13,925
Views
85
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Equity in informal science education: developing an access and equity framework for science museums and science centres

References

  • Aguirre, C. (2014). Science centers. Which roles can they play to participate in a city social reconstruction? Journal of Science Communication, 13(2), 1–12.
  • Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52.10.1080/03057269608560077
  • Aikenhead, G. (2002). Science communication with the public: A cross-cultural event. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 151–166). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence based practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Ash, D. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 138–162. doi:10.1002/tea.1006910.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Ash, D. (2004). Reflective scientific sense-making dialogue in two languages: The science in the dialogue and the dialogue in the science. Science & Education, 88, 855–884.
  • Ash, D., & Lombana, J. (2011, April 3–6). Reculturing museums: Scaffolding towards equitable mediation in informal settings. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching international conference, Orlando, FL.
  • Association of Science and Technology Centres. (1987). Natural partners: How science centres and community groups can team up to increase scientific literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Atkinson, R., Siddall, K., & Mason, C. (2014). Experiments in engagement: Engaging with young people from disadvantaged backgrounds. London: Wellcome Trust.
  • Bain, R., & Ellenbogen, K. M. (2002). Placing objects within disciplinary perspectives: Examples from history and science. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 140–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2008). An experience for the lifelong journey: The long-term effect of a class visit to a science center. Visitor Studies, 11, 198–212.10.1080/10645570802355760
  • Bandelli, A., & Konijn, E. A. (2012). Science centers and public participation: Methods, strategies, and barriers. Science Communication, 35, 419–448.
  • Bandelli, A., Konijn, E. A., & Willems, J. W. (2009). The need for public participation in the governance of science centers. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24, 89–104.10.1080/09647770902857497
  • Basu, S. J., Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2011). Democratic science teaching: Building the expertise to empower low-income minority youth in science. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6091-370-9
  • Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E., Warde, A., Gayo-Cal, M., & Wright, D. (2009). Culture, class, distinction. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Borun, M. (1999). Gender roles in science museum learning. Visitor Studies Today! 3(3), 11–14.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812507
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Darbel, A. (1991). The love of art: European art museums and their public. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Johnson, R. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans., 2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Bradu, C., Orquin, J., & Thøgersen, J. (2013). The mediated influence of a traceability label on consumer’s willingness to buy the labelled product. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–13.
  • Brice Heath, S. (2007). Diverse learning and learner diversity in ‘informal’ science learning environments. Palo Alto, CA: National Research Council Board on Science Education.
  • Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bruner, J. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bultitude, K., McDonald, D., & Custead, S. (2011). The rise and rise of science festivals: An international review of organised events to celebrate science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1, 165–188.10.1080/21548455.2011.588851
  • Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Ermer, J. L., Burkett, T. A., & Osborne, M. D. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Carlone, H. B. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 17–34.10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1
  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Crowley, K. (1999). Parent explanations during museum visits: Gender differences in how children hear informal science. Visitor Studies Today! 3(3), 21–28.
  • Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12, 258–261.10.1111/1467-9280.00347
  • Dancu, T. (2010). Designing exhibits for gender equity (PhD dissertation). Portland State University, Portland.
  • Dawson, E. (in press). ‘Not designed for us’: How science museums and science centres socially exclude low-income, minority ethnic groups. Science & Education.
  • Dawson, E., & Jensen, E. (2011). Towards a ‘contextual turn’ in visitor studies: Evaluating visiting segmentation and identity-related motivations. Visitor Studies, 14, 127–140.10.1080/10645578.2011.608001
  • Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–299.
  • Delpit, L. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.
  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2011). Taking part: The national survey of culture, leisure and sport. London: Author.
  • DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2010). Recollections of exhibits: Stimulated-recall interviews with primary school children about science centre visits. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1365–1388.10.1080/09500690903085664
  • Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2009). Learning for life: The role of free-choice learning in science education. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), World of science education: North America (pp. 179–206). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Duensing, S. (2006). Culture matters: Informal science centes and cultural contexts. In Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbules, & D. Silberman Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal education reader (pp. 183–202). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Dumais, S. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75, 44–68.10.2307/3090253
  • Ecsite-UK. (2008). Inspiration, engagement and learning: The value of Science & Discovery Centres in the UK, working towards a benchmarking framework. Bristol: Ecsite-UK.
  • Ellenbogen, K. M. (2002). Museums in family life: An ethnographic case study. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 81–101). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists: Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology. Brussels: Author.
  • Falk, J. H. (2002). The contribution of free-choice learning to public understanding of science. Interciencia, 27, 62–65.
