Lessons from an escalation prediction competition

References

• Attinà, Fulvio, Marcello Carammia, and Stefano Iacus. 2022. “Forecasting Change in Conflict Fatalities with Dynamic Elastic Net.” International Interactions 48 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bätz, Konstantin, Ann-Cathrin Klöckner, and Gerald Schneider. 2022. “Challenging the Status Quo: Predicting Violence with Sparse Decision-Making Data.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2051024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, Benjamin E. 2015. “Forecasting Civil Conflict with Zero-Inflated Count Models.” Civil Wars 17 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13698249.2015.1059564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Curtis. 2016. The Rulers, Elections, and Irregular Governance Dataset (REIGN). Broomfield: OEF Research.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, David M. 2014. “Build, Compute, Critique, Repeat: Data Analysis with Latent Variable Models.” Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 1 (1): 203–232. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-022513-115657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschee, Elizabeth, Jennifer Lautenschlager, Sean O’Brien, Steve Shellman, and James Starz. 2018. “ICEWS Automated Daily Event Data v121”. Harvard Dataverse. Accessed 30 September 2020. https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/QI2T9A
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Patrick, Vito D’Orazio, Latifur Khan, Yi-Fan Li, Javier Osorio, and Marcus Sianan. 2022. “Conflict Forecasting with Event Data and Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2036987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, Patrick, Philip Schrodt, and John Freeman. 2014. “Evaluating Forecasts of Political Conflict Dynamics.” International Journal of Forecasting 30 (4): 944–962. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Jennifer. 2011. “May the Best Analyst Win.” Science 331 (6018): 698–699. doi:10.1126/science.331.6018.698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Nils B. Weidmann. 2017. “Predicting Armed Conflict: Time to Adjust Our Expectations?” Science 355 (6324): 474–476. doi:10.1126/science.aal4483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadefaux, Thomas. 2022. “A Shape-Based Approach to Conflict Forecasting.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2009821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cil, Deniz, Hanne Fjelde, Lisa Hultman, and Desirée Nilsson. 2020. “Mapping Blue Helmets: Introducing the Geocoded Peacekeeping Operations (Geo-PKO) Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 57 (2): 360–370. doi:10.1177/0022343319871978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colaresi, Michael, and Zuhaib Mahmood. 2017. “Do the Robot: Lessons from Machine Learning to Improve Conflict Forecasting.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (2): 193–214. doi:10.1177/0022343316682065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, Paul, Anke Hoeffler, and Måns Söderbom. 2008. “Post-Conflict Risks.” Journal of Peace Research 45 (4): 461–478. doi:10.1177/0022343308091356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, et al. 2020. V-Dem Codebook v10. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Accessed 30 September 2020. https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/data-version-10/
   Google Scholar
• Croicu, Mihai Catalin, and Ralph Sundberg. 2013. “UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset Codebook v4.0”. Uppsala Conflict Data Program, Uppsala University. Accessed 22 June 2022. https://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/index.html#ged_global
   Google Scholar
• Cunen, Céline, Nils Lid Hjort, and Håvard Mokleiv Nygård. 2020. “Statistical Sightings of Better Angels: Analysing the Distribution of Battle-Deaths in Interstate Conflict over Time.” Journal of Peace Research 57 (2): 221–234. doi:10.1177/0022343319896843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Orazio, Vito, and Yu Lin. 2022. “Forecasting Conflict in Africa with Automated Machine Learning Systems.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2017290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettensperger, Felix. 2022. “Forecasting Conflict Using a Diverse Machine-Learning Ensemble: Ensemble Averaging with Multiple Tree-Based Algorithms and Variance Promoting Data Configurations.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.1993209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577–592. doi:10.2307/2944796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, Cornelius, Michael Lebacher, and Göran Kauermann. 2020. “Tempus Volat, Hora Fugit: A Survey of Tie-Oriented Dynamic Network Models in Discrete and Continuous Time.” Statistica Neerlandica 74 (3): 275–299. doi:10.1111/stan.12198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, Cornelius, Marius Mehrl, Paul W. Thurner, and Göran Kauermann. 2022. “The Role of Governmental Weapons Procurements in Forecasting Monthly Fatalities in Intrastate Conflicts: A Semiparametric Hierarchical Hurdle Model.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.1993210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartzke, Erik. 1999. “War is in the Error Term.” International Organization 53 (3): 567–587. doi:10.1162/002081899550995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GDELT 2020. The GDELT Project. Accessed 30 September 2020. https://www.gdeltproject.org
   Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Michael D. Ward. 1999. “A Revised List of Independent States since the Congress of Vienna.” International Interactions 25 (4): 393–413. doi:10.1080/03050629908434958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, Jack A., Robert H. Bates, David L. Epstein, Ted Robert Gurr, Michael B. Lustik, Monty G. Marshall, Jay Ulfelder, and Mark Woodward. 2010. “A Global Model for Forecasting Political Instability.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 190–208. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00426.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Kevin, Håvard Hegre, Frederick Hoyles, and Michael Colaresi. 2019. “Move It or Lose It: Introducing Pseudo-Earth Mover Divergence as a Context-Sensitive Metric for Evaluating and Improving Forecasting and Prediction Systems.” Paper presented at the 2019 Barcelona GSE Summer Forum, Workshop on Forecasting Political and Economic Crisis: Social Science Meets Machine Learning, Barcelona, Spain, June.
   Google Scholar
• Hegre, Håvard, Marie Allansson, Matthias Basedau, Mike Colaresi, Mihai Catalin Croicu, Hanne Fjelde, Frederick Hoyles, et al. 2019. “ViEWS: A Political Violence Early Warning System.” Journal of Peace Research 56 (2): 155–174. doi:10.1177/0022343319823860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegre, Håvard, Joakim Karlsen, Håvard Mokleiv Nygård, Håvard Strand, and Henrik Urdal. 2013. “Predicting Armed Conflict 2010–2050.” International Studies Quarterly 57 (2): 250–270. doi:10.1111/isqu.12007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegre, Håvard, Nils W. Metternich, Håvard Mokleiv Nygård, and Julian Wucherpfennig. 2017. “Introduction: Forecasting in Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (2): 113–124. doi:10.1177/0022343317691330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegre, Håvard, Curtis Bell, Michael Colaresi, Mihai Catalin Croicu, Frederick Hoyles, Remco Jansen, Maxine Ria Leis, et al. 2021. “ViEWS: Revising and Evaluating the ViEWS Political Violence Early-Warning System.” Journal of Peace Research 58 (3): 599–611. doi:10.1177/0022343320962157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegre, Håvard, Mihai Catalin Croicu, Kristine Eck, and Stina Högbladh. 2020. “Introducing the UCDP Candidate Events Dataset.” Research & Politics 7 (3): 205316802093525. doi:10.1177/2053168020935257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, Sepp, and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. “Long Short-Term Memory.” Neural Computation 9 (8): 1735–1780. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Lu, and Scott E. Page. 2001. “Problem Solving by Heterogeneous Agents.” Journal of Economic Theory 97 (1): 123–163. doi:10.1006/jeth.2000.2709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Lu, and Scott E. Page. 2004. “Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers Can Outperform Groups of High-Ability Problem Solvers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (46): 16385–16389. doi:10.1073/pnas.0403723101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, Lisa, Maxine Leis, and Desirée Nilsson. 2022. “Employing Local Peacekeeping Data to Forecast Changes in Violence.” International Interactions 48 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N., A. Hitchman, D. Phan, and L. Smith. 2018. “Self-Exciting Point Process Models for Political Conflict Forecasting.” European Journal of Applied Mathematics 29 (4): 685–707. doi:10.1017/S095679251700033X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlin, Samuel. 2014. A First Course in Stochastic Processes. Cambridge: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Lawrence I-Kuei. 1989. “A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility.” Biometrics 45 (1): 255–268. doi:10.2307/2532051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, Andreas, Johannes Hendriks, Adrian Wills, and Thomas B. Schön. 2022. “Predicting Political Violence Using a State-Space Model.” International Interactions 48 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkiel, Burton G., and Eugene F. Fama. 1970. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” The Journal of Finance 25 (2): 383–417. doi:10.2307/2325486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, Iris. 2022. “Recurrent Neural Networks for Conflict Forecasting.” International Interactions 48 (x): 1–20. doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2016736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, Hannes, and Christopher Rauh. 2022. “Using Past Violence and Current News to Predict Changes in Violence.” International Interactions 48 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, Hannes Felix, and Christopher Rauh. 2019. The Hard Problem of Prediction for Conflict Prevention. CEPR Discussion Papers 13748. C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers, London: CEPR Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, Christian, and Daniel Ohrenhofer. 2022. “Click, Click Boom: Using Wikipedia Data to Predict Changes in Battle-Related Deaths.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2061969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OpenViEWS2 2020. ViEWS. Accessed 30 September 2020. https://github.com/UppsalaConflictDataProgram/OpenViEWS
   Google Scholar
• Page, Scott E. 2007. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creaetes Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, Therése, and Magnus Öberg. 2020. “Organized Violence, 1989–2019.” Journal of Peace Research 57 (4): 597–613. doi:10.1177/0022343320934986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, Benjamin J. 2022. “High Resolution Conflict Forecasting with Spatial Convolutions and Long Short-Term Memory.” International Interactions 48 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raleigh, Clionadh, Håvard Hegre, Joakim Karlsen, and Andrew Linke. 2010. “Introducing ACLED: An Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (5): 651–660. doi:10.1177/0022343310378914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randahl, David, and Johan Vegelius. 2022. “Predicting Escalating and de-Escalating Violence in Africa Using Markov Models.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2049772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Adam, Gerald Schneider, Anna Nöh, and Aaron Clauset. 2014. “Forecasting the Risk of Extreme Massacres in Syria.” ERIS – European Review of International Studies 1 (2): 50–68. doi:10.3224/eris.v1i2.16503.
   Google Scholar
• Spaniel, William, and Iris Malone. 2019. “The Uncertainty Trade-off: Reexamining Opportunity Costs and War.” International Studies Quarterly 63 (4): 1025–1034. doi:10.1093/isq/sqz050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, Ralph, and Erik Melander. 2013. “Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 50 (4): 523–532. doi:10.1177/0022343313484347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollefsen, Andreas Forø, Håvard Strand, and Halvard Buhaug. 2012. “PRIO-GRID: A Unified Spatial Data Structure.” Journal of Peace Research 49 (2): 363–374. doi:10.1177/0022343311431287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesco, Paola, Håvard Hegre, Michael Colaresi, Remco Bastiaan Jansen, Adeline Lo, Gregor Reisch, and Nils B. Weidmann. 2022. “United They Stand: Findings from an Escalation Prediction Competition.” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2029856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestby, Jonas, Jürgen Brandsch, Vilde Bergstad Larsen, Peder Landsverk, and Andreas Forø Tollefsen. 2022. “Predicting (de-)Escalation of Sub-National Violence Using Gradient Boosting: Does It Work?” International Interactions 48 (4). doi:10.1080/03050629.2022.2021198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ViEWSER 2022. ViEWS. Accessed 22 June 2022. https://github.com/prio-data/viewser/wiki
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Michael D., and Andreas Beger. 2017. “Lessons from near Real-Time Forecasting of Irregular Leadership Changes.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (2): 141–156. doi:10.1177/0022343316680858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Michael D., Brian D. Greenhill, and Kristin M. Bakke. 2010. “The Perils of Policy by p-Value: Predicting Civil Conflicts.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (4): 363–375. doi:10.1177/0022343309356491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidmann, Nils B. 2015. “On the Accuracy of Media-Based Conflict Event Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (6): 1129–1149. doi:10.1177/0022002714530431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidmann, Nils B., Doreen Kuse, and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. 2010. “The Geography of the International System: The CShapes Dataset.” International Interactions 36 (1): 86–106. doi:10.1080/03050620903554614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmer, Frank D. W., Andrew M. Linke, John O’Loughlin, Andrew Gettelman, and Arlene Laing. 2017. “Subnational Violent Conflict Forecasts for Sub-Saharan Africa, 2015–65, Using Climate-Sensitive Models.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (2): 175–192. doi:10.1177/0022343316682064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank 2019. “World Development Indicators”. World Bank Data Bank. Accessed 22 June 2022. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
   Google Scholar