Making the case for case studies

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 353–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (1995). Points east and west: Acupuncture and teaching the cultural contexts of science. In F. Finley, D. Allchin, D. Rhees, & S. Fifield (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international history, philosophy and science teaching conference (Vol. 1, pp. 23–32). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (1996). Points east and west: Acupuncture and comparative philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 63, S107–S115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (1997). Rekindling phlogiston: From classroom case study to interdisciplinary relationships. Science & Education, 6, 473–509.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2003). Scientific myth-conceptions. Science & Education, 87, 329–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2011a). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science & Education, 95, 918–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2011b). Towards clarity on whole science and KNOWS. Science & Education, 96, 693–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfield, H. (1931). The Whig interpretation of history. London: G. Bell & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Craven III, J. A., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2002). Assessing explicit and tacit conceptions of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 785–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagher, Z., Brickhouse, N., Shipman, H., & Letts, W. (2004). How some college students represent their understanding of scientific theories. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 735–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, K. (1986). Teaching as story telling. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1996). The disunities of the sciences. In P. Galison & D. Stump (Eds.), The disunity of science (pp. 37–74). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20, 591–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keranto, T. (2001). The perceived credibility of scientific claims, paranormal phenomena and miracles among primary teacher students: A comparative study. Science & Education, 10, 493–511.
   Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influences of explict and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. J. (1972). The use and abuse of historical teaching in physics. In S. G. Brush & A. L. King (Eds.), History in the teaching of physics (pp. 12–18). Hanover, NH: University of New England Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research: Concepts and methodologies (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, D., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., Clough, M., & Olson, J. (2007). Building a foundation for the use of historical narratives. Science & Education, 16, 313–334.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, C. (1998). Philosophically correct science stories? Examining the implications of heroic science stories for school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, F., & Strausberg, M. (2001). Americans’ beliefs in psychic and paranormal phenomena is up over the last decade. Gallup News (Poll Analyses, June 8). Retrieved from www.gallup.com
   Google Scholar
• Radner, D., & Radner, M. (1982). Science and unreason. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, L. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (1993). Short story science. The Science Teacher, 60(6), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, C. (1995). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Scharmann, L. C., Smith, M. U., James, M. C., & Jensen, M. (2005). Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2011). A series of misrepresentations: A response to Allchin’s whole science approach to assessing nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 96, 685–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Scientific literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), The communication of scientific information (pp. 44–52). Basel: Karger.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science & Education, 83, 493–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (2008). A multi-year program developing an explicit reflective pedagogy for teaching pre-service teachers the nature of science by ostention. Science & Education, 17, 219–248.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, J. (1941). Umbrellaology, or, methodology in social science. Philosophy of Science, 8, 557–566.
   Google Scholar
• Stinner, A., & Williams, H. (1993). Conceptual change, history and science stories. Interchange, 24, 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Stinner, A., & Williams, H. (1998). History and philosophy of science in the science curriculum. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), The international handbook of science education (pp. 1027–1045). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Suchting, W. A. (1995). The nature of scientific thought. Science & Education, 4, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. R. (1980). Why astrology is a pseudoscience. In E. D. Klemke, R. Hollinger, & A. D. Kline (Eds.), Introductory readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 66–73). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, E. M. (2011). Portraying real science in science communication. Science & Education, 95, 1086–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. (1992). A mythology of reason: The persistence of pseudo-science in the modern world. In S. A. McKnight (Ed.), Science, pseudo-science, and utopianism in early modern thought (pp. 141–166). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. M. (1987). Racist society, racist science. In D. Gill & L. Levidow (Eds.), Anti-racist science teaching (pp. 16–42). London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar