Evidence for effective uses of dynamic visualisations in science curriculum materials

References

• *Adegoke, B. A. (2010). Integrating animations, narratives and textual information for improving physics learning. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 725–748.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S. E. (1999). A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33, 131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S. E. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183–198.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Aldahmash, A. H., & Abraham, M. R. (2009). Kinetic versus static visuals for facilitating college students’ understanding of organic reaction mechanisms in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 86, 1442–1446.10.1021/ed086p1442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ali, A. (2010). Effects of teacher controlled segmented-animation presentation in facilitating learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19, 367–378.
   Google Scholar
• Anastopoulou, A., Sharples, M., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., O’Malley, C., & Wright, M. (2011). Creating personal meaning through technology supported science learning across formal and informal settings. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 251–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Andres, H. P., & Petersen, C. (2002). Presentation media, information complexity, and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30, 225–246.10.2190/3TWA-NVA7-0MEW-402J
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Human memory. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bivall, P., Ainsworth, S., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2011). Do haptic representations help complex molecular learning? Science & Education, 95, 700–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Bruchmuller, K., & Hacker, S. (2005). Supporting learning with interactive multimedia through active integration of representations. Instructional Science, 33, 73–95.10.1007/s11251-004-7685-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743386
   Google Scholar
• *Boucheix, J., & Lowe, R. K. (2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction, 20, 123–135.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Boucheix, J. M., & Schneider, E. (2009). Static and animated presentations in learning dynamic mechanical systems. Learning and Instruction, 19, 112–127.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Schneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• *Chan, M. S., & Black, J. B. (2006, June). Direct-manipulation animation: Incorporating the haptic channel in the learning process to support middle school students in science learning and mental model acquisition. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, P. (2004). The crucial role of cognitive processes in the design of dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 353–357.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chang, H.-Y., & Linn, M. C. (2013). Scaffolding learning from molecular visualizations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 858–886.10.1002/tea.v50.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chang, H., Quintana, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter. Science & Education, 94, 73–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *ChanLin, L. (2001). Formats and prior knowledge on learning in a computer-based lesson. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 409–419.10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00197.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2012). The role of self-monitoring in learning chemistry with dynamic visualization. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition and science education: Trends in current research (pp. 133–163). London: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6
   Google Scholar
• *Cid, X. C., & Lopez, R. E. (2010). The impact of stereo display on student understanding of phases of the moon. Astronomy Education Review, 9, 010105.
   Google Scholar
• *Clark, D., & Jorde, D. (2004). Helping students revise disruptive experientially supported ideas about thermodynamics: Computer visualizations and tactile models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1–23.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science & Education, 90, 1073–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• *Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 428–434.10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, C., Harris, C., & Rutstein, D. (2013). Systematic review and meta-analysis of STEM simulations. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 conference proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 239–240). Madison, WI: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340, 305–308.10.1126/science.1230579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 731–746.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2010a). Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction, 20, 111–122.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2010b). Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations: Two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations. Computers & Education, 55, 681–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2011a). Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The role of presentation speed. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 41–45.10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2011b). Improved effectiveness of cueing by self-explanations when learning from a complex animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 183–194.10.1002/acp.v25.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, D. F., Linn, M. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2014). Impacts and characteristics of computer-based science inquiry learning environments for precollege students. Review of Educational Research, 84, 572–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dunsworth, Q., & Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent’s image. Computers & Education, 49, 677–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 355–385.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391–450.10.1080/10508406.1999.9672075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., … Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300.10.3102/0034654308325998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Falvo, D. A., & Suits, J. P. (2009). Gender and spatial ability and the use of specific labels and diagrammatic arrows in a micro-level chemistry animation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41, 83–102.10.2190/EC.41.1.d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fischer, S., & Schwan, S. (2010). Comprehending animations: Effects of spatial cueing versus temporal scaling. Learning and Instruction, 20, 465–475.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2005). The game, the pieces, and the players: Generative resources from two instructional portrayals of experimentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 449–487.10.1207/s15327809jls1404_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. S., & diSessa, A. A. (1999). What students should know about technology: The case of scientific visualization. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 175–195.10.1023/A:1009404212653
   Google Scholar
• *Fund, Z. (2007). The effects of scaffolded computerized science problem-solving on achievement outcomes: A comparative study of support programs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 410–424.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82, 300–329. doi:10.3102/003465431245720610.3102/0034654312457206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313–331.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 69–110.10.1207/s15327809jls1401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 713–729.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 325–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722–738.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Höffler, T. N., Prechtl, H., & Nerdel, C. (2010). The influence of visual cognitive style when learning from instructional animations and static pictures. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 479–483.10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Huk, T., Steinke, M., & Floto, C. (2010). The educational value of visual cues and 3D-representational format in a computer animation under restricted and realistic conditions. Instructional Science, 38, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Imhof, B., Scheiter, K., Edelmann, J., & Gerjets, P. (2012). How temporal and spatial aspects of presenting visualizations affect learning about locomotion patterns. Learning and Instruction, 22, 193–205.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 621–629.10.1037/a0015183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 169–175.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Google Scholar
• *Kartal, G. (2010). Does language matter in multimedia learning? Personalization principle revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 615–624.10.1037/a0019345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, P. (2006). Effects of 3D virtual reality of plate tectonics on fifth grade students’ achievement and attitude toward science. Interactive Learning Environments, 14, 25–34.10.1080/10494820600697687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, S. I., Yoon, M., Whang, S. M., Tversky, B., & Morrison, J. B. (2007). The effect of animation on comprehension and interest. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 260–270.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00219.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kombartzky, U., Ploetzner, R., Schlag, S., & Metz, B. (2010). Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animations. Learning and Instruction, 20, 424–433.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Koroghlanian, C., & Klein, J. D. (2004). The effect of audio and animation in multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• *Kriz, S., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 911–930.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kuhl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Gemballa, S. (2011). Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? Computers & Education, 56, 176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, H. (2007). Instructional design of web-based simulations for learners with different levels of spatial ability. Instructional Science, 35, 467–479.10.1007/s11251-006-9010-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, H., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2006). Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 902–913.10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, K., Nicoll, G., & Brooks, D. W. (2004). A comparison of inquiry and worked example web-based instruction using Physlets. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 81–88.10.1023/B:JOST.0000019640.07432.2b
   Google Scholar
• *Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13, 177–189.10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00019-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lin, C.-L., & Dwyer, F. M. (2004). Effect of varied animated enhancement strategies in facilitating achievement of different educational objectives. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31, 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• *Lin, H., & Dwyer, F. M. (2010). The effect of static and animated visualization: A perspective of instructional effectiveness and efficiency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 155–174.10.1007/s11423-009-9133-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164603
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183–200). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816819
   Google Scholar
• *Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390–397.10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 389–395.10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mayer, R. E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I. T. N., & Rothman, D. (2008). Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 329–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 11, 256–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87–99.10.1023/A:1013184611077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43–52.10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389–401.10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McClean, P., Johnson, C., Rogers, R., Daniels, L., Reber, J., Slator, B. M., … White, A. (2005). Molecular and cellular biology animations: Development and impact on student learning. Cell Biology Education, 4, 169–179.10.1187/cbe.04-07-0047
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McElhaney, K. W., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Investigations of a complex, realistic task: Intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive experimenters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 745–770.10.1002/tea.v48.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction – what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474–496. doi:10.1002/tea.2034710.1002/tea.v47:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minstrell, J. (2001). The role of the teacher in making sense of classroom experiences and effecting better learning. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 121–149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 165–173.10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Munyofu, M., Swain, W. J., Ausman, B. D., Lin, H., Kidwai, K., & Dwyer, F. (2007). The effect of different chunking strategies in complementing animated instruction. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 407–419.10.1080/17439880701690109
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S. (2010, Summer). Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• *O’Day, D. H. (2006). Animated cell biology: A quick and easy method for making effective, high-quality teaching animations. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 5, 255–263.10.1187/cbe.05-11-0122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Day, D. H. (2008). Using animations to teach biology: Past & future research on the attributes that underlie pedagogically sound animations. The American Biology Teacher, 70, 274–278.10.1662/0002-7685(2008)70[274:UATTBP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Paas, F., Van Gerven, P. W., & Wouters, P. (2007). Instructional efficiency of animation: Effects of interactivity through mental reconstruction of static key frames. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 783–793.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal process. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1991). Images in minds: The evolution of a theory. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Hayward, E. (2009). Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 31–61.10.1007/s12528-009-9011-x
   Google Scholar
• Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2012). A systemic characterization of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 781–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ploetzner, R., Lippitsch, S., Galmbacher, M., Heuer, D., & Scherrer, S. (2009). Students’ difficulties in learning from dynamic visualisations and how they may be overcome. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 56–65.10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., … Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337–386.10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rebetez, C., Sangin, M., Bétrancourt, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010). Learning from animation enabled by collaboration. Instructional Science, 38, 471–485.10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rieber, L. P., & Noah, D. (2008). Games, simulations, and visual metaphors in education: Antagonism between enjoyment and learning. Educational Media International, 45, 77–92.10.1080/09523980802107096
   Google Scholar
• *Riess, W., & Mischo, C. (2010). Promoting systems thinking through biology lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 705–725.10.1080/09500690902769946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58, 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ryoo, K. L., & Linn, M. C. (2012). Can dynamic visualizations improve middle school students’ understanding of energy in photosynthesis? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 218–243.10.1002/tea.21003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalise, K., Timms, M., Moorjani, A., Clark, L., Holtermann, K., & Irvin, P. S. (2011). Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1050–1078.10.1002/tea.v48.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schar, S. G., & Zimmermann, P. G. (2007). Investigating means to reduce cognitive load from animations: Applying differentiated measures of knowledge representation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 64–78.10.1080/15391523.2007.10782497
   Google Scholar
• *Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., Imhof, B., & Kammerer, Y. (2009). The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 19, 481–494.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141–156.10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 47–58.10.1007/BF02504797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students’ understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 165–205.10.1207/s1532690xci2302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, S., Hilton, M., & Schweingruber, H. (2005). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1337–1370.10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Tabbers, H. K., & de Koeijer, B. (2010). Learner control in animated multimedia instructions. Instructional Science, 38, 441–453.10.1007/s11251-009-9119-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tate, E. D. (2009). Asthma in the community: Designing instruction to help students explore scientific dilemmas that impact their lives (Dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• *Timpe, S., & Wichmann, A. (2012, August 22–24). How can we prepare learners to benefit from experimentation during an inquiry cycle? Paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction SIG 20 conference, Bochum, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247–262.10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Urhahne, D., Nick, S., & Schanze, S. (2009). The effect of three-dimensional simulations on the understanding of chemical structures and their properties. Research in Science Education, 39, 495–513.10.1007/s11165-008-9091-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van der Meij, J., & de Jong, T. (2006). Supporting students’ learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 199–212.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van der Meij, J., & de Jong, T. (2011). The effects of directive self-explanation prompts to support active processing of multiple representations in a simulation-based learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 411–423.10.1111/jca.2011.27.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van Oostendorp, H., Beijersbergen, M. J., & Solaimani, S. (2008). Conditions for learning from animations. In International perspectives in the learning sciences: Creating a learning world. Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 435–438). Utrecht: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• *Veermans, K., van Joolingen, W., & de Jong, T. (2006). Use of heuristics to facilitate scientific discovery learning in a simulation learning environment in a physics domain. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 341–361.10.1080/09500690500277615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, C. (2013). Information visualization: Perception for design. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. E., Knowlton, D. S., & Morrison, G. R. (2002). Principles for using animation in computer-based instruction: Theoretical heuristics for effective design. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 465–477.10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00049-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yang, E.-M., Andre, T., & Greenbowe, T. (2003). Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 329–349.10.1080/09500690210126784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yarden, H., & Yarden, A. (2010). Learning using dynamic and static visualizations: Students’ comprehension, prior knowledge and conceptual status of a biotechnological method. Research in Science Education, 40, 375–402.10.1007/s11165-009-9126-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhang, J., Chen, Q., Sun, Y., & Reid, D. J. (2004). Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: Experimental research. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 269–282.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhang, Z., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1177–1198.10.1002/tea.20443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar