Why “cheap” threats are meaningful: Threat perception and resolve in North Korean propaganda

References

• Allison, David, Stephen Herzog, and Jiyoung Ko. Forthcoming. “Under the Umbrella: Nuclear Crises, Extended Deterrence, and Public Opinion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrababa’h, Ala, and Lisa, Blaydes. 2021. “Authoritarian media and diversionary threats: Lessons from 30 years of Syrian state discourse.” Political Science Research and Methods 9 (4): 693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anceschi, Luca. 2014. “Regime-Building, Identity-Making and Foreign Policy: neo-Eurasianist Rhetoric in post-Soviet Kazakhstan.” Nationalities Papers 42 (5): 733–749. doi:10.1080/00905992.2014.928276.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Jonathan. 2004. “Lessons from Russia: A Neo-Authoritarian Media System.” European Journal of Communication 19 (2): 139–163. doi:10.1177/0267323104042908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benes, Libor. 2013. “OSINT, New Technologies, Education: Expanding Opportunities and Threats. A New Paradigm.” Journal of Strategic Security 6 (3): 22–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.6.3S.3.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, Jordan, and Lauren Sukin. 2021. “Joint Military Exercises and Crisis Dynamics on the Korean Peninsula.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 65 (5): 855–888. doi:10.1177/0022002720972180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, Anne-Marie. 2015a. “Authoritarianism Goes Global (II): China’s Foreign Propaganda Machine.” Journal of Democracy 26 (4): 51–59. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, Anne-Marie. 2015b. “Unifying the Ancestral Land: The CCP’s ‘Taiwan’ Frames.” The China Quarterly 223: 787–806. doi:10.1017/S030574101500082X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, Erin. 2020. “Diversionary Cheap Talk: Economic Conditions and US Foreign Policy Rhetoric, 1945-2010.” International Interactions 46 (2): 163–198. doi:10.1080/03050629.2020.1688319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare, Joe, and Vesna Danilovic. 2012. “Reputation for Resolve, Interests, and Conflict.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 29 (1): 3–27. doi:10.1177/0738894211430190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSIS Beyond Parallel. 2019. “Database: North Korean Provocations.” Center for Strategic & International Studies. Accessed 30 April 2022. https://beyondparallel.csis.org/database-north-korean-provocations/.
   Google Scholar
• D’Orazio, Vito. 2012. “War Games: North Korea’s Reaction to US and South Korean Military Exercises.” Journal of East Asian Studies 12 (2): 275–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denmark, Abraham, and Lindsey Ford. 2018. “America’s Military Exercises in Korea Aren't a Game: To Drill or Not to Drill? It Shouldn't Even Be a Question.” Foreign Policy, June 21. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/06/21/americas-military-exercises-in-korea-arent-a-game/
   Google Scholar
• Denny, Matthew, and Arthur Spirling. 2018. “Text Preprocessing for Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, and What to Do about It.” Political Analysis 26 (2): 168–189. doi:10.1017/pan.2017.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edney, Kingsley. 2012. “Soft Power and the Chinese Propaganda System.” Journal of Contemporary China 21 (78): 899–914. doi:10.1080/10670564.2012.701031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Joseph, and Matthew Rabin. 1996. “Cheap Talk.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (3): 103–118. doi:10.1257/jep.10.3.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, James. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (3): 379–414. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, James. 1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1): 68–90. doi:10.1177/0022002797041001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller, Daniel. 1990. “Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Crisis Escalation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34 (2): 291–310. doi:10.1177/0022002790034002006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gochman, Charles, and Russell Leng. 1983. “Realpolitik and the Road to War: An Analysis of Attributes and Behavior.” International Studies Quarterly 27 (1): 97. doi:10.2307/2600621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth, Alid, Scott Sagan, and Benjamin Valentino. 2019. “What Do Americans Really Think about Conflict with Nuclear North Korea? The Answer Is Both Reassuring and Disturbing.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75 (4): 179–186. doi:10.1080/00963402.2019.1629576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, Stephen. 2021. “Backchannel Non-Proliferation: Militarily Non-Aligned States and Nuclear Diplomacy.” In Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law-Volume VI, edited by Black-Branch, Jonathan & Fleck, Dieter, 281–303. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Christopher. 2009. “‘Super-Sizing’ the DPRK Threat: Japan's Evolving Military Posture and North Korea.” Asian Survey 49 (2): 291–311. doi:10.1525/as.2009.49.2.291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, Helen-Louise. 1999. Kim Il-Song's North Korea. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, John, and Chung-in Moon. 2007. The United States and Northeast Asia: Debates, Issues, and New Order. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Van. 2016. Rival Reputations: Coercion and Credibility in US-North Korea Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30 (2): 167–214. doi:10.2307/2009958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, Oscar, and Robert Seely. 2015. “Russian Full-Spectrum Conflict: An Appraisal after Ukraine.” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 28 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/13518046.2015.998118.
   Google Scholar
• KCNA. 2000. “Japan Urged to Turn to Peace.” KCNA Watch, July 13. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://kcnawatch.org/newstream/1452001798-602660861/japan-urged-to-turn-to-peace/?t=1667322401299.
   Google Scholar
• KCNA. 2010. “Minju Joson: DPRK Will Bolster Up Its War Deterrent.” KCNA Watch, March 14. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://kcnawatch.org/newstream/1451888836-985739834/minju-joson-dprk-will-bolster-up-its-war-deterrent/?t=1667322333525
   Google Scholar
• KCNA. 2016. “Preemptive Attack Is Not Monopoly of US.” KCNA Watch, March 6. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://kcnawatch.org/newstream/273088/preemptive-attack-is-not-monopoly-of-u-s-papers/?t=1667322436504.
   Google Scholar
• KCNA. 2017. “Preventative War Is Not Privileged Option for U.S.” KCNA Watch, August 12, 2017. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://kcnawatch.org/newstream/1502445795-50558923/preventive-war-is-not-privileged-option-for-u-s/?t=1667322471840
   Google Scholar
• Kertzer, Joshua, Brian Rathbun, and Nina Srinivasan Rathbun. 2020. “The Price of Peace: Motivated Reasoning and Costly Signaling in International Relations.” International Organization 74 (1): 95–118. doi:10.1017/S0020818319000328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret Roberts. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 326–343. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret Roberts. 2017. “How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument.” American Political Science Review 111 (3): 484–501. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, Bruce. 2017. “Save Preemption for Imminent North Korean Attack.” The Heritage Foundation March 1. Accessed 30 April, 2022. https://www.heritage.org/missile-defense/report/save-preemption-imminent-north-korean-attack.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, Jiyoung. 2019. “Alliance and Public Preference for Nuclear Forbearance: Evidence from South Korea.” Foreign Policy Analysis 15 (4): 509–529. doi:10.1093/fpa/ory014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kydd, Andrew. 2003. “Which Side Are You on? Bias, Credibility, and Mediation.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 597–611. doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, Harold. 1941. “The Garrison State.” American Journal of Sociology 46 (4): 455–468. doi:10.1086/218693.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Jack. 1989. “The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique.” Handbook of War Studies 1: 259–288.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Jae-Cheon. 2015. Leader Symbols and Personality Cult in North Korea: The Leader State. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lin-Greenberg, Erik, and Theo Milonopoulos. 2021. “Private Eyes in the Sky: Emerging Technology and the Political Consequences of Eroding Government Secrecy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution: 65 (6): 1067–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi, Paasha, and John Ishiyama. 2020. “Dynamics of the Inner Elite in Dictatorships: Evidence from North Korea.” Comparative Politics 52 (2): 221–249. doi:10.5129/001041520X15652680065751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, Udo. 2014. “The Politics of Sport and Identity in North Korea.” The International Journal of the History of Sport 31 (3): 376–390. doi:10.1080/09523367.2013.861419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Steve. 2018. “Will Canceling Joint Exercises Move N. Korea Closer toward Denuclearization?” Voice of America, October 24. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://www.voanews.com/a/ending-joint-military-exercises/4626923.html.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, James. 1994. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, Brian. 2010. “North Korea's Race Problem.” Foreign Policy (178): 100.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, Steven, and Stuart Thompson. 2022. “Truth is Another Front in Putin's War.” The New York Times, March 20. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/20/world/asia/russia-putin-propaganda-media.html
   Google Scholar
• Nakato, Sachio. 2016. “North Korea's Fourth Nuclear Test: System Pressures, Decision Makers Perceptions, and Foreign Policy.” Korea Observer 47 (3): 621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanto, Dick, and Mark Manyin. 2011. “China-North Korea Relations.” North Korean Review 7 (2): 94–101. doi:10.3172/NKR.7.2.94.
   Google Scholar
• Pion-Berlin, David. 1988. “The National Security Doctrine, Military Threat Perception, and the Dirty War in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies 21 (3): 382–407. doi:10.1177/0010414088021003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, Daryl Grayson. 2005. Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, Timothy. 2014a. “Introducing the Great Successor: North Korean English Language News Coverage of Kim Jong Un 2010-2011.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (2): 127–136. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, Timothy. 2014b. “Propaganda with Purpose: Uncovering Patterns in North Korea's Nuclear Coverage.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific.” 14 (3): 427–453. doi:10.1093/irap/lcu011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richey, Mason. 2019. “Cheap Talk, Costly Talk, Crazy Talk: Patterns in North Korea's English Language Propaganda.” The Pacific Review 32 (4): 537–571. doi:10.1080/09512748.2018.1488763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Anne. 2013. Deterrence by Diplomacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheller, Bente. 2014. The Wisdom of Syria's Waiting Game: Foreign Policy under the Assads. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Kenneth. 2001. “Looking for Audience Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (1): 32–60. doi:10.1177/0022002701045001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, Lara. 2018. “Experts Question Wisdom of Canceling U.S. Exercises with South Korea, as Mattis Makes It Official.” Foreign Policy, June 26. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/06/26/experts-question-wisdom-of-canceling-u-s-exercises-with-south-korea-as-mattis-makes-it-official/
   Google Scholar
• Shinkman, Paul. 2021. “China Escalates War Rhetoric over Taiwan: Do Not Test Our Determination.” US News and World Report, January 29. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://www.usnews.com/news/world-report/articles/2021-01-29/china-escalates-war-rhetoric-over-taiwan-do-not-test-our-determination
   Google Scholar
• Stavridis, James. 2018. “I Was a Navy Admiral. Here's Why Ending War Games with South Korea Would Be a Grave Mistake.” TIME, June 12. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://time.com/5310534/donald-trump-north-korea-war-games-military-exercises/
   Google Scholar
• Sukin, Lauren. 2020. “Experimental Evidence on Determinants of Support for Nuclear Use in Response to Threats of Nuclear Retaliation.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 26 (3): 336–339. doi:10.1037/pac0000407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukin, Lauren. 2020. “Credible Nuclear Security Commitments Can Backfire: Explaining Domestic Support for Nuclear Weapons Acquisition in South Korea.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 64 (6): 1011–1042. doi:10.1177/0022002719888689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukin, Lauren, and Allen Weiner. 2022. “War and Words: The International Use of Force in the United Nations Charter Era.” In Challenges to the International Legal Order, edited by David Sloss. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, Philip. 1979. “Identifying Victims of Groupthink from Public Statements of Decision Makers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (8): 1314–1324. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrall, Trevor, and Jane Cramer. 2009. American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear: Threat Inflation since 9/11. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tingley, Dustin, and Barbara Walter. 2011. “Can Cheap Talk Deter? An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (6): 996–1020. doi:10.1177/0022002711414372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trager, Robert. 2010. “Diplomatic Calculus in Anarchy: How Communication Matters.” American Political Science Review: 104 (2): 347–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, Robert. 2014. “North Korea and Diversion: A Quantitative Analysis (1997-2011).” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (2): 147–158. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, Robert. 2016. North Korea and the Science of Provocation: Fifty Years of Conflict-Making. Jefferson: McFarland & Company..
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, Jessica. 2008. “Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve.” International Organization 62 (01): 35–64. doi:10.1017/S0020818308080028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisiger, Alex, and Keren Yarhi-Milo. 2015. “Revisiting Reputation: How Past Actions Matter in International Politics.” International Organization 69 (2): 473–495. doi:10.1017/S0020818314000393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whang, Taehee, Michael Lammbrau, and Hyung-min Joo. 2017. “Talking to Whom? The Changing Audience of North Korean Nuclear Tests.” Social Science Quarterly 98 (3): 976–992. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whang, Taehee, Michael Lammbrau, and Hyung-min Joo. 2018. “Detecting Patterns in North Korean Military Provocations: What Machine-Learning Tells us.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 18 (2): 193–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarhi-Milo, Keren, Joshua D. Kertzer, and Jonathan Renshon. 2018. “Tying Hands, Sinking Costs, and Leader Attributes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (10): 2150–2179. doi:10.1177/0022002718785693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegart, Amy. 2010. “‘Spytainment’: The Real Influence of Fake Spies.” International Journal of Intelligence and Counter-Intelligence 23 (4): 599–622. doi:10.1080/08850607.2010.501635.
   Google Scholar