The challenge of plural conceptions

References

• Bachelard, G. (1940/1968). The philosophy of no: A philosophy of the scientific mind. New York, NY: Orion Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2009). Force, ontology, and language. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5, 010110.10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010110
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. E., & Hammer, D. (2013). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 121–137). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Waltman, M. S. (1988). Cognitive complexity: Using the role category questionnaire measure. In C. H. Tardy (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring and assessing communication processes (pp. 1–35). Westport, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Caravita, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89–111.10.1016/0959-4752(94)90020-5
   Google Scholar
• Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmeche, C. (1997). Defining life, explaining emergence. Retrieved August 20, 2014, from http://www.nbi.dk/~emmeche/cePubl/97e.defLife.v3 f.html
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61–98.10.1080/03057268308559905
   Google Scholar
• Gold, P. E., & McGaugh, J. L. (1984). Endogenous processes in memory consolidation. In H. Weingartner & E. S. Parker (Eds.), Memory consolidation (pp. 65–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or P-prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 97–127.10.1207/s15327809jls0502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964/1999). The early growth of logic in the child: Classification and seriation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (2003). A brief introduction to personal construct theory. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 4–20). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Knefelkamp, L. L., & Slepitza, R. (1978). A cognitive-developmental model of career development: An adaptation of the Perry scheme. In C. A. Parker (Ed.), Encouraging development in college students (pp. 135–150). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurfiss, J. G. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1988). The society of mind. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, W. S. (1994). Student and faculty epistemology in the college classroom: The Perry schema of intellectual and ethical development. In K. W. Prichard & R. M. Sawyer (Eds.), Handbook of college teaching: Theory and applications (pp. 45–67). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science & Education, 4, 267–285.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 2–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1868). Some consequences of four incapacities. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2, 140–157.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Pervin, L. A. (1984). Personality. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1965). The child’s conception of number. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (1986). Intuitive theories – A researcher’s dilemma: Some practical methodological implications. British Educational Research Journal, 12, 153–166.10.1080/0141192860120205
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1978, April 7). Three worlds. Paper presented at the Tanner Lecture on Human Values, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Retrieved August 4, 2014, from https://www.thee-online.com/Documents/Popper-3Worlds.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science & Education, 66, 211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1988). Representation and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (2004). Ethics without ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reif, F. (2008). Applying cognitive science to education. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shermer, M. (2012). The believing brain: From spiritual faiths to political convictions – how we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths. London: Constable & Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2000). Multiple frameworks?: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 399–417.10.1080/095006900289813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. (2005, February). Conceptual integration and science learners – Do we expect too much? Seminar paper presented at the Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Retrieved August 4, 2014, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003875.htm
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2008). Conceptual resources for learning science: Issues of transience and grain‐size in cognition and cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1027–1053.10.1080/09500690701485082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2431-2
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2013). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7648-7
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C., & Huang, C. (2001). Development of cognitive structures and information processing strategies of elementary school students learning about biological reproduction. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 21–26.10.1080/00219266.2001.9655791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585.10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1931/1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. (1982). Gravity – don't take it for granted! Physics Education, 17, 116–121.10.1088/0031-9120/17/3/306
   Google Scholar
• Weiskopf, D. A. (2009). The plurality of concepts. Synthese, 169, 145–173.10.1007/s11229-008-9340-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, L., Flammini, A., Vespignani, A., & Menczer, F. (2012). Competition among memes in a world with limited attention. Nature Scientific Reports, 2. Article no. 335. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/120329/srep00335/full/srep00335.html?WT.mc_id=FBK_SciReports
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, P. (1999). Rhetoric and relativism: Protagoras and Gorgias. In A. A. Long (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to early Greek philosophy (pp. 290–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521441226
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar