On the prospects for Aristotelian character education

References

• Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent virtue. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228782.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Annas, J., Narvaez, D., & Snow, N. E. (Eds.). (2016). Developing the virtues: Integrating perspectives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baehr, J. (2011). The inquiring mind: On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604074.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Baehr, J. (2016). Is intellectual character growth a realistic educational aim? Journal of Moral Education, 45, 117–131. doi:10.1080/03057240.2016.1174676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 122–136. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugental, D. B., & Goodnow, J. J. (1998). Socialization processes. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 3: Social, emotional and personality development (pp. 389–462). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D. (2007). Character in teaching. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 369–389. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, D., & Steutel, J. (Eds.). (1999). Virtue ethics and moral education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Character.org. (2016). 11 Principles of effective character education: A framework for school success. Washington, DC: Character.org.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. L. (2013). A missing piece of the contemporary character education puzzle: The individualization of moral character. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32, 345–360. doi:10.1007/s11217-012-9331-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, Philip (2006). Varieties of naturalism. In P. Clayton & Z. Simpson (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science (pp. 430–453). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279272.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, E. M., Braungart-Rieker, J. M., & Rocher Schudlich, T. D. (2013). Emotion and personality development. In I.Weiner(Ed.), Handbook of psychology Vol. 6: Developmental psychology (R. M Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks & J. Mistry, Vol. Eds., (pp. 215–241). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. A. (2005). A certain and reasoned art: The rise and fall of character education in America. In D. K. Lapsley & F. C. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 166–200). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, J. M., & Tappan, M. B. (1996). The narrative approach to moral development: From epistemic subject to dialogical selves. Human Development, 39, 67–82. doi:10.1159/000278410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doris, J. (2002). Lack of Character. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139878364
   Google Scholar
• Dow, P. E. (2013). Intellectual virtues: Intellectual character development. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, O. (1991). Varieties of moral personality: Ethics and psychological realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, O. (2009). Moral science? Still metaphysical after all these years. In D. Narvaez & D. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp 52–78). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511627125.004
   Google Scholar
• Fleeson, W., Furr, R. M., Jayawickreme, E., Meindl, P., & Helzer, E. G. (2014). Character: The prospects for a personality-based perspective on morality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 178–191. doi:10.1111/spc3.12094
   Google Scholar
• Fowers, B. F. (2005). Virtue and psychology: Pursuing excellence in ordinary practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.10.1037/11219-000
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy, 68, 5–20. doi:10.2307/2024717
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. (1992). The importance of what we care about. Synthese, 53, 257–272. doi:10.1007/BF00484902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2010). Propositions for the study of moral personality development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 380–383. doi:10.1177/0963721410389168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haste, H., & Abrahams, S. (2008). Morality, culture and the dialogic self: Taking cultural pluralism seriously. Journal of Moral Education, 37, 377–394. doi:10.1080/03057240802227502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2014). Morality for humans: Ethical understanding from the perspective of cognitive science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226113548.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person-situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the big five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1149–1179. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamtekar, R. (2004). Situationism and virtue ethics on the content of our character. Ethics, 114, 458–491. doi:10.1086/381696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjansson, K. (2013). Virtues and vices in positive psychology: A philosophical critique. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139177818
   Google Scholar
• Kristjansson, K. (2015). Aristotelian character education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1978a). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes. Imre Lakatos philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 8–101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621123
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1978b). Introduction. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J.Worrall & G.Currie(Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes. Imre Lakatos philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 1–7). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621123
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, D. (in press). Situationism and the Pyrrhic defense of character education: Commentary on Sreenivasan. In W. Sinnot-Armstrong & C. B. Miller (Eds.), Moral psychology Vol. 5: Virtue and happiness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, D., & Hill, P. (2009). The development of moral personality. In D. Narvaez & D. K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 185–213). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627125.009
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, D., & Stey, P. (2014). Moral self-identity as the aim of education. In L. Nucci, D. Narvaez, & T. Krettenauer (Eds.), Moral and character education (2nd ed., pp. 84–100). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, D., & Woodbury, R. (in press). Moral character development for teacher education. Action in Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, D., & Yeager, D. (2013). Moral-character education. In I. Weiner(Ed.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 7, Educational Psychology, W. Reynolds & G. Miller, Vol. Eds.). (pp. 147–177). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, C., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2008). Values in action scale and the Big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 787–799. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. (2015). The art and science of personality development. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClellan, B. W. (1999). Moral education in America: Schools and the shaping of character from colonial times to the present. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. B. (2013). Moral character: An empirical inquiry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674350.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, G., Turner, J., & Narvaez, D. (2005). Student perceptions of climate influence character and motivation. Paper present at the annual meeting of the American education research association, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D. (2006). Integrative ethical education. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Development (pp. 703–733). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D. (2010). Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 163–181. doi:10.1177/1745691610362351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D. (2014). Neurobiology and the development of human morality: Evolution, culture and wisdom. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., & Gleason, T. (2013). Developmental optimization. In D. Narvaez, J. Panksepp, A. Schore, & T. Gleason (Eds.), Evolution, early experience and human development: From research to practice and policy pp. 307–325 New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. (2014). Becoming moral: Development of moral agents through social interaction. In M. Christen, J. Fischer, M. Huppenbauer, C. Tanner, & C. van Schaik (Eds.), Empirically Informed Ethics. Morality between Facts and Norms (pp. 227–238). Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy 32, [Springer Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy] Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01369-5_1
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. S. (1981). Moral development and moral education. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues. New York, NY: Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. C., & Wood, W. J. (2009). Intellectual virtues: An essay in regulative epistemology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. N., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (Eds.). (2013). The moral work of teaching and teacher education: Preparing and supporting practitioners. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, N. (1989). The fabric of character: Aristotle’s theory of virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2000). Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 14, 407–428. doi:10.1002/1099-0984(200009/10)14:5<407:AID-PER391>3.0.CO;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shryack, J., Steger, M. F., Krueger, R. F., & Kallie, C. S. (2010). The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 714–719. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, N. (2010). Virtue as social intelligence: An empirically grounded theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sreenivasan, G. (2002). Errors about Errors: Virtue theory and trait attribution. Mind, 111, 47–68. doi:10.1093/mind/111.441.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreenivasan, G. (in press). Character education and the rearguard of situationism. In W.Sinnot-Armstrong & C. B. Miller (Eds.), Moral psychology Vol. 5: Virtue and happiness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347–365. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347
   Google Scholar
• Steutal, J. W. (1997). The virtue approach to moral education: Some conceptual clarifications. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 31, 115–120. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19–31. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M. D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 559–580. doi:10.1037/a0037637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar