Considering soil–structure interaction effects on performance-based design optimization of moment-resisting steel frames by an engineered cluster-based genetic algorithm

References

• AISC 341-16. 2016. AISC 341-16: Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC).
   Google Scholar
• AISC 360-16. 2016. AISC 360-16. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE 41-17. 2017. ASCE Standard, ASCE/SEI, 41–17: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings.
   Google Scholar
• ATC 40. 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings Report ATC-40. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bento, R., S. Falcao, and F. Rodrigues. 2004. “Nonlinear Static Procedures in Performance Based Seismic Design.” 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Paper.
   Google Scholar
• BHRC. 2014. Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistance Design of Buildings: Standard No. 2800. Building and Housing Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bybordiani, Milad, and Saeid Kazemzadeh Azad. 2019. “Optimum Design of Steel Braced Frames Considering Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 60 (3): 1123–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Shih-Ho, M. Reza Bayat, and Subhash C. Goel. 2008. “Performance-Based Plastic Design of Steel Concentric Braced Frames for Enhanced Confidence Level.” 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, October.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, Indrajit, and Shambhu P. Dasgupta. 2008. Dynamics of Structure and Foundation—A Unified Approach: 1. Fundamentals. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicconi, Paolo, Vincenzo Castorani, Michele Germani, Marco Mandolini, and Alessio Vita. 2019. “A Multi-objective Sequential Method for Manufacturing Cost and Structural Optimization of Modular Steel Towers.” Engineering with Computers 36 (2): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daloglu, Ayse T., Musa Artar, Korhan Özgan, and Ali İ. Karakas. 2016. “Optimum Design of Steel Space Frames Including Soil-Structure Interaction.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 54 (1): 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daloglu, Ayse T., Musa Artar, Korhan Ozgan, and Ali I. Karakas. 2018. “Optimum Design of Braced Steel Space Frames including Soil-Structure Interaction via Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization and Harmony Search Algorithms.” Advances in Civil Engineering 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dehghani, S., A. R. Vosoughi, and Mo R. Banan. 2019. “The Effects of Rehabilitation Objectives on Near Optimal Trade-off Relation Between Minimum Weight and Maximum Drift of 2D Steel X-Braced Frames Considering Soil-Structure Interaction Using a Cluster-Based NSGA II.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 59 (5): 1703–1722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Far, H. 2008. “A Criterion for Considering Soil-Structure Interaction Effects in Seismic Design of Ductile RC-MRFS According To Iranian Codes.” 14th world conference on earthquake engineering (14WCEE).
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 273. 1997. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 273). Washnigton, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 356. 2000. Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 356). Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 440. 2005. “Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures (FEMA 440).” FEMA-440, Redwood City 7 (9): 11.
   Google Scholar
• Ganzerli, S., C. P. Pantelides, and L. D. Reaveley. 2000. “Performance-Based Design Using Structural Optimization.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 29 (11): 1677–1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazetas, George. 1991. “Formulas and Charts for Impedances of Surface and Embedded Foundations.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 117 (9): 1363–1381.
   Google Scholar
• Gholizadeh, S., R. Kamyab, and H. Dadashi. 2013. “Performance-Based Design Optimization of Steel Moment Frames.” Iran University of Science and Technology 3 (2): 327–343.
   Google Scholar
• Gholizadeh, S., and A. Milani. 2016. “Optimal Performance-Based Design of Steel Frames Using Advanced Metaheuristics.” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) 17 (5): 607–623.
   Google Scholar
• Gholizadeh, Saeed, and Reza Kamyab Moghadas. 2014. “Performance-Based Optimum Design of Steel Frames by an Improved Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization.” Advances in Structural Engineering 17 (2): 143–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Yanglin. 2004. Performance-Based Design of Steel Building Frameworks Under Seismic Loading. Ontario: University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, Jorge A., and Anil K. Chopra. 1978. “A Substructure Method for Earthquake Analysis of Structures Including Structure-Soil Interaction.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 6 (1): 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappos, Andreas J., and Georgios Panagopoulos. 2004. “Performance-Based Seismic Design of 3D R/C Buildings Using Inelastic Static and Dynamic Analysis Procedures.” ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 41 (1): 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Kaveh, A., B. Farahmand Azar, A. Hadidi, F Rezazadeh Sorochi, and S. Talatahari. 2010. “Performance-Based Seismic Design of Steel Frames Using Ant Colony Optimization.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 66 (4): 566–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaveh, A., and A. Nasrollahi. 2014. “Performance-Based Seismic Design of Steel Frames Utilizing Charged System Search Optimization.” Applied Soft Computing 22: 213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocak, Suleyman, and Yalcin Mengi. 2000. “A Simple Soil–Structure Interaction Model.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 24 (8-9): 607–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawinkler, Helmut, Farzin Zareian, Ricardo A. Medina, and Luis F. Ibarra. 2006. “Decision Support for Conceptual Performance-Based Design.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35 (1): 115–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Soon-Sik, Subhash C. Goel, and Shih-Ho Chao. 2004. “Performance-Based Seismic Design of Steel Moment Frames Using Target Drift and Yield Mechanism.” Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Zhifeng, Sez Atamturktur, and C. Hsein Juang. 2013. “Performance Based Robust Design Optimization of Steel Moment Resisting Frames.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 89: 165–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Yang, Iman Hajirasouliha, and Alec M. Marshall. 2016. “Performance-Based Seismic Design of Flexible-Base Multi-storey Buildings Considering Soil–Structure Interaction.” Engineering Structures 108: 90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, Silvia, Frank McKenna, Michael H. Scott, and G. Fenves. 2004. “OpenSees Users Manual.” PEER, University of California, Berkeley 18: 56–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mylonakis, George, and George Gazetas. 2000. “Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction: Beneficial or Detrimental?” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 4 (3): 277–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEHRP. 2009. NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA P-750), 2009 Edition. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Peng, Makoto Ohsaki, and Takuya Kinoshita. 2007. “Constraint Approach to Performance-Based Design of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames.” Engineering Structures 29 (2): 186–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, Hugo A., Shahram Pezeshk, and Christopher M. Foley. 2007. “Performance-Based Optimization Considering Both Structural and Nonstructural Components.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (3): 685–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem, Muhammad Umair. 2018. “Design Optimization of Pre Engineered Steel Truss Buildings.” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 9 (10): 304–316.
   Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, Shahrokh, Iman Mansouri, Jong Wan Hu, and Armin Karami. 2018. “Effect of Soil Classification on Seismic Behavior of SMFs Considering Soil-Structure Interaction and Near-Field Earthquakes.” Shock and Vibration 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Tahghighi, H., and M. Rabiee. 2017. “Influence of Foundation Flexibility on the Seismic Response of Low-to-Mid-Rise Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings.” Scientia Iranica 24 (3): 979–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, A. R., and A. Darabi. 2017. “A New Hybrid CG-GAs Approach for High Sensitive Optimization Problems: With Application for Parameters Estimation of FG Nanobeams.” Applied Soft Computing 52: 220–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, A. R., A. Darabi, N. Anjabin, and U. Topal. 2017. “A Mixed Finite Element and Improved Genetic Algorithm Method for Maximizing Buckling Load of Stiffened Laminated Composite Plates.” Aerospace Science and Technology 70: 378–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, A. R., A. Darabi, and H. Dehghani Forkhorji. 2017. “Optimum Stacking Sequences of Thick Laminated Composite Plates for Maximizing Buckling Load Using FE-GAs-PSO.” Composite Structures 159: 361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, A. R., .H Dehghani Forkhorji, and H. Roohbakhsh. 2016. “Maximum Fundamental Frequency of Thick Laminated Composite Plates by a Hybrid Optimization Method.” Composites Part B: Engineering 86: 254–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Fengxia, and Jinping Ou. 2007. “Pushover Analysis Procedure for Systems Considering SSI Effects Based on Capacity Spectrum Method.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 6 (3): 269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worku, Asrat. 2009. “Winkler’s Single-Parameter Subgrade Model from the Perspective of an Improved Approach of Continuum-Based Subgrade Modeling.” Zede Journal 26: 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdani, Hessam, Mohsen Khatibinia, Sadjad Gharehbaghi, and Kianoosh Hatami. 2017. “Probabilistic Performance-Based Optimum Seismic Design of RC Structures Considering Soil–Structure Interaction Effects.” ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 3 (2): G4016004.
   Google Scholar
• Žula, Tomaž, and Stojan Kravanja. 2019. “MINLP Optimization of a Cantilever Roof Structure.” International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements 7 (3): 236–245.
   Google Scholar