Favouritism behaviours of school principals: teachers’ perceptions on the causes and consequences of favouritism in Turkey

References

• Adams, J. S. 1965. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz, 267–299. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akan, D., and M. Zengin. 2018. “Okul Yöneticilerinin Kayirmaci Tutum Ve Davranişlari Ile Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Güven Algilari Arasindaki Ilişki [The Relationship between School Administrators and Teachers’ Organizational Trust Perceptions].” Route Educational and Social Science Journal 5 (5): 334–345. doi:10.17121/ressjournal.1142.
   Google Scholar
• Akuffo, I. N., and K. Kivipõld. 2021. “Authentic Leadership Competences and Positional Favouritsim: Impact on Positive and Negative Organisational Effectiveness.” International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences 14 (1): 81–104. doi:10.1504/IJADS.2021.112927.
   Google Scholar
• Alwerthan, T. A., D. P. Swanson, and R. D. Rogge. 2018. “It’s Better to Give than to Receive: Psychological Need Satisfaction Mediating Links between Wasta (Favouritism) and Individuals’ Psychological Distress.” International Journal of Psychology 53 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1002/ijop.12419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Araslı, H., H. E. Arici, and N. Çakmakoğlu-Arici. 2019. “Workplace Favouritism, Psychological Contract Violation and Turnover Intention: Moderating Roles of Authentic Leadership and Job Insecurity Climate.” German Journal of Human Resource Management 33 (3): 197–222. doi:10.1177/2397002219839896.
   Google Scholar
• Araslı, H., and M. Tümer. 2008. “Nepotism, Favoritism and Cronyism: A Study of Their Effects on Job Stress and Job Satisfaction in the Banking Industry of North Cyprus.” Social Behavior and Personality 36 (9): 1237–1250. doi:10.2224/sbp.2008.36.9.1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argon, T. 2016. “Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Ilkokullarda Yöneticilerin Kayirmacilik Davranişlari [Favouritism Behaviours of Primary School Managers from Teachers’ Point of View].” Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 24 (1): 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Arya, A., and J. Glover. 2003. “Real Options, Conflicting Valuations, and Favoritism.” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 3 (1): 1–10. doi:10.2202/1538-0653.1177.
   Google Scholar
• Aydoğan, İ. 2009. “Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage.” Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 4 (1): 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Aytaç, Ö. 2010. “Kayırmacı Ilişkilerin Sosyolojik Temeli [Sociological Basis of Favouritism Relations].” In Yönetim Ve Örgüt Açısından Kayırmacılık [Favouritism Behaviour in Terms of Organization and Management], edited by R. Erdem, 3–26. İstanbul, Turkey: Beta.
   Google Scholar
• Baş, G., and C. Şentürk. 2011. “Ilköğretim Okulu Öğretmenlerinin Örgütsel Adalet, Örgütsel Vatandaşlik Ve Örgütsel Güven Algilari [Elementary School Teachers’ Perceptions of Organisational Justice, Organizational Citizenship Behaviours and Organisational Trust].” Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi [Educational Administration: Theory and Practice] 17 (1): 29–62.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, K., and J. McCormick. 2004. “Leadership and Individual Principal-Teacher Relationships in Schools.” Educational Administration Quarterly 40 (3): 406–434. doi:10.1177/0013161X03261742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baydar, T. 2004. “Yönetim Etiği Açısından Ingiltere’deki Kamu Yönetimi Uygulamaları [The Practice of Management Ethics in England]”. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Ankara University, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Begley, T. M., N. Khatri., and E. W. K. Tsang. 2010. “Networks and Cronyism: A Social Exchange Analysis.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 27 (2): 281–297. doi:10.1007/s10490-009-9137-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., and W. H. Turnley. 2009. “Relative Deprivation among Employees in Lower-quality Leader-member Exchange Relationships.” Leadership Quarterly 20: 276–286. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursalıoğlu, Z. 2010. Eğitim Yönetiminde Teori Ve Uygulama [Theory and Practice in Educational Administration]. 9th ed. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem.
   Google Scholar
• Büte, M. 2011. “Kayirmaciliğin Çalişan Davranişlari Ve Insan Kaynaklari Yönetimi Uygulamalari Üzerine Etkileri: Türk Kamu Bankalarina Yönelik Bir Araştirma [The Relationship between the Effects of Nepotism on the Employees and Human Resource Practices: A Research on Turkish Public Banks].” Amme İdaresi Dergisi 44 (1): 135–153.
   Google Scholar
• Caroline, U. N. 2015. “Absenteeism, Favouritism, and Tardiness as Predictors of Job Deviance in Academia: The Nigeria Experience.” Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 1 (2): 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Clabaugh, G. K. 2009. “Teacher Merit Pay: Is It a Good Idea?” Educational Horizons 88 (1): 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dağlı, A., and Z. Akyol. 2019. “The Relationship between Favouritism Behaviours of Secondary School Administrators and Organizational Commitment of the Teachers.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 7 (7): 35–49. doi:10.11114/jets.v7i7.4191.
   Google Scholar
• Dansereau, F., G. Graen, and W. J. Haga. 1975. “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13: 46–78. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Los Santos, J. A. A., R. A. Rosales, C. C. Falguera, C. N. Firmo, K. Tsaras, and L. J. Labrague. 2020. “Impact of Organizational Silence and Favoritism on Nurse’s Work Outcomes and Psychological Well‐being.” Nursing Forum 1–11. doi:10.1111/nuf.12496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulebohn, J. H., W. H. Bommer, R. C. Liden, R. L. Brouer, and G. R. Ferris. 2012. “A Meta-analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-member Exchange: Integrating the past with an Eye toward the Future.” Journal of Management 38 (6): 1715–1759. doi:10.1177/0149206311415280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekmekçi, M. 2014. “Değişim Mühendisliği, Nepotizm Ve Mobbingin Çalışan Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi [Reengineering, Nepotism and Mobbing Impact on Employee Performance]”. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Beykent University, İstanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, M., T. Aytaç, and T. Gönül. 2020. “The Relationship between Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Cynicism and School Administrators’ Behaviours of Favouritism.” European Journal of Education Studies 7 (6): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, R. 2010. “Kayırmacılık/Ayrımcılık [Favouritism/Discrimination].” In Yönetim Ve Örgüt Açısından Kayırmacılık [Favouritism Behaviour in Terms of Organization and Management], edited by R. Erdem, 10–45. İstanbul, Turkey: Beta.
   Google Scholar
• Ersoy, A. F. 2019. “Fenomenoloji [Phenomenology].” In Eğitimde Nitel Araştırma Desenleri (3. Baskı) [Qualitative Research Design in Educational Research], edited by A. Saban and A. Ersoy, 81–138. 3nd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Anı.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstner, C. R., and D. V. Day. 1997. “Meta-analytic Review of Leader-member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues.” Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (6): 827–844. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., and M. Uhl-Bien. 1995. “Relationship-based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-level Multi-domain Perspective.” The Leadership Quarterly 6 (2): 219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günel, R. 2005. “Aile Işletmelerinde Yönetimin Bir Sonraki Kuşağa Devrinde Karşılaşılan Sorunların Tespitine Ve Bu Sorunların Çözümüne Ilişkin Bir Araştırma [A Research Related to Determination of the Problems Faced in the Term of Succession Process of Management to the Next Generation in Family Business; and Solutions of These Problems]”. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiung, H. H., and M. C. Bolino. 2018. “The Implications of Perceived Leader Favouritism in the Context of Leader-member Exchange Relationships.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 27 (1): 88–99. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2017.1395414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karacaoğlu, K., and D. Yörük. 2012. “Çalışanların Nepotizm Ve Örgütsel Adalet Algilamalari: Orta Anadolu Bölgesinde Bir Aile Işletmesi Uygulamasi [Workers’ Nepotism and Their Organizational Justice Perceptions: Application of a Family Business in Central Anatolian Region].” Iş, Güç Endüstri Ilişkileri Ve Insan Kaynakları Dergisi 14 (3): 43–64. doi:10.4026/1303-2860.2012.0205.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kayabaşı, Y. 2005. “Politik Yozlaşmaya Çözüm Olarak Anayasal Iktisat [Constitutional Economics as a Solution to the Political Degeneration]”. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Khatri, N., E. W. Tsang, and T. M. Begley. 2006. “Cronyism: A Cross-cultural Analysis.” Journal of International Business Studies 37 (1): 61–75. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, I. 2006. “Endogenous Favoritism in Organizations.” The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 6 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Landrum-Jackson, E. 2020. “A Correlational Study of Perceptions of Favoritism, Job Satisfaction, and Job Attendance”. Unpublished dissertation, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 2012. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meriç, E., and M. Erdem. 2013. “Ilköğretim Okullarinda Görev Yapan Öğretmenlerin Algilarina Göre Okul Yönetiminde Kayirmacilik [According to the Perceptions of Primary School Teachers Favoritism on School Management].” Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi [Educational Administration: Theory and Practice] 19 (3): 467–498.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. 2014. “What Is a Principal’s Quality Mark? Issues and Challenges in Leadership Progression among Primary Teachers in Jamaica.” Research in Comparative and International Education 9 (1): 126–136. doi:10.2304/rcie.2014.9.1.126.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education - MoNE. 2020. “National Education Statistics 2019/’20”. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_09/04144812_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2019_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette, 2014. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Okul Öncesi Eğitim ve İlköğretim Kurumları Yönetmeliği, Sayı: 29072 [Ministry of National Education Pre-School and Primary Education Institutions Regulation, Number: 29072]. Accessed 18 March 2021. http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/1703.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette, 2021. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına Bağlı Eğitim Kurumlarına Yönetici Seçme ve Görevlendirme Yönetmeliği, Sayı: 31386 [Regulation on Selection and Assignment of Principals to Educational Institutions Affiliated to the MoNE, Number: 31386]. Accessed 18 March 2021. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2021/02/20210205-1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Othman, R., F. F. Ee, and N. L. Shi. 2010. “Understanding Dysfunctional Leader‐member Exchange: Antecedents and Outcomes.” Leadership & Organization Development Journal 31 (4): 337–350. doi:10.1108/01437731011043357.
   Google Scholar
• Özsemerci, K. 2002. Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Yolsuzluklar Nedenleri Zararları Ve Çözüm Önerileri [Corruptions in Turkish Public Administration: Causes, Damages and Solutions]. Ankara, Turkey: TC. Sayıştay Başkanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Özgan, H., and F. Bozbayındır. 2011. “Okullarda Adil Olmayan Uygulamalar Ve Etkileri [Unfair Applications and Their Effects in Schools].” Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 16: 66–85.
   Google Scholar
• Özkanan, A., and R. Erdem. 2014. “Yönetimde Kayirmaci Uygulamalar: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve [Favoritism Applications in Management: A Conceptual Framework].” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2 (20): 179–206.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. L. 2015. “Cronyism and Nepotism are Bad for Everyone: The Research Evidence.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology 8 (1): 41–44. doi:10.1017/iop.2014.10.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. L., I. Branyczki, and G. A. Bakacsi. 1994. “Person-based Reward Systems.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 15 (3): 261–282. doi:10.1002/job.4030150307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, G. 2012. “Örgütlerde Nepotizmin Örgütsel Adalet Algısı Ile Ilişkisinin Tespitine Yönelik Bir Araştırma [A Research on the Relationship between Nepotism in Organizations and Employee’s Organizational Justice Perception]”. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Dumlupınar University, Kütahya, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, S., and E. Kazak. 2014. “Okul Yöneticilerinin Kayirmaci Tutum Ve Davranişlari Ile Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Adalet Algilari Arasindaki Ilişki [The Correlation between School Principals’ Favoritist Behaviors and Attitudes and Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice].” Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi [Educational Administration: Theory and Practice] 20 (1): 71–92. doi:10.14527/kuey.2014.004.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzo, M., and V. Scoppa. 2010. “The Use of Informal Networks in Italy: Efficiency or Favoritism?” The Journal of Socio-Economics 39 (1): 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.07.007.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, C., and R. H. Topel. 1996. “Favoritism in Organizations.” Journal of Political Economy 104 (5): 958–978. doi:10.1086/262048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, M. H., and F. C. Roy. 2004. “An Empirical Analysis of Favoritism during Business Training.” Industrial and Commercial Training 36 (6): 238–242. doi:10.1108/00197850410556676.
   Google Scholar
• Scandura, T. A. 1999. “Rethinking Leader-member Exchange: An Organizational Justice Perspective.” The Leadership Quarterly 10 (1): 25–40. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)80007-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., S. Bashir, and A. K. Khan. 2017. “Examining Organizational Cronyism as an Antecedent of Workplace Deviance in Public Sector Organizations.” Public Personnel Management 46 (3): 308–323. doi:10.1177/0091026017716655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabancalı, E. 2018. “Nepotism in Primary Schools.” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 10 (2): 162–175. doi:10.15345/iojes.2018.02.011.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. 1974. “Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour.” Social Science Information 13 (2): 65–93. doi:10.1177/053901847401300204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In Organizational Identity: A Reader, edited by M. J. Hatch and M. Schultz, 56–65. Oxford, U.K: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toytok, E. H., and A. Uçar. 2018. “The Effect of Administrators’ Behaviors that Involves Favoritism on Organizational Opposition.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 6 (3a): 68–77. doi:10.11114/jets.v6i3a.3160.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, E. 2014. Kamu yönetiminde yolsuzluk olgusu, rapor no. 13 [Corruption phenomenon in public administration, report no: 13]. Ankara, Turkey: Türk Akademisi Siyasi Sosyal Stratejik Araştırmalar Vakfı (TASAV). https://www.tasav.org/media/k2/attachments/bf_rapor_no.13_yolsuzluk_olgusu_erol_turan_son_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turhan, M. 2014. “Organizational Cronyism: A Scale Development and Validation from the Perspective of Teachers.” Journal of Business Ethics 123 (2): 295–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Breukelen, W., B. Schyns, and P. Le Blanc. 2006. “Leader-member Exchange Theory and Research: Accomplishments and Future Challenges.” Leadership 2 (3): 295–316. doi:10.1177/1742715006066023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, A., and H. Şimşek. 2013. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences]. Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin.
   Google Scholar
• Zorlu, M., and S. İ. Çalım. 2012. “Işyerinde Damgalama Ve Ayrimcilik Faktörü Olarak Hiv/Aids [Hiv/aids as Stigmatization and Discrimination Factors in Workplaces].” Çalışma Ve Toplum 35 (4): 165–188.
   Google Scholar