Moral attention: A comparative philosophical study

References

• Antonaccio, M. (2000). Picturing the human: The moral thought of Iris Murdoch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antonaccio, M. (2012). A philosophy to live by. Engaging Iris Murdoch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellow, S. (2006). Dangling man (1st ed. 1944). New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2013). Just babies: The origins of good and evil. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, L. (2012). Visual metaphors in Murdoch’s moral philosophy. In J. Broackes (Ed.), Iris Murdoch, philosopher. A collection of essays (pp. 307–323). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, P. (1998). Ethical attention: Accumulating understandings. European Journal of Philosophy, 6, 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diller, A. (1996). The ethics of care and education: A new paradigm, its critics and its educational significance. In A. Diller, B. Huston, K. M. Morgan, & M. Ayim (Eds.), The gender question in education: Theory, pedagogy and politics (pp. 89–104). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. T. (1999). Understanding students. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14, 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labour: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laugier, S. (2005). Care et perception. In P. Paperman & S. Laugier. (Eds.), Le souci des autres : Éthique et politique du care [Caring for others : Ethics and politics of care] (pp. 317–348). Paris: Écoles des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, I. (1959). The sublime and the good. Chicago Review, 13, 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, I. (1991). The sovereignty of good (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, I. (1993). Metaphysics as a guide to morals. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, I. (1997). Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature (P. J. Conradi, Ed.). London: Chatto & Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1988). An ethic of caring and its implications for instructional arrangements. American Journal of Education, 96, 215–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1991). Stories in dialogue, caring, and interpersonal reasoning. In C. Whiterell & N. Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education (pp. 157–170). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1992). In defense of caring. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 3, 230–241.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1994). Learning to engage in moral dialogue. Holistic Education Review, 7, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1995). Care and moral education. In W. Kohli (Ed.), Critical conversation in philosophy of education (pp. 137–148). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1997). Must we motivate? In N. Burbules & D. Hansen (Eds.), Teaching and its predicaments (pp. 29–43). New York, NY: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2002). Starting at home: Caring and social policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2010a). The maternal factor: Two paths to morality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2010b). Complexity in caring and empathy. Abstracta, Special Issue V, 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (1985). “Finely aware and richly responsible”: Moral attention and the moral task of literature. Journal of Philosophy, 82, 516–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, L. -M. (2011). Teaching emotional self-awareness through inquiry-based education. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 13. URL: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v13n2/perez.html
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1027–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardif, M. (2014). Liberté et reconnaissance au coeur de l’enseignement [Freedom and recognition at the heart of teaching]. Relations, 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. (2012). Le risque ou le care? [Risk or care?]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. (2013a). Caring democracy: Markets, equality and justice. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. (2013b). Particularisme et responsabilité relationnelle en morale: une autre approche de l’éthique globale [Particularism and relational responsability in the moral domain: another approach of global ethics]. In P. Paperman, & P. Molinier (Eds.), Contre l’indifférence des privilégiés [Against the indifference of the privileged] (pp. 99–137). Paris: Payot.
   Google Scholar