How women promote peace: Gender composition, duration, and frames in conflict resolution

References

• Aggestam, Karin, and Ann Towns. 2019. “The Gender Turn in Diplomacy: A New Research Agenda.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 21 (1): 9–28. doi:10.1080/14616742.2018.1483206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, Karin, and Isak Svensson. 2018. “Where Are the Women in Peace Mediation?” In Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation, edited by Karin Aggestam and Ann E. Towns, 149–168. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, James, and Lise Vesterlund. 2001. “Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1): 293–312. doi:10.1162/003355301556419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baquero, Guillermo, Willem Smit, and Luc Wathieu. 2013. “The Generosity Effect: Fairness in Sharing Gains and Losses.” ESMT Working Paper No. 13-08. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2323551.
   Google Scholar
• Bayram, A. Burcu, and Vivian P. Ta. 2019. “Diplomatic Chameleons: Language Style Matching and Agreement in International Diplomatic Negotiations.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 12 (1): 23–40. doi in nodoi:10.1111/ncmr.12142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, Max H. 1983. “Negotiator Judgment: A Critical Look at the Rationality Assumption.” American Behavioral Scientist 27 (2): 211–228. doi:10.1177/000276483027002007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, Francis A., Alice F. Healy, Grant P. Sinclair, and Lyle E. Bourne. Jr. 1987. “War Cues and Foreign Policy Acts.” American Political Science Review 81 (3): 701–715. doi:10.2307/1962672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Curtis, Clayton Besaw, and Matthew Frank. 2021. The Rulers, Elections, and Irregular Governance (REIGN) Dataset. Broomfield, CO: One Earth Future. Accessed 23 March 2021. https://oefdatascience.github.io/REIGN.github.io/
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. Scott. 1998. “Integrating and Testing Models of Rivalry.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1200–1232. doi:10.2307/2991855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, Rebecca H., Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, and Reed M. Wood. 2019. “Legislative Gender Diversity and the Resolution of Civil Conflict.” Political Research Quarterly 72 (1): 215–228. doi:10.1177/1065912918785459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchouicha, Ranoua, Lachlan Deer, Ashraf Galal Eid, Peter McGee, Daniel Schoch, Hrvoje Stojic, Jolanda Ygosse-Battisti, and Ferdinand M. Vieider. 2019. “Gender Effects for Loss Aversion: Yes, No, Maybe?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 59 (2): 171–184. doi:10.1007/s11166-019-09315-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box-Steffenmeier, Janet M., and Bradford S. Jones. 1997. “Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1414–1461. doi:10.2307/2960496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, Mark A., Brian Urlacher, Natalie Florea Hudson, Anat Niv-Solomon, Laura L. Janik, Michael J. Butler, Scott W. Brown, and Andri Ioannou. 2009. “Gender and Negotiation: Some Experimental Findings from an International Negotiation Simulation.” International Studies Quarterly 53 (1): 23–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.01522.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, Leslie R. 1993. “On Understanding Gender Differences in the Expression of Emotion.” In Human Feelings: Explorations in Affect Development and Meaning, edited by Steven L. Ablon, Daniel P. Brown, Edward J. Khantzian, and John E. Mack, 87–121. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchan, Nancy R., Rachel T. A. Croson, and Sara Solnick. 2008. “Trust and Gender: An Examination of Behavior and Beliefs in the Investment Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 68 (3–4): 466–476. doi in nodoi:10.1016/j.jebo.2007.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan, Nancy, Rachel Croson, Eric Johnson, and George Wu. 2005. “Gain and Loss Ultimatums.” In Vol. 13 of Advances in Applied Microeconomics: Experimental and Behavioral Economics, edited by John Morgan, 1–24. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 2011. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caprioli, Mary. 2000. “Gendered Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 37 (1): 51–68. doi:10.1177/0022343300037001003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprioli, Mary. 2005. “Primed for Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (2): 161–178. doi:10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00340.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, Fredrik, Dinky Daruvala, and Olof Johansson‐Stenman. 2005. “Are People Inequality‐Averse, or Just Risk‐Averse?” Economica 72 (287): 375–396. doi:10.1111/j.0013-0427.2005.00421.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, Peter J., and Dean G. Pruitt. 1992. “Negotiation and Mediation.” Annual Review of Psychology 43 (1): 531–582. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochard, François, Alexandre Flage, Gilles Grolleau, and Angela Sutan. 2020. “Are Individuals More Generous in Loss Contexts?” Social Choice and Welfare 55 (4): 845–866. doi:10.1007/s00355-020-01266-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croson, Rachel, and Uri Gneezy. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448–474. doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Peter J. D. Carnevale, Ben J. M. Emans, and Evert Van De Vliert. 1994. “Effects of Gain-Loss Frames in Negotiation: Loss Aversion, Mismatching, and Frame Adoption.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60 (1): 90–107. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMeritt, Jacqueline H. R., Angela D. Nichols, and Eliza G. Kelly. 2014. “Female Participation and Civil War Relapse.” Civil Wars 16 (3): 346–368. doi:10.1080/13698249.2014.966427.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., and Cindy D. Kam. 2011. “Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base’.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by J. Druckman, D. Greene, J. Kuklinski, and A. Lupia, 41–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511921452.004.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski, and Arthur Lupia. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 627–635. doi:10.1017/S0003055406062514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg, Martin, and Astri Muren. 2006. “Gender Composition in Teams.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 61 (1): 50–54. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, Alice H. 2013. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, Alice H., and Mary C. Johannesen-Schmidt. 2007. “Leadership style matters: The Small, but Important, Style Differences between Male and Female Leaders.” In Handbook on Women in Business and Management, edited by Diana Billimoria and Sandy Kristin Piderit, 279–303. Pennsylvania: IGI Global. doi:10.4337/9781847204134.
   Google Scholar
• Eckel, Catherine, Angela C. M. De Oliveira, and Philip J. Grossman. 2008. “Gender and Negotiation in the Small: Are Women (Perceived to Be) More Cooperative than Men?” Negotiation Journal 24 (4): 429–445. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00196.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Karin Hederos, and Anna Sandberg. 2012. “Gender Differences in Initiation of Negotiation: Does the Gender of the Negotiation Counterpart Matter?” Negotiation Journal 28 (4): 407–428. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2012.00349.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Kimmo, and Brent Simpson. 2010. “Emotional Reactions to Losing Explain Gender Differences in Entering a Risky Lottery.” Judgment and Decision Making 5 (3): 159–163. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46525643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577–592. doi:10.2307/2944796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Féron, Élise. 2020. “Reinventing Conflict Prevention? Women and the Prevention of the Reemergence of Conflict in Burundi.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 37 (3): 239–252. doi:10.1002/crq.21275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippin, Antonio, and Paolo Crosetto. 2016. “A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes.” Management Science 62 (11): 3138–3160. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, Frank, Ed Diener, and Ed Sandvik. 1991. “Gender Differences in Negative Affect and Well-Being: The Case for Emotional Intensity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (3): 427–434. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gent, Stephen E., and Megan Shannon. 2011. “Decision Control and the Pursuit of Binding Conflict Management: Choosing the Ties That Bind.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (5): 710–734. doi:10.1177/0022002711408012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gizelis, Theodora-Ismene. 2018. “Systematic Study of Gender, Conflict, and Peace.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 24 (4): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Joshua S. 2001. War and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, Michele, and Wendy Wood. 1993. “Sex Differences in Intensity of Emotional Experience: A Social Role Interpretation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (5): 1010–1022. doi in no doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handgraaf, Michel J. J., Eric Van Dijk, Riël C. Vermunt, Henk A. M. Wilke, and Carsten K. W. De Dreu. 2008. “Less Power or Powerless? Egocentric Empathy Gaps and the Irony of Having Little versus No Power in Social Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (5): 1136–1149. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel, Paul R. 2001. “Contentious Issues and World Politics: The Management of Territorial Claims in the Americas, 1816–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 45 (1): 81–109. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, Uta, and Sabine Schwarz. 2011. “How Valid is Negotiation Research Based on Student Sample Groups? New Insights into a Long-Standing Controversy.” Negotiation Journal 27 (2): 147–170. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00300.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, Valerie M., Bonnie Ballif-Spanvill, Mary Caprioli, and Chad F. Emmett. 2012. Sex and World Peace. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, Susan D. 2015. “Experiments in International Relations: Lab, Survey, and Field.” Annual Review of Political Science 18 (1): 403–424. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-094854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Heajung, Maia J. Young, and Christopher W. Bauman. 2010. “What Helps Women Ask for More? The Role of Discrete Emotions on the Initiation of Negotiation.” Paper presented at IACM 23rd Annual Conference, July 24–27, 2010, Boston, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 1992. “Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51 (2): 296–312. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90015-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Jessica A., and Laura J. Kray. 2015. “A Pawn in Someone Else's Game? The Cognitive, Motivational, and Paradigmatic Barriers to Women's Excelling in Negotiation.” Research in Organizational Behavior 35: 3–28. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2015.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, Michael T., and Sarah A. Fulton. 2011. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, Jana, Werner Krause, and Piia Bränfors. 2018. “Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Durability of Peace.” International Interactions 44 (6): 985–1016. doi:10.1080/03050629.2018.1492386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, Jennifer S., Roxana M. Gonzalez, Deborah A. Small, and Baruch Fischhoff. 2003. “Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field Experiment.” Psychological Science 14 (2): 144–150. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leliveld, Marijke C., Ilja Van Beest, Eric Van Dijk, and Ann E. Tenbrunsel. 2009. “Understanding the Influence of Outcome Valence in Bargaining: A Study on Fairness Accessibility, Norms, and Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (3): 505–514. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel, Tiffany, Susan Shefte, and Deborah J. Swiss. 1999. Suiting Themselves: Women's Leadership Styles in Today's Workplace. Cambridge, MA: Radcliffe Public Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 5 (1): 31–61. doi in nodoi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.091001.170657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, Rose, Dominic Johnson, Jonathan Cowden, and Stephen Rosen. 2007. “Testosterone and Aggression in a Simulated Crisis Game.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614 (1): 15–33. doi:10.1177/0002716207305268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, Monica. 2016. “Women at the Peace Table: The Gender Dynamics of Peace Negotiations.” Transitional Justice Institute Research Paper no.16-06, Maryland, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Melander, Erik. 2005. “Gender Equality and Intrastate Armed Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (4): 695–714. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00384.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, Marie, and Andrea Ó. Súilleabháin. 2013. Women in Conflict Mediation: Why It Matters. New York: International Peace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, Marie, Andrea Ó. Súilleabháin, and Thania Paffenholz. 2015. Reimagining Peacemaking: Women's Roles in Peace Processes. New York: International Peace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. 2018. “Women in Peace Negotiations.” In Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation, edited by Karin Aggestam and Ann E. Towns, 169–191. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania, Nick Ross, Steven Dixon, Anna-Lena Schluchter, and Jacqui True. 2016. Making Women Count-Not Just Counting Women: Assessing Women's Inclusion and Influence on Peace Negotiations. Geneva: Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative (The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies) and UN Women.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, Pamela, Green, Jennifer, and Hughes, Melanie M. 2008. “Women in Parliament, 1945–2003: Cross-National Dataset.” Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. doi:10.3886/ICPSR24340.v1.
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, Elazar J., and Fred N. Kerlinger. 1982. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, Holger A. 2014. “The Disposition Effect and Loss Aversion: Do Gender Differences Matter?” Economics Letters 123 (1): 33–36. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2014.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, Dan. 2015. “The Positivist Study of Gender and International Relations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (7): 1301–1326. doi:10.1177/0022002714560351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaftenaar, Susanne. 2017. “How (Wo)Men Rebel: Exploring the Effect of Gender Equality on Nonviolent and Armed Conflict Onset.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (6): 762–776. doi:10.1177/0022343317722699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Ulrich, and Horst Zank. 2005. “What is Loss Aversion?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 30 (2): 157–167. doi in nodoi:10.1007/s11166-005-6564-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Security Council Resolution 1325. 2000. Women in Armed Conflict. New York: United Nations Security Council.
   Google Scholar
• Shair-Rosenfield, Sarah, and Reed M. Wood. 2017. “Governing Well after War: How Improving Female Representation Prolongs Post-Conflict Peace.” The Journal of Politics 79 (3): 995–1009. doi:10.1086/691056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Karen E. 2020. “Missing in Analysis: Women in Foreign Policy–Making.” Foreign Policy Analysis 16 (1): 130–141. doi:10.1093/fpa/orz019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller, Robert J. 2020. Sex and Gender: The Development of Masculinity and Femininity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thyne, Clayton L. 2012. “Information, Commitment, and Intra-War Bargaining: The Effect of Governmental Constraints on Civil War Duration.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (2): 307–321. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00719.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, Catherine. 2019. “‘Soft Ways of Doing Hard Things’: Women Mediators and the Question of Gender in Mediation.” Peacebuilding 8 (4): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegand, Krista, and Emilia Justyna Powell. 2011. “Past Experience, Quest for the Best Forum, and Peaceful Attempts to Resolve Territorial Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (1): 33–59. doi:10.1177/0022002710377168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegand, Krista, and Eric Keels. 2019. “Oil Wealth, Winning Coalitions, and Duration of Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (4): 1077–1105. doi:10.1177/0022002718766414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Xiaolin, and Yan Wu. 2011. “Sharing Losses and Sharing Gains: Increased Demand for Fairness under Adversity.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47 (3): 582–588. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar