References
- Baird, J.-A., Ahmed, A., Hopfenbeck, T., Brown, C., & Elliott, V. (2013). Research evidence relating to proposals for reform of the GCSE: OUCEA Report. Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.
- Beck, U. (1992). The risk society. Oxford, London: Sage Publications.
- Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606.
- De Wolf, I. F., & Janssens, F. J. G. (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396.
- Department for Education (2014). Factsheet: Progress 8 measure. London, UK. Retrieved from. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/285990/P8_factsheet.pdf
- Dunne, M., Humphreys, S., & Sebba, J. 2007. Effective teaching and learning for pupils in low attaining groups. Nottingham, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families. Retrieved from. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6622/1/DCSF-RR011.pdf
- Figlio, D. N., & Getzler, L. S. (2006). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system? In T. J. Gronberg & D. W. Jansen (ed.), Improving School Accountability (Advances in Applied Microeconomics, Volume 14 (pp. 35–49). Amsterdam: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Johnson, S. (2013). On the reliability of high-stakes teacher assessment. Research Papers in Education, 28(1), 91–105.
- NAO. 2003. Making a difference: Performance of maintained secondary schools in England. London: National Audit Office. Retrieved from. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2003/11/02031332.pdf
- Noyes, A., Drake, P., Wake, G., & Murphy, R. (2010). Evaluating mathematics pathways: Final report. London: DfE.
- Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2013a). Our announcement on speaking and listening assessments. Retrieved from https://ofqual.blog.gov.uk/2013/09/04/our-announcement-on-speaking-and-listening-assessments/
- Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2013b). Review of controlled assessment in GCSEs. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/377903/2013-06-11-review-of-controlled-assessment-in-GCSEs.pdf
- Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2013c). GCSE reform consultation. In June 2013. Coventry: Ofqual.
- Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2013d). GCSE reform consultation. June 2013. Coventry: Ofqual. Website: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20141110161313/http://www.ofqual.gov.uk/files/2013-06-11-gcse-reform-consultation-june-2013.pdf
- Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2017). GCSE mathematics: Understanding schools’ approaches to tiering. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/591000/2017-02-10_Report_on_maths_tiering.pdf
- Ofsted. (2013). Schools’ use of early entry to GCSE examinations: Its usage and impact. Manchester: Author.
- Perryman, J, Ball, S, Maguire, M, & Braun, A. (2011). Life in the pressure cooker – school league tables and english and mathematics teachers’ responses to accountability in a results-driven era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179–195.
- Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great american school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
- Riddell, S., & Weedon, E. (2006). What counts as a reasonable adjustment? Dyslexic students and the concept of fair assessment. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 16(1), 57–73.
- Smith, P. (1993). Outcome-related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector. British Journal of Management, 4, 135–151.
- Strand, S. (2012). The White British–Black Caribbean achievement gap: Tests, tiers and teacher expectations. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 75–101.
- Sturman, L. (2003). Teaching to the test: Science or intuition? Educational Research, 45, 261–273.
- Taylor, R. C. (2016). The effects of accountability measures in English secondary schools: Early and multiple entry to GCSE mathematics assessments. Oxford Review of Education, 42, 629–645.
- Vidal Rodeiro, C. L., & Nádas, R. (2010). Effects of modularisation. Cambridge: Cambridge Assessment.
- Wilson, D., Croxson, B., & Atkinson, A. (2006). “what gets measured gets done” Headteachers’ responses to the English secondary school performance management system. Policy Studies, 27(2), 153–171.