. 2008. “Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Comparative Review of Selected Practices.” OECD Education Working Papers, No. 15, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Pasternack, P. 2008. “Die Exzellenzinitiative als politisches Programm – Fortsetzung der normalen Forschungsförderung oder Paradigmenwechsel?.” In Making Excellence: Grundlagen, Praxis und Konsequenzen der Exzellenzinitiative Making Excellence, edited by R. Bloch, A. Keller, A. Lottmann, and C. Würmann, 13–36. Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, F. 2009. “Increased Competition and Diversity in Higher Education: An Empirical Analysis of the Italian Unniversity System.” Higher Education Policy 22: 389–413. doi: 10.1057/hep.2008.33
   Google Scholar
• Saisana, M., B. d'Hombres, and A. Saltelli. 2011. “Rickety Numbers: Volatility of University Rankings and Policy Implications.” Research Policy 40 (1): 165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattock, M. 2013. “University Governance, Leadership and Management in a Decade of Diversification and Uncertainty.” Higher Education Quarterly 67 (3): 217–233. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12017
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J. C., and R. K. Totkoushian. 2012. “The Past, Present, and Future of University Rankings.” In University Rankings – Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impact on Global Higher Education, edited by J. C. Shin, R. K. Totkoushian, and U. Teichler, 1–18. Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• SJTU. 2011. “Academic Ranking of World Universities.” Shanghai Jao Tong University (SJTU), www.arwu.org, retrieved 23.05.2011, Shanghai.
   Google Scholar
• Skolnik, M. L. 2010. “Quality Assurance in Higher Education as a Political Process.” OECD Higher Education Management and Policy 22 (1) 1–20, Paris. doi: 10.1787/hemp-22-5kmlh5gs3zr0
   Google Scholar
• Sondermann, M., D. Simon, A.-M. Scholz, and S. Hornbostel. 2008. Die Exzellenzinitiative: Beobachtungen aus der Implementierungsphase, iFQ Working Paper No. 5, 12/2008, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Strohschneider, P. 2009. “Über Voraussetzungen und Konzeption der Exzellenzinitiative.” Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung 31: 8–24.
   Google Scholar
• Taixeira, P., and T. Koryakinabc. 2013. “Funding Teforms and Tevenue Diversification – Patterns, Challenges and Rhetoric.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (2): 174–191. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.573844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama, K. 2012. “Exploring the Interweaving of Contrary Currents: Transnational Policy Enactment and Path-dependent Policy Implementation in Australia and Japan.” Comparative Education 48 (4): 505–523. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2012.721631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichler, U. 2003. “Changing Concepts of Excellence in Europe in the Wake of Globalization.” In Excellence in Higher Education, edited by E. De Corte, 33–51. London.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vught, F. A., ed. 2009. Mapping the Higher Education Landscape: Towards a European Classification of Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vught, F. A., F. Kaiser, J. File, C. Gaethgens, R., Peter, and D.F. Westerheijden. 2010. The European Classification of Higher Education Institutions. Enschede: CHEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Veerman, C. P., R. M. Berdahl, M. J. G. Bormans, K. M. Geven, E. Hazelkorn, A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, W. A. van Niekerk, and J. J. Vossensteyn. 2010. Differentiëren in Drievoud, Omwille van kwaliteit en verscheidenheid in het hoger onderwijs, Advies van de Commissie Toekomstbestendigheid Hoger Onderwijs, Koninklijke Broese & Peereboom, Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• WR (Wissenschaftsrat). 2010. Empfehlungen zur Differenzierung der Hochschulen. Berlin: Wissenschaftsrat.
   Google Scholar
• WR (Wissenschaftsrat). 2011. Institutionelle Akkreditierung nichtstaatlicher Hochschulen durch den Wissenschaftsrat 2001 bis 2011. Berlin: Wissenschaftsrat.
   Google Scholar
• WR (Wissenschaftsrat). 2013a. Empfehlungen zur Weiterentwicklung des Hochschulsystems des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt. Berlin: Wissenschaftsrat.
   Google Scholar
• WR (Wissenschaftsrat). 2013b. Perspektiven des deutschen Wissenschaftssystems. Berlin: Wissenschaftsrat.
   Google Scholar