Learning and expertise in support for parents of children at risk: a cultural-historical analysis of partnership practices

References

• Baggens, C. A. L. (2004). The institution enters the family home: Home visits in Sweden to new parents by the child health care nurse. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 21(1), 15–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandom, R. (1995). Knowledge and the social articulation of the space of reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55(4), 895–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H., & Fallowfield, L. (1991). Counselling and communication in health care. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Ellis, M., & Harris, L. (2015). Family partnership model: Reflective practice handbook (2nd ed.). London: Centre for Parent and Child Support, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, J. (2008a). Abstract rationality in education: From Vygotsky to Brandom. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derry, J. (2008b). Technology-enhanced learning: A question of knowledge. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3–4), 505–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derry, J. (2013). Can inferentialism contribute to social epistemology? In B. Kotzee (Ed.), Education and the growth of knowledge: Perspectives from social and virtue epistemology (pp. 76–91). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & Evangelou, M. (in press). Easing transitions into school for children from socially excluded “hard to reach” families: From risk and resilience to agency and demand. In M. Hedegaard & A. Edwards (Eds.), Support for children, young people and their carers in difficult transitions: Working in the zone of social concern. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Eronen, R., Pincombe, J., & Calabretto, H. (2010). The role of child health nurses in supporting parents of young infants. Collegian (Royal College of Nursing, Australia), 17, 131–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., Dunston, R., Lee, A., Rossiter, C., & McKenzie, J. (2012). Reciprocal learning in partnership practice: An exploratory study of a home visiting program for mothers with depression. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(2), 99–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., & Lee, A. (2007). Knowing how to know: Questioning ‘knowledge transfer’ as a model for knowing and learning in health. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Glasby, J. (2016). If integration is the answer, what was the question? What next for English health and social care partnerships? International Journal of Integrated Care, 16(4), 11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guile, D. (2014). Professional knowledge and professional practice as continuous recontextualisation: A social practice perspective. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 78–92). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., & Slembrouck, S. (2009). Communication with parents in child welfare: Skills, language and interaction. Child & Family Social Work, 14, 461–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C, & Slembrouck, S. (2011). Categorisations of child ‘in need’ and child ‘in need of protection’ and implications for the formulation of ‘deficit’ parenting. In Christopher N. Candlin & J. Crichton (Eds.). Discourses of Deficit (pp. 63–80). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Slembrouck, S., Haigh, E., & Lee, A. (2010). The management of professional roles during boundary work in child welfare. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(3), 348–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L., Wood, L., & Day, C. (2014). An ethnographic study into the Family Partnership Model: Implementation and sustainability. London: Centre for Parent and Child Support/South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Lindström, A. (1998). Motherhood, medicine, and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3&4), 397–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interaction between health visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 359–417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N. (2017). Expertise, learning, and agency in partnership practices in services for families with young children. In A. Edwards (Ed.), Working relationally in and across practices: Cultural-historical approaches to collaboration (pp. 25–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N., Day, C., & Edwards, A. (2016). Partnership practice as collaborative knowledge work: Overcoming common dilemmas through an augmented view of professional expertise. Journal of Children’s Services, 11(2), 111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N., & Edwards, A. (2017). How common knowledge is constructed and why it matters in collaboration between professionals and clients. International Journal of Educational Research, 83, 107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhila, K., Hall, C., & Raitakari, S. (2016). Interaction during mental health floating support home visiting: Managing host–guest and professional–client identities in home-spaces. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(1), 101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggi, S., Irwin, L., Siddiqi, A., & Hertzman, C. (2010). The social determinants of early child development: An overview. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 46(11), 627–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo, Å. (2003). Accounting practices as situated knowing: Dilemmas and dynamics in institutional categorization. Discourse Studies, 5(4), 495–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo, Å. (2014). Categorisation. In C. Hall, K. Juhila, M. Matarese, & C. van Nijnatten (Eds.), Analysing social work communication: Discourse in practice (pp. 25–43). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo, Å., & Säljö, R. (2002). Talk in institutional context and institutional context as talk: Categories as situated practices. Text, 22(1), 57–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mitcheson, J., & Cowley, S. (2003). Empowerment or control? An analysis of the extent to which client participation is enabled during health visitor/client interactions using a structured health needs assessment tool. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(4), 413–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myors, K. A., Schmied, V., & White, E. (2014). Child and family health nurses working with families of preschool-aged children. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23, 181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorloos, R., Taylor, S. D., Bakker, A., & Derry, J. (2017). Inferentialism as an alternative to socioconstructivism in mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(4), 437–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSW Health. (2010). Families NSW Supporting Families Early package: SAFE START strategic policy. Sydney: NSW Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Roose, R., Roets, G., van Houte, S., Vandenhole, W., & Reynaert, D. (2013). From parental engagement to the engagement of social work services: Discussing reductionist and democratic forms of partnership with families. Child & Family Social Work, 18, 449–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellars, W. (1963). Science, perception and reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Slembrouck, S., & Hall, C. (2014). Boundary work. In C. Hall, K. Juhila, M. Matarese, & C. van Nijnatten (Eds.), Analysing social work communication (pp. 61–78). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slembrouck, S., & Hall, C. (2017). Advice giving, managing interruptions and the construction of ‘teachable moments’. Applied Linguistics, TBC, 1–22. doi:10.1093/applin/amx004
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Swallow, V., & Coyne, I. (2015). Involving parents in managing their child’s long-term condition—A concept synthesis of family-centered care and partnership-in-care. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 30, 143–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.
   Google Scholar
• Swick, K. (2008). Empowering the parent–child relationship in homeless and other high-risk parents and families. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(2), 149–153.
   Google Scholar
• van Houte, S., Bradt, L., Vandenbroeck, M., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2015). Professionals’ understanding of partnership with parents in the context of family support programmes. Child & Family Social Work, 20(1), 116–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works (Vol. 1): Problems of general psychology (R.W. Reiber & A.S. Carton, eds.). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works (Vol. 5): Child psychology (R. Reiber, ed.). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, T., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, A. (2003). Rethinking resilience: A developmental process perspective’. In S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 242–266). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar