“You must learn something during a lesson”: how primary students construct meaning from teacher feedback

References

• Alderson, P., and V. Morrow. 2011. The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People: A Practical Handbook. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boistrup, L. B. 2017. “Assessment in Mathematics Education: A Gatekeeping Dispositive.” In The Disorder of Mathematics Education – Challenging the Socio-Political Dimensions of Research, edited by H. Straehler-Pohl, N. Bohlmann, and A. Pais, 209–230. Dortrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, P. C., and V. Mandel. 2010. “Praise and Feedback in the Primary Classroom: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives.” Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology 10: 145–154. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ906941.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Charon, J. M. 2009. Symbolic Interactionism: An Introduction, an Interpretation, an Integration. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, I. 1999. Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., L. B. Boistrup, and R. Thornberg. 2017. “A Categorisation of Teacher Feedback in the Classroom: A Field Study on Feedback Based on Routine Classroom Assessment in Primary School.” Research Papers in Education 32 (3): 316–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1225787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., and M. Waring. 2011. “Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Feedback in Relation to Cognitive Styles and Culture.” Research Papers in Education 26 (2): 171–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.561976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., and K. Smith. 2013. “Student Perceptions of Classroom Feedback.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 20 (2): 150–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212.
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, C., and P. Tunstall. 1998. “Effort, Ability and the Teacher: Young Children’s Explanations for Success and Failure.” Oxford Review of Education 24 (2): 149–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498980240201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, N.J.: Aldine Transaction (a division of Transaction Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. 2013. “Inquiring into Children’s Experiences of Teacher Feedback: Reconceptualising Assessment for Learning.” Oxford Review of Education 39 (2): 229–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.787922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., G. T. L. Brown, and J. A. Harnett. 2014. “Understanding Classroom Feedback Practices: A Study of New Zealand Student Experiences, Perceptions, and Emotional Responses.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 26 (2): 107–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, S. D. 2000. “Using Focus Group Methods with Middle School Children.” Research in Nursing & Health 23: 510–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x(200012)23:6<510::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-l.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. 1968. Life in Classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. 2009. “A Pluralist View of Generalization in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 32 (1): 25–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902759931.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. 2001. Childhood and Society: Growing up in an Age of Uncertainty. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., and J. K. Smith. 2009. “‘I Really Need Feedback to Learn:”’ Students’ Perspectives on the Effectiveness of the Differential Feedback Messages.’.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (4): 347–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9082-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayall, B. 2002. Towards a Sociology for Childhood – Thinking from Children’s Lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayall, B. 2008. “Conversations with Children: Working with Generational Issues.” In Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, edited by P. Christensen and A. James, 109–127. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, L. 2014. “The Motivational Paradox of Feedback: Teacher and Student Perceptions.” The Curriculum Journal 25 (4): 526–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.944197.
   Google Scholar
• Närvänen, A.-L., and E. Näsman. 2004. “Childhood as Generation or Life Phase?” Young 12 (1): 71–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308804039637.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, .
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. R., and S. Earl Irving. 2008. “Secondary School Students’ Conceptions of Assessment and Feedback.” Learning and Instruction 18 (3): 238–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., and M. Li. 2013. “Examining Formative Feedback in the Classroom Context: New Research Perspectives.” In SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment, edited by J. H. McMillan, 215–232. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1998. “Formative Assessment: Revisiting the Territory.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 77–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050104.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. I., and D. S. Thomas. 1928. The Child in America: Behaviour Problems and Programs. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R. 2007. “Inconsistencies in Everyday Patterns of School Rules.” Ethnography and Education 2 (3): 401–416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457820701547609.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R. 2008. “School Children’s Reasoning about School Rules.” Research Papers in Education 23 (1): 37–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701651029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R. 2012. “Informed Grounded Theory.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 56 (3): 243–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.581686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., and J. Pryor. 1998. Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, P., and C. Gipps. 1996. “‘How Does Your Teacher Help You Make Your Work Better?’ Children’s Understanding of Formative Assessment.” Curriculum Journal 7 (2): 185–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517960070205.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, E. 1983. “Hiding the Hidden Curriculum.” In The Hidden Curriculum and Moral Education: Deception or Discovery? edited by H. A. Giroux and D. E. Purpel, 9–27. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. A. 2010. “‘You Know What You’ve Done Right and What You’ve Done Wrong and What You Need to Improve On’: New Zealand Students’ Perspectives on Feedback.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17 (3): 301–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.496249.
   Google Scholar