Exploring the impact of achievement goals orientation and study engagement on nursing students’ approaches to learning

References

• Asikainen, H., and D. Gijbels. 2017. “Do Students Develop Towards More Deep Approaches to Learning during Studies? A Systematic Review on the Development of Students’ Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning in Higher Education.” Educational Psychology Review 29 (2): 1–30. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., E. Kyndt, K. Struyven, and F. Dochy. 2010. “Using Student-Centred Learning Environments to Stimulate Deep Approaches to Learning: Factors Encouraging or Discouraging Their Effectiveness.” Educational Research Review 5: 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beccaria, L., M. Kek, H. Huijser, J. Rose, and L. Kimmins. 2014. “The Interrelationships between Student Approaches to Learning and Group Work.” Nurse Education Today 34: 1094–1103. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., D. Kember, and D. Y. P. Leung. 2001. “The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 133–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. 2016. “Engagement as an Inherent Aspect of the Learning Process.” Learning and Instruction 43: 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard, T., and N. Couture. 2003. “Motivational Profile and Academic Achievement among Students Enrolled in Different Schooling Tracks.” Educational Studies 29 (1): 19–38. doi:10.1080/03055690303270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., D. Smith, G. Boulton-Lewis, J. C. Brownlee, P. C. Burnett, S. Carrington, and N. Purdie. 2001. “Studentsʼ Perceptions of Teaching and Learning: The Influence of Studentsʼ Approaches to Learning and Teachersʼ Approaches to Teaching.” Teachers and Teaching 7 (2): 173–187. doi:10.1080/13540600120054964.
   Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., and A. Furnham. 2008. “Personality, Intelligence and Approaches to Learning as Predictors of Academic Performance.” Personality and Individual Differences 44: 1596–1603. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H., K. Hillman, D. Jackson, L. Tan, A. Daws, D. Rainsford, and M. Murphy. 2008. “Attracting, Engaging and Retaining: New Conversations about Learning.” Australasian Student Engagement Report (AUSSE). Camberwell: ACER. http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=ausse.
   Google Scholar
• Deemer, E. D., A. P. Carter, and M. T. Lobrano. 2010. “Extending the 2 × 2 Achievement Goal Framework: Development of a Measure of Scientific Achievement Goals.” Journal of Career Assessment 18 (4): 376–392. doi:10.1177/1069072710374575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, A. 2011. “Self-Efficacy, Goal Orientations and Learning Strategies as Mediators between Preceding and Subsequent Academic Achievement.” Learning and Individual Differences 21: 191–195. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, A., and Ø. Martinsen. 2003. “Approaches to Learning, Cognitive Style, and Motives as Predictors of Academic Achievement.” Educational Psychology 23 (2): 195–207. doi:10.1080/01443410303225.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A., E. Boyle, K. Dunleavy, and J. Ferguson. 2004. “The Relationship between Personality, Approach to Learning and Academic Performance.” Personality and Individual Differences 36: 1907–1920. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupeyrat, C., and C. Mariné. 2005. “Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Goal Orientation, Cognitive Engagement, and Achievement: A Test of Dweck’s Model with Returning to School Adults.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 30: 43–59. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durán, A., N. Extremera, L. Rey, P. Fernández-Berrocal, and F. M. Montalbán. 2006. “Predicting Academic Burnout and Engagement in Educational Settings: Assessing the Incremental Validity of Perceived Emotional Intelligence beyond Perceived Stress and General Self-Efficacy.” Psicothema 18: 158–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A., and H. A. McGregor. 2001. “A 2 × 2 Achievement Goal Framework.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80: 501–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J. 1999. “Approach and Avoidance Motivation and Achievement Goals.” Educational Psychologist 34 (3): 169–189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley, A.-M., and D. L. Biggerstaff. 2015. “Exam Success at Undergraduate and Graduate-Entry Medical Schools: Is Learning Style or Learning Approach More Important? A Critical Review Exploring Links between Academic Success, Learning Styles, and Learning Approaches among School-Leaver Entry (“Traditional”) and Graduate-Entry (“Nontraditional”) Medical Students.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 27 (3): 237–244. doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1046734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., J. Monsen, and G. Ahmetoglu. 2009. “Typical Intellectual Engagement, Big Five Personality Traits, Approaches to Learning and Cognitive Ability Predictors of Academic Performance.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 769–782. doi:10.1348/978185409X412147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., A. M. Durik, K. E. Barron, L. Linnenbrink-Garcia, and J. M. Tauer. 2008. “The Role of Achievement Goals in the Development of Interest: Reciprocal Relations between Achievement Goals, Interest, and Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 100 (1): 105–122. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbour, K. E., L. L. Evanovich, C. A. Sweigart, and L. E. Hughes. 2015. “A Brief Review of Effective Teaching Practices that Maximize Student Engagement.” Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 59 (1): 5–13. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockings, C., S. Cooke, H. Yamashita, S. McGinty, and M. Bowl. 2008. “Switched Off? A Study of Disengagement among Computing Students at Two Universities.” Research Papers in Education 23 (2): 191–201. doi:10.1080/02671520802048729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., M. Hayes, I. Solomonides, and M. Swannell. 2001. “Changes in Student Nurses’ Approaches to Studying.” Journal of Research in Nursing 6 (6): 921–934. doi:10.1177/136140960100600607.
   Google Scholar
• Howie, P., and R. Bagnall. 2013. “A Critique of the Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning Model.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (4): 389–400. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.733689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., D. Y. P. Leung, and C. McNaught. 2008. “A Workshop Activity to Demonstrate that Approaches to Learning are Influenced by the Teaching and Learning Environment.” Active Learning in Higher Education 9 (1): 43–56. doi:10.1177/1469787407086745.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Q., D. M. McInerney, G. A. D. Liem, and Y. P. Ortiga. 2010. “The Relationship between Future Goals and Achievement Goal Orientations: An Intrinsic–Extrinsic Motivation Perspective.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 35 (4): 264–279. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, D. Y., and D. Kember. 2003. “The Relationship between Approaches to Learning and Reflection upon Practice.” Educational Psychology 23 (1): 61–71. doi:10.1080/01443410303221.
   Google Scholar
• Mäenpää, K., K. Pyhältö, H. Järvenoja, and J. Peltonen. 2017. “Nursing Students’ Motivation Regulation and Its Relationship with Engagement and Burnout.” Nordic Journal of Nursing Research 21: 143–150. doi:10.1177/2057158517731719.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 2005. “Approach to Learning.” In The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education, edited by F. Marton, D. Hounsell, and N. Entwistle, 39–58. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Martyn, J., R. Terwijn, M. Y. Kek, and H. Huijser. 2014. “Exploring the Relationships between Teaching, Approaches to Learning and Critical Thinking in a Problem-Based Learning Foundation Nursing Course.” Nurse Education Today 34: 829–835. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, L., W. Lens, M. Vansteenkiste, and A. Mouratidis. 2017. “Optimal Motivation in Peruvian High Schools: Should Learners Pursue and Teachers Promote Mastery Goals, Performance-Approach Goals or Both?” Learning and Individual Differences 55: 87–96. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhuis, J. F. H., M. S. R. Segers, and W. H. Gijselaers. 2005. “Influence of Redesigning a Learning Environment on Student Perceptions and Learning Strategies.” Learning Environments Research 8: 67–93. doi:10.1007/s10984-005-7950-3.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., A. M. Conley, and T. M. Kempler. 2003. “Current Issues in Achievement Goal Theory and Research.” International Journal of Educational Research 39: 319–337. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Ranellucci, L., N. C. Hall, and T. Goetz. 2015. “Achievement Goals, Emotions, Learning, and Performance: A Process Model.” Motivation Science 1 (2): 98–120. doi:10.1037/mot000001.
   Google Scholar
• Rochmawati, E., G. R. Rahayu, and A. Kumara. 2014. “Educational Environment and Approaches to Learning of Undergraduate Nursing Students in an Indonesian School of Nursing.” Nurse Education in Practice 14: 729–733. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2014.08.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamonson, Y., R. Weaver, S. Chang, J. Koch, R. Bhathal, C. Khoo, and I. Wilson. 2013. “Learning Approaches as Predictors of Academic Performance in First Year Health and Science Students.” Nurse Education Today 33: 729–733. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., W. B. Schaufeli, I. Martínez, and E. Bresó. 2010. “How Obstacles and Facilitators Predict Academic Performance: The Mediating Role of Study Burnout and Engagement.” Anxiety, Stress, & Coping 23 (1): 53–70. doi:10.1080/10615800802609965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmela-Aro, K., J. Moeller, B. Schneider, J. Spicer, and J. Lavonen. 2016. “Integrating the Light and Dark Sides of Student Engagement Using Person-Oriented and Situation-Specific Approaches.” Learning and Instruction 43: 61–70. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., I. M. Martínez, A. M. Pinto, M. Salanova, and A. B. Bakker. 2002. “Burnout and Engagement in University Students. A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 33 (5): 464–481. doi:10.1177/0022022102033005003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senko, C., H. Hama, and K. Belmonte. 2013. “Achievement Goals, Study Strategies, and Achievement: A Test of the ‘Learning Agenda’ Framework.” Learning and Individual Differences 24: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, J., S. Dewitte, and W. Lens. 2004. “The Role of Different Types of Instrumentality in Motivation, Study Strategies, and Performance: Know Why You Learn, so You’ll Know What You Learn!” British Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 343–360. doi:10.1348/0007099041552314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snelgrove, S. R. 2004. “Approaches to Learning of Student Nurses.” Nurse Education Today 24: 605–614. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2004.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparfeldt, J. R., N. Brunnemann, L. Wirthwein, S. R. Buch, J. Schult, and D. H. Rost. 2015. “General versus Specific Achievement Goals: A Re-Examination.” Learning and Individual Differences 43: 170–177. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadyaya, K., and K. Salmela-Aro. 2013. “Development of School Engagement in Association with Academic Success and Well-Being in Varying Social Context. A Review of Empirical Research.” European Psychologist 18 (2): 136–147. doi:10.1027//1016-9040/a000143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., and C. Giancarlo. 2001. “A Comparison of Motivational and Critical Thinking Orientations across Ethnic Groups.” In Research on Sociocultural Influences on Motivation and Learning, edited by D. M. McInerney and S. V. Etten, 37–60. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• van Beek, I., I. C. Kranenburg, T. W. Taris, and W. B. Schaufeli. 2013. “BIS- and BAS-activation and Study Outcomes: A Mediation Study.” Personality and Individual Differences 55: 474–479. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varunki, M., N. Katajavuori, and L. Postareff. 2017. “First-Year Students’ Approaches to Learning, and Factors Related to Change or Stability in Their Deep Approach during a Pharmacy Course.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (2): 331–353. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1049140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., and J. Fowler. 2005. “Assessing the Impact of Learning Environments on Students’ Approaches to Learning: Comparing Conventional and Action Learning Designs.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (1): 87–101. doi:10.1080/0260293042000251770.
   Google Scholar
• Yardimci, F., M. Bektaş, N. Özkütük, G. K. Muslu, G. Ö. Gerçeker, and Z. Başbakkal. 2017. “A Study of the Relationship between the Study Process, Motivation Resources, and Motivation Problems of Nursing Students in Different Educational Systems.” Nurse Education Today 48: 13–18. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Y. Gan, and H. Cham. 2007. “Perfectionism, Academic Burnout and Engagement among Chinese College Students: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis.” Personality and Individual Differences 43: 1529–1540. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong, X., L. Zhang, and M. Yao. 2017. “Parental Involvement and Chinese Elementary Students’ Achievement Goals: The Moderating Role of Parenting Style.” Educational Studies 44 (3): 341–356. doi:10.1080/03055698.2017.1373634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar