Computer-based course evaluation: an extended technology acceptance model

References

• Almaiah, M. A., M. A. Jalil, and M. Man. 2016. “Extending the TAM to Examine the Effects of Quality Features on Mobile Learning Acceptance.” Journal of Computers in Education 3 (4): 453–485.10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asassfeh, S., H. Al-Ebous, F. Khwaileh, and Z. Al-Zoubi. 2014. “Student Faculty Evaluation (SFE) at Jordanian Universities: A Student Perspective.” Educational Studies 40 (2): 121–143.10.1080/03055698.2013.833084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, L. 2006. “Graduate Unemployment: Dilemmas and Challenges in China’s Move to Mass Higher Education.” The China Quarterly 185: 128–144.10.1017/S0305741006000087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calisir, F., C. Altin Gumussoy, and A. Bayram. 2009. “Predicting the Behavioral Intention to Use Enterprise Resource Planning Systems.” Management Research News 32 (7): 597–613.10.1108/01409170910965215
   Google Scholar
• Churchill Jr, G. A. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.” Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1): 64–73.10.2307/3150876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1985. “A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results.” PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340.10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1989. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.” Management Science 35 (8): 982–1003.10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, K. 2013. “What’s the Use of Rankings?” In Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses, edited by P. T. M. Marope, P. J. Wells, and E. Hazelkorn, 197–208. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dunegan, K. J., and M. W. Hrivnak. 2003. “Characteristics of Mindless Teaching Evaluations and the Moderating Effects of Image Compatibility.” Journal of Management Education 27 (3): 280–303.10.1177/1052562903027003002
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, D. 2014. “Expectancy Theory Outcomes and Student Evaluations of Teaching.” Educational Research and Evaluation 20 (7–8): 536–556.10.1080/13803611.2014.997138
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39–50.10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamliel, E., and L. Davidovitz. 2005. “Online versus Traditional Teaching Evaluation: Mode Can Matter.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (6): 581–592.10.1080/02602930500260647
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., and D. W. Straub. 1997. “Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model.” MIS Quarterly 21 (4): 389–400.10.2307/249720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., and D. W. Straub. 2000. “The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 1 (1): 8.
   Google Scholar
• Guri-Rosenblit, S., H. Šebková, and U. Teichler. 2007. “Massification and Diversity of Higher Education Systems: Interplay of Complex Dimensions.” Higher Education Policy 20 (4): 373–389.10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300158
   Google Scholar
• Hair Jr, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W., J. Y. L. Thong, W. M. Wong, and K. Y. Tam. 2002. “Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics.” Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (3): 97–124.10.1080/07421222.2002.11045692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaca, F., G. Can, and S. Yildirim. 2013. “Technology Utilisation in Elementary Schools in Turkey’s Capital: A Case Study.” Educational Studies 39 (5): 552–567.10.1080/03055698.2013.807726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M. 2005. “Higher Education in Scotland and England after Devolution.” Regional & Federal Studies 15 (4): 423–435.10.1080/13597560500230524
   Google Scholar
• King, W. R., and J. He. 2006. “A Meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information & Management 43 (6): 740–755.10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer, A. L., D. J. Maupin, M. P. Sena, and Y. Zhuang. 2000. “The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web.” Decision Support Systems 29 (3): 269–282.10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, H. M., and Z. Xu. 2005. “Issues in the Expansion of Higher Education in the People’s Republic of China.” China Review 5 (1): 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, B. J., and W. B. Chiou. 2010. “Undergraduates’ Intentions to Take a Second Language Proficiency Test: A Comparison of Predictions from the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Theory.” Psychological Reports 106 (3): 798–810.10.2466/pr0.106.3.798-810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangunić, N., and A. Granić. 2015. “Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review from 1986 to 2013.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14 (1): 81–95.10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, H. R., and N. G. Regstad. 1996. “Using Subjective Norms to Predict Teachers’ Computer Use.” Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 13 (1): 27–33.10.1080/10402454.1996.11008223
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K. 1991. “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Information Systems Research 2 (3): 173–191.10.1287/isre.2.3.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzolini, A., S. Daniel, and L. Mann. 2012. “A Comparison of on-Line and ‘in-Class’ Student Feedback Surveys: Some Unexpected Results.” In Profession of Engineering Education: Advancing Teaching, Research and Careers: The 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education 2012, 644. Australia: Engineers Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ngai, E. W., J. K. L. Poon, and Y. H. C. Chan. 2007. “Empirical Examination of the Adoption of WebCT Using TAM.” Computers & Education 48 (2): 250–267.10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. Y. 2009. “An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use E-Learning.” Educational Technology & Society 12 (3): 150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. Y., N. W. Nam, and S. B. Cha. 2012. “University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: Evaluating the Technology Acceptance Model.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (4): 592–605.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N., R. Roman, S. Lee, and J. E. Chung. 2009. “User Acceptance of a Digital Library System in Developing Countries: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model.” International Journal of Information Management 29 (3): 196–209.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikkarainen, T., K. Pikkarainen, H. Karjaluoto, and S. Pahnila. 2004. “Consumer Acceptance of Online Banking: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Internet Research 14 (3): 224–235.10.1108/10662240410542652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., and D. W. Organ. 1986. “Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects.” Journal of Management 12 (4): 531–544.10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauniar, R., G. Rawski, J. Yang, and B. Johnson. 2014. “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Social Media Usage: An Empirical Study on Facebook.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 27 (1): 6–30.10.1108/JEIM-04-2012-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawang, S., Y. Sun, and S. A. Salim. 2014. “It’s Not Only What I Think but What They Think! The Moderating Effect of Social Norms.” Computers & Education 76: 182–189.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. S. 2017. Business Ethics: An Ethical Decision-Making Approach. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118393390
   Google Scholar
• Stark, P. B., and R. Freishtat. 2014. “An Evaluation of Course Evaluations.” ScienceOpen Research 9: 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Telford, R., and R. Masson. 2005. “The Congruence of Quality Values in Higher Education.” Quality Assurance in Education 13 (2): 107–119.10.1108/09684880510594364
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. 2010a. “A Path Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitudes to Computer Use: Applying and Extending the Technology Acceptance Model in an Educational Context.” Interactive Learning Environments 18 (1): 65–79.10.1080/10494820802231327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. 2010b. “The Development, Validation, and Analysis of Measurement Invariance of the Technology Acceptance Measure for Preservice Teachers (TAMPST).” Educational and Psychological Measurement 70 (6): 990–1006.10.1177/0013164410378087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. 2011. “Factors Influencing Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology: Model Development and Test.” Computers & Education 57 (4): 2432–2440.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., C. B. Lee, and C. S. Chai. 2008. “Understanding Pre-Service Teachers Computer Attitudes: Applying and Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24 (2): 128–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., C. B. Lee, C. S. Chai, and S. L. Wong. 2009. “Assessing the Intention to Use Technology among Pre-Service Teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A Multigroup Invariance Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).” Computers & Education 53: 1000–1009.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2017. Gross Enrolment Ratio, Tertiary, Both Sexes (%). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.TER.ENRR
   Google Scholar
• To, W. M., L. S. L. Lai, J. W. Y. Lung, and T. M. Lai. 2014. “Intent to Pursue Further Studies among Chinese Students.” Educational Studies 40 (3): 292–309.10.1080/03055698.2014.889598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaira, M. 2004. “Globalization and Higher Education Organizational Change: A Framework for Analysis.” Higher Education 48 (4): 483–510.10.1023/B:HIGH.0000046711.31908.e5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 1996. “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test.” Decision Sciences 27 (3): 451–481.10.1111/deci.1996.27.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204.10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkwein, J. F. 2010. “The Assessment Context: Accreditation, Accountability, and Performance.” New Directions for Institutional Research 2010 (S1): 3–12.10.1002/ir.v2010.1s
   Google Scholar
• Wint, Z., and K. Downing. 2016. “Uses and Abuses of Ranking in University Strategic Planning.” In World University Rankings and the Future of Higher Education, edited by K. Downing and F. Jr. Ganotice, 232–251. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, K. T., T. Teo, and S. Russo. 2012. “Influence of Gender and Computer Teaching Efficacy on Computer Acceptance among Malaysian Student Teachers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 28 (7): 1190–1207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q., C. D. Chen, and J. L. Wang. 2016. “The Effects of Psychological Ownership and TAM on Social Media Loyalty: An Integrated Model.” Telematics and Informatics 33 (4): 959–972.10.1016/j.tele.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar