Probability-related naïve ideas across physics topics

References

• Abbott, D. S. (2003). Assessing student understanding of measurement and uncertainty. North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Allie, S., Buffler, A., Kaunda, L., Campbell, B., & Lubben, F. (1998). First-year physics students’ perceptions of the quality of experimental measurements. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almekinders, R., Thijs, G., & Fred, L. (1998). Development of procedural understanding among South African science students at pre-tertiary education level. Journal of Biological Education, 33(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1998.9655634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsop, S. (2001). Living with and learning about radioactivity: A comparative conceptual study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006901750066510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, R., Holding, B., Bell, J., & Daniels, S. (1991). Patterns and relationships in school science. Assess-Ment Matters, 7(1).
   Google Scholar
• Barragués, J. I., Guisasola, J., & Morais, A. (2006). Chance and probability: What do they mean to university engineering students? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(8), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390600818948
   Google Scholar
• Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. J., Engel, J., Lee, H. S., & Sánchez, E. (2016). Research on teaching and learning probability. In Research on teaching and learning probability (pp. 1–33). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31625-3_1
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T., & Euler, M. (2001). Learning about complex systems: How much instruction do we need to foster autonomous model construction. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopoulos, E. Hatzikraniotis, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society, Vol. 1. (pp. 291–293). Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T. (2007). Konzeptentwicklung in einer Lernprozessstudie im Breich “komplexe Systeme und Selbstregulation.”. Physik Und Didaktik in Schule Und Hochschule, 2(6), 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bethge, T. (1988). Aspekte des Schülervorverständnisses zu grundlegenden Begriffen der Atomphysik. Universität Bremen.
   Google Scholar
• Bethge, T. (1992). Vorstellung von Schülerinnen und Schülern zu Begriffen der Atomphysik. In H. F. Hrsg (Ed.), Quantenphysik in der Schule (pp. 215–233). IPN.
   Google Scholar
• Boeing, G. (2016). Visual analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems: Chaos, fractals, self-similarity and the limits of prediction. Systems, 4(4), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems4040037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, A., Reid, D., & Koretsky, M. (2015). Development of interactive virtual laboratories to help students learn difficult concepts in thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Education, 49(4), 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Buechter, A., Hussmann, S., Leuders, T., & Prediger, S. (2005). Den Zufall im Griff?–Stochastische Vorstellungen fördern. Praxis Der Mathematik in Der Schule, 47(4), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Buecker, N., Komorek, M., & Duit, R. (1999). Experimente, elementarisierungen und schuelervorstellungen im bereich fraktales wachstum. In: R. Brechel (Ed.): Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie, Probleme und Perspektiven - Vorträge zur GDCP-Jahrestagung in Essen 1998, Alsbach: Leuchtturm, 229–231
   Google Scholar
• Buffler, A., Allie, S., & Lubben, F. (2001). The development of first year physics students’ ideas about measurement in terms of point and set paradigms. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1137–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110039567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cauzinille-Marmeche, E., Meheut, M., Sere, M., & Weil-Barais, A. (1985). The influence of a priori ideas on the experimental approach. Science Education, 69(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730690212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J.-Y. (1999). Teachers college students’ conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Science Education, 83(5), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199909)83:5<511::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it, and the learning outcomes. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed.). Routledge. pp 61-82.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & Slotta, J. D. (1993). The ontological coherence of intuitive physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4 (1), 27–43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959475294900175.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, S. M., & Sere, M. (1998). Pupils’ reasoning and practice during hands‐on activities in the measurement phase. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514980160107
   Google Scholar
• Cros, D., Chastrette, M., & Fayol, M. (1988). Conceptions of second year university students of some fundamental notions in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidowitz, B., Lubben, F., & Rollnick, M. (2001). Undergraduate science and engineering students‘ understanding of the reliability of chemical data. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(2), 247. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Posada, J. M. (1997). Conceptions of high school students concerning the internal structure of metals and their electric conduction: Structure and evolution. Science Education, 81(4), 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199707)81:4<445::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deardorff, D. L. (2001). Introductory physics students’ treatment of measurement uncertainty. North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., Wales, P. W., (2014). No TitleDefining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSessa, A. A., Sherin, B., & Levin, M. (2016). Knowledge analysis: An introduction. In A. DiSessa, M. Levin, & N. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences (pp. 30–71). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DiSessa, A. A. (2017). Conceptual change in a microcosm: Comparative analysis of a learning event. Human Development, 60(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1159/000469693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döhrmann, M. (2005). Schülervorstellung zum Begriff “Zufall.”. In In: Graumann, G. (Ed.): Beitraege zum Mathematikunterricht 2005 – Vortraege auf der 39. Tagung für Didaktik der Mathematik, Bielefeld. Franzbecker: Hildesheim, S. 167-170 .
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography - STCSE students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Retrieved July 31, 2019, from http://archiv.ipn.uni-kiel.de/stcse/
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., Roth, W.-M., Komorek, M., & Wilbers, J. (1998). Conceptual change cum discourse analysis to understand cognition in a unit on chaotic systems: Towards an integrative perspective on learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children’s conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730630210
   Google Scholar
• Evangelinos, D., Psillos, D., & Valassiades, O. (2002). An investigation of teaching and learning about measurement data and their treatment in the introductory physics laboratory. In Teaching and learning in the science laboratory, Psillos, Dimitris, Niedderer, H. (eds.) (pp. 179–190). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fischler, H., & Lichtfeldt, M. (1992). Modern physics and students’ conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 14(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, C. F., Vega, M. E. J., Tovar, M. M. E., & Bello, G. S. (2014). Ideas Previas. Retrieved July 31, 2019, from http://www.ideasprevias.ccadet.unam.mx:8080/ideasprevias/searching.htm
   Google Scholar
• Garratt, J., Horn, A., & Tomlinson, J. (2010). Misconceptions about Error. University Chemistry Education, 4(2), 2.
   Google Scholar
• Germann, P., & Aram, R. (1996). Student performances on the science processes of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 773–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<773::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedhart, M. J., & Verdonk, A. H. (1991). The development of statistical concepts in a design-oriented laboratory course in scientific measuring. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(12), 1005. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed068p1005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Developing science and technology education. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gougis, R. D., Stomberg, J. F., O’Hare, A. T., O’Reilly, C. M., Bader, N. E., Meixner, T., & Carey, C. C. (2017). Post-secondary science students’ explanations of randomness and variation and implications for science learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(6), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9737-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. R. (1983). School pupils’ probability concepts. Teaching Statistics, 5(2), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.1983.tb00493.x
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students‘ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Conlin, L. (2014). How substance-based ontologies for gravity can be productive: A case study. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 010113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010113
   Google Scholar
• Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1992). Expert — Novice differences in science investigation skills. Research in Science Education, 22(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356893
   Google Scholar
• Häder, M. (2009). Delphi-Befragungen: Ein Arbeitsbuch. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or p-prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective, 89. http://umdperg.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/51074580/Transfer_chapter_final.pdf. 89-121
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students‘ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<509::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinicke, S. (2012). Aus Fehlern Wird Man Klug: Eine Genetisch-Didaktische Rekonstruktion des Messfehlers. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en‎&id=pPNl9uKfCpIC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Susanne+Heinicke+%22Aus+Fehlern+wird+man+klug,+Eine+Genetisch-Didaktische+Rekonstruktion+des+Messfehlers%22&ots=-CcYx-NYXI&sig=8CR3X6xJeorsxl5kAR2a0bPrR_0
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, P. (2013). Gibt es Zufälle? In S. Rödl, & H. Tegtmeyer (Ed.), Sinnkritisches Philosophieren. Berlin: DeGruyter. (pp. 311–336).
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, M. G. A. B., & Hamlyn, D. (1984). The influence of intellectual environment on conceptions of heat. European Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528840060306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewson, Mariana. A'B., and Daryl Hamlyn. “the influence of intellectual environment on conceptions of heat.” European Journal of Science Education 6.3 (1984): 245–262
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., & Fisherkeller, J. (1996). Representing students‘ thinking about nutrient cycling in ecosystems: Bidimensional coding of a complex topic. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 941–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<941::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, N. G. (2011). The invention support environment: Using metacognitive scaffolding and interactive learning environments to improve learning from invention. The University Of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, B. T., & Hwang, H. W. (1990). A study of cognitive development of the concepts of solution. (CITED BY chang, Jin-Yi. (1999). Teacher’s college students’ conceptions about evaporation, condensation and boiling. Science Education, 83 (5), 511–526,p. 513. Paipei
   Google Scholar
• IBO. (2014). Diploma programme: Physics guide, For first examination in 2016. International Baccalaureate Organization. Geneva. https://ibphysics.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ib-physics-syllabus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, B. B. (2006). The relationship between views of the nature of science and views of the nature of scientific measurement. University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. (1979). Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kesidou, S., & Duit, R. (1993). Students‘ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics—an interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komorek, M. (1998). Lernprozesstudie zum deterministischen Chaos. Zeitschrift Fuer Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 5(3), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Komorek, M., Duit, R., Naujack, B., & Buecker, N. (1999). Learning process studies in the field of fractals. In A. M. Komorek, H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, & W., . K. Graeber (Eds.), Research in science education - past, present, and future (Vol. 1, pp. 131–133). IPN Kiel.
   Google Scholar
• Komorek, M., Duit, R., Naujack, B., Buecker, N., & Naujak, B. (2001). Learning process studies in the field of fractals. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graeber, M. Komorek, & K. A. Dordrecht (Eds.), Research in science education - past, present, and future Vol.1 (pp. 95–100). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kung, R. L. (2005). Teaching the concepts of measurement: An example of a concept-based laboratory course. American Journal of Physics, 73(8), 771. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1881253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattery, M. J. (2016). Deep learning in introductory physics: Exploratory studies of model-based reasoning. IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., Sere, M.-G., Hammelev, D., Niedderer, H., Leach Lis, J. (1998). Labwork in science education survey 2: Students’ images of science as they relate to labwork learning. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/34112485/1998-LSE-WP4.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1528902631&Signature=CPlBmLvVI5qsyOQtbDLQ0rER550%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3Bfilename%3DSURVEY_2_STUDENTS_IMAGES_OF_SCIENCE
   Google Scholar
• Lijnse, P. L., Eijkelhof, H. M. C., Klaassen, C. W. J. M., & Scholte, R. L. J. (1990). Pupils’ and mass‐media ideas about radioactivity. International Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069900120106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann, R. F. (2003). Students’ understanding of measurement and uncertainty in the physics laboratory: Social construction, underlying concepts, and quantitative analysis. ProQuest Dissertations And Theses; Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of Maryland, College Park, 2003.; Publication Number: AAI3112498; ISBN: 9780496600106; Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: B, page: 5560., 349. University of Maryland College Park. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PhDT
   Google Scholar
• Lubben, F., Campbell, B., Buffler, A., & Allie, S. (2001). Point and set reasoning in practical science measurement by entering university freshmen. Science Education, 85(4), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubben, F., & Millar, R. (1994). A survey of the understanding oj children aged 11-16 oj key ldeas about evidence in science. York.
   Google Scholar
• Lubben, F., & Millar, R. (1996). Children’s ideas about the reliability of experimental data. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manthei, U. (1980). Zur genetischen Begriffsdifferenzierung und Begriffspraezisierung. Phsisik in Der Schule, 18(9), 389–398.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, L., & Thompson, D. (1997). Portuguese students’ understanding at ages 10‐11 and 14‐15 of the origin and nature of the earth and the development of life. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150103
   Google Scholar
• Masnick, A. M., & Morris, B. J. (2002). Reasoning from data: The effect of sample size and variability on children’s and adults’ conclusions. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource letter: PER-1: physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755–767. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R., Gott, R., Lubben, F., & Duggan, S. (1996). Children’s performance of investigative tasks in science: A framework for considering progression. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Progression in learning (pp. 82–108). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Gill, J. S. (1996). School students’ understanding of processes involving radioactive substances and ionizing radiation. Physics Education, 31(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/019
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Lubben, F. (1996). Knowledge and action: Students’ understanding of the procedures of scientific enquiry. In Geoff Welford, Jonathan Osborne, Phil Scott. In research in science education in Europe (pp. 166). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., Lubben, F., Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1994). Investigating in the school science laboratory: Conceptual and procedural knowledge and their influence on performance. Research Papers in Education, 9(2), 207–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152940090205
   Google Scholar
• Müller, R. (2003). Quantenphysik in der Schule. Studien zum Physiklernen. Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Petri, J. (1996). Der Lernpfad eines Schülers in der Atomphysik. Mainz.
   Google Scholar
• Pillay, S., Buffler, A., Lubben, F., & Allie, S. (2008). Effectiveness of a GUM-compliant course for teaching measurement in the introductory physics laboratory. European Journal of Physics, 29(3), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/29/3/024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollnick, M., Dlamini, B., Lotz, S., & Lubben, F. (2001). Views of South African chemistry students in university bridging programs on the reliability of experimental data. Research in Science Education, 31(4), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013102108541
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Duit, R. (2003). Emergence, flexibility, and stabilization of language in a physics classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 869–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozier, S., & Viennot, L. (1991). Students’ reasonings in thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saricayir, H., Ay, S., Comek, A., Cansiz, G., & Uce, M. (2016). Determining students’ conceptual understanding level of thermodynamics. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i6.1421
   Google Scholar
• Schurz, G. (2015). Probleme des objektiv-statistischen Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs. In W. de Gruyter (Ed.), Wahrscheinlichkeit. Berlin/Boston. pp. 39-64.
   Google Scholar
• Sere, M.-G., Fernandez-Gonzalez, M., Gallegos, J. A., Gonzalez-Garcia, F., De Manuel, E., Perales, F. J., & Leach, J. (2001). Images of science linked to labwork: A survey of secondary school and university students. Research in Science Education, 31(4), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013141706723
   Google Scholar
• Sere, M.-G., Journeaux, R., & Larcher, C. (1993). Learning the statistical analysis of measurement errors. International Journal of Science Education, 15(4), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. G. (1996). Children’s astronomical beliefs: A preliminary study of Year 6 children in south-west England. International Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 685–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M., & Ciancetta, M. (2002). Students’ understanding of variability in a probability environment. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics: Developing a Statistically Literate Society. http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots6/6a6_shau.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M., & Zawojewski, J. S. (1999). Secondary students’ performance on data and chance in the 1996 NAEP. The Mathematics Teacher, 92 (8), 713. http://search.proquest.com/openview/1ef2b981b447c8612498b0abbc049527/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=41299
   Google Scholar
• Slotta, J. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Helping students understand challenging topics in science through ontology training. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2402_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing students’ misclassifications of physics concepts: An ontological basis for conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 373–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1303_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriyansyah, S. P., Karim, S., Saepuzaman, D., & Suhandi, A. (2015). Investigation of students’ scientific consistency and learning difficulties in the first law of thermodynamics. International conference on mathematics, science, and education.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrou, D., & Duit, R. (2014). Teaching and learning the interplay between chance and determinism in nonlinear systems. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 506–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.802056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrou, D., Duit, R., & Komorek, M. (2008). A teaching and learning sequence about the interplay of chance and determinism in nonlinear systems. Physics Education, 43(4), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/43/4/011
   Google Scholar
• Stavrou, D., Komorek, M., & Duit, R. 2003. Schülervorstellungen über das Wechselspiel von Determinismus und Zufall. Außerschulisches Lernen in Physik und Chemie Band 23 (Vol. 23299–301).A. Pitton. LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrou, D., Komorek, M., & Duit, R. (2005). Didaktische Rekonstruktion des Zusammenspiels von Zufall und Gesetzmäßigkeit in der nichtlinearen Dynamik. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 11, 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Stehlik, S., & Pade, J. (2006). Schüler begegnen der Nichtlinearen Dynamik - ein Projekt zur Untersuchung von Schülervorstellungen anhand des chaotischen Wasserrads. In Frühjahrstagung des Fachverbands Didaktik der Physik der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft. Lehmanns Media.
   Google Scholar
• Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1982). Conceptual change and science teaching. European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528820040302
   Google Scholar
• Summers, M. K. (1983). Teaching heat–an analysis of misconceptions. School Science Review, 64 (229), 670–676. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ283122
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (1998). The sharing-out of nuclear attraction: Or ‘I can’t think about physics in chemistry’. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ure, M. C. D., & Colinvaux, D. (1989). Developing adults’ views on the phenomenon of change of physical state in water. International Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacc, N. N. (1999). Exploring fractal geometry with children. School Science and Mathematics, 99(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17451.x
   Google Scholar
• Volkwyn, T. S., Allie, S., Buffler, A., & Lubben, F. (2008). Impact of a conventional introductory laboratory course on the understanding of measurement. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 010108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010108
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2014). Conceptual change from the framework theory side of the fence. Science & Education, 23(7), 1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9640-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, P., Linfield, R. S., & Stephenson, P. (1999). A comparison of primary school pupils’ ability to express procedural understanding in science through speech and writing. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesner, H. (1996). Verständnisse von Leistungskursschülern über Quantenphysik (1/2). Ergebnisse mündlicher Befragungen. In Physik in der Schule (pp. 34, 95–99, 136–140). Köln: Aulis Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbers, J. D., & Duit, R. (2001). On the micro-structure of analogical reasoning: The case of understanding chaotic systems. In I. M. Komorek, H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graeber, & K. A. Kiel (Eds.), Research in science education - past, present, and future (pp. 205–210). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar