Exploring the difficulty of mathematics examination questions for weaker readers

References

• Assessment of Performance Unit. 1988. Mathematical Development: A Review of Monitoring in Mathematics. 1978–1982, Parts 1 and 2. Slough: NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, S. E., and M. L. Thurlow. 2006. Item-level Effects of the Read-aloud Accommodation for Students with Reading Disabilities (Synthesis Report 65). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• British Dyslexia Association. 2013. Dyslexia Research Information: BDA Definition of Dyslexia. Accessed August 1. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/about-dyslexia/further-information/dyslexia-research-information-.html
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., and M. Dunne. 1998. “Anyone for Tennis? Social Class Differences in Children’s Difficulties with ‘Realistic’ Mathematics Testing.” Sociological Review 46 (1): 115–148.10.1111/sore.1998.46.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., and M. Dunne. 2000. Assessing Children’s Mathematical Knowledge: Social Class, Sex and Problem Solving. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, K., R. Hedderly, and P. Pumfrey. 1983. “Specific Learning Difficulties: The ‘Specific Reading Difficulties’ Versus ‘Dyslexia’ Controversy Resolved?” Occasional Papers of The Division of Education and Child Psychology of the British Psychological Society 7 (3) [complete edition].
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, V., M. Johnson, and N. Novakovic. 2012. “The Effects of Features of Examination Questions on the Performance of Students with Dyslexia.” British Educational Research Journal 38 (5): 813–839.10.1080/01411926.2011.584964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, A., P. Gregor, and A. F. Newell. 2002. “Ongoing Investigation of the Ways in Which Some of the Problems Encountered by Some Dyslexics Can Be Alleviated Using Computer Techniques.” Paper presented at Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS 2002), Edinburgh, July 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Everatt, J., M. F. Bradshaw, and P. B. Hibbard. 1999. “Visual Processing and Dyslexia.” Perception 28: 243–254.10.1068/p2743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, N., J. H. Mueller, and A. E. Marini. 1994. “Solving Difference Problems: Wording Primes Co-ordination.” Cognition and Instruction 12 (4): 355–369.10.1207/s1532690xci1204_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Hoch, H., and S. Hughes. 1996. “What Makes Mathematics Exam Questions Difficult?” Paper presented at the British Educational Association Annual Conference, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, September.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher-Hoch, H., S. Hughes, and T. Bramley. 1997. “What Makes GCSE Exam Questions Difficult? Outcomes of Manipulating Difficulty of GCSE Questions.” Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, York.
   Google Scholar
• Gillard, D. 2011. “Education in England: A Brief History.” www.educationengland.org.uk/history.
   Google Scholar
• Guiard, V., and D. Rasch. 2004. “The Robustness of Two Sample Tests for Means: A Reply on von Eye’s Comment.” Psychology Science 46 (4): 549–554.
   Google Scholar
• Hedderly, R. G. 1992. “Psychologists’ Assessments of Specific Learning Difficulties (Dyslexia) and Examination Boards: Policies and Practices.” Educational Psychology in Practice 8 (1): 32–42.10.1080/0266736920080105
   Google Scholar
• Joint Council for the GCSE. 1991. Special Arrangements for Candidates with Disabilities. Bristol: Joint Council for the GCSE.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Council for Qualifications. 2007. Regulations and Guidance Relating to Candidates Who Are Eligible for Adjustments in Examinations. London: Joint Council for Qualifications.
   Google Scholar
• Kitz, W. R., and R. T. Nash. 1995. “Applying Effective Instructional Strategies for Teaching Dyslexic Students in a Remedial College Algebra Course.” Annals of Dyslexia 45 (1): 143–160.10.1007/BF02648216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., J. Larkin, and J. Kadane. 1984. “A Cognitive Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Ability.” In Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence. Vol. 2, edited by R. J. Sternberg, 231–273. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, L. L., C. Deville, and D. A. Frisbie. 2002. “The Effect of a Read Aloud Accommodation on Test Scores of Students With and Without a Learning Disability in Reading.” Remedial and Special Education 23 (4): 248–255.10.1177/07419325020230040801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midland Examining Group. 1987. GCSE Examinations 1988 and 1989, Handbook for Centres. Cambridge: Midlands Examining Group.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. A. 1977. “An Analysis of Sixth-grade Pupils’ Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks.” In Research in Mathematics Education in Australia, edited by M. Clements and J. Foyster, 239–258. Melbourne: Swinburne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickson, M., and S. Green. 1996. “A Study of the Effects of Context in the Assessment of the Mathematical Learning of 10/11 Year Olds.” Paper presented at the British Educational Association Annual Conference, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, September.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Public Sector Information. 2005. Disability Discrimination Act 2005. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Public Sector Information. 2010. Equality Act 2010. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., and J. Patrick. 2008. “Home Examinations after 1945.” In Examining the World, edited by S. Raban, 71–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, A., and A. Ahmed. 2000. “Comprehension Failures in Educational Assessment.” Paper presented at European Conference on Educational Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, A., C. Hutchinson, N. Entwhistle, and C. de Luca. 1985. What Makes Examination Questions Difficult? Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., and S. Lifson. 1984. “Are Learning Disabled Students ‘Test-wise?’: An Inquiry into Reading Comprehension Test Items.” Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Evaluation Network and the Evaluation Research Society, San Francisco, CA, October 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Shaurd, H., and A. Rothery. 1984. Children Reading Mathematics. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, P. C., R. J. Kopriva, C. Chen, and J. E. Emick. 2006. “Exploring Individual and Item Factors that Affect Assessment Validity for Diverse Learners: Results from a Large-scale Cognitive Lab.” Learning and Individual Differences 16: 267–276.10.1016/j.lindif.2007.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar