Moral rationality and intuition: An exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire

References

• Baril, G. L., & Wright, J. C. (2012). Different types of moral cognition: Moral stages versus moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 468–473. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.01810.1016/j.paid.2012.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. J. (2003). Guide for DIT-2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Center for the Study of Ethical Development.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, L. (2013). Political identity and moral education: A response to Jonathan Haidt’s The Righteous Mind. Journal of Moral Education, 42, 298–315.10.1080/03057240.2013.817331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2012). A direct comparison approach for testing measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 167–198.10.1177/1094428111421987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Speicher, B., Hewer, A., Candee, D., Gibbs, J., & Power, C. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment: Standard issues scoring manual (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y. (n.d.). Norms for DIT2: From 2005-2009. Retrieved from http://ethicaldevelopment.ua.edu/files/2014/03/Norms-for-DIT2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberal and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditton, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. doi:10.1037/a002184710.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.81410.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 65–72. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structures be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351–362.10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 59, 381–389.10.1007/BF02296131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: The nature and validity of moral stage (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, B., & Beaulac, G. (2013). The concept of moral domain in moral foundations theory and cognitive development theory: Horses for courses? Journal of Moral Education, 42, 360–382.10.1080/03057240.2013.818530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1982). Linear vs. nonlinear models in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 379–396.10.1177/014662168200600402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Retrieved from http://www.yourmorals.org/
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D. (2010). Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 163–181. doi:10.1177/174569161036235110.1177/1745691610362351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., & Bock, T. (2002). Moral schemas and tacit judgments or how the Defining Issues Test is supported by cognitive science. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 297–314. doi:10.1080/030572402200000812410.1080/0305724022000008124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1932/1965). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press. ( Original work published 1932).
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Post-conventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a new instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 644–659.10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 381–395.10.1080/713679390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling correlations for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, USA, 1, 308–313.
   Google Scholar
• Thoma, S. J. (2006). Research on the Defining Issues Test. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 67–91). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychmetrika, 38, 1–10.10.1007/BF02291170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turiel, E. (2010). Thought, emotions, and social interactional processes in moral development. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 7–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar