Metrics in education—control and corruption

References

• Baird, J., Johnson, S., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Isaacs, T., Sprague, T., Stobart, G., & Yu, G. (2016). On the supranational spell of PISA in policy. Educational Research, 58(2), 121–138. Special Issue: International Policy Borrowing and Evidence-based Educational Policy Making: Relationships and Tensions..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., Ludtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Brunner, M. (2009). Large-scale student assessment studies measure the results of processes of knowledge acquisition: Evidence in support of the distinction between intelligence and student achievement. Educational Research Review, 4, 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the public health care system. Public Administration, 84(3), 517–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, J. (2018). Off-rolling: using data to see a fuller picture. Retreived from https://educationinspection.blog.gov.uk/2018/06/26/off-rolling-using-data-to-see-a-fuller-picture/.
   Google Scholar
• Bushnell, M. (2003). Teachers in the schoolhouse panopticon: Complicity and resistance. Education and Urban Society, 35(3), 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Gillard, J. W. (2018). An initial analysis and reflection of the metrics used in the Teaching Excellence Framework in the UK. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 22(2), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2012). What PISA knows and can do: studying the role of national actors in the making of PISA. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 243–254.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, K. H. (2006). The German ‘PISA-Shock’: some aspects of the extraordinary impact of the OECD’s PISA study on the German education system. In H. Ertl (ed.) Cross-national Attraction in Education: accounts from England and Germany. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, F. A. (2000). How tests create what they are intended to measure. In A. Filer (Ed.), Assessment. Social Practice and Social Product (pp. 67–81). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69, 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. (2017). Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckie, G., & Goldstein, H. (2009). The limitations of using school league tables to inform school choice. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 172(4), 835–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A report on knowledge. Theory and History of Literature, Volume 10. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mallen, R. E. (1979). Recognizing and Defining Legal Malpractice. SCL Reviews, 30, 203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NAO (2017). Department for Education. Retaining and developing the teaching workforce. HC 307 Session 2017–19. Retrieved 12 September from https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Retaining-and-developing-the-teaching-workforce.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nuttall, D. L. (1987). The validity of assessments. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2(2), 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oancea, A. (2018) The future of research assessment. In: Palgrave Communications 4, Special Collection on Research Assessment, ISSN 2055-1045 (online).
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2012). Introduction:. Assessing PISA. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 166–171.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2002). Political economies of scale: fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography, 78(3), 331–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2011). Life in the pressure cooker—School league tables and English and mathematics teachers’ responses to accountability in a results-driven era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2007). Instructional sensitivity of tests: accountability’s dire drawback. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 146–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 486–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, D., & Wiliam, D. (1999). ‘I’ll be a nothing’: structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 343–354.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2006). A history of China (2nd ed.). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• SamGyimah (2018). We want students to be better informed about degree choices & the returns - today, we’re officially launching a competition for tech companies to take graduate data & create a MoneySuperMarket for students, giving them real power to make the right choice. [Tweet]. Retrieved 26 June from https://twitter.com/SamGyimah/status/1011530092965715968.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, N. (2013). Assessment for learning in secondary writing classrooms. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar