Are many sets of eyes better than one? Evaluating multiple databases of armed actors in Colombia

References

• Arjona, A. M. 2011. “Presencia vs. violencia: problemas de medición de la presencia de actores armados en Colombia”, Foro Económico, December 20. Accessed 6 March 2023. https://dev.focoeconomico.org/2011/12/20/presencia-vs-violencia-problemas-de-medicion-de-la-presencia-de-actores-armados-en-colombia/
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., B. Jones, and M. MacLeod. 1998. “Lessons from the Trenches: Ensuring Quality, Reliability, and Usability in the Creation of a New Data Source.” The Political Methodologist 8 (2): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bell-Martin, R., and J. Marston. 2021. “Confronting Selection Bias: The Normative and Empirical Risks of Data Collection in Violent Contexts.” Geopolitics 26 (1): 159–192. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1659780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centro de Estudios Sobre Desarrollo Econoómico. 2019. “Panel Municipal del CEDE”, Catálogo de Datos. Accessed 21 March 2023. https://datoscede.uniandes.edu.co/es/catalogo-de-microdata
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Investigación Popular. 2016. “Banco de Datos de Derechos Humanos, DIH y Violencia Política.” Noche y Niebla. Accessed 6 March 2023. https://www.nocheyniebla.org/
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, C., and P. Ball. 2002. “Views to a Kill: Exploring the Implications of Source Selection in the Case of Guatemalan State Terror, 1977–1995.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (3): 427–450. doi:10.1177/0022002702046003005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnay, K., E. Dunford, E. McGrath, D. Backer, and D. Cunningham. 2019. “Integrating Conflict Event Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (5): 1337–1364. doi:10.1177/0022002718777050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, R., and K. Harkness. 2018. “Measuring the Landscape of Civil War: Evaluating Geographic Coding Decisions with Historic Data from the Mau Rebellion.” Journal of Peace Research 55 (2): 190–205. doi:10.1177/0022343318754959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, O., and J. Vargas. 2013. “Commodity Prices Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Colombia.” Review of Economic Studies 80 (4): 1384–1421. doi:10.1093/restud/rdt009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., A. Martin, J. McCarthy, and S. A. Soule. 2004. “The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology 30 (1): 65–80. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck, K. 2012. “In Data we Trust? A Comparison of UCDP GED and ACLED Conflict Events Datasets.” Cooperation and Conflict 47 (1): 124–141. doi:10.1177/0010836711434463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fariss, C. 2014. “Respect for Human Rights Has Improved over Time: Modelling the Changing Standard of Accountability.” American Political Science Review 108 (2): 297–318. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S., and M. Z. Isla. 2018. “Comparing Sets of Patterns with the Jaccard Index.” Australasian Journal of Information Systems 22: 1–17. doi:10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., and N. B. Weidmann. 2014. “Using Machine-Coded Event Data for the Micro-Level Study of Political Violence.” Research & Politics 1 (2). doi:10.1177/2053168014539924.
   Google Scholar
• Hegre, H., M. Croicu, K. Eck, and S. Hogbladh. 2018. “Introducing the UCDP-Candidate Events Dataset and the ViEWS Outcomes Dataset.” UCDP. Accessed 21 March 2023. https://www.pcr.uu.se/digitalAssets/653/c_653796-l_1-k_ucdp_candidate_views_outcomes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hegre, H., and N. Sambanis. 2006. “Sensitivity Analysis of Empirical Results on Civil War Onset.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (4): 508–535. doi:10.1177/0022002706289303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto de Estudios para el Desarrollo y la Paz. 2017. “XIII Informe Sobre Presencia de Grupos Narcoparamilitares.” Primer Semestre 2017. Accessed 21 March 2023. http://www.indepaz.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Informe-2017-narcoparas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, P. 1901. “Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Drouces et dans quelques regions voisines [Distribution of Alpine Flora in the Bassin des Drouces and in Several Neighboring Regions].” Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37 (140): 241–272.
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, P. 1912. “The Distribution of the Flora in the Alpine Zone.” New Phytologist 11 (2): 37–50. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. N., I. Shapiro, and T. Masoud. 2008. Order, Conflict and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• López, C. ed. 2010. Y Refundaron la Patria: De cómo Mafiosos y Políticos Reconfiguraron el Estado Colombiano. Bogotá: Corporación Nuevo Arcoíris.
   Google Scholar
• Loyle, C., and A. Simoni. 2017. “Researching under Fire: Political Science and Researcher Trauma.” Political Science & Politics 50 (1): 141–145. doi:10.1017/S1049096516002328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum, K., M. E. Price, and D. Banks. 2013. “Applications of Multiple Systems Estimation in Human Rights Research.” American Statistician 67 (4): 191–200. doi:10.1080/00031305.2013.821093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. 2014. Tasas de homicidios en Colombia. https://github.com/finiterank/homicidios/blob/master/data/homicidios.1990.a.2013.csv
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., and T. Plümper. 2017. Robustness Tests for Quantitative Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niwattanakul, S., J. Singthongchai, E. Naenudorn, and S. Wanapu. 2013. “Using of Jaccard Coefficient for Keywords Similarity.” Paper presented at Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2013 Vol I, IMECS 2013, March 13–15, Hong Kong. Accessed 21 March 2023. https://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2013/IMECS2013_pp380-384.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Osorio, J. 2013. “Numbers Under Fire: The Challenges of Quantitative Data Gathering in Highly Violent Settings.” DSD Working Papers on Research Security. New York City, September, http://webarchive.ssrc.org/working-papers/DSD_ResearchSecurity_06_Osorio.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osorio, J., M. Mohamed, V. Pavon, and S. Brewer-Osorio. 2019. “Mapping Violent Presence of Armed Actors in Colombia.” Advances in Cartography and GIScience of the International Cartographic Association, 1:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Raleigh, C., A. Linke, H. Hegre, and J. Karlsen. 2010. “Introducing ACLED: An Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (5): 651–660. doi:10.1177/0022343310378914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restrepo, J., M. Spagat, and J. Vargas. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Colombian Civil Conflict: A New Data Set.” Homo Oeconomicus 21 (2): 396–428.
   Google Scholar
• Ricotta, C., and S. Pavoine. 2015. “A Multiple-Site Dissimilarity Measure for Species Presence/Absence Data and Its Relationship with Nestedness and Turnover.” Ecological Indicators 54: 203–206. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutas del Conflicto. 2019. Geografía del Paramilitarismo en Colombia. https://rutasdelconflicto.com/geografia-paramilitarismo
   Google Scholar
• Salehyan, I., C. S. Hendrix, J. Hamner, C. Case, C. Linebarger, E. Stull, and J. Williams. 2012. “Social Conflict in Africa: A New Database.” International Interactions 38 (4): 503–511. doi:10.1080/03050629.2012.697426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambanis, N. 2004. “What is Civil War? Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Definition.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (6): 814–858. doi:10.1177/0022002704269355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger, W., and T. Warin. 2019. “Dataset of Jaccard Similarity Indices from 1,597 European Political Manifestos across 27 Countries (1945–2017).” Data in Brief 24: 103907–103907. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2019.103907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P. A. 2006. “Twenty Years of the Kansas Event Data System Project.” The Political Methodologist 14 (1): 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P., and D. Van Brackel. 2013. “Automated Coding of Political Event Data.” In Handbook of Computational Approaches to Counterterrorism, edited by D. Subramanian, 23–50. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, R., and E. Melander. 2013. “Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 50 (4): 523–532. doi:10.1177/0022343313484347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, M., A. Beger, J. Cutler, M. Dickenson, C. Dorff, and B. Radford. 2013. “Comparing GDELT and ICEWS Event Data.” https://blog.predictiveheuristics.com/2013/10/17/gdelt-and-icews-ashort-comparison/
   Google Scholar
• Weidmann, N. B. 2016. “A Closer Look at Reporting Bias in Conflict Event Data.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 206–218. doi:10.1111/ajps.12196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisber, M. 2006. “Robustness Analysis.” Philosophy of Science 73 (5): 730–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhukov, Y. M., C. Davenport, and N. Kostyuk. 2019. “Introducing xSub: A New Portal for Cross-National Data on Subnational Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 56 (4): 604–614. doi:10.1177/0022343319836697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar