Exploring teachers’ curriculum decision making: insights from history education

References

• Anderson, G. (2015). What is knowledge in English and where does it come from? Changing English, 22, 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, R. (2017). Understanding historical evidence: Teaching and learning challenges. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (2nd ed.). (pp. 144–154). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. (2009). The denial of desire: How to make history education meaningless. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 265–282). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. (2013). Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43, 177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERA (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21, 624–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschman, F., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2014). Understanding decision making in teachers’ curriculum design approaches. Education Technology Research Development, 62, 393–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, K., & Harris, R. (2011). Historical Association survey of history in schools in England 2011. London: Historical Association. Retrieved from https://www.history.org.uk/resources/secondary_news_1290.html
   Google Scholar
• Cain, T., & Chapman, A. (2014). Dysfunctional dichotomies? Deflating bipolar constructions of curriculum and pedagogy through case studies from music and history. The Curriculum Journal, 25, 111–129.
   Google Scholar
• Cannadine, D., Keating, J., & Sheldon, N. (2011). The right kind of history. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cercadillo, L. (2015). Teachers teaching history in Spain: Aims, perceptions, and practices on second order concepts. In A. Chapman & A. Wilschut (Eds.), Joined-up history (pp. 115–136). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, I. (2008). Thinking across time: Planning and teaching the story of power and democracy at Key Stage 3. Teaching History, 130, 14–21. Retrieved from www.history.irg.uk
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2013a). The National Curriculum in England: Framework document for consultation. Retrieved from https://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/n/national%20curriculum%20consultation%20-%20framework%20document.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2103b). History programmes of study: Key Stage 3 National Curriculum in England. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239075/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_History.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (2012). ‘Purpose’ as a way of helping white trainee history teachers engage with diversity issues. Education Sciences, 2, 218–241.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Burn, K. (2011). Curriculum theory, curriculum policy and the problem of ill-disciplined thinking. Journal of Education Policy, 26, 245–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Burn, K. (2016). English history teachers’ views on what substantive content young people should be taught. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48, 518–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Haydn, T. (2006). Pupils’ enjoyment of history: What lessons can teachers learn from their pupils? The Curriculum Journal, 17, 315–333.
   Google Scholar
• Haydn, T., & Harris, R. (2010). Pupil perspectives on the purposes and benefits of studying history in high school: A view from the UK. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42, 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, J., & Shemilt, D. (2011). Frameworks of knowledge: Dilemmas and debates. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp. 73–83). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Husbands, C., Kitson, A., & Pendry, A. (2003). Understanding history teaching: Teaching and learning about the past in secondary schools. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., & Biddulph, M. (2015). The dialogic space offered by curriculum-making in the process of learning to teach, and the creation of a progressive knowledge-led curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaro, E. (2014). Grammar: The never-ending debate. In P. Driscoll, E. Macaro, & A. Swarbrick (Eds.), Debates in modern language teaching (pp. 108–120). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., & Lambert, D. (2015). Subject knowledge and teacher preparation in English secondary schools: The case of geography. Teacher Development, 19, 365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C., de la Paz, S., & Felton, M. (2014). Implementing a disciplinary-literacy curriculum for US history: Learning from expert middle school teachers in diverse classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46, 540–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakou, I., & Barca, I. (2010). Contemporary public debates over history education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nuttall, D. (2013). Possible futures: Using frameworks of knowledge to help Year 9 connect past, present and future. Teaching History, 151, 33–44. Retrieved from www.history.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Ormond, B. M. (2016). Curriculum decisions—the challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for history. Journal of Curriculum Studies, in press. doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1149225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QCA. (2007). History: Programme of study for Key Stage 3 and attainment target. London: QCA.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, M. (1997). Big stories and big pictures: Making outlines and overviews interesting. Teaching History, 88, 20–22. Retrieved from www.history.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandwell, R. (2012). ‘We were allowed to disagree, because we couldn’t agree on anything’: Seventeen voices in Canadian debates over history education. In T. Taylor & R. Guyver (Eds.), History wars and the classroom: Global perspectives (pp. 51–76). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, A. (2017). Trends and issues in history education in international contexts. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (2nd ed.). (pp. 42–52). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2007). Who needs a canon? In M. Grever & S. Stuurman (Eds.), Beyond the canon: History for the twenty-first century (pp. 19–30). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (2009). Drinking an ocean and pissing a cupful: How adolescents make sense of history. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 141–210). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Swalwell, K., Pellegrino, A. M., & View, J. L. (2015). Teachers’ curricula choices when teaching histories of oppressed people: Capturing the US Civil Rights Movement. Journal of Social Studies Research, 39, 79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Van Straaten, D., Wilschut, A., & Oostdam, R. (2016). Making history relevant to students by connecting past, present and future: A framework for research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48, 479–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2011). The return to subjects: A sociological perspective on the UK Coalition government’s approach to the 14–19 curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 22, 265–278.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2013). Powerful knowledge: An analytically useful concept or just a ‘sexy sounding term’? A response to John Beck’s ‘Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43, 195–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2014). What is a curriculum and what can it do? The Curriculum Journal, 25, 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45, 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar