Gender differences in teacher feedback and students’ self-regulated learning

References

• Atlas, G. D., T. Taggart, and D. J. Goodell. 2004. “The Effects of Sensitivity to Criticism on Motivation and Performance in Music Students.” British Journal of Music Education 21 (1): 81–87. doi:10.1017/S0265051703005540.
   Google Scholar
• Author. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Author. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Author. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. 2005. “Developmental Differences in Metacognition: Implications for Metacognitively Oriented Reading Instruction.” In Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development, edited by S. E. Israel, 61–79. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2011. “Social Cognitive Theory.” Handbook of Social Psychological Theories 2012: 349–373.
   Google Scholar
• Bidjerano, T. 2005. Gender Differences in Self-Regulated Learning. Paper presented at the 36th /2005 Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Kerhonkson, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education 5: 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., and W. L. Poon. 2015. “Self-regulated Learning Strategies & Academic Achievement in Online Higher Education Learning Environments: A Systematic Review.” The Internet and Higher Education 27: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, M., N. Barned, and B. Otumfuor. 2016. “Peers Influence Mathematics Strategy Use in Early Elementary School.” International Journal of Educational Psychology 5 (1): 27–55. doi:10.17583/ijep.2016.1861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A., and N. B. Gaubatz. 2000. “Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching?.” The Journal of Higher Education 71 (1): 17–33. doi:10.1080/00221546.2000.11780814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. 2007. “Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling 14 (3): 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, I. 2012. “Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 24 (2): 205–249. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, G. R., C. Wang, and D. Berthelsen. 2016. “Early School-based Parent Involvement, Children’s Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Australian Longitudinal Study.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 36: 168–177. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D. L. 2017. “Examining the Ontological and Epistemic Assumptions of Research on Metacognition, Self-regulation and Self-regulated Learning.” Educational Psychology 37 (9): 1125–1153. doi:10.1080/01443410.2017.1333575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and E. Ushioda. 2013. Teaching and Researching: Motivation. Edinburgh: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Droe, K. L. 2013. Effect of verbal praise on achievement goal orientation, motivation, and performance attribution. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 23(1),63-78. doi:10.1177/1057083712458592.
   Google Scholar
• Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, B., and J. Metcalfe. 2010. “Scaffolding Feedback to Maximize Long-term Error Correction.” Memory & Cognition 38 (7): 951–961. doi:10.3758/MC.38.7.951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. 1979. “Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive–developmental Inquiry.” American Psychologist 34 (10): 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuligni, A. J., and W. Zhang. 2004. “Attitudes toward Family Obligation among Adolescents in Contemporary Urban and Rural China.” Child Development 75 (1): 180–192. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00662.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., C. M. Bolick, W. P. Jackson, A. M. Caprino, C. Oswald, and M. McVea. 2015. “Domain-specificity of Self-regulated Learning Processing in Science and History.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 42: 111–128. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, M., and D. Mehtani. 2017. “Type of School, Locality and Gender as Determinants of Self-regulated Learning among Students: An Empirical Study.” International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences 7: 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, M. 2014. “Arts versus science—Academic Background Implicitly Activates Gender Stereotypes on Cognitive Abilities with Threat Raising Men’s (But Lowering Women’s) Performance.” Intelligence 46: 235–245. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.07.0040160-2896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderlong, J., and M. R. Lepper. 2002. “The Effects of Praise on Children’s Intrinsic Motivation: A Review and Synthesis.” Psychological Bulletin 128 (5): 774. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.5.774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, E., and Y. Peng. 2008. “Do Chinese Students’ Perceptions of Test Value Affect Test Performance? Mediating Role of Motivational and Metacognitive Regulation in Test Preparation.” Learning and Instruction 18 (6): 499–512. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong-Nam, K. & Leavell, A.G. 2006. Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context, System, 34(3), 399–415. doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Hornstra, L., I. van der Veen, and T. Peetsma. 2016. “Domain-specificity of Motivation: A Longitudinal Study in Upper Primary School.” Learning and Individual Differences 51: 167–178. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. 2013. “Gender Differences in Academic Self-efficacy: A Meta-analysis.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 28 (1): 1–35. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., and J. Wheatley. 1990. “Gender Differences in Teacher-student Interactions in Science Classrooms.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 (9): 861–874. doi:10.1002/tea.3660270906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L., and E. Ho. 2016. “Reading Performance and Self-regulated Learning of Hong Kong Students: What We Learnt from PISA 2009.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 25 (1): 159–171. doi:10.1007/s40299-015-0246-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. C., H. Yin, and Z. Zhang. 2009. “Exploring the Influence of the Classroom Environment on Students’ Motivation and Self-regulated Learning in Hong Kong.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 18 (2): 219–232. doi:10.3860/taper.v18i2.1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. 2003. “The Core of Confucian Learning.” The American Psychologist 58 (2): 146–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., and J. K. Smith. 2008. “Response to Assessment Feedback: The Effects of Grades, Praise, and Source of Information.” ETS Research Report Series 2008 (1): 1–57. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02116.x.
   Google Scholar
• Maclellan, E. 2005. Academic achievement: The role of praise in motivating students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6(3), 194–206. doi:10.1177/1469787405057750.
   Google Scholar
• MacNell, L., A. Driscoll, and A. N. Hunt. 2015. “What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching.” Innovative Higher Education 40 (4): 291–303. doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, J. J. R., M. L. V. Pérez, and J. H. Navarrete. 2015. “Language Learning Strategy Use by Spanish EFL Students: The Effect of Proficiency Level, Gender, and Motivation.” Revista De Investigación Educativa 34 (1): 133–149. doi:10.6018/rie.34.1.232981.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. S., L. M. Marulis, and A. P. Williford. 2014. “Gender Processes in School Functioning and the Mediating Role of Cognitive Self-regulation.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 35 (3): 128–137. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. 2014. Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-based Instruction. USA, NJ: Virginia Commonwealth University, Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., B. B. Glienke, and S. Burg. 2006. “Gender and Motivation.” Journal of School Psychology 44 (5): 351–373. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, P. M., C. Terlouw, and A. Pilot. 2006. “Culturally Appropriate Pedagogy: The Case of Group Learning in a Confucian Heritage Culture Context.” Intercultural Education 17 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/14675980500502172.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 2002. “Gender and Perceived Self-efficacy in Self-regulated Learning.” Theory Into Practice 41 (2): 116–125. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, D., M. A. Flores, A. M. V. Simão, and A. Barros. 2016. “Effectiveness and Relevance of Feedback in Higher Education: A Study of Undergraduate Students.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 49: 7–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera, J., N. Lee, K. Win, J. Perera, and L. Wijesuriya. 2008. “Formative Feedback to Students: The Mismatch between Faculty Perceptions and Student Expectations.” Medical Teacher 30 (2): 395–399. doi:10.1080/01421590801949966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 1999. “The Role of Motivation in Promoting and Sustaining Self-regulated Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research 31 (6): 459–470. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcla, and W. J. McKeachie. 1991. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED).
   Google Scholar
• Plante, I., R. De la Sablonnière, J. M. Aronson, and M. Théorêt. 2013. “Gender Stereotype Endorsement and Achievement-related Outcomes: The Role of Competence Beliefs and Task Values.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 38 (3): 225–235. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinton, S., and T. Smallbone. 2010. “Feeding Forward: Using Feedback to Promote Student Reflection and Learning–a Teaching Model.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 47 (1): 125–135. doi:10.1080/14703290903525911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salahshour, F., M. Sharifi, and N. Salahshour. 2013. “The Relationship between Language Learning Strategy Use, Language Proficiency Level and Learner Gender.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 70: 634–643. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.103.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C. P. 1995. “Attributions of Success, Grade Level, and Gender as Factors in Choral Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Feedback.” Journal of Research in Music Education 43 (4): 313–329. doi:10.2307/3345730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, M. A., J. Lander, and S. Levine-Silverman. 1990. “Diagnosing and Dealing with Multicollinearity.” Western Journal of Nursing Research 12 (2): 175–187. doi:10.1177/019394599001200204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and B. J. Zimmerman. 2010. “Social Origins of Self-regulatory Competence.” Educational Psychologist 32 (4): 195–208. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skipper, Y., and K. Douglas. 2012. “Is No Praise Good Praise? Effects of Positive Feedback on Children’s and University Students’ Responses to Subsequent Failures.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (2): 327–339. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02028.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sontag, C., and H. Stoeger. 2015. “Can Highly Intelligent and High-achieving Students Benefit from Training in Self-regulated Learning in a Regular Classroom Context?.” Learning and Individual Differences 41: 43–53. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, P., and A. Nevgi. 2010a. “Disciplinary and Gender Differences among Higher Education Students in Self‐regulated Learning Strategies.” Educational Psychology 30 (3): 323–347. doi:10.1080/01443411003606391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D., and S. D. Voyer. 2014. “Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 140 (4): 1–31. doi:10.1037/a0036620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., and M. M. C. Mok. 2018. “Predicting Primary Students’ Self-regulated Learning by Their Prior Achievement, Interest, Personal Best Goal Orientation and Teacher Feedback.” Educational Psychology 38 (9): 1106–1128. doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1497775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. 2001. Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspective (pp.1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Attaining Self-regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective.” In Handbook of Self-regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 13–35. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar