Questioning intuition through reflective engagement

References

• Barsky, A., Kaplan, S. A., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Just feelings? The role of affect in the formation of organizational fairness judgments. Journal of Management, 37, 248–279. doi:10.1177/014920631037632510.1177/0149206310376325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi, A. (1995). Moral understanding and the moral personality: The process of moral integration. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development: An introduction (pp. 229–253). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007a). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In A. Bryan & K. Charmaz (Eds.), Handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31–57). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007b). Introduction. In A. Bryan & K. Charmaz (Eds.), Handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31–57). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (1983). Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health and Illness, 5, 168–195.10.1111/shil.1983.5.issue-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (1995). The body, identity and self: Adapting to impairment. Sociological Quarterly, 36, 657–680.10.1111/tsq.1995.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2011). A constructivist grounded theory analysis of losing and regaining a valued self. In F. J. Wertz, K. Charmaz, L. M. McMullen, R. Josselson, R. Anderson, & E. McSpadden (Eds.), Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry (pp. 165–204). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craigie, J. (2011). Thinking and feeling: Moral deliberation in a dual-process framework. Philosophical Psychology, 24, 53–71.10.1080/09515089.2010.533262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, T. (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Westport, CT: American Council on Education/The Oryx Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 454–459.10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, C. (2006). Is the emotional dog wagging its tail, or chasing it? Philosophical Explorations, 9, 83–98.10.1080/13869790500492680
   Google Scholar
• Frimer, J. A., & Walker, L. J. (2008). Towards a new paradigm of moral personhood. Journal of Moral Education, 37, 333–356.10.1080/03057240802227494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1984). From the native’s point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In R. Shweder & R. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory (pp. 123–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (2003). The grounded theory perspective: Description’s remodeling of grounded theory methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Angell, A. D., Darley, H. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, H. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.10.1126/science.1062872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left–right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 110–119.10.1080/10478400903028573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 797–832). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, S., Black, P., Hoffman, K., & Pierce, D. (2009). Some considerations of the import of the 2008 EPAS for curriculum design. Retrieved October 19, 2013, from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=31578
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2006). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. In T. Frangsmyr (Ed.), Nobel Prizes 2002: Nobel Prizes, presentations, biographies, & lectures (pp. 416–499). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Fredrick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49–81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808098
   Google Scholar
• Kennett, J., & Fine, C. (2009). Will the real moral judgment please stand up? The implications of the social intuitionist models of cognition for meta-ethics and moral psychology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12, 77–96.10.1007/s10677-008-9136-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauseer, M. D., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgments. Nature, 446, 908–911.10.1038/nature05631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, D., & Hill, P. L. (2008). On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition. Journal of Moral Education, 37, 313–332.10.1080/03057240802227486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 529–566.10.1017/S0140525X00044903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (1995, April). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Keynote address presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, M. J., Seifert, T. A., & Pascarella, E. T. (2012). How the first year of college influences moral reasoning development for students in moral consolidation and moral transition. Journal of College Student Development, 53, 19–40.10.1353/csd.2012.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, J., de Oliviera-Souza, R., Eslinger, P. J., Bramati, I. E., Mourão-Miranda, J., Andreiuolo, P. A., & Pessoa, L. (2002). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 2730–2736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Moll, F. T., Ignácio, F. A., Bramati, I. E., Caparelli-Dáquer, E. M., & Eslinger, P. J. (2005). The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 68–78.10.1097/01.wnn.0000152236.46475.a7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.25010.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2005). The psychological foundations of everyday morality and moral expertise. In D. Lapsley & C. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 140–165). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., & Vaydich, J. L. (2008). Moral development and behaviour under the spotlight of the neurobiological sciences. Journal of Moral Education, 37, 289–312.10.1080/03057240802227478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges (1997). Returning to our roots: The student experience. Retrieved October 19, 2013, from http://www.aplu.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=181
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. O. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, H. (2012). Educated intuitions. Automaticity and rationality in moral judgment. Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action, 15, 255–275.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.10.1017/S0140525X00003435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557842
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar