2,000
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Unpacking the paradox of Chinese science learners: insights from research into Asian Chinese school students’ attitudes towards learning science, science learning strategies, and scientific epistemological views

&

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1988). An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 607–629.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Baker, D. P. (1997). Surviving TIMSS: Or, everything you blissfully forgot about international comparisons. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 295–300.
  • Ballard, B., & Clanchy, C. (1991). Teaching students from overseas. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
  • Bembenutty, H. (2007). The last word: An interview with Frank Pajares: God, the Devil, William James, the Little Prince, and self-efficacy. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 660–677.
  • Biggs, J. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381–394.10.1007/BF01680526
  • Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Biggs, J. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal, 6, 27–39.
  • Biggs, J. (1994). Asian learners through Western eyes: An astigmatic paradox. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Vocational Educational Research, 2, 40–63.
  • Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In J. B. Biggs & D. Watkins (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 45–67). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
  • Biggs, J. B., & Moore, P. J. (1993). The process of learning. Sydney: Prentice Hall of Australia.
  • Boone, W. J. (1997). Science attitudes of selected middle school students in china: A preliminary investigation of similarities and differences as a function of gender. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 96–103.10.1111/ssm.1997.97.issue-2
  • Bracey, G. W. (1997). Accuracy as a frill. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 801–802.
  • Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965–980.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441–458.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in U.S. and Chinese students’ solving of process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 309–340.10.1207/S15327833MTL0204_4
  • Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 401–421.10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00142-6
  • Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2008). Attitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in Singapore. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 940–954.10.1002/tea.v45:8
  • Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392–414.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Wong, B., & Qian, Y. (2010). South China education majors’ epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of the nature of science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19, 111–125.
  • Chai, C. S., Deng, F., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). A comparison of scientific epistemological views between mainland China and Taiwan high school students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 17–26.10.1007/s12564-011-9174-9
  • Chan, S. (1999). The Chinese learner – A question of style.. Education + Training, 41, 294–305.
  • Chan, S. (2007). Learning strategies in a multicultural environment. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
  • Chang, C. Y., & Cheng, W. Y. (2008). Science achievement and students’ self-confidence and interest in science: A Taiwanese representative sample study. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1183–1200.10.1080/09500690701435384
  • Chen, S., Chang, W. H., Lieu, S. C., Kao, H. L., Huang, M. T., & Lin, S. F. (2013). Development of an empirically based questionnaire to investigate young students’ ideas about nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 408–430.10.1002/etc.v50.4
  • Cheung, D. (2009a). Developing a scale to measure students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 2185–2203.10.1080/09500690802189799
  • Cheung, D. (2009b). Students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons: The interaction effect between grade level and gender. Research in Science Education, 39, 75–91.10.1007/s11165-007-9075-4
  • Cheung, P. C., & Lau, S. (1985). Self-esteem: Its relationship to the family and school social environments among Chinese adolescents. Youth and Society, 16, 438–456.10.1177/0044118X85016004003
  • Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 815–843.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109–138.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<>1.0.CO;2-F
  • Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 883–908.10.1002/tea.20385
  • Chiou, G. L., Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). High school students’ approaches to learning physics with relationship to epistemic views on physics and conceptions of learning physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31, 1–15.
  • Chirkov, V. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and U.S. adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 618–635.10.1177/0022022101032005006
  • Clifford, M. M. (1986). The comparative effects of strategy and effort attributions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 75–83.10.1111/bjep.1986.56.issue-1
  • Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science and Education, 15, 463–494.10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7
  • Collis, B. A., & Williams, R. L. (1987). Cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in adolescents’ attitudes toward computers and selected school subjects. The Journal of Educational Research, 81, 17–27.10.1080/00220671.1987.10885792
  • Commission of European Communities. (2001). The concrete future objectives of education systems: Final report from the commission. Brussel: Author.
  • Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186–204.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
  • Cortazzi, M. (1998). Learning from Asian lessons: Cultural expectations and classroom talk. Education 3-13, 26, 42–49.
  • Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.10.3102/00346543058004438
  • Dahlin, B., & Watkins, D. (2000). The role of repetition in the processes of memorising and understanding: A comparison of the views of German and Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 65–84.10.1348/000709900157976
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
  • DeHaan, R. L. (2006). Education for innovation: A look at China and the U.S. China Currents, 5. Retrieved July 4, 2014, from http://www.chinacenter.net/China_Currents/fall_2006/ cc_dehaan.htm
  • Dekkers, J., & Delaeter, J. (2001). Enrolment trends in school science education in Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 487–500.10.1080/09500690118451
  • Deng, F., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., & Lin, T. J. (2014). Assessing South China (Guangzhou) high school students’ views on nature of science: A validation study. Science & Education, 23, 843–863.
  • Dogan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1083–1112.10.1002/tea.v45:10
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, A., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
  • Feniger, Y., & Lefstein, A. (2014). How not to reason with PISA data: An ironic investigation. Journal of Education Policy, 29, 845–855.10.1080/02680939.2014.892156
  • Fensham, P. J. (2007). Context or culture: Can TIMSS and PISA teach us about what determines educational achievement in science? In B. Atweh, A. Calabrese Barton, M. C. Borba, N. Gough, C. Keitel-Kreidt, C. Vistro-Yu, & R. Vithal (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 151–172). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5908-7
  • Foong, Y. Y., & Lam, T. L. (1988). Development and validation of the attitudes to science instrument. Singapore: Institute of Education.
  • Garg, K., & Gupta, B. (2003). Decline in science education in India: A case study at +2 and undergraduate level. Current Science, 84, 1198–1201.
  • Geary, D., Liu, F., & Bow-Thomas, C. (1992). Numerical cognition: Loci of ability differences comparing children from china and the United States. Psychological Science, 3, 180–185.10.1111/psci.1992.3.issue-3
  • Gibbs, W. W., & Fox, D. (1999). The false crisis in science education. Scientific American, 281, 86–93.10.1038/scientificamerican1099-86
  • Ginsberg, E. (1992). Not just a matter of English. Herdsa News, 14, 6–8.
  • Goto, M. (2001). Japan. In M. Poisson (Ed.), Science Education for Contemporary Society: Problems, Issues and Dilemmas (pp. 31–38). Geneva: International Bureau for Education, UNESCO.
  • Hau, K. T., & Salili, F. (1991). Structure and semantic differential placement of specific causes: Academic causal attributions by Chinese students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 175–193.10.1080/00207599108247885
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  • Holliday, W. G., & Holliday, B. W. (2003). Why using international comparative math and science achievement data from TIMSS is not helpful. The Educational Forum, 67, 250–257.10.1080/00131720309335038
  • Hong, Z. T., & Lin, H. S. (2011). An investigation of students’ personality traits and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1001–1028.10.1080/09500693.2010.524949
  • Huang, C. M., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2005). An investigation of Taiwanese early adolescents’ views about the nature of science. Adolescence, 40, 645–654.
  • Hung, E. H. C. (1997). The nature of science: Problems and perspectives. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20, 591–607.
  • Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1991). A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 117–128.10.1080/03075079112331382934
  • Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261–279.10.1348/000709904773839879
  • Laukenmann, M., Bleicher, M., Fuß, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P., & von Rhöneck, C. (2003). An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 489–507.10.1080/09500690210163233
  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lederman, N. G., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225–239.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92, 191–220.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Leung, F. K. S., Yung, B. H. W., Wong, S. L., Mok, I. D. A., & Leung, C. Y. C. (2010). The Hong Kong component of trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) 2007 final report. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Center for IEA Studies.
  • Li, X., & Chang, S. (2001). A positive cultural perspective on rote learning in China: An analysis of views from 100 Chinese learners of English, BALEAP PIMS Reports, 2001. Retrieved January 31, 2005, from http://www.baleap.org.uk/primreports/2001/shu/li.htm.
  • Lim, C. S. (2007). Characteristics of mathematics teaching in Shanghai, China: Through the lens of a Malaysian. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19, 77–88.10.1007/BF03217450
  • Lin, H. S., & Chiu, H. L. (2004). Student understanding of the nature of science and their problem-solving strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 101–112.10.1080/0950069032000070289
  • Lin, C. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring the structural relationships between high school students’ scientific epistemological views and their utilization of information commitments toward online science information. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 2001–2022.10.1080/09500690701613733
  • Lin, T. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A multi-dimensional instrument for evaluating Taiwanese high school students’ science learning self-efficacy in relation to their approaches to learning science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 1275–1301.10.1007/s10763-012-9376-6
  • Lin, H. S., Hong, Z. R., & Huang, T. C. (2012). The role of emotional factors in building public scientific literacy and engagement with science. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 25–42.10.1080/09500693.2010.551430
  • Lin, T. J., Deng, F., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). High school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, motivation in learning science, and their relationships: A comparative study within the Chinese culture. International Journal of Educational Development, 33, 37–47.10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.01.007
  • Lin, T. J., Goh, A. Y. S., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). An initial examination of Singaporean seventh and eighth graders’ views of nature of science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31, 117–132.
  • Lin, T. J., Tan, A. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison of Singaporean and Taiwanese eighth graders’ science learning self-efficacy from a multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 1083–1109.10.1080/09500693.2013.776193
  • Liu, Z. X. (2005). Chemistry curriculum and instruction. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
  • Ma, H. (2012). The images of science through cultural lenses: A Chinese study of the nature of science. Taipei: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6091-942-8
  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.10.1111/bjep.1976.46.issue-1
  • Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Tse, L. K. (1996). Memorizing and understanding: The keys to the paradox. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 69–83). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.
  • McComas, W. F. (1998). A thematic introduction to the nature of science: The rationale and content of a course for science educators. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 211–241). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Meyer, H. D., & Benavot, A. (2013). PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  • Misiti, F. L., Shrigley, R. L., & Hanson, L. (1991). Science attitude scale for middle school students. Science Education, 75, 525–540.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Morris, P. (1985). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to the implementation of a pedagogic innovation: A South East Asian case study. International Review of Education, 31, 3–18.10.1007/BF02262565
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
  • Murphy, D. (1987). Offshore education: A Hong Kong perspective. Australian Universities’ Review, 30, 43–44.
  • National Science Foundation. (2002). Science and engineering indicators 2002. Retrieved March 4, 2004 from www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind02/c0/c0sl.htm
  • Neber, H., He, J., Liu, B. X., & Schofield, N. (2008). Chinese high-school students in physics classroom as active, self-regulated learners: Cognitive, motivational and environmental aspects. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 769–788.10.1007/s10763-007-9110-y
  • O’Connor, J. E. (1991). A descriptive analysis of Chinese teachers’ thought processes. Paper presented at the conference on Chinese education for the 21st century, Honolulu, November 21.
  • Ogawa, M. (2005). Recent affairs in Japanese science education. Keynote lecture at Korean association for research in science education annual conference, Seoul, February.
  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2005). The self and academic motivation: Theory and research after the cognitive revolution. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), The impact of the cognitive revolution on educational psychology (pp. 165–198). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Peak, L. (1996). Pursuing excellence (NECES No. 97-198). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Washington, DC: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
  • Powell, M., & Kleinman, D. L. (2008). Building citizen capacities for participation in techno-scientific decision making: The democratic virtues of the consensus conference model. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 329–348.10.1177/0963662506068000
  • Pratt, D. D., & Wong, K. M. (1999). Chinese conceptions of “effective teaching” in Hong Kong: Towards culturally sensitive evaluation of teaching. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18, 241–258.10.1080/026013799293739a
  • Ramsden, P. (1985). Student learning research: Retrospect and prospect. Higher Education Research and Development, 4, 51–69.10.1080/0729436850040104
  • Rao, Z. H. (2006). Understanding Chinese students’ use of language learning strategies from cultural and educational perspectives. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27, 491–508.10.2167/jmmd449.1
  • Rubba, P., & Anderson, H. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62, 449–458.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Samuelowicz, K. (1987). Learning problems of overseas students: Two sides of a story. Higher Education Research and Development, 6, 121–133.10.1080/0729436870060204
  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40, 917–936.10.1002/berj.3120
  • Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176.10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
  • Sit, H. H. W. (2013). Characteristics of Chinese students’ learning styles. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 62, 36–39.
  • Sjøberg, S. (2015). PISA and global educational governance – A critique of the project, its uses and implications. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11, 111–127.
  • Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York, NY: Summit Books.
  • Stigler, J. W., & Stevenson, H. W. (1991). How Asian teachers polish each lesson to perfection. American Educator, 15, 12–20.
  • Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J. D. (1996). Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397–407.10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.397
  • Tobin, J. J., Wu, D. Y., & Davidson, D. H. (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students’ interest in biology. Science Education International, 17, 31–48.
  • Tsai, C. C., & Kuo, P. C. (2008). Cram school students’ conceptions of learning and learning science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 353–375.10.1080/09500690701191425
  • Tsai, C. C., & Liu, S. Y. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1621–1638.10.1080/09500690500206432
  • Tsai, C. C., Ho, H. N. J., Liang, J. C., & Lin, H. M. (2011). Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students. Learning and Instruction, 21, 757–769.
  • Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 639–654.10.1080/0950069042000323737
  • Tytler, R. (2014). Attitudes, identity, and aspirations toward science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 82–103). New York: Routledge.
  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 125–141.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.03.002
  • Wan, Z. H., Wong, S. L., & Yung, B. H. W. (2011). Common interest, common visions? Chinese science teacher educators’ views about the values of teaching nature of science to prospective science teachers. Science Education, 95, 1101–1123.10.1002/sce.v95.6
  • Wang, J. (1998). International achievement comparison: Interesting debates on inconclusive findings. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 376–382.10.1111/ssm.1998.98.issue-7
  • Wang, J., Oliver, J. S., & Staver, J. R. (2008). Self-concept and science achievement: Investigating a reciprocal relation model across the gender classification in a crosscultural context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 711–725.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Wilson, L. L. (1954). A study of opinions related to the nature of science and its purpose in society. Science Education, 38, 159–164.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Wong, P. L., & Fleer, M. (2012). A cultural-historical study of how children from Hong Kong immigrant families develop a learning motive within everyday family practices in Australia. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19, 107–126.10.1080/10749039.2011.634941
  • Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse’s mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93, 109–130.10.1002/sce.v93:1
  • Wong, K., & Wen, Q. (2001). The impact of university education on conceptions of learning: A Chinese study. International Education Journal, 2, 138–147.
  • Yan, W., & Gaier, E. L. (1994). Causal attributions for college success and failure an Asian–American comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 146–158.10.1177/0022022194251009
  • Yu, Z. Q. (2002). Science curriculum. Beijing: Educational Science Press.
  • Zeng, M. (2006). The adaptation of Mainland Chinese research postgraduates to the Universities of Hong Kong. (Unpublished PhD thesis). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.10.5353/th_b3700685
  • Zhou, N., Lam, S. F., & Chan, K. C. (2012). The Chinese classroom paradox: A cross-cultural comparison of teacher controlling behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1162–1174.10.1037/a0027609
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.