A conceptual model and set of instruments for measuring student engagement in learning

References

• Ainley, M. (1987). The factor structure of curiosity measures: Breadth and depth of interest curiosity styles. Australian Journal of Psychology, 39(1), 53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2002). Dynamic measures for studying interest in learning. In: P. R. Pintritch & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods (pp. 43–76). Amsterdam: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate them. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, F.G., Isen, A.M., & Turken, A.U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1957). Going beyond the information given. Reprinted (2006). In: J. Bruner (Ed.), In Search of Pedagogy: The Selected Works of Jerome Bruner (pp. 7–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1991). Self-making and world-making. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 25(1), 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T.C., Barrett, L.F., Bliss-Moreau, E., Lebo, K., & Kaschub, C. (2003). A practical guide to experience-sampling procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Row.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 509–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin Crick, R. (2012). Deep engagement as a complex system: identity, learning power and authentic enquiry. In: S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 675–694). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2006). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DECS (2010). South Australian Teaching for Effective Learning Framework guide. A resource for developing quality teaching and learning in South Australia. Adelaide: Government of South Australia, Department of Education and Children’s Services.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, J., & Milton, P. (2010). Student engagement for effective teaching and deep learning. Education Canada, 48(5),.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C.S. (2000). Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egloff, B. (1998). The independence of positive and negative affect depends on the affect measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(6), 1101–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: a description of 21 instruments. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011–No. 098). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast . Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B.L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredrickson, B.L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognitive Emotion, 19, 313–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B.L., & Losada, M.F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullarton, S. (2002). Student engagement with school: Individual and school-level influences. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilby, N., Hamlyn, B., Hanson, T., Romanou, E., Mackey, T., Clark, J., Trikka, N., & Harrison, M. (2008). National survey of parents and children: Family life, aspirations and engagement with learning 2008. Research Report DCSF-RR059. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Goldspink, C. (2007). Measuring what matters: Final report. Adelaide: Government of South Australia, Department of Education and Children’s Services.
   Google Scholar
• Goldspink, C. (2008). Constructivist classroom case studies final report. Adelaide: Government of South Australia, Department of Education and Children’s Services.
   Google Scholar
• Goldspink, C., & Winter, P. (2007). Measuring what matters: A conceptual model and set of instruments for measuring student engagement in learning. Adelaide: Government of South Australia, Department of Education and Children’s Services.
   Google Scholar
• Harmer, A.J., & Cates, W.M. (2004). Designing for learner engagement in middle school science: Technology, inquiry, and the hierarchies of engagement. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, Melbourne, October.
   Google Scholar
• Hautamaki, J., Arinen, P., & Eronen, S. (2002). Assessing Learning to Learn: A framework. Helsinki: Centre for Educational Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Hautamaki, J., & Kupiainen, S. (2002). The Finnish Learning-to-Learn Assessment Project: A concise report with key results. Brussels: Centre for Educational Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L-t, & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A.M. (2001). An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: Theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kort, B., & Reilly, R. (2002). Restructuring Educational Pedagogy: A model for deep change. Pathways to Change Conference. Alexandria, VA: . April.
   Google Scholar
• Laevers, F. (1994). The innovative project Experiential Education and the definition of quality in education. In: F. Laevers (Ed.), Defining and assessing quality in early childhood education (pp. 157–172). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laevers, F.V.E., Kog, M., & Depondt, L. (1997). A process-oriented child monitoring system for young children. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Experiential Education.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 679–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, H.M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, T., & Ulich, M. (1999). Children’s well-being in day care centres: An exploratory empirical study. International Journal of Early Years Education, 7(3), 229–239.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, M., & Munns, G. (2002). Student engagement and the social relations of pedagogy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 357–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, B., & Portelli, J.P. (2004). Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(1), 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam, R.A., Trivette, C.M., & Dunst, C.J. (1985). Behaviour engagement as a measure of the efficacy of early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson Laird, T.F., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G.D. (2005). Measuring Deep Approaches to learning Using the National Survey of Student Engagement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, 14–18 May.
   Google Scholar
• Price, D. (2012). Moral purpose for the Commons. Creative Blueprint . Retrieved from http://creative-blueprint.co.uk/thinkpieces/item/moral-purpose-for-the-commons.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, H.T., Sheldon, K.M., Gable, S.L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personal Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 299–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmukle, S.C., Egloff, B., & Burns, L.R. (2002). The relationship between positive and negative affect in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(5), 463–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, C.N., Kim-prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D.J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Steele, E. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Nelms, L. (2006). School engagement and life chances: 15 year olds in transition. Life Chances Study stage 7. Fitzroy, Vic: Brotherhood of St Lawrence.
   Google Scholar
• Tugade, M.M., & Fredrickson, B.L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1929). The problem of the cultural development of the child II. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 36, 415–432.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1962/1934). Thought and Language (E. Haufmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willms, J. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, P. (2003). Curriculum for babies and toddlers: A critical evaluation of the first phase (birth to age three) of the South Australian Curriculum, Standards and Accountability Framework in selected childcare centres in South Australia. Ph.D dissertation, University of South Australia, Magil.
   Google Scholar
• Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2010). Charting the Path from Engagement to Achievement: A Report on the 2009 High School Survey of Student Engagement . Retrieved 1st March, 2012, from http://ceep.indiana.edu/hssse/images/HSSSE_2010_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zyngier, D. (2004). Doing Education not Doing Time: Engaging Pedagogies and Pedagogues – what does student engagement look like in action? Paper presented at International Education Research Conference, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar