1,853
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Being professional: accountability and authority in teachers’ responses to science curriculum reform

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.
  • Ametller, J., Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2007). Using perspectives on subject learning to inform the design of subject teaching: An example from science education. Curriculum Journal, 18, 479–492.10.1080/09585170701687928
  • Anderson, R. D., & Helms, J. V. (2001). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 3–16.10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<>1.0.CO;2-F
  • Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488733
  • Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139087315
  • Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258–267.10.3102/0013189X07306523
  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215–228.10.1080/0268093022000043065
  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2011). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
  • Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J., & Weiss, I. R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the national science foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 375–395.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 83–90.10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.06.002
  • Benson, G. D. (1989). Epistemology and science curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 329–344.10.1080/0022027890210403
  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Bryce, T., & Gray, D. (2004). Tough acts to follow: The challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 717–733.10.1080/0950069032000138833
  • Bulte, A. M. W., & Seller, F. (2010). Making an innovation grow. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Ericksen, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 236–254). London: Routledge.
  • Campbell, B., Lazonby, J., Millar, R., Nicolson, P., Ramsden, J., & Waddington, D. (1994). Science: The Salters' approach – A case study of the process of large scale curriculum development. Science Education, 78, 415–447.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Clark, J., Case, J. M., Davies, N., Sheridan, G., & Toerien, R. (2011). ‘Struggling Up Mount Improbable’: A cautionary (implementation) tale of a Vision II scientific literacy curriculum in South Africa. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, D. A. Roberts, P. O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 272–287). London: Routledge.
  • Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.10.3102/0013189X032006013
  • Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental education: The importance of teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 67–83.10.1080/00220270500038644
  • Cronin-Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 235–250.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Cuban, L. (1995). The hidden variable: How organizations influence teacher responses to secondary science curriculum reform. Theory Into Practice, 34, 4–11.10.1080/00405849509543651
  • Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 601–616.10.1080/01411920600775316
  • DeBoer, G. E. (Ed.). (2011). The role of public policy in K-12 science education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • DeBoer, G. E. (2014). The history of science curriculum reform in the United States. In N. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 559–578). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Donnelly, J., Buchan, A. S., Jenkins, E. W., Laws, P., & Welford, G. (1996). Investigations by order: Policy, curriculum and science teachers’ work under the Education Reform Act. Driffield: Studies in Education.
  • Donnelly, J., & Jenkins, E. (2001). Science education: Policy, professionalism and change. London: Sage.
  • Donnelly, J., & Ryder, J. (2011). The pursuit of humanity: Curriculum change in English school science. History of Education, 40, 291–313.10.1080/0046760X.2010.521196
  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.10.3102/0013189X023007005
  • Enfield, M., Smith, E. L., & Grueber, D. J. (2008). “A sketch is like a sentence”: Curriculum structures that support teaching epistemic practices of science. Science Education, 92, 608–630.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists. Report of the high level group on human resources for science and technology in Europe. European Commission. Retrieved March 2014 from http://ec.europa.eu/research/conferences/2004/sciprof/pdf/final_en.pdf
  • Fensham, P. (2009). The link between policy and practice in science education: The role of research. Science Education, 93, 1076–1095.10.1002/sce.v93:6
  • Fernandez, T., Ritchie, G., & Barker, M. (2008). A sociocultural analysis of mandated curriculum change: The implementation of a new senior physics curriculum in New Zealand schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 187–213.10.1080/00220270701313978
  • Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (Eds.). (2012). Second international handbook of science education. London: Springer.
  • Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
  • Gelbart, H., & Yarden, A. (2006). Learning genetics through an authentic research simulation in bioinformatics. Journal of Biological Education, 40, 107–112.10.1080/00219266.2006.9656026
  • Gewirtz, S., Mahony, P., Hextall, I., & Cribb, A. (Eds.). (2009). Changing teacher professionalism. London: Routledge.
  • Goodson, I. F. (2003). Professional knowledge, professional lives. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Hanley, P., Ratcliffe, M., & Osborne, J. (2007, August 21–25). Teachers’ experiences of teaching ‘Ideas-about-science’ and socio-scientific issues. Paper presented at the European Science Education Association Conference (ESERA), Malmo, Sweden.
  • Hewson, P. W., Kahle, J. B., Scantlebury, K., & Davies, D. (2001). Equitable science education in urban middle schools: Do reform efforts make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1130–1144.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Hingant, B., & Albe, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46, 121–152.10.1080/03057267.2010.504543
  • Huffman, D., & Lawrenz, F. (2004). The impact of a state systemic initiative on U.S. science teachers and students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 357–377.
  • Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 426–440.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Jeffrey, B., & Woods, P. (1998). Testing teachers: The effect of school inspections on primary teachers. London: Routledge.
  • Kahle, J. B. (2007). Systemic reform: Research, vision, and politics. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 911–942). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kelly, M. P., & Staver, J. R. (2005). A case study of one school system’s adoption and implementation of an elementary science program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 25–52.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631–645.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Kim, M., Tan, A. L., & Talaue, F. T. (2013). New vision and challenges in inquiry-based curriculum change in Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 289–311.10.1080/09500693.2011.636844
  • King, C. (2001). The response of teachers to new subject areas in a national science curriculum: The case of the earth science component. Science Education, 85, 636–664.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33, 551–567.10.1080/00220270010016874
  • Larkin, D. B., Seyforth, S. C., & Lasky, H. J. (2009). Implementing and sustaining science curriculum reform: A study of leadership practices among teachers within a high school science department. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 813–835.10.1002/tea.v46:7
  • Lawrenz, F., & Desjardins, C. D. (2012). Trends in US government-funded multisite K-12 science program evaluation. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 723–734). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Leach, J., Scott, P., Ametller, J., Hind, A., & Lewis, J. (2006). Implementing and evaluating teaching interventions: Towards evidence-based practice? In R. Millar, J. Leach, J. Osborne, & M. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Improving subject teaching: Lessons from research in science education (pp. 79–99). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Leander, K. M., & Osborne, M. D. (2008). Complex positioning: Teachers as agents of curricular and pedagogical reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 23–46.10.1080/00220270601089199
  • Lederman, N., & S. K., Abell (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Lee, O., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Large-scale interventions in science education for diverse student groups in varied educational settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 271–280.10.1002/tea.21009
  • Lee, O., Penfield, R., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2009). Effects of fidelity of implementation on science achievement gains among English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 836–859.10.1002/tea.v46:7
  • Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–839.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Lunn, S., & Solomon, J. (2000). Primary teachers’ thinking about the English National Curriculum for science: Autobiographies, warrants, and autonomy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1043–1056.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Luttenberg, J., Veen, K. V., & Imants, J. (2013). Looking for cohesion: The role of search for meaning in the interaction between teacher and reform. Research Papers in Education, 28, 289–308.10.1080/02671522.2011.630746
  • Lynch, S. J., Pyke, C., & Grafton, B. H. (2012). A retrospective view of a study of middle school science curriculum materials: Implementation, scale-up and sustainability in a changing policy environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 305–332.10.1002/tea.21000
  • McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2006). Design research from a curriculum perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 67–80). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
  • Melville, W. (2008). Mandated curriculum change and a science department: A superficial language convergence? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1185–1199.10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.004
  • Melville, W., Hardy, I., & Bartley, A. (2011). Bourdieu, department chairs and the reform of science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 2275–2293.10.1080/09500693.2010.550334
  • Miller, K. H., Edwards, R., & Priestley, M. (2010). Levels and equivalence in credit and qualifications frameworks: Contrasting the prescribed and enacted curriculum in school and college. Research Papers in Education, 25, 225–243.10.1080/02671520902928507
  • Mitchener, C. P., & Anderson, R. D. (1989). Teachers' perspective: Developing and implementing an STS curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 351–369.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • National Academy of Sciences. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.10.3102/0034654307313793
  • Oates, T. (2011). Could do better: Using international comparisons to refine the National Curriculum in England. Curriculum Journal, 22, 121–150.10.1080/09585176.2011.578908
  • Olson, J. (1981). Teacher influence in the classroom: A context for understanding curriculum translation. Instructional Science, 10, 259–275.10.1007/BF00139803
  • Penuel, W., & Fishman, B. J. (2012). Large-scale science education intervention research we can use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 281–304.10.1002/tea.21001
  • Penuel, W., Fishman, B. J., Gallagher, L. P., Korbak, C., & Lopez-Prado, B. (2009). Is alignment enough? Investigating the effects of state policies and professional development on science curriculum implementation. Science Education, 93, 656–677.10.1002/sce.v93:4
  • Plass, J. L., Milne, C., Homer, B. D., Schwartz, R. N., Hayward, E. O., Jordan, T., ... Barrientos, J. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of computer simulations for chemistry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 394–419.
  • Rigano, D., & Ritchie, S. (2003). Implementing change within a school science department: Progressive and dissonant voices. Research in Science Education, 33, 299–317.10.1023/A:1025483130881
  • Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 669–692.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. Fensham (Ed.), Developments and dilemmas in science education (pp. 27–54). London: Falmer Press.
  • Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R.W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 545–558). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 883–907.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Rudolph, J. L. (2014). Why understanding science matters: The IES research guidelines as a case in point. Educational Researcher, 43, 15–18.10.3102/0013189X13520292
  • Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2013). School teachers’ experiences of science curriculum reform. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 490–514.10.1080/09500693.2012.665195
  • Saez, M. J., & Carretero, A. (1998). Innovations in the Spanish science curriculum: A view of a systemic reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30, 719–738.10.1080/002202798183404
  • Sato, M., Coffey, J., & Moorthy, S. (2005). Two teachers making assessment for learning their own. Curriculum Journal, 16, 177–191.10.1080/09585170500135996
  • Seddon, T., Ozga, J., & Levin, J. S. (2013). Global transitions and teacher professionalism. In T. Seddon & J. S. Levin (Eds.), Educators, professionalism and politics: Global transitions, national spaces and professional projects (pp. 3–24). London: Routledge.
  • Smith, L. K., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms?: Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 396–423.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Spillane, J. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 143–175.10.1080/002202799183205
  • Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab, S. L. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87, 468–489.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Teo, T. W. (2012). Building Potemkin schools: Science curriculum reform in a STEM school. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 659–678.10.1080/00220272.2012.689356
  • Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Pilot, A. (2011). Classroom implementation of context-based chemistry education by teachers: The relation between experiences of teachers and the design of materials. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1407–1432.10.1080/09500693.2010.511659
  • Wallace, C. S. (2012). Authoritarian science curriculum standards as barriers to teaching and learning: An interpretation of personal experience. Science Education, 96, 291–310.10.1002/sce.v96.2
  • Wallace, C. S., & Priestley, M. (2011). Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum innovation in Scotland: A socio-cultural perspective on professional development and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 357–381.10.1080/00220272.2011.563447
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  • Zembylas, M. (2004). Emotional issues in teaching science: A case study of a teacher’s views. Research in Science Education, 34, 343–364.10.1007/s11165-004-0287-6

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.