Investigating agentive urban learning: an assembly of situated experiences for sustainable futures

References

• Amin, A., & Cirolia, L. (2017). Politics/matter: Governing cape town’s informal settlements. Urban Studies, 55(2), 274–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Reimaginging the urban. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2017). Seeing like a city. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bannerjee, I. (2010, June). Educational urbanism. Urban, virtual and de-territorial imaginaries of emerging educational spaces. In M. Schrenk, V. Popovich, D. Engelke, & P. Elisei (Eds.), REAL CORP 2010 Proceedings (pp. 1–16). Vienna: REAL CORP. Retrieved from https://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/PubDat_193027.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, L. (2001). An update on transformational learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, Spring(89), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bringle, R., Phillips, M., & Hudson, M. (2004). The measure of service learning: Research scales to assess student experiences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Christansen, P., & O’Brien, M. (Eds.). (2003). Children in the city: Home, neighbourhood and community. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Costandius, E., & Botes, H. (2018). Educating citizen designers in South Africa. SUN PreSS. online.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & Mackenzie, L. (2008). Identity shifts in informal learning trajectories. In B. van Oers, W. Wardekker, E. Elbers, & R. van der Veer (Eds.), The transformation of learning (pp. 163–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O. (2013). Digital learning lives: Trajectories, literacies, and schooling. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., Sefton-Green, J., & Arnseth, H. C. (2016). Learning identities, education and community. Young lives in the cosmopolitan city. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., & Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures: Education, technology and social change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (30th anniversary edn). New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, T., & Loogma, K. (2009). Constructing futures: A social constructionist perspective on foresight methodology. Futures, 41(2), 71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., Skukauskaite, A., & Baker, W. (2012). Ethnography as epistemology: An introduction to educational ethnography. In J. Arthur, M. J. Warring, R. Coe, & L. Hedges (Eds.), Research methodologies and method in education (pp. 309–321). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2016). Expanding educational research and interventionist methodologies. Cognition and Instruction, 3(34), 275–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a change laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J., Spencer, B., Way, T., & Yocom, K. (Eds.) (2015). Now urbanism: The future city is here. Abingdon: Routledge. (Kindle Edition).
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G., & Katz, M. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, G., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2010). Literate arts in a global world: Reframing social networking as cosmopolitan practice. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(2), 85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., … Watkins, S. G. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., Lesh, R., & Baek, J. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, J., Erasmus, M., Hendricks, D., Nduna, J., & Slamat, J. (2008). Embedding community engagement in South African higher education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3(1), 57–83.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leirvik, M. (2014). Mer enn klasse: betydningen av ‘etnisk capital’ og ‘subkulturell capital’ for utdanningsatferd blant etterkommere av innvandrere. (More than class. The meaning of ‘ethnic capital’ and ‘subcultural capital’ for educational behaviour among descendants of immigrants) Doctoral thesis. Oslo: Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Liestøl, G. (2009). Augmented reality and digital genre design – Situated simulations on the iPhone. In R. Grasset, C. DiSalvo, J. Pair, & J. Bolter. (Eds.), IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality—Arts, Media and Humanities, 2009 (pp. 29–34). Orlando: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Liestøl, G. (2011). Situated simulations between virtual reality and mobile augmented reality: Designing a narrative space. In B. Furth (Ed.), Handbook of augmented reality (pp. 309–319). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liestøl, G., & Morrison, A. (2013). Views, alignment and incongruity in indirect augmented reality’. In M. Billinghurst & B. Thomas (Eds.), Proceedings of ISMAR 2013, IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality—Arts, Media and Humanities (pp. 23–28). Adelaide: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Liestøl, G., & Morrison, A. (2014). The power of place and perspective: Sensory media and situated simulations in urban design. In A. de Souza & M. Sheller (Eds.), Local and mobile: Linking mobilities, mobile communication and locative media (pp. 207–222). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liestøl, G., Morrison, A., & Stenarson, T. (2015). Visualization of climate change in situ. In J. Shaw, H. Thwaites, & S. Kenerdine. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM) (pp. 251–256). Hong Kong: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Liestøl, G., Rasmussen, T., & Stenarson, T. (2011). Mobile innovation: Designing & evaluating situated simulations. Digital Creativity, 22(3), 172–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., Luque-Ayala, A., & McFarlane, C. (Eds.) (2016). Smart urbanism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manchester, H., & Cope, G. (2019). Learning to be a smart citizen. Oxford Review of Education, 45(1).
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A. (2018). Future north, nuture forth: Design fiction, anticipation and Arctic futures. In J. Kampevold Larsen & P. Hemmersam (Eds.), Future north. The changing arctic landscapes (pp. 119–143). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A., Aspen, J., & Westvang, E. (2013, April). Making the mobile and networked city visible by design. In U. Johansson, L. S. Holm, M. Nyström, M. Soila-Wadman, R. Cooper, & P. Atkinson (Eds.), Proceedings of Crafting the Future, 10th European Academy of Design Conference.Gothenburg/Lancaster: The European Academy of Design. Retrieved fromhttp://www.trippus.se/web/presentation/web.aspx?evid=qTCRaT4TJ70WGtClyjpKRA==&ecid=vajn7H5hFUL31Hr+Q9enuw==&ln=eng&emid=3JGsoZYZLLLPljnQTw8HmA==&view=infopage&template=desktop
   Google Scholar
• Osberg, D. (2010). Taking care of the future? In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.), Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 153–166). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pinfold, N., & Moodley, R. (2013). The importance of service-learning and community engagement within the GIS pedagogy of the town and regional planning department (CPUT). In Africa geo-spatial forum Retrieved from https://www.geospatialworld.net/.
   Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., Hilppö, J., Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2013). Expanding the chronotopes of schooling for the promotion of students’ agency. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age (pp. 107–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, I. (2012). Trajectories of participation: Temporality and learning. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the science of learning (pp. 3334–3337). n.p.: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Robin, E., Chazal, C., Acuto, M. & Carrero, R. (2019). (Un)learning the city through crisis: lessons from Cape Town. Oxford Review of Education, 45(1).
   Google Scholar
• Salama, A. (2009). Transformative pedagogy in architecture and urbanism. Solingen: UMBAU Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Codesign, 4(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Smørdal, O., Liestøl, G., & Erstad, O. (2016). Exploring situated knowledge building using mobile augmented reality. Qwerty, 11(1), 26–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stornaiuolo, A., Hull, G., & Hall, M. (2017). Cosmopolitan practices, networks, and flows of literacies. In K. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith, & J. Zacher Pandya (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures (pp. 13–25). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, T. (2013). At the coalface: Community–university engagements and planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(2), 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar