Identifying precursory concepts in evolution during early childhood – a systematic literature review

References

• (References marked with an asterisk are included in the systematic review)
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M. (2017). Early understandings of simple food chains: A learning progression for the preschool years. International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1485–1510. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1336809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952–978. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton, C., Bossdorf, O., & Weisheit, E. (2012). Evolution vor unserer Haustür entdecken [Discovering evolution at your front door]. In D. C. Dreesmann, D. Graf, & K. Witte (Eds.), Evolutionsbiologie: Moderne Themen für den Unterricht (pp. 205–215). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2786-1_8
   Google Scholar
• Banet, E., & Ayuso, G. E. (2003). Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 373–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batzli, J. M., Knight, J. K., Hartley, L. M., Maskiewicz, A. C., & Desy, E. A. (2016). Crossing the threshold: Bringing biological variation to the foreground. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), Article es9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-10-0221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316(5827), 996–997. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgerding, L. A., & Kaya, F. (2019). Preschool children’s ideas about biological adaptation during a science camp. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2410–2429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1683911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgerding, L. A., & Raven, S. (2018). Children’s ideas about fossils and foundational concepts related to fossils. Science Education, 102(2), 414–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, R., & Sá-Pinto, A. (2013). Early evolution of evolutionary thinking: Teaching biological evolution in elementary schools. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6, Article ar25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1936-6434-6-25
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1988). Conceptual differences between children and adults. Mind & Language, 3(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1988.tb00141.x
   Google Scholar
• Catley, K. M., & Novick, L. R. (2009). Digging deep: Exploring college students’ knowledge of macroevolutionary time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek, K. A. (2012). Students’ understanding of large numbers as a key factor in their understanding of geologic time. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1047–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9312-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek, K. A., LaDue, N. D., & Shipley, T. F. (2018). Learning about spatial and temporal scale: Current research, psychological processes, and classroom implications. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.5408/16-213.1
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D., & Linn, M. C. (2003). Designing for knowledge integration: The impact of instructional time. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 451–493. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coley, J. D., Solomon, G. E. A., & Shafto, P. (2002). The development of folkbiology: A cognitive science perspective on children’s understanding of the biological world. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological. sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 65–92). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coley, J. D., & Muratore, T. M. (2012). Trees, fish, and other fictions. In K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges (pp. 22–46). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0002
   Google Scholar
• Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. (2015). Relations between intuitive biological thinking and biological misconceptions in biology majors and nonmajors. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), Article ar8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A., Zembal‐Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers’ ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry‐based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 613–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE) (2015). National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study
   Google Scholar
• Dickins, T. E., & Rahman, Q. (2012). The extended evolutionary synthesis and the role of soft inheritance in evolution. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 279(1740), 2913–2921. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endler, J. A. (1986). Natural selection in the wild. Monographs in population biology. (Vol. 21). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Ergazaki, M., Alexaki, A., Papadopoulou, C., & Kalpakiori, M. (2014). Young children’s reasoning about physical & behavioural family resemblance: Is there a place for a precursor model of inheritance? Science & Education, 23(2), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9594-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ergazaki, M., Valanidou, E., Kasimati, M.-C., & Kalantzi, M. (2015). Introducing a precursor model of inheritance to young children. International Journal of Science Education, 37(18), 3118–3142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1121551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Emmons, N. A., & Kelemen, D. A. (2015). Young children’s acceptance of within-species variation: Implications for essentialism and teaching evolution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Emmons, N., Smith, H., & Kelemen, D. (2016). Changing minds with the story of adaptation: Strategies for teaching young children about natural selection. Early Education and Development, 27(8), 1205–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1169823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Emmons, N., Lees, K., & Kelemen, D. (2018). Young children’s near and far transfer of the basic theory of natural selection: An analogical storybook intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(3), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergazaki, M. (2018). Biology and young children. In K. Kampourakis & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Teaching biology in schools (pp. 22–34). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E. M. (2000). The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46(2), 221–254. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/mpq/vol46/iss2/4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42(3), 217–266. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K. S., Lane, J. D., & Price, K. L. S. (2012). Encountering counterintuitive ideas: Constructing a developmental learning progression for evolution understanding. In K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges (pp. 174–199). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0008
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1231–1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, D., Sbeglia, G. C., Nehm, R. H., & Harms, U. (2019). How strongly does statistical reasoning influence knowledge and acceptance of evolution? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, D., Tröbst, S., & Harms, U. (2017). University students’ conceptual knowledge of randomness and probability in the contexts of evolution and mathematics. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1181–1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin-Doxas, K., & Klymkowsky, M. W. (2008). Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: Lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(2), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-08-0063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford series in cognitive development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Rhodes, M. (2012). Two-thousand years of stasis. In K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges (pp. 3–21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.5.796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38(3), 213–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90007-Q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaze, A. L., & Goldston, M. J. (2015). U.S. science teaching and learning of evolution: A critical review of the literature 2000-2014. Science Education, 99(3), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey-Smith, P. (2007). Conditions for evolution by natural selection. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(10), 489–516. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2007104103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, R. F., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Developmental “roots” in mature biological knowledge. Psychological Science, 20(4), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02320.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göransson, A., Orraryd, D., Fiedler, D., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2020). Conceptual characterization of threshold concepts in student explanations of evolution by natural selection and Effects of Item Context. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1), Article ar1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1
   Google Scholar
• Gresch, H., & Martens, M. (2019). Teleology as a tacit dimension of teaching and learning evolution: A sociological approach to classroom interaction in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(3), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, U., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). Evolution education re-considered: Understanding what works. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1994). Young children’s naive theory of biology: A multi-national study. Cognition, 50(1–3), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90027-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernando-Herraez, I., Prado-Martinez, J., Garg, P., Fernandez-Callejo, M., Heyn, H., Hvilsom, C., Navarro, A., Esteller, M., Sharp, A. J., & Marques-Bonet, T. (2013). Dynamics of DNA methylation in recent human and great ape evolution. PLoS Genetics, 9(9), Article e1003763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Herrmann, P. A., French, J. A., DeHart, G. B., & Rosengren, K. S. (2013). Essentialist reasoning and knowledge effects on biological reasoning in young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59(2), 198–220. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2013.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, A. J., Fernando, I. E. S. S., & Otero, I. C. E. J. (2007). An analysis of the understanding of geological time by students at secondary and post‐secondary level. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2004). Vitalistic causality in young children’s naive biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(8), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. C., Middendorf, J., Rehrey, G., Dalkilic, M. M., & Cassidy, K. (2014). Geological time, biological events and the learning transfer problem. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(4), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.14434/v14i4.4667
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mogill, A. T. (1997). A framework for assessing and nurturing young children‘s thinking in probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(2), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002981520728
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K. (2015). Distorting the history of evolutionary thought in conceptual development research. Cognitive Science, 39(4), 833–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K. (2020). Students’ “teleological misconceptions” in evolution education: Why the underlying design stance, not teleology per se, is the problem. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 13, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0116-z
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., Pavlidi, V., Papadopoulou, M., & Palaiokrassa, E. (2012). Children’s teleological intuitions: What kind of explanations do 7-8 year olds give for the features of organisms, artifacts and natural objects? Research in Science Education, 42(4), 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9219-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2007). Students’ preconceptions about evolution: How accurate is the characterization as “Lamarckian” when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Science & Education, 16(3–5), 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9019-9
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9075-9
   Google Scholar
• *Kaminski, G., Berger, C., Jolly, C., & Mazens, K. (2013). Children’s consideration of relevant and non-relevant facial features in kinship detection. L’Annee Psychologique, 113(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503313003011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kelemen, D., Emmons, N. A., Seston Schillaci, R., & Ganea, P. A. (2014). Young children can be taught basic natural selection using a picture-storybook intervention. Psychological Science, 25(4), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (1999). Why are rocks pointy? Children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35(6), 1440–1452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2012). Teleological minds. In K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges (pp. 66–92). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0004
   Google Scholar
• Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.96.3.118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemm, J., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017). The role of involvement and emotional well-being for preschool children’s scientific observation competency in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 863–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1310408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, M., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Pollock, N., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (1998a). Guidelines for critical review form: Qualitative studies. Retrieved from http://srs-mcmaster.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Guidelines-for-Critical-Review-Form-Qualitative-Studies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Law, M., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Pollock, N., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (1998b). Guidelines for critical review form: Quantitative studies. Retrieved from http://srs-mcmaster.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Guidelines-for-Critical-Review-Form-Quantiative-Studies-English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E., & Thompson, L. D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Legare, C. H., Lane, J. D., & Evans, E. M. (2013). Anthropomorphizing science: How does it affect the development of evolutionary concepts? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59(2), 168–197. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2013.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, J. G., & Kampourakis, K. (2013). Biological teleology: The need for history. In K. Kampourakis (Ed.), History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences: Vol. 1. The philosophy of biology: A companion for educators (pp. 421–454). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5_20
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (2001). What evolution is. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, T. P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R., Mitchell, G., Bally, R., Inglis, M., Day, J., & Jacobs, D. (2002). Undergraduates’ understanding of evolution: Ascriptions of agency as a problem for student learning. Journal of Biological Education, 36(2), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2002.9655803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Moya, C., Boyd, R., & Henrich, J. (2015). Reasoning about cultural and genetic transmission: Developmental and cross-cultural evidence from Peru, Fiji, and the United States on how people make inferences about trait transmission. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nätt, D., Rubin, C.-J., Wright, D., Johnsson, M., Beltéky, J., Andersson, L., & Jensen, P. (2012). Heritable genome-wide variation of gene expression and promoter methylation between wild and domesticated chickens. BMC Genomics, 13 , Article 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehm, R. H. (2019). Biology education research: Building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0017-6
   Google Scholar
• Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 699–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7
   Google Scholar
• Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1131–1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nieswandt, M., & Bellomo, K. (2009). Written extended‐response questions as classroom assessment tools for meaningful understanding of evolutionary theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennisi, E. (2013). Plant biology. Evolution heresy? Epigenetics underlies heritable plant traits. Science, 341(6150), 1055. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.341.6150.1055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1969). The child’s conception of time. Routledge library editions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• *Raman, L. (2018). Do children think that inheritance determines height and weight? Infant and Child Development, 27(1), Article e2041. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D. D., & Siegler, R. S. (1986). Children’s understandings of the attributes of life. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90013-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, R. L., & Burns, S. (2011). Gain in student understanding of the role of random variation in evolution following teaching intervention based on Luria-Delbruck experiment. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 12(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v12i1.272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2015). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren, K. S., & Evans, E. M. (2012). Constrained learning: Reframing the problem of evolution understanding and implications for science education. In K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges (pp. 200–208). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0009
   Google Scholar
• Rosengren, K. S., Gelman, S. A., Kalish, C. W., & McCormick, M. (1991). As time goes by: Children’s early understanding of growth in animals. Child Development, 62(6), 1302–1320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01607.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren, K. S., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & van der Kamp, J. (2003). Development and learning: A TASC-based perspective of the acquisition of perceptual-motor behaviors. Infant Behavior and Development, 26(4), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, T., & McGuigan, L. (2015). Understanding of evolution and inheritance at KS1 and KS2: Review of literature and resources. Retrieved from https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Review%20of%20literature%20and%20resources%20-%20July%202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R. W. (1997). Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlottmann, A. (2001). Children’s probability intuitions: Understanding the expected value of complex gambles. Child Development, 72(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2019). Learning progressions: An empirically grounded, learner-centered framework to guide biology instruction. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), Article es5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (KMK) (2004). Einheitliche Prüfungsanforderungen in der Abiturprüfung Biologie (Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 01.12.1989 i.d.F. vom 05.02.2004). [Standard exam requirements for the Abitur in biology]. Retrieved from https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/1989/1989_12_01-EPA-Biologie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (KMK) (2005). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss (Jahrgangsstufe 10) (Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 16.12.2004). [National educational standards for the subject of biology concerning the 10th grade]. Retrieved from https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2004/2004_12_16-Bildungsstandards-Biologie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A., & Calabi, P. (2012). Cognitive constraints on the understanding and acceptance of evolution. In K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges (pp. 47–65). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0003
   Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A., & Calabi, P. (2013). Tuition vs. intuition: Effects of instruction on naïve theories of evolution. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59(2), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2013.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Tensions between science and intuition across the lifespan. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210801897864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shtulman, A., Neal, C., & Lindquist, G. (2016). Children’s ability to learn evolutionary explanations for biological adaptation. Early Education and Development, 27(8), 1222–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1154418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, G. E. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2000). Conceptual change in the classroom: Teaching young children to understand biological inheritance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151000165580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, K., & Keil, F. C. (1989). On the development of biologically specific beliefs: The case of inheritance. Child Development, 60(3), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, F., & Kampourakis, K. (2017). Teaching for genetics literacy in the post-genomic era. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibell, L. A. E., & Harms, U. (2017). Biological principles and threshold concepts for understanding natural selection. Science & Education, 26(7–9), 953–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9935-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trommler, F., Gresch, H., & Hammann, M. (2017). Students’ reasons for preferring teleological explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1404658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turck, F., & Coupland, G. (2014). Natural variation in epigenetic gene regulation and its effects on plant developmental traits. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 68(3), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., & Prain, V. (2009). A framework for re‐thinking learning in science from recent cognitive science perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 32(15), 2055–2078. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903334849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2012). International standard classification of education ISCED 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 381–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Waxman, S., Medin, D., & Ross, N. (2007). Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: Early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, E. A., & Gelman, S. A. (2014). You get what you need: An examination of purpose-based inheritance reasoning in undergraduates, preschoolers, and biological experts. Cognitive Science, 38(2), 197–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 337–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Williams, J. M., & Smith, L. A. (2010). Concepts of kinship relations and inheritance in childhood and adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 523–546. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X449568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Williams, J. M. (2012). Children and adolescents’ understandings of family resemblance: A study of naïve inheritance concepts. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02031.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Robinson, C. (1994). Young people’s ideas about inheritance and evolution. Studies in Science Education, 24(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269408560038
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, J. P., Silvertown, J., Cook, L., Cameron, R., Dodd, M., Greenwood, R. M., McConway, K., & Skelton, P. (2012). Evolution MegaLab: A case study in citizen science methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(2), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabel, J., & Gropengiesser, H. (2011). Learning progress in evolution theory: Climbing a ladder or roaming a landscape? Journal of Biological Education, 45(3), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.586714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziadie, M. A., & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Moving evolution education forward: A systematic analysis of literature to identify gaps in collective knowledge for teaching. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education? Heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199811)82:6<679::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar