Signaling restraint: international engagement and rebel groups’ commitment to international law

References

• Abbott, Kenneth, and Duncan Snidal. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54 (3): 421–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangerter, Olivier. 2011. “Internal Controls: Codes of Conduct within Insurgent Armed Groups.” Small Arms Survey. Occasional Paper No 31.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Christine. 2000. Peace Agreements and Human Rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, David, and Curtis S. Signorino. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis 18 (3): 271–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell, Andrew, and Jonathan Somer. 2018. “Comparing Experiences: Engaging States and Armed Groups on International Humanitarian Law.” In The Companion to International Humanitarian Law, edited by Dražan Djukić and Niccolò Pons, 39–55. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Coggins, Bridget. 2015. “Rebel Diplomacy: Theorizing Violent Non-State Actors’ Strategic Use of Talk.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by Ana Arjona, Nelseon Kasfir, and Zachariah Mampilly, 74–97. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, Paul. 2000. Economic Causes of Civil Conflict and Their Implications for Policy. Washington: World Bank Development Research Group report.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, David, Kristian Gleditsch, Belén González, Dragana Vidović, and Peter White. 2017. “Words and Deeds: From Incompatibilities to Outcomes in Anti-government Disputes.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (4): 468–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343317712576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, David, Kristian Gleditsch, and Idean Salehyan. 2013. “Non-state Actors in Civil Wars: A New Dataset.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 30 (5): 516–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894213499673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazal, Tanisha. 2017. “Rebellion, War Aims & the Laws of War.” Daedalus 146 (1): 71–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazal, Tanisha. 2018. Wars of Law: Unintended Consequences in the Regulation of Armed Conflict. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fazal, Tanisha, and Margarita Konaev. 2019. “Homelands versus Minelands: When and Why Do Rebel Groups Commit to Adhere to International Humanitarian Law?” Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (2): 149–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortna, Page. 2015. “Do Terrorists Win? Rebels’ Use of Terrorism and Civil War Outcomes.” International Organization 69 (2): 519–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Dataset.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (2): 313–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714000851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, Kristian, Simon Hug, Livia Schubiger, and Julian Wucherpfennig. 2018. “International Conventions and Nonstate Actors: Selection, Signaling and Reputation Effects.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (2): 346–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716650924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodliffe, Jay, Darren Hawkins, Christine Home, and Daniel Nielson. 2012. “Dependence Networks and the International Criminal Court.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 131–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00703.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhill, Brian. 2010. “The Company You Keep: International Socialization and the Diffusion of Human Rights Norms.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (1): 127–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00580.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanmer, Michael, and Kerem Ozan Kalkan. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 263–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00602.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbom, Lotta, Stina Högbladh, and Peter Wallensteen. 2006. “Armed Conflict and Peace Agreements.” Journal of Peace Research 43 (5): 617–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306067613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Claudia, and Ulrich Schneckener. 2011. “Engaging Non-State Armed Actors in State-and Peace-building: Options and Strategies.” International Review of the Red Cross 93 (883): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Lise, and Alexandra Stark. 2018. “How Civil Wars End: The International System, Norms, and the Role of External Actors.” International Security 42 (3): 127–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Reyko. 2016. “Rebel Diplomacy in Civil War.” International Security 40 (4): 89–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRC. 2018. The Roots of Restraint in War. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/roots-restraint-war. Accessed on 1 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, Daniel Garcia-Pena. 2001. “Humanitarian Protection in Non-International Conflicts: A Case Study of Colombia.” In Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, edited by Yoram Dinstein and Fania Domb, Brill/Leiden 30, 179–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jo, Hyeran. 2015. Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Benjamin, and Eleonora Mattiacci. 2019. “A Manifesto in 140 Characters or Fewer: Social Media as A Tool of Rebel Diplomacy.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 739–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, Madhav, and Jason Michael Quinn. 2017. “Implementing the Peace: The Aggregate Implementation of Comprehensive Peace Agreements and Peace Duration after Intrastate Armed Conflict.” British Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 869–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, Stathis, and Laia Barlcells. 2010. “International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 415–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartik, Navin, and Richard Van Weelden. 2019. “Informative Cheap Talk in Elections.” Review of Economic Studies 86 (2): 755–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary. 2001. “Proper Nouns and Methodological Propriety: Pooling Dyads in International Relations Data.” International Organization 55 (2): 497–507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/00208180151140667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, Heike. 2018. “International Law and Governance by Armed Groups: Caught in the Legitimacy Trap?” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (4): 563–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2018.1504489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasley, Trace, and Clayton Thyne. 2015. “Secession, Legitimacy, and the Use of Child Soldiers.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 32 (3): 289–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894214526541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mampilly, Zachariah. 2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mantilla, Giovanni. 2018. “Forum Isolation: Social Opprobrium and the Origins of the International Law of Internal Conflict.” International Organization 72 (2): 317–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818318000097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, Monty, Ted Robert Gurr, and Keith Jaggers. 2017. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2016.”
   Google Scholar
• Mitts, Tamar. 2019. “From Isolation to Radicalization: Anti-Muslim Hostility and Support for ISIS in the West.” American Political Science Review 113 (1): 173–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagamine, Yoshinobu. 2015. The Legitimization Strategy of the Taliban’s Code of Conduct. NewYork: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Desiree. 2012. “Anchoring the Peace: Civil Society Actors in Peace Accords and Durable Peace.” International Interactions 38 (2): 243–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2012.659139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odermatt, Jed. 2017. “Council of the European Union V. Front Populaire Pour La Libération De La Saguia-El-Hamra Et Du Rio De Oro (Front Polisario).” American Journal of International Law 111 (3): 731–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova, Marina. 2019. “What Matters Is Who Supports You: Diaspora and Foreign States as External Supporters and Militants’ Adoption of Nonviolence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (29): 2155–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719826645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Emilia. 2015. “Islamic Law States and Peaceful Resolution of Territorial Disputes.” International Organization 69 (4): 777–807. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provost, Rene. 2012. “Asymmetrical Reciprocity and Compliance with the Laws of War.” In Modern Warfare: Armed Groups, Private Militaries, Humanitarian Organizations, and the Law, edited by Benjamin Perrin, 17–41. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, Steven. 2011. “Law Promotion beyond Law: The Red Cross, Persuasion, and the Laws of War.” European Journal of International Law 22 (2): 459–506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Anthea, and Sandesh Sivakumaran. 2012. “Lawmaking by Nonstate Actors: Engaging Armed Groups in the Creation of International Humanitarian Law.” Yale Journal of International Law 37 (1):108–53.
   Google Scholar
• Roggio, Bill. 2018. “At Moscow Conference, Taliban Refers to Itself as the ‘Islamic Emirate’ 61 Times” Long War Journal, Foundation for Defense of Democracies, November 9, 2018, https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2018/11/at-moscow-conference-taliban-refers-to-itself-as-the-islamic-emirate-61-times.php
   Google Scholar
• San-Akca, Belgin. 2016. States in Disguise: Causes of State Support for Rebel Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Katherine, Kathleen Cunningham, and William Reed.  2017. “The Role of External Support in Civil War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (6): 1174–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715600761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sivakumaran, Sandesh. 2012. The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Hazel, and Paul Stares. 2007. Diasporas in Conflict: Peace-makers or Peace-Wreckers? Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, Jessica. 2016. Violence and Restraint in Civil War: Civilian Targeting in the Shadow of International Law. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Megan. 2018. “Civil War as State Building: Strategic Governance in Civil War.” International Organization 72 (1): 205–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szajkowski, Bogdan. 2004. Revolutionary and Dissident Movements of the World. 4th ed. Blackwater, UK: John Harper Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, Fiona. 2002. Condemned to Repeat? the Paradox of Humanitarian Action. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tingley, Dustin, and Barbara Walter. 2011. “Can Cheap Talk Deter? An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (6): 996–1020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002711414372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trager, Robert. 2010. “Diplomatic Calculus in Anarchy: How Communication Matters.” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 347–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Barbara. 2017a. “The Extremist’s Advantage in Civil Wars.” International Security 42 (2): 7–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Barbara. 2017b. “The New New Civil Wars.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 469–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060415-093921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, Jeremy. 2006. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, Peter, Dragana Vidovic, Belen Gonzalez, Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, and David Cunningham. 2015. “Nonviolence as a Weapon of the Resourceful: From Claims to Tactics in Mobilization.” Mobilization 20 (4): 471–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-20-4-471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Reed, and Jacob Kathman. 2014. “Too Much of a Bad Thing? Civilian Victimization and Bargaining in Civil War.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 685–706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341300001X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitzoff, Thomas. 2017. “How Social Media Is Changing Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (9): 1970–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717721392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar