United they stand: Findings from an escalation prediction competition

References

• Attinà, Fulvio, Marcello Carammia, and Stefano Iacus. 2022. “Forecasting Change in Conflict Fatalities with Dynamic Elastic Net.” International Interactions 48 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bätz, Konstantin, Ann-Cathrin Klöckner, and Gerald Schneider. 2022. “Challenging the Status Quo: Predicting Violence with Sparse Decision-Making Data.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2051024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlsby, Drew, Erica Chenoweth, Cullen Hendrix, and Jonathan D. Moyer. 2020. “The Future is a Moving Target: Predicting Political Instability.” British Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 1405–1413. doi:10.1017/S0007123418000443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, Patrick, Vito D’Orazio, Latifur Khan, Yi-Fan Li, Javier Osorio, and Marcus Sianan. 2022. “Conflict Forecasting with Event Data and Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2036987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadefaux, Thomas. 2022. “A shape-based approach to conflict forecasting.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2009821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colaresi, Michael, and Zuhaib Mahmood. 2017. “Do the Robot: Lessons from Machine Learning to Improve Conflict Forecasting.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (2): 193–214. doi:10.1177/0022343316682065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Orazio, Vito, and Yu Lin. 2022. “Forecasting Conflict in Africa with Automated Machine Learning Systems.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2017290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettensperger, Felix. 2022. “Forecasting conflict using a diverse machine-learning ensemble: Ensemble averaging with multiple tree-based algorithms and variance promoting data configurations.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.1993209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, Cornelius, Marius Mehl, Paul W. Thurner, and Göran Kauermann. 2022. “The Role of Governmental Weapons Procurements in Forecasting Monthly Fatalities in Intrastate Conflicts: A Semiparametric Hierarchical Hurdle Model.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.1993210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Kevin, Håvard Hegre, Frederick Hoyles, and Michael Colaresi. 2019. “Move It or Lose It: Introducing Pseudo-Earth Mover Divergence as a Context-sensitive Metric for Evaluating and Improving Forecasting and Prediction Systems.” Presented at the 2019 Barcelona School of Economics Summer Forum, Workshop on Forecasting Political and Economic Crisis: Social Science Meets Machine Learning, Barcelona, June 17. https://events.barcelonagse.eu/summerforum/event/7461#date/20220607
   Google Scholar
• Hegre, Håvard, Paola Vesco, and Michael Colaresi. 2022. “Lessons from an Escalation Prediction Competition.” International Interactions 48 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, Lisa, Maxine Leis, and Desirée Nilsson. 2022. “Employing Local Peacekeeping Data to Forecast Changes in Violence.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2055010.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, Andreas, Johannes Hendriks, Adrian Wills, and Thomas B. Schön. 2022. “Predicting political violence using a state-space model.” International Interactions 48 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, Iris. 2022. “Recurrent Neural Networks for Conflict Forecasting.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2016736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, Hannes, and Christopher Rauh. 2022. “Using past Violence and Current News to Predict Changes in Violence.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2063853.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, Christian, and Daniel Ohrenhofer. 2022. “Click, Click Boom: Using Wikipedia Data to Predict Changes in Battle-Related Deaths.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2061969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, Scott E. 2007. The Difference: how the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Scott E. 2018. The Model Thinker: What You Need to Know to Make Data Work for You. 1st ed. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, Therése, Shawn Davies, Amber Deniz, Garoun Engström, Nanar Hawach, Stina Högbladh, Margareta Sollenberg, and Magnus Öberg. 2021. “Organized Violence 1989–2020, with a Special Emphasis on Syria.” Journal of Peace Research 58 (4): 809–825. doi:10.1177/00223433211026126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, Benjamin J. 2022. “High Resolution Conflict Forecasting with Spatial Convolutions and Long Short-Term Memory.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi: 10.1080/03050629.2022.2031182.
   Google Scholar
• Randahl, David, and Johan Vegelius. 2022. “Predicting Escalating and de-Escalating Violence in Africa Using Markov Models.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2049772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestby, Jonas, Jürgen Brandsch, Vilde Bergstad Larsen, Peder Landsverk, and Andreas F. Tollefsen. 2022. “Predicting (de-)escalation of Sub-National Violence Using Gradient Boosting: Does It Work?” International Interactions 48 (4). doi: 10.1080/03050629.2022.2021198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar