The structure of pre-adolescents’ perceptions of their teacher’s interpersonal behaviours and their relation to pre-adolescents’ learning outcomes

References

• Abdi, H. 2007. “Metric Multidimensional Scaling.” In Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, edited by N. J. Salkind, 598–605. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alin, A. 2010. “Multicollinearity.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2: 370–374. doi:10.1002/wics.84.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S. J., and K. L. Mills. 2014. “Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing?” Annual Review of Psychology 65: 187–207. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., and S. Biklen. 2006. Introduction to Qualitative Research in Education. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, I., P. J. Groenen, and P. Mair. 2012. Applied Multidimensional Scaling. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Brekelmans, M., P. den Brok, J. van Tartwijk, and T. Wubbels. 2005. “An Interpersonal Perspective on Teacher Behaviour in the Classroom.” In Contemporary Teaching and Teacher Issues, edited by L. V. Barnes, 197–226. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. 1970. “Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1: 185–216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Brok, P., D. Fisher, M. Brekelmans, T. Rickards, Th. Wubbels, J. Levy, and B. Waldrip. 2003, April. Students’ Perceptions of Secondary Teachers’ Interpersonal Style in Six Countries: A Study on the Validity of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. ERIC document: ED475164
   Google Scholar
• den Brok, P., D. L. Fisher, T. Rickards, and E. Bull. 2006. “Californian Science Students’ Perceptions of Their Classroom Learning Environments.” Educational Research and Evaluation 12: 3–25. doi:10.1080/13803610500392053.
   Google Scholar
• den Brok, P., D. L. Fisher, and R. Scott. 2005. “The Importance of Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour for Student Attitudes in Brunei Primary Science Classes.” International Journal of Science Education 27: 765–779.10.1080/09500690500038488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Brok, P., J. van Tartwijk, T. Wubbels, and I. Veldman. 2010. “The Differential Effect of the Teacher-Student Interpersonal Relationship on Student Outcomes for Students with Different Ethnic Backgrounds.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 199–221. doi:10.1348/000709909X465632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, D., and K. Murphy. 2009. “Issues in Using Methodological Triangulation in Research.” Nurse Researcher 16: 40–55. doi:10.7748/nr2009.07.16.4.40.c7160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charalampous, K., and C. M. Kokkinos. 2013. “The Model of Interpersonal Teacher Behaviour: A Qualitative Cross-Cultural Validation within the Greek Elementary Education Context.” British Educational Research Journal 39: 182–205. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.617437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalampous, K., and C. M. Kokkinos. 2014. “Students’ Big Three Personality Traits, Perceptions of Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour, and Mathematics Achievement: An Application of the Model of Reciprocal Causation.” Communication Education 63: 235–258. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.917688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalampous, K., C. M. Kokkinos, Ε. Apota, Α. Iliadou, Μ. Iosifidou, S. Moysidou, and E. Vriza. 2016. “Pre-Adolescents? Representations of Multiple Attachment Relationships: The Role of Perceived Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour.” Learning Environments Research 19: 63–86. doi:10.1007/s10984-015-9196-z.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. F., and M. A. A. Cox. 2001. Multidimensional Scaling. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., L. Goodchild, and P. Turner. 1996. “Integrated Qualitative and Quantitative Research: Epistemology, History, and Designs.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by J. Smart, 90–136. New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Créton, H., T. Wubbels, and H. Hooymayers. 1993. “A Systems Perspective on Classroom Communication.” In Do You Know What You Look like? Interpersonal Relationships in Education, edited by T. Wubbels and J. Levy, 1–12. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H. A. 2003. “Conceptualizing the Role and Influence of Student-Teacher Relationships on Children's Social and Cognitive Development.” Educational Psychologist 38: 207–234. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3804_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, M. L., and C. L. Skay. 1991. “Multidimensional Scaling and Factor Models of Test and Item Responses.” Psychological Bulletin 110: 551–556. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Duncan, T., and W. J. McKeachie. 2005. “The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.” Educational Psychologist 40: 117–128. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., and H. Kungäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62: 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., D. T. Wegener, R. C. MacCallum, and E. J. Strahan. 1999. “Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research.” Psychological Methods 4: 272–299. doi:10.1.1.372.4546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, E., and T. Smith. 1998. Adolescence: The Survival Guide for Parents and Teenagers. London: Dorling Kindersley.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. D., and B. J. Fraser. 1999. “Changes in Learning Environment During the Transition from Primary to Secondary School.” Learning Environments Research 1: 369–383.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., and J. Cresswell. 1998. “Actual and Ideal Principal Interpersonal Behaviour.” Learning Environments Research 1: 231–247. doi:10.1023/A:1009914102379.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. L., B. Waldrip, J. Dorman, and P. den Brok. 2007, April. Interpersonal Behaviour Styles of Science Teachers in Primary Education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1981. TOSRA: Test of Science-Related Attitudes Handbook. Hawthorn: The Australian Council for Educational Research Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1998. “Science Learning Environments: Assessments, Effects and Determinants.” In International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin, 527–561. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 2012. “Classroom Learning Environments: Retrospect, Context and Prospect.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin and C. J. McRobbie, 1191–1239. The Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., and H. J. Walberg. 2005. “Research on Teacher-Student Relationships and Learning Environments: Context, Retrospect and Prospect.” International Journal of Educational Research 43: 103–109. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• García-Bacete, F. J., P. Ferrà, M. I. Monjas, and G. Marande. 2014. “Teacher-Students Relationships in First and Second Grade Classrooms: An Adaptation of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction-Early Primary (QTI-EP).” Revista De Psicodidáctica 19: 2011–2031. doi:10.1387/RevPsicodidact.9081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, S. C., and B. J. Fraser. 1996. “Validation of an Elementary School Version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction.” Psychological Reports 79: 515–522. doi:10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, S. C., and B. J. Fraser. 1998. “Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour, Classroom Environment and Student Outcomes in Primary Mathematics in Singapore.” Learning Environments Research 1: 199–229.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, S. C., and B. J. Fraser. 2000. “Teacher Interpersonal Behavior and Elementary Students' Outcomes.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 14: 216–231. doi:10.1080/02568540009594765.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., and V. J. Caracelli. 1997. “Defining and Describing the Paradigm Issue in Mixed-Method Evaluation.” In Advances in Mixed-Method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms, edited by J. C. Greene and V. J. Caracelli, 5–17. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., and H. Fisher. 2011. “Teacher-Student Interactions in a Technology-Supported Science Classroom Environment in Relation to Selected Learner Outcomes: An Indian Study.” MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices 1: 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gurtman, M. B. 2009. “Exploring Personality with the Interpersonal Circumplex.” Social Psychology Compass 3: 601–619. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2099.00172.x.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, W., M. Russell, C. Gulek, and E. Fierros. 1998. “Drawing on Education: Using Student Drawings to Promote Middle School Improvement.” Schools in the Middle 7: 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, L. 1989. “Describing the Affective Domain: Saying What We Mean.” In Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving, edited by D. McLeod and V. Adams, 37–45. New York: Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-3614-6
   Google Scholar
• Heiser, W. J., and F. M. T. A. Busing. 2004. “Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding of Symmetric and Asymmetric Proximity Relations.” In The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, edited by D. Kaplan, 25–48. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hockley, M., and J. Harkin. 2000. “Communicating with Students with Learning Difficulties in Further Education.” Educational Action Research 8: 341–360. doi:10.1080/09650790000200121.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. L., and S. Strack. 2011. Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., M. Moerbeek, and R. van de Schoot. 2010. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. The Netherlands: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheson, G., and N. Sofroniou. 1999. The Multivariate Social Scientist. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857028075
   Google Scholar
• Kambell, J. P., M. D. Dunette, R. D. Arvey, and L. V. Hellervik. 1973. “The Development and Evaluation of Behaviourally Based Rating Scales.” Journal of Applied Psychology 57: 15–22. doi:10.1037/h0034185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, D. J. 1996. Contemporary Interpersonal Theory and Research. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., D. Fisher, and B. J. Fraser. 2000. “Classroom Environment and Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour in Secondary Science Classes in Korea.” Evaluation and Research in Education 14: 3–22. doi:10.1080/09500790008666958.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinos, C. M., K. Charalambous, and A. Davazoglou. 2009. “Interpersonal Teacher Behaviour in Primary School Classrooms: A Cross-Cultural Validation of a Greek Translation of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction.” Learning Environments Research 12: 101–114.10.1007/s10984-009-9056-9
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinos, C. M., K. Charalambous, and A. Davazoglou. 2010. “Primary School Teacher Interpersonal Behavior through the Lens of Students’ Eysenckian Personality Traits.” Social Psychology of Education 13: 331–349. doi:10.1007/s11218-009-9111-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R. 2003. Teacher-Student Interactions and Classroom Learning Environments in India. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer-Hayon, L., and T. Wubbels. 1993. “Supervisors’ Interpersonal Behavior and Student Teachers’ Satisfaction.” In Do You Know What You Look like?, edited by T. Wubbels and J. Levy, 123–135. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L. 2005. “Drawing from Teacher Effectiveness Research and Research into Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour to Establish a Teacher Evaluation System: A Study on the Use of Student Ratings to Evaluate Teacher Behaviour.” Journal of Classroom Interaction 40: 44–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, Q. C., A. F. Wong, and B. J. Fraser. 2005a. “Student Perceptions of Chemistry Laboratory Learning Environments, Student–Teacher Interactions and Attitudes in Secondary School Gifted Education Classes in Singapore.” Research in Science Education 35: 299–321. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-0093-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, Q. C., A. F. Wong, and B. J. Fraser. 2005b. “Teacher-Student Interaction and Gifted Students’ Attitudes toward Chemistry in Laboratory Classrooms in Singapore.” Journal of Classroom Interaction 40: 18–28. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-0093-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapointe, J., F. Legault, and S. Batiste. 2005. “Teacher Interpersonal Behavior and Adolescents? Motivation in Mathematics: A Comparison of Learning Disabled, Average, and Talented Students.” International Journal of Educational Research 43: 39–54.10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Leary, T. 1957. Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality. New York: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 1985. “Ideology, Intertextuality, and the Notion of Register.” In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, edited by J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves, 275–294. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mainhard, T. 2015. “Liking a Tough Teacher: Interpersonal Characteristics of Teaching and Students’ Achievement Goals.” School Psychology International 36: 559–574.10.1177/0143034315608235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, J. F., B. Stecher, and H. Borko. 2009. “Classroom Assessment Practices, Teacher Judgments, and Student Achievement in Mathematics: Evidence from the ECLS.” Educational Assessment 14: 78–102.10.1080/10627190903039429
   Google Scholar
• Maulana, R., M. C. J. L. Opdenakker, P. den Brok, and R. J. Bosker. 2012. “Teacher–Student Interpersonal Relationships in Indonesian Lower Secondary Education: Teacher and Student Perceptions.” Learning Environments Research 15: 251–271.10.1007/s10984-012-9113-7
   Google Scholar
• McGee, C., R. Ward, J. Gibbons, and A. Harlow. 2003. Transition to Secondary School: A Literature Review. a Report to the Ministry of Education. New Zealand: University of Waikato.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. 1992. “Research on Affect in Mathematics Education: Α Reconceptualization.” In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by D. Grows, 575–596. New York: McMillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. L., F. Lalonde, L. S. Clasen, J. N. Giedd, and S. J. Blakemore. 2014. “Developmental Changes in the Structure of the Social Brain in Late Childhood and Adolescence.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9: 123–131. doi:10.1093/scan/nss113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newberry, M., and H. A. Davis. 2008. “The Role of Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Closeness to Students on Their Differential Behaviour in the Classroom.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 1965–1985. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, D. G., J. M. Serovich, and T. L. Mason. 2005. “Constraints and Opportunities with Interview Transcription: Towards Reflection in Qualitative Research.” Social Forces 84: 1273–1289.10.1353/sof.2006.0023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and N. L. Leech. 2010. “Generalization Practices in Qualitative Research: A Mixed Methods Case Study.” Quality & Quantity 44: 881–892. doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9241-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M. C., R. Maulana, and P. den Brok. 2012. “Teacher–Student Interpersonal Relationships and Academic Motivation within One School Year: Developmental Changes and Linkage.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23: 95–119.10.1080/09243453.2011.619198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62: 307–332.10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passini, S., L. Molinari, and G. Speltini. 2015. “A Validation of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction in Italian Secondary School Students: The Effect of Positive Relations on Motivation and Academic Achievement.” Social Psychology of Education 18: 547–559. doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9300-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, H. J., M. Brekelmans, T. Wubbels, A. C. van der Want, L. C. Claessens, and J. van Tartwijk. 2014. “A Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Approach to Real-Time Teacher Behavior: Differences between Teachers.” Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 18: 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C. 2006. “Classroom Management and Relationships between Children and Teachers: Implications for Research and Practice.” In Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice and Contemporary Issues, edited by C. Evertson and C. S. Weinstein, 685–709. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., D. A. F. Smith, T. García, and W. J. McKeachie. 1991. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Poulou, M. 2014. “The Effects on Students’ Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties of Teacher–Student Interactions, Students’ Social Skills and Classroom Context.” British Educational Research Journal 40: 986–1004. doi:10.1002/berj.3131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulou, M. 2015. “Teacher-Student Relationships, Social and Emotional Skills, and Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties.” International Journal of Educational Psychology 4: 84–108. doi:10.4471/ijep.2015.04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quek, C. L., A. F. Wong, S. Divaharan, W. C. Liu, J. Peer, and M. D. Williams. 2007. “Secondary School Students’ Perceptions of Teacher–Student Interaction and Students’ Attitudes towards Project Work.” Learning Environments Research 10: 177–187. doi:10.1007/s10984-007-9030-3.
   Google Scholar
• Rawnsley, D. G., and D. L. Fisher. 1998, December. Learning Environments in Mathematics Classrooms and Their Associations with Students’ Attitudes and Learning. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rickards, T., and D. L. Fisher. 2000, April. Three Perspectives on Perceptions of Teacher-Student Interaction: A Seed for Change in Science Teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B. 1970. “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction.” Review of Educational Research 40: 279–300. doi:10.3102/00346543040002279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1991. “Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation.” Educational Psychologist 26: 201–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and F. Pajares. 2005. “Competence Perceptions and Academic Functioning.” In Handbook of Competence and Motivation, edited by A. J. Elliot and C. S. Dweck, 141–163. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. H., and D. L. Fisher. 2004. “Development, Validation and Application of a Malay Translation of an Elementary Version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction.” Research in Science Education 34: 173–194. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000033759.09807.50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, J. B. 2014. “A Mixed Methods Study of the Relationship between Student Perceptions of Teacher-Student Interactions and Motivation in Middle Level Science.” Research in Middle Level Education Online 38: 1–19. doi:10.1080/19404476.2014.11462117.
   Google Scholar
• Soerjaningsih, W., B. J. Fraser, and J. M. Aldridge. 2002, April. Instructor-Student Interpersonal Behavior and Student Outcomes at the University Level in Indonesia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L. 2005. “Cognitive and Affective Development in Adolescence.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 69–74.10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, S., and L. M. Horowitz. 2011. “Introduction.” In Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology: Theory, Research, Assessment, and Therapeutic Interventions, edited by L. M. Horowitz and S. Strack, 1–13. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Südkamp, A., J. Kaiser, and J. Möller. 2012. “Accuracy of Teachers’ Judgments of Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104: 743–762. doi:10.1037/a0027627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telli, S., P. den Brok, and J. Cakiroglu. 2007. “Students’ Perceptions of Science Teachers’ Interpersonal Behaviour in Secondary Schools: Development of a Turkish Version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction.” Learning Environments Research 10: 115–129. doi:10.1007/s10984-007-9023-2.
   Google Scholar
• Thijs, J., H. M. Y. Koomen, D. Roorda, and J. ten Hagen. 2011. “Explaining Teacher-Student Interactions in Early Childhood: An Interpersonal Theoretical Approach.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 32: 34–43. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2010.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. M. 2005. Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, M., P. den Brok, and Y. Zhou. 2009. “Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour and Student Achievement in English as a Foreign Language Classrooms in China.” Learning Environments Research 12: 157–174. doi:10.1007/s10984-009-9059-6.
   Google Scholar
• White, A. G. (2009). Ninth and Tenth Grade Students’ Mathematics Self-Efficacy Beliefs: The Sources and Relationship to Teacher Classroom Interpersonal Behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Alabama, Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Widaman, K. F. 1993. “Common Factor Analysis versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 28: 263–311. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., and M. Brekelmans. 2005. “Two Decades of Research on Teacher-Student Relationships in Class.” International Journal of Educational Research 43: 6–24. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., M. Brekelmans, P. den Brok, J. Levy, T. Mainhard, and J. Van Tartwijk. 2012. “Let’s Make Things Better.” In Interpersonal Relationships in Education: An Overview of Contemporary Research, edited by T. Wubbels, P. Den Brok, J. Van Tartwijk and J. Levy, 225–249. Rotterdam: SENSE Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-939-8
   Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., H. A. Créton, and H. P. Hooymayers. 1985. Discipline Problems of Beginning Teachers: Interactional Teacher Behaviour Mapped Out. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, March–April.
   Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., H. A. Créton, J. Levy, and H. Hooymayers. 1993. “The Model for Interpersonal Teacher Behavior.” In Do You Know What You Look like? Interpersonal Relationships in Education, edited by T. Wubbels and J. Levy, 13–28. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., and J. Levy. 1991. “A Comparison of Interpersonal Behavior of Dutch and American Teachers.” International Journal of Intercultural Relationships 15: 1–18. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(91)90070-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandvliet, D., P. den Brok, and T. Mainhard, eds. 2014. Interpersonal Relationships in Education: From Theory to Practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zijlstra, H., T. Wubbels, M. Brekelmans, and H. M. Koomen. 2013. “Child Perceptions of Teacher Interpersonal Behavior and Associations with Mathematics Achievement in Dutch Early Grade Classrooms.” The Elementary School Journal 113: 517–540. doi:10.1086/669618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar