Modelling of the relationships between students’ grade-level, epistemic beliefs, metacognition, and science achievement in low and high - achieving schools

References

• Acar, Ö. 2017. “An Investigation of the Differences Between Students in Low and High Achieving Schools and Between Female and Male Students Based on Motivational and Cognitive Variables in Turkey.” Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches 6 (1): 500–518.
   Google Scholar
• Acar, Ö. 2019. “Investigation of the Science Achievement Models for Low and High Achieving Schools and Gender Differences in Turkey.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56 (5): 649–675. doi:10.1002/tea.21517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alacacı, C., and A. K. Erbaş. 2010. “Unpacking the Inequality Among Turkish Schools: Findings from PISA 2006.” International Journal of Educational Development 30 (2): 182–192. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpaslan, M. M. 2017. “The Relationship Between Personal Epistemology and Self-Regulation Among Turkish Elementary School Students.” The Journal of Educational Research 110 (4): 405–414. doi:10.1080/00220671.2015.1108277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areepattamannil, S. 2014. “International Note: What Factors are Associated with Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy of Indian Adolescents? A Multilevel Examination.” Journal of Adolescence 37 (4): 367–372. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın, U., and B. Ubuz. 2010. “Structural Model of Metacognition and Knowledge of Geometry.” Learning and Individual Differences 20 (5): 436–445. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aypay, A., M. Erdoğan, and M. A. Sözer. 2007. “Variation Among Schools on Classroom Practices in Science Based on TIMSS-1999 in Turkey.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (10): 1417–1435. doi:10.1002/tea.20202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., and A. L. Brown. 1984. “Metacognitive Skills and Reading.” In Handbook of Reading Research, edited by P. D. Pearson, 353–394. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boz, Y., M. Aydemir, and N. Aydemir. 2011. “4th, 6th, and 8th Grade Turkish Elementary Students’ Epistemological Beliefs.” Elementary Education Online 10 (3): 1191–1201.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., and H. I. Strømsø. 2004. “Epistemological Beliefs and Implicit Theories of Intelligence as Predictors of Achievement Goals.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 29 (4): 371–388. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., and H. I. Strømsø. 2005. “The Relationship Between Epistemological Beliefs, Implicit Theories of Intelligence, and Self‐regulated Learning Among Norwegian Postsecondary Students.” The British Journal of Educational Psychology 75 (4): 539–565. doi:10.1348/000709905X25067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursal, M. 2013. “Longitudinal Investigation of Elementary Students’ Science Academic Achievement in 4-8th Grades: Grade Level and Gender Differences.” Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 13 (2): 1151–1156.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. 2001. “Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Measuring Instrument.” International Journal of Testing 1 (1): 55–86. doi:10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, F. 2005. “Epistemological Beliefs and Approaches to Learning: Their Change Through Secondary School and Their Influence on Academic Performance.” The British Journal of Educational Psychology 75 (2): 203–221. doi:10.1348/000709904X22683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavas, P. 2011. “Factors Affecting the Motivation of Turkish Primary Students for Science Learning.” Science Education International 22 (1): 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. A., and F. Pajares. 2010. “Implicit Theories of Ability of Grade 6 Science Students: Relation to Epistemological Beliefs and Academic Motivation and Achievement in Science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 35 (1): 75–87. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, A. M., P. R. Pintrich, I. Vekiri, and D. Harrison. 2004. “Changes in Epistemological Beliefs in Elementary Science Students.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 29 (2): 186–204. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., and E. L. Leggett. 1988. “A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality.” Psychological Review 95 (2): 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eğitimi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı. 2009. ÖBBS 2008: İ̇lköğretim öğrencilerinin başarilarinin belirlenmesi: Fen ve teknoloji raporu. Ankara: Earged.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, A. D. (1999). “An Exploration of Fifth-Grade Students’ Epistemological Beliefs in Science and an Investigation of Their Relation to Science Learning.” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. 1979. “Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive Developmental Inquiry.” The American Psychologist 34 (10): 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacıeminoğlu, E., H. Ertepınar, Ö. Yılmaz-Tüzün, and H. Çakır. 2015. “Students and School Characteristics Related to Elementary School Students’ Views of the Nature of Science.” Education 3-13 43 (6): 698–719. doi:10.1080/03004279.2013.865655.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. 2004. “Epistemological Understanding as a Metacognitive Process: Thinking Aloud During Online Searching.” Educational Psychologist 39 (1): 43–55. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. 2016. “Epistemic Cognition as a Psychological Construct: Advancements and Challenges.” In Handbook of Epistemic Cognition, edited by J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, and I. Bråten, 31–50. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., and P. R. Pintrich. 1997. “The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning.” Review of Educational Research 67 (1): 88–140. doi:10.3102/00346543067001088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordanou, K. 2016. “Developing Epistemological Understanding in Scientific and Social Domains Through Argumentation.” Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie 30 (2–3): 109–119. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. A., and A. E. Lawson. 1998. “What are the Relative Effects of Reasoning Ability and Prior Knowledge on Biology Achievement in Expository and Inquiry Classes?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35 (1): 89–103. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199801)35:1<89:AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., and D. Sörbom. 1996. LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., L. Bao, and O. Acar (2006). “Students’ Cognitive Conflict and Conceptual Change in a Physics by Inquiry Class.” In AIP Conference Proceedings edited by P. Heron, L. McCullough, and J. Marx, Vol. 818, No. 1, 117–120. Salt Lake City, Utah: American Institute of Physics.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchener, K. S. 1983. “Cognition, Metacognition and Epistemic Cognition: A Three-Level Model of Cognitive Processing.” Human Development 26: 222–232. doi:10.1159/000272885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilgunes, B., C. Tekkaya, and S. Sungur. 2009. “Modeling the Relations Among Students’ Epistemological Beliefs, Motivation, Learning Approach, and Achievement.” The Journal of Educational Research 102 (4): 243–256. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.4.243-256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2000. “Metacognitive Development.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 9 (5): 178–181. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., K. T. Hau, C. Artelt, J. Baumert, and J. L. Peschar. 2006. “Oecd’s Brief Self-Report Measure of Educational Psychology’s Most Useful Affective Constructs: Cross-Cultural, Psychometric Comparisons Across 25 Countries.” International Journal of Testing 6 (4): 311–360. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0604_1.
   Google Scholar
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. 2018. 2018 Liselere Geçiş Sistemi (LGS): Merkezi Sınavla Yerleşen Öğrencilerin Performansı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R. 2007. “The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in Self-Regulated Learning.” Educational Psychologist 42 (3): 173–190. doi:10.1080/00461520701416306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R. 2008. “Epistemic Profiles and Self-Regulated Learning: Examining Relations in the Context of Mathematics Problem Solving.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 (2): 177–208. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, H. K. 2016. “Examining Heterogeneity in Student Metacognition: A Factor Mixture Analysis.” Learning and Individual Differences 49: 373–377. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, H. K. 2019. “The Bifactor Model of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Jr. MAI).” Current Psychology 38 (2): 367–375. doi:10.1007/s12144-017-9619-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., P. Bryant, S. Strand, J. Hillier, R. Barros, and J. Miller-Friedmann (2017). Review of SES and Science Learning in Formal Educational Settings: A Report Prepared for the EEF and the Royal Society. Oxford: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pamuk, S., S. Sungur, and C. Oztekin. 2017. “A Multilevel Analysis of Students’ Science Achievements in Relation to Their Self-Regulation, Epistemological Beliefs, Learning Environment Perceptions, and Teachers’ Personal Characteristics.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (8): 1423–1440. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9761-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, W. G. 1968. Patterns of Development in Thought and Values of Students in a Liberal Arts College: A Validation of a Scheme. Cambridge: Bureau of Study Counsel.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., R. W. Roeser, and E. A. M. De Groot. 1994. “Classroom and Individual Differences in Early Adolescents’ Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning.” The Journal of Early Adolescence 14 (2): 139–161. doi:10.1177/027243169401400204.
   Google Scholar
• Ricco, R., S. S. Pierce, and C. Medinilla. 2010. “Epistemic Beliefs and Achievement Motivation in Early Adolescence.” The Journal of Early Adolescence 30 (2): 305–340. doi:10.1177/0272431609333299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. 1983. “Beyond the Purely Cognitive: Belief Systems, Social Cognitions, and Metacognitions as Driving Forces in Intellectual Performance.” Cognitive Science 7 (4): 329–363. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0704_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. 1990. “Effects of Beliefs About the Nature of Knowledge on Comprehension.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (3): 498–504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. 1993. “Epistemological Development and Academic Performance Among Secondary Students.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (3): 406–411. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer-Aikins, M., O. K. Duell, and R. Hutter. 2005. “Epistemological Beliefs, Mathematical Problem-Solving Beliefs, and Academic Performance of Middle School Students.” The Elementary School Journal 105 (3): 289–304. doi:10.1086/428745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer-Aikins, M., W. C. Mau, S. Brookhart, and R. Hutter. 2000. “Understanding Middle Students’ Beliefs About Knowledge and Learning Using a Multidimensional Paradigm.” The Journal of Educational Research 94 (2): 120–127. doi:10.1080/00220670009598750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M., C. Calvert, G. Gariglietti, and A. Bajaj. 1997. “The Development of Epistemological Beliefs Among Secondary Students: A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Educational Psychology 89 (1): 37–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., and R. G. Lomax. 2004. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., D. Maclin, C. Houghton, and M. G. Hennessey. 2000. “Sixth-Grade Students’ Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development.” Cognition and Instruction 18 (3): 349–422. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., B. C. Howard, L. A. Miller, and C. Murphy. 2002. “Measures of Children’s Knowledge and Regulation of Cognition.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 27 (1): 51–79. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., A. S. Richmond, C. M. Ramsay, and M. Klapp. 2012. “The Measurement and Predictive Ability of Metacognition in Middle School Learners.” The Journal of Educational Research 105 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.514690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: What Makes Schools Successful? Resources, Policies and Practices (Volume IV). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2016a. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2016b. PISA 2015 Results (Volume II): Policies and Practices for Successful Schools. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2018. PISA 2018 Results (Volume V): Effective Policies, Successful Schools. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Topcu, M. S., and O. Yilmaz-Tuzun (2007). “Relationships Among Elementary School Students’ Epistemological Beliefs, Metacognitive Skills, and Constructivist Learning Environment Perceptions.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for American Educational Research Association, Chicago, USA, April 9-13.
   Google Scholar
• Topçu, M. S., and Ö. Yılmaz-Tüzün. 2009. “Elementary Students’ Metacognition and Epistemological Beliefs Considering Science Achievement, Gender and Socioeconomic Status.” Elementary Education Online 8 (3): 676–693.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C. 1998. “An Analysis of Taiwanese Eighth Graders’ Science Achievement, Scientific Epistemological Beliefs and Cognitive Structure Outcomes After Learning Basic Atomic Theory.” International Journal of Science Education 20 (4): 413–425. doi:10.1080/0950069980200403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C. 2001. “A Review and Discussion of Epistemological Commitments, Metacognition, and Critical Thinking with Suggestions on Their Enhancement in Internet-Assisted Chemistry Classrooms.” Journal of Chemical Education 78 (7): 970–974. doi:10.1021/ed078p970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and X. Wang. 2012. Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., and J. R. Frederiksen. 1998. “Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students.” Cognition and Instruction 16 (1): 3–118. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., and M. S. Topcu (2007). “Validation of Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Jr. MAI) and Investigation of the Effect of Achievement on Metacognitive Skills of Elementary School Students.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, USA, April 15-18.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and S. Barzilai. 2013. “A Review of Research on Metacognition in Science Education: Current and Future Directions.” Studies in Science Education 49 (2): 121–169. doi:10.1080/03057267.2013.847261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar