The consequences of metrics for social justice: tensions, pending issues, and questions

References

• Addey, C. (2017). The assessment culture of international organisations: “From philosophical doubt to statistical certainty” through the appearance and growth of international large-scale assessments. In C. Alarcón & M. Lawn (Eds.), Assessment cultures. Historical perspectives (pp. 379–408). Berlin: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• AERA, APA, NCME. (2014). Fairness in testing. In Standards for educational and psychological testing (pp. 49–74). Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A. (2011). Michael Young’s the rise of the meritocracy: A philosophical critique. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(4), 367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo, K., & Martuccelli, D. (2015). La escuela y la cuestión del mérito: Reflexiones desde la experiencia chilena. Educação E Pesquisa, 41(Número Especial), 1503–1518.
   Google Scholar
• Aristóteles. (2005). Ética a Nicómaco (4th ed.). Madrid: Alianza.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Johnson, S., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Isaacs, T., Stobart, G., & Yu, G. (2017). On the supranational spell of PISA in policy. Educational Research, 58(2), 121–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J. A., Hopfenbeck, T., Ahmed, A., Elwood, J., Paget, C., & Usher, N. (2014). Predictability in the Irish leaving certificate examination (working paper 1). Oxford: University of Oxford and Knowledge Centre for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R, & Adamson, B. (2011). Assessment Reform in Education: Policy and Practice. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berryhill, J., Linney, J. A., & Fromewick, J. (2009). The effects of education accountability on teachers: Are policies too stress provoking for their own good? International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 4(5), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., & Lee, C. (2004). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P. (2007). An introduction to assessment. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Carrasco, A., Seppanen, P., Rinne, R., & Falabella, A. (2016). Educational accountability in Chile and Finland: Divergent principles framing school choice policies. In P. Seppanen, A. Carrasco, M. Kalalahti, R. Rinne, & H. Simola (Eds.), Contrasting dynamics in education politics of extremes: School choice in Chile and Finland (pp. 53–82). The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. & Rustique-Forrester, E. (2005). The consequences of student testing for teaching and teacher quality. En J Herman & E Haertel (eds.). The Uses and Misuses of Data in Accountability Testing: the 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part II(pp. 289–319). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dubet, F. (2011). Repensar la justicia social. Contra el mito de la igualdad de oportunidades. Buenos Aires: Editorial siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J. (2005). Gender and achievement: What have exams got to do with it? Oxford Review of Education, 31(3), 373–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J. (2013). The role(s) of student voice in 14–19 education policy reform: Reflections on consultation and participation. London Review of Education, 2(11), 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Falabella, A. (2016). Do national test scores and quality labels trigger school self-assessment and accountability? A critical analysis in the Chilean context. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(5), 743–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falabella, A., & De La Vega, L. F. (2016). Políticas de responsabilización por desempeño escolar: Un debate a partir de la literatura internacional y el caso chileno. Estudios Pedagógicos, 2(42), 395–413.
   Google Scholar
• Flórez, M. T. (2015). Systems, ideologies and history: A three-dimensional absence in the study of assessment reform processes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. In N. Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds.), Redistribution ir recognition? A political-philosophical exchange First (pp. 7–109). London, New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. 2003. Redistribution or recognition? First. London; New York: verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T. (2000). Rethinking social justice in schools: How will we recognize it when we see it? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4(3), 253–269.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., Holmes, B., & Leitch, R. (2009). Assessment and social justice. A futurelab literature review: Report 16. Bristol: Futurelab.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S. (2006). Towards a contextualized analysis of social justice in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(1), 69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, R. (2012). Can complexity move uk policy beyond “evidence-based policy making” and the “audit culture”? Applying a “complexity cascade” to education and health policy. Political Studies, 60(1), 20–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipps, C., & Stobart, G. (2009). Fairness in assessment. In C. J. J. Wyatt-Smith Claire (Ed.), Educational assessment in the 21st century: Connecting theory and practice (pp. 105–118). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9
   Google Scholar
• Green, A., Preston, J., & Janmaat, J. G. (2006). Education, equality and social cohesion: A comparative analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230207455
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. (2001). Dialogue in evaluation. A relational perspective. Evaluation, 7(2), 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA “effect” in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gür, B. S., Çelik, Z., & Özoǧlu, M. (2012). Policy options for Turkey: A critique of the interpretation and utilization of PISA results in Turkey. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A. (1994). Introduction. In Ch. Taylor & A. Gutmann (Eds.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hevia, F., & Vergara-Lope, S. (2016). Evaluaciones educativas realizadas por ciudadanos en México: Validación de la Medición Independiente de Aprendizajes. Innovación Educativa, 16(70), 85–110. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1794/179445403005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hopson, R. (2009). Reclaiming knowledge at the margins: Culturally responsive evaluation in the current evaluation moment. In K. Ryna & B. Cousins (Eds.), The Sage international handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 429–446). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M. J., & DeLuca, C. (2012). Rethinking validation in complex high-stakes assessment contexts. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 19(1), 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2004). Accountability, social differentitation and racialized social control. High-stakes education (pp. 41–69). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Luaces, O. (2010). Hacia un Sistema de evaluación de aprendizajes en línea. Montevideo: Dirección de Investigación Evaluación y Estadística (DIEE), Uruguay.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Murrillo, F., & Hernández, R. (2011). Hacia un concepto de justicia social. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad. Eficacia Y Cambio En Educación, 9(4), 8–23.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, J. (2010). Education inquiry. Social Justice in Education Revisited, 1(4), 269–287. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3402/edui.v1i4.21946
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, I. (2012). En torno a la validez del Sistema de Medición de la Calidad de la Educación en Chile. Estudios Pedagógicos, 38(2), 355–373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PREAL. (2009). Tendencias en la evaluación del logro escolar: La experiencia de cinco países con alto rendimiento educativo. Serie Mejores Prácticas, 11(31), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Revised edition (original from 1971). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D., & Wiliam, D. (1999). ‘I’ ll be a nothing’: Structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 343–354.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez de Mayo, R. (2003). Naturaleza política de la evaluación curricular: Los fundamentos políticos del enfoque democrático de Barry MacDonald. Revista Pedagogica, 24(71), 349–384.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. (1992). Will national tests improve student learning? CSE Technical report 342, CRESST, University of Colorado, Boulder
   Google Scholar
• SIMCE Committee. (2015). Hacia un sistema completo y equilibrado de evaluación de los aprendizajes en Chile. Informe Equipo de Tarea para la Revisión del SIMCE. Santiago: Agencia de Calidad de la Educación. Retrieved from. http://www.auladigital.cl/sminforma/documentos/doc3_Informe_ejecutivo_equipo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R., & Madden, N. (2006). Reducing the gap: Success for all and the achievement of African American students. The Journal of Negro Education, 75(3), 389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004).The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. London, New York. Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times the uses and abuses of assessment. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taut, S., Cortés, F., Sebastian, C., & Preiss, D. (2009). Evaluating school and parent reports of the national student achievement testing system (SIMCE) in Chile: Access, comprehension, and use. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), 129–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In Taylor, Ch. & A. Gutmann (Eds.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25–74). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldow, F. (2017). Constellations of actors and fairness in assessment. In C. Alarcón & M. Lawn (Eds.), Assessment cultures. Historical perspectives (pp. 335–361). Berlin: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Wandall, J. (2009). National tests in Denmark—CAT as a pedagogic tool. In F. Scheuermann, & J. Björnsson (Eds.). The Transition to Computer-Based Assessment. New Approaches to Skills Assessment and Implications for Large-scale Testing (pp. 45–50). Luxemburg: European Commission, Joint Research Centre Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy (classics in organization and management series). Middlesex: Penguin.
   Google Scholar