  • Falk, J. H. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  • Falk, J. H. (2011). Contextualizing Falk’s identity-related visitor motivation model. Visitor Studies, 14, 141–157.10.1080/10645578.2011.608002
  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2012). Lifelong learning for adults: The role of free-choice experiences. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1063–1079). London: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7
  • Falk, J. H., Osborne, J., Dierking, L. D., Dawson, E., Wenger, M., & Wong, B. (2012). Analyzing the UK science education community: The contribution of informal providers. London: Wellcome Trust.
  • Feinstein, N. W., & Meshoulam, D. (2014). Science for what public? Addressing equity in American science museums and science centers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 368–394.10.1002/tea.v51.3
  • Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Foggett, M. (2008). Community consultation at the Dana centre: An audience-led project between London’s African-Caribbean community and the Science Museum. London: Science Museum.
  • Fraser, N. (1987). Social movements vs. disciplinary bureaucracies: The discourse of social needs ( CHS Occasional Paper No. 8). Minneapolis, MN: Centre for Humanistic Studies, University of Minnesota.
  • Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. In N. Fraser & A. Honneth, Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 7–109). London: Verso.
  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
  • Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Freire, P., & Freire, A. M. A. (1992). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Garibay, C. (2009). Latinos, leisure values, and decisions: Implications for informal science learning and engagement. The Informal Learning Review, 94, 10–13.
  • Gayo-Cal, M. (2006). Leisure and participation in Britain. Cultural Trends, 15, 175–192.10.1080/09548960600713015
  • Gieryn, T. F. (1998). Balancing acts: Science, Enola Gay and history wars at the Smithsonian. In S. Macdonald (Ed.), The politics of display: Museums, science, culture (pp. 197–228). London: Routledge.
  • Golding, V. (2009). Learning at the museum frontiers: Identity, race and power. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Grabill, J. T. (1998). Utopic visions, the technopoor, and public access: Writing technologies in a community literacy program. Computers and Composition, 15, 297–315.10.1016/S8755-4615(98)90003-2
  • Gurian, E. H. (2006). Civilizing the museum: The collected writings of Elaine Heumann Gurian. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall (Ed.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–79 (pp. 107–116). Birmingham, AL: Umwin Hyman.
  • Hall, S. (1996). Who needs ‘identity’? In S. Hall & P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–19). London: Sage.
  • Harding, S. (2006). Science and social inequality: Feminist and postcolonial issues. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialisms, and modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822381181
  • Heath, C., Lehn, D. V., & Osborne, J. (2005). Interaction and interactives: Collaboration and participation with computer-based exhibits. Public Understanding of Science, 14, 91–101.10.1177/0963662505047343
  • Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachiotte, W., Jr., & Cain, C. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • hooks, b. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. Boston, MA: South End Press.
  • hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge.
  • Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1994). Museums and their visitors. London: Routledge.
  • Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1995). Museums and communication: An introductory essay. In E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), Museum, media, message (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203456514
  • Hooper-Greenhill, E., Dodd, J., Creaser, C., Sandell, R., Jones, C., & Woodham, A. (2007). Inspiration, identity, learning: The value of museums. Second study. An evaluation of the DCMS/DCSF National/Regional Museum Partnership Programme in 2006–2007. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport.
  • Ipsos MORI. (2001). Visitors to museums and galleries in the UK. London: Resource, The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries.
  • Ipsos MORI. (2006). Renaissance in the regions 2005: Visitor exit survey – Final national report. London: Museums Libraries Archives.
  • Ipsos MORI. (2011). Public attitudes to science 2011. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
  • Ipsos MORI. (2014). Public attitudes to science 2014. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
  • Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (1996). Introduction. In A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511563737
  • Jasanoff, S. (1997). Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 221–232.10.1088/0963-6625/6/3/002
  • Kelly, G. (2010). Scientific literacy, discourse, and epistemic practices. In C. J. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Ericksen, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 61–73). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • King, H., & Dillon, J. (2012). Learning in informal settings. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1905–1908). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Lawler, S. (2014). Identity: Sociological perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Lee, O. (1999). Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents. Review of Educational Research, 69, 83–115.10.3102/00346543069001083
  • Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2010). Diversity and equity in science education: Research, policy, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Westport, CT: Ablex.
  • Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Levin, A. K. (2010a). Straight talk: Evolution exhibits and the reproduction of heterosexuality. In A. K. Levin (Ed.), Gender, sexuality and museums (pp. 201–212). London: Routledge.
  • Levin, A. K. (Ed.). (2010b). Gender, sexuality and museums. London: Routledge.
  • Levitas, R. (2004). Let’s hear it for Humpty: Social exclusion, the third way and cultural capital. Cultural Trends, 13, 41–56.10.1080/0954896042000267143
  • Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 330–345.
  • Lynch, B. (2001). If the museum is the gateway, who is the gatekeeper? Engage, 11, 12–21.
  • Lynch, B. (2011). Whose cake is it anyway? A collaborative investigation into engagement and participation in 12 museums and galleries in the UK. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
  • Lynch, B., & Alberti, S. J. M. M. (2010). Legacies of prejudice: Racism, co-production and radical trust in the museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25, 13–35.10.1080/09647770903529061
  • Macdonald, S. (1998). Exhibitions of power and power of exhibition: An introduction to the politics of display. In S. Macdonald (Ed.), The politics of display: Museums, science, culture (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Macdonald, S. (2002). Behind the scenes at the Science Museum. Oxford: Berg.
  • Machin, R. (2010). Gender representation in the natural history galleries at the Manchester Museum. In A. K. Levin (Ed.), Gender, sexuality and museums (pp. 187–200). London: Routledge.
  • Mack, E., Augare, H., Different Cloud-Jones, L., Davíd, D., Quiver Gaddie, H., Honey, R., … Wippert, R. (2012). Effective practices for creating transformative informal science education programs grounded in native ways of knowing. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 49–70.10.1007/s11422-011-9374-y
  • Massarani, L., & Merzagora, M. (2014). Socially inclusive science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 13(2), 1–2.
  • Matthews, J. (2008). A missing link? The imagined audience, news practices and the production of children’s news. Journalism Practice, 2, 264–279.10.1080/17512780801999402
  • McCallie, E., Bell, L., Lohwater, T., Falk, J. H., Lehr, J. L., Lewenstein, B., … Wiehe, B. (2009). Many experts, many audiences: Public engagement with science and informal education. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education.
  • McKinley, E. (2008). From object to subject: Hybrid identities of indigenous women in science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 959–975.10.1007/s11422-008-9128-7
  • McNeil, M. (2007). Feminist cultural studies of science and technology. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014). Who’s asking? Native science, western science, and science education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Michael, M. (2006). Technoscience and everyday life: The complex simplicities of the mundane. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Mickelson, R. A. (2003). Gender, Bourdieu, and the anomaly of women’s achievement redux. Sociology of Education, 76, 373–375.10.2307/1519873
  • Mortensen, M. F., & Smart, K. (2007). Free-choice worksheets increase students’ exposure to curriculum during museum visits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1389–1414.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • National Science Foundation. (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: Author.
  • Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  • New York Hall of Science. (2010). The science career ladder: 1986–2010. New York, NY: Author.
  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science & Education, 87, 224–240.
  • OECD. (2012). Education at a glance 2012: OECD indicators. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en
  • Ogbu, J. U. (1992). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educational Researcher, 21(8), 5–14.10.3102/0013189X021008005
  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
  • Packer, J. (2008). Beyond learning: Exploring visitors’ perceptions of the value and benefits of museum experiences. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51, 33–54.10.1111/cura.2008.51.issue-1
  • Palmquist, S., & Crowley, K. (2007). From teachers to testers: How parents talk to novice and expert children in a natural history museum. Science & Education, 91, 783–804.
  • Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centres and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37, 1–41.10.1080/03057260208560176
  • Phipps, M. (2010). Research trends and findings from a decade (1997–2007) of research on informal science education and free-choice science learning. Visitor Studies, 13, 3–22.10.1080/10645571003618717
  • Porter, J. E. (1998). Rhetorical ethics and internetworked writing. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
  • Rahm, J. (2008). Urban youths’ hybrid positioning in science practices at the margin: A look inside a school–museum–scientist partnership project and an after-school science program. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 97–121.10.1007/s11422-007-9081-x
  • Rahm, J. (2010). Science in the making at the margin: A multisited ethnography of learning and becoming in an afterschool program, a garden and a math and science upward bound program. Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Ramey-Gassert, L. (1996). Same place, different experiences: Exploring the influence of gender on students’ science museum experiences. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 903–912.10.1080/0950069960180803
  • Reay, D. (1998). Cultural reproduction: Mothers’ involvement in their children’s primary schooling. In M. Grenfell & D. James (Eds.), Bourdieu and education (pp. 55–71). London: Falmer Press.
  • Rice, D. (1992). Vision and culture: The role of musuems in visual literacy. In S. K. Nichols (Ed.), Patterns in practice (pp. 144–152). Washington, DC: Museum Education Roundtable.
  • Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2008). Bricolage, métissage, hybridity, heterogeneity, diaspora: Concepts for thinking science education in the 21st century. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 891–916.10.1007/s11422-008-9113-1
  • Roth, W.-M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.10.4324/9780203463918
  • Ruiz-Funes, C. R. (2008). Mediation within science centres and museums. The guides of Universum, México. Journal of Science Communication, 7(4), 1–4.
  • Sandell, R. (1998). Museums as agents of social inclusion. Museum Management and Curatorship, 17, 401–418.10.1080/09647779800401704
  • Sandell, R. (2007). Museums, prejudice and the reframing of difference. London: Routledge.
  • Sandell, R., Dodd, J., & Garland-Thomson, R. (2010). Preface. In R. Sandell, J. Dodd, & R. Garland-Thomson (Eds.), Re-presenting disability: Activism and agency in the museum (pp. xix–xx). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Schlereth, T. J. (1992). Cultural history and material culture: Everyday life, landscapes, museums. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
  • Shanahan, M.-C. (2009). Identity in science learning: Exploring the attention given to agency and structure in studies of identity. Studies in Science Education, 45, 43–64.10.1080/03057260802681847
  • Shanahan, M.-C., & Nieswandt, M. (2011). Science student role: Evidence of social structural norms specific to school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 367–395.10.1002/tea.v48.4
  • Shanahan, M.-C., Pedretti, E., DeCoito, I., & Baker, L. (2011). Exploring the responses of underrepresented students in science to an elementary classroom outreach program. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 131–142.10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00071.x
  • Simon, N. (2010). The participatory museum. Santa Cruz, CA: Museum 2.0.
  • Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender. London: Sage.
  • Song, X., & Zhao, J. (2012). The practice of HPS educational model in science museum. Elementary & Secondary Schooling Abroad, 11, 60–65.
  • Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Teaching sciences: The multicultural question revisited. Science & Education, 85, 35–49.
  • Stocklmayer, S., Rennie, L., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46, 1–44.10.1080/03057260903562284
  • Storksdieck, M., Haley-Goldman, K., & Jones, M. C. (2002). Impact of the New York Hall of Science Career Ladder Program on its former participants. Annapolis, MD: Institute for Learning Innovation.
  • Streicher, B., Unterleitner, K., & Schulze, H. (2014). Knowledge rooms – Science communication in local, welcoming spaces to foster social inclusion. Journal of Science Communication, 13(2), 1–5.
  • Tait Lima, M., das Neves, E. F., & Dagnino, R. (2008). Popularization of science in Brazil: Getting onto the public agenda, but how? Journal of Science Communication, 7(4), 2–8.
  • Tal, T., & Alkaher, I. (2010). Collaborative environmental projects in a multicultural society: Working from within separate or mutual landscapes? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 325–349.10.1007/s11422-009-9202-9
  • Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Gutiérrez, M. V., & Turner, E. (2012). Empowering science and mathematics education in urban schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226037998.001.0001
  • Tenenbaum, H. R., & Callanan, M. A. (2008). Parents’ science talk to their children in Mexican-descent families residing in the USA. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 1–12.10.1177/0165025407084046
  • Tervalon, M., & Murray-Garcia, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9, 117–125.10.1353/hpu.2010.0233
  • The Association for Science and Discovery Centres. (2010). Assessing the impact of UK Science and Discovery Centres: Towards a set of common indicators. Bristol: Author.
  • Tissier, D., & Singh Nathoo, S. (2004). Telling it like it is: Non-user research. Black and minority ethnic engagement with London’s museums. London: Strategic Urban Futures.
  • Tlili, A. (2008). Behind the policy mantra of the inclusive museum: Receptions of social exclusion and inclusion in museums and science centres. Cultural Sociology, 2, 123–147.10.1177/1749975507086277
  • Trienekens, S. (2002). ‘Colourful’ distinction: The role of ethnicity and ethnic orientation in cultural consumption. Poetics, 30, 281–298.10.1016/S0304-422X(02)00025-6
  • Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). Conversations of family and primary school groups at robotic dinosaurs in a museum? What do they talk about? Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3), 17–33.10.1007/BF03174706
  • Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Laterveer-de Beer, M. (2002). An interactive exhibition about animal skeletons: Did the visitors learn any zoology? Journal of Biological Education, 36, 130–134.10.1080/00219266.2002.9655818
  • Uyen Tran, L., & King, H. (2007). The professionalization of museum educators: The case in science museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 22, 131–149.10.1080/09647770701470328
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Harvard, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wellcome Trust. (2008). Millennium science centres impact assessment report. Executive summary. London: Author.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V., Minick, N., & Arns, J. (1984). The creation of context in joint problem solving. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social contexts (pp. 151–171). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Yalowitz, S., Garibay, C., Renner, N., & Plaza, C. (2013). Bilingual exhibit research initiative: Institutional and intergenerational experiences with bilingual exhibitions. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education.
  • Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 69–91.10.1080/1361332052000341006
  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zouaoui, A. (2007). Education, facilitation and inclusion – The Tunisian experience. Journal of Science Communication, 6(2), 1–2.