Improving variable-fidelity modelling by exploring global design space and radial basis function networks for aerofoil design

References

• Abott, Ira H., and A. E. V. Doenhoff. 1959. Theory of Wing Sections, Including a Summary of Airfoil Data. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandrov, Natalia M., Clyde R. Gumbert, Robert Michael Lewis, Lawrence L. Green, and Perry A. Newmann. 2001. “Approximation and Model Management in Aerodynamic Optimization with Variable-Fidelity Models.” Journal of Aircraft 38 (6): 1093–1101. doi: 10.2514/2.2877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrov, N. M., E. J. Nielsen, R. M. Lewis, and W. K. Anderson. 2000. “First-Order Model Management with Variable-Fidelity Physics Applied to Multi-Element Airfoil Optimization.” In 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization, 6–8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA, AIAA Paper 2000-4886. Reston, VA: AIAA.
   Google Scholar
• Ansys Inc. 2011. Ansys Fluent Theory Guide. 14th ed. http://cdlab2.fluid.tuwien.ac.at/LEHRE/TURB/Fluent.Inc/v140/flu_ug.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Azamatov, Abdulaziz, Jae-Woo Lee, and Yung-Hwan Byun. 2011. “Comprehensive Aircraft Configuration Design Tool For Integrated Product and Process Development.” Advances in Engineering Software 42 (1–2): 35–49. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandler, J., Q. Cheng, S. Dakroury, A. Mohamed, M. Bakr, and K. Madsen. 2004. “Space Mapping: The State of the Art.” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 52 (1): 337–361. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2003.820904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, John P. 2013. “A Fourier Error Analysis for Radial Basis Functions on an Infinite Uniform grid. Part 2: Spectral-Plus Is Special.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 225 (1): 695–707. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.09.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomhead, D. S., and David Lowe. 1988a. “Multivariable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks.” Complex Systems 2 (3): 321–355.
   Google Scholar
• Broomhead, D. S., and David Lowe. 1988b. Radial Basis Functions, Multi-Variable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks. Technical Report (Memorandum 4148), Royal Signals & Radar Establishment, Malvern, Worcestershire, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Jonathan C., Richard W. Fright, and Richard K. Beatson. 1997. “Surface Interpolation with Radial Basis Function for Medical Imaging.” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16 (1): 96–107. doi: 10.1109/42.552059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Kwan J., Raphael T. Haftka, Gary L. Giles, and I-Jen Kao. 1993. “Sensitivity-Based Scaling for Approximating Structural Response.” Journal of Aircraft 30 (2): 283–288. doi: 10.2514/3.48278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, P. H., M. A. McDonald, and M. C. P. Firmin. 1979. Aerofoil RAE 2822 – Pressure Distributions, and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements. AGARD Report AR 138, Experimental Data Base for Computer Program Assessment, Fluid Dynamics Panel, Working Group 04.
   Google Scholar
• Drela, Mark. 2001. Xfoil, User Primer. 6th ed. http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil/
   Google Scholar
• Eglajs, V., and P. Audze. 1977. “New Approach to the Design of Multifactor Experiments (in Russian).” Problems of Dynamics and Strengths 35 (1): 104–107.
   Google Scholar
• Elsayed, Khairy, Dean Vucinic, Roberto d'Ippolito, and Chris Lacor. 2012. “Comparison between RBF and Kriging Surrogates in Design Optimization of High Dimensional Problems.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Engineering Optimization (ENGOPT2012- 0262), 1–5 July 2012, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. http://www.engopt.org/proceedings.html.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, Alexander I. J., and Andy J. Keane. 2009. “Recent Advances in Surrogate-Based Optimization.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences 45 (1–3): 50–79. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, A., A. Sobester, and A. Keane. 2008. Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9780470770801
   Google Scholar
• Gano, Shawn E., John E. Renaud, Jay D. Martin, and Timothy W. Simpson. 2006. “Update Strategies for Kriging Models Used in Variable Fidelity Optimization.” Structural Multidiscriplinary Optimization 32 (4): 287–298. doi: 10.1007/s00158-006-0025-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gano, Shawn E., John E. Renaud, and Brian Sanders. 2005. “Hybrid Variable Fidelity Optimization by Using a Kriging-Based Scaling Function.” AIAA Journal 43 (11): 2422–2433. doi: 10.2514/1.12466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haftka, Raphael T. 1991. “Combining Global and Local Approximations.” AIAA Journal 29 (9): 1523–1525. doi: 10.2514/3.10768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, Norbert, and Thanh Tran. 2013. “A Mixed Method for Dirichlet Problems with Radial Basis Functions.” Computers & Mathematics with Applications 66 (10): 2045–2055. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2013.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel, Slawomir, and Leifur Leifsson. 2012. “Knowledge-Based Airfoil Shape Opitmization Using Space Mapping.” In 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 25–28 June 2012, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, D. 1988. A Software Package for Sequential Quadratic Programming, Technical Report DFVLR-FB 88-28, Institute for Flight Mechanics, DLR German Aerospace Center, Koln, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Krige, Daniel G. 1951. “A Statistical Approach to Some Basic Mine Valuation Problems on the Witwatersrand.” Journal of the Chemical, Metallurgical and Mining Society of South Africa 52 (6): 119–139.
   Google Scholar
• Kulfan, Brenda M. 2007. “A Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method CST.” In 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 8–11 January 2007, Reno, NV, Paper No. AIAA 0062. http://brendakulfan.com/docs/CST2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Robert, and Stephen Nash. 2000. “A Multigrid Approach to the Optimization of Systems Governed By Differential Equations.” In 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 6–8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA, Paper No. AIAA 2000-4890.
   Google Scholar
• Matheron, G. 1963. “Principles of Geostatistics.” Economic Geology 58 (8): 1246–1266. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246
   Google Scholar
• McKay, M. D., R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover. 1979. “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code.” Technometrics 21 (2): 239–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Nhu-Van. 2011. “An Efficient Multi-Fidelity Approach for the Multi-Disciplinary Aerospace System Design and Optimization.” PhD thesis, Department of Aerospace Information Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Pointwise Inc. 2012. Mesh Generation Software for CFD. http://pointwise.com
   Google Scholar
• Praveen, C., and R. Duvigneau. 2007. Radial Basis Function and Kriging Metamodels for Aerodynamic Optimization. Technical Report No. 123456789, INRIA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
   Google Scholar
• JMP5®. Release 8. 2009. User Guide. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Travers, John. 2007. “Scientific Python Library.” http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/tutorial/interpolate.html
   Google Scholar
• Vu, Ngoc Anh, Jae-Woo Lee, and Jungil Shu. 2013. “Aerodynamic Design Optimization of Helicopter Rotor Blades Including Aerofoil Shape for Hover Performance.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 26 (1): 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2012.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, Jing-Jing, Rui-Min Lue, Hai-Li Guo, Ya-Qiong Li, Hai-Yan Fu, Tian-Ming Yang, and Yan-Ping Zhou. 2014. “Radial Basis Function Network-Based Transformation for Nonlinear Partial Least-Squares as Optimized By Particle Swarm Optimization: Application to QSAR studies.” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 130 (1): 37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar