2,155
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Forum on Global Land Grabbing Part 2

Transnational multi-stakeholder sustainability standards and biofuels: understanding standards processes

Pages 563-587 | Published online: 28 Jun 2013

References

  • Amekawa, Y. 2009. Reflections on the growing influence of good agricultural practices in the global South. Journal of Agricultural Envronmental Ethics, 22(6), 531–557. doi: 10.1007/s10806-009-9171-8
  • Auld, G. and L.H. Gulbrandsen. 2010. Transparency in nonstate certification: Consequences for accountability and legitimacy. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 97–119. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00016
  • Bacon, C. 2010. Who decides what is fair in fair trade? The agri-environmental governance of standards, access, and price. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 111–147. doi: 10.1080/03066150903498796
  • Bailey, R. 2007. Bio-fuelling Poverty: Why the EU renewable-fuel target may be disastrous for poor people. Oxfam Briefing Note, Oxfam International, 1-10. Available at: http://www.oxfam.org/en/node/217 [accessed 13/6/13].
  • Bain, C. and M. Hatanaka. 2010. The practice of third-party certification: Enhancing environmental sustainability and social justice in the global South? In: V. Higgins and W. Larner, eds. Calculating the social: Standards and the reconfiguration of governing. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 56–74.
  • Barry, A. 2002. The anti-political economy. Economy and Society, 31(2), 268–284. doi: 10.1080/03085140220123162
  • Barry, A. and D. Stater. 2002. Introduction: The technological economy. Economy and Society, 31(2), 175–193. doi: 10.1080/03085140220123117
  • Bebbington, A.J., S. Hickey and D.C. Mitlin. 2008. Introduction: Can NGOs make a difference? The challenge of development alternatives. In: A.J. Bebbington, S. Hickey and D.C. Mitlin, eds. Can NGOs make a differnce? The challenge of development alternatives. London: Zed Books, pp. 3–37.
  • Bernstein, S. and B. Cashore. 2007. Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation and Governance, 1(4), 1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00021.x
  • Black, J. 2008. Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulations and Governance, 2(2), 137–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
  • Borras, J.S.M. 2010. The politics of transnational agrarian movements. Development and Change, 41(4), 771–803. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01661.x
  • Borras, J.S.M., P. McMichael and I. Scoones. 2010. The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change: Editors’ introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(5), 575–592. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512448
  • Boström, M. and K.T. Hallström. 2010. NGO power in global social and environmental standard-setting. Global Environmental Politics, 10(4), 36–59. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00030
  • Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Brassett, J., B. Richardson and W. Smith. 2012. Experiments in global governance: Sustainability roundtables and the politics of deliberation. GR:EEN Working Papers. Available from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/green/workingpapers/ [Accessed 20 June 2013].
  • Brown, S. and C. Getz. 2008. Privatizing farm worker justice: Regulating labor through voluntary certification and labeling. Geoforum, 39(3), 1184–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.002
  • Busch, L. 2000. The moral economy of grades and standards. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 273–283. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00061-3
  • Cashore, B. 2002. Legitimacy and privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Adminitration, and Institutions, 15(4), 503–529. doi: 10.1111/1468-0491.00199
  • Casper, S. and B. Hancké. 1999. Global quality norms within national production regimes: ISO 9000 standards in the French and German car industries. Organization Studies, 20(6), 961–985. doi: 10.1177/0170840699206003
  • Cleaver, F. 2004. The social embeddedness of agency and decision-making. In: S. Hickey and G. Mohan, eds. Participation: from tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. London: Zed Books, pp. 271–277.
  • Conroy, M. 2007. Branded! How the certification revolution is transforming global corporations. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
  • Cornwall, A. 2002. Making spaces, changing places: Situating participation in development. In: IDS Working Paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, pp. 1–35.
  • Cotula, L., N. Dyer and S. Vermeulen. 2008. Fuelling exclusion? The biofuels boom and poor peoples access to land. London: FAO and IIED.
  • Cotula, L., S. Vermeulen, R. Leonard and J. Keeley. 2009. Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. London and Rome: FAO, IIED and IFAD.
  • Dauvergne, P. and K.J. Neville. 2009. The changing North–South and South–South political economy of biofuels. Third World Quarterly, 30(6), 1087–1102. doi: 10.1080/01436590903037341
  • Dauvergne, P. and K.J. Neville. 2010. Forests, food, and fuel in the tropics: The uneven social and ecological consequences of the emerging political economy of biofuels. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), 631–660. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512451
  • Dingwerth, K. 2007. The new transnationalism: Transnational governance and democratic legitimacy. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dingwerth, K. 2008. North–South parity in global governance: The affirmative procedures of the Forest Stewardship Council. Global Governance, 14(1), 53–71.
  • Dolan, C. and J. Humphrey. 2001. Governance and trade in fresh vegetables: The impact of UK supermarkets on the African horticulture industry. Journal of Development Studies, 37(1), 147–176.
  • FAO and GBEP. 2008. A review of the current state of bioenergy development in G8 +5 countries. Rome: FAO and GBEP.
  • Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fischer, F. 2007. Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment: The cultural politics of discursive space. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 19–40. doi: 10.1177/0275074005282582
  • Fortin, E. 2005. Reforming land rights: The World Bank and the globalization of agriculture. Social and Legal Studies, 14(2), 147–177. doi: 10.1177/0964663905051217
  • Fortin, E. and B. Richardson. 2013. Certification Schemes and the Governance of Land: Enforcing Standards or Enabling Scrutiny?. Globalizations, 10(1), 141–159.
  • Foucault, M. 1991. Questions of method. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller, eds. The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 73–86.
  • Foucault, M. 1997. ‘Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth’, in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984, Vol. 1, New York: New Press, pp. xlv–334.
  • Franco, J., L. Levidow, D. Fig, L. Goldfarb, M. Hönicke and M.L. Mendonça. 2010. Assumptions in the European Union biofuels policy: frictions with experiences in Germany, Brazil and Mozambique. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), 661–698. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512454
  • Friedmann, H. 1993. The political economy of food: A global crisis. New Left Review, 197, 29–57.
  • Friedmann, H. 2000. What on earth is the modern world-system? Foodgetting and territory in the modern era and beyond. Journal of World-Systems Research, 6(2), 480–515.
  • Fuchs, D., A. Kalfagianni and T. Havinga. 2011. Actors in private food governance: The legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 353–367. doi: 10.1007/s10460-009-9236-3
  • García-López, G.A. and N. Arizpe. 2010. Participatory processes in the soy conflicts in Paraguay and Argentina. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.013
  • Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
  • Gibbon, P. and S. Ponte. 2005. Trading down: Africa, value chains, and the global economy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Gibbon, P. and S. Ponte. 2008. Global value chains: From governance to governmentality? Economy and Society, 37(3), 365–392. doi: 10.1080/03085140802172680
  • Gordon, C. 1991. Governmental rationality: An introduction. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller, eds. The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–52.
  • GRAIN. 2008. Seized: The 2008 landgrab for food and financial security GRAIN Reports. Available at: http://www.grain.org/article/entries/93-seized-the-2008-landgrab-for-food-and-financial-security [Accessed on 13 June 2013].
  • Grindle, M. and J. Thomas. 1991. Public choices and policy change: The political economy of reform in developing countries. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Guthman, J. 2007a. The polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode, 39(3), 456–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00535.x
  • Guthman, J. 2007b. The polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode, 456–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00535.x
  • Hajer, M. and W. Versteeg. 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
  • Hajer, M. and H. Wagenaar. 2003a. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hajer, M. and H. Wagenaar. 2003b. Introduction. In: M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, eds. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.
  • Haraway, Donna. 1995. ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, In: A. Feenberg and A. Hannay, eds. Technology and the Politics of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Hatanaka, M. and L. Busch. 2008. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system: An objective or socially mediated governance mechanism? Sociologia Ruralis, 48(1), 73–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00453.x
  • Hatanaka, M., J. Konefal and D.H. Constance. 2011. A tripartite standards regime analysis of the contested development of a sustainable agriculture standard. Agriculture and Human Values, March 2012, Volume 29(1), 65–78.
  • Hayward, D.J., R.B. Le Heron, M. Perry and I. Cooper. 1998. Networking, technology, and governance: Lessons from New Zealand horticulture. Environment and Planning A, 30(11), 2025–2040. doi: 10.1068/a302025
  • Hebb, T. and D. Wójcik. 2005. Global standards and emerging markets: The institutional–investment value chain and the CalPERS investment strategy. Environment and Planning A, 37(11), 1955–1974. doi: 10.1068/a37264
  • Henman, P. and M. Dean. 2010. E-Government and the production of standardized individuality. In: V. Higgins and W. Larner, eds. Calculating the Social: Standards and the Reconfiguration of Governing. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan., 56–74
  • Henson, S. and J. Humphrey. 2010. Understanding the complexities of private standards in global agri-food chains as they impact developing countries. Journal of Development Studies, 46(9), 1628–1646. doi: 10.1080/00220381003706494
  • Hickey, S. and G. Mohan. 2005. Relocating participation within a radical politics of development. Development and Change, 36(2), 237–262. doi: 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00410.x
  • Higgins, V. and W. Larner. 2010. Standards and standardization as a social scientific problem. In: V. Higgins and W. Larner, eds. Calculating the social: Standards and the reconfiguration of governing. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hoekman, S.K. 2009. Biofuels in the US – challenges and opportunities. Renewable Energy, 34(1), 14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.030
  • Jaffee, D. and P.H. Howard. 2010. Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values, 27(4), 387–399. doi: 10.1007/s10460-009-9231-8
  • Keohane, R.O. and J.S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Klooster, D. 2005. Environmental certification of forests: The evolution of environmental governance in a commodity network. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(4), 403–417. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.005
  • Klooster, D. 2006. Environmental certification of forests in Mexico: The political ecology of a nongovernmental market intervention. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 541–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00705.x
  • Klooster, D. 2010. Standardizing sustainable development? The Forest Stewardship Council's plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum, 41, 117–129. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.02.006
  • Lin, J. 2011. Governing biofuels: A principal–agent analysis of the european union biofuels certification regime and the clean development mechanism. Journal of Environmental Law, 1–31.
  • Loconto, A. and L. Busch. 2010. Standards, techno-economic networks, and playing fields: Performing the global market economy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(3), 507–536. doi: 10.1080/09692290903319870
  • Mahar, C., R. Harker and C. Wilkes. 1990. The basic theoretical position. In: C. Mahar, R. Harker and C. Wilkes, eds. An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu: The practice of theory. London: Macmillan.
  • Marx, A. and D. Cuypers. 2010. Forest certification as a global environmental governance tool: What is the macro-effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council? Regulation and Governance, 4(4), 408–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01088.x
  • McCarthy, J., P. Gillespie and Z. Zen. 2012. Swimming upstream: Local Indonesian production networks in ‘globalized’ palm oil production. World Development, 40(3), 555–569. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.012
  • McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime analysis of the ‘world food crisis‘. Agriculture aand Human Values, 26(4), 281–295. doi: 10.1007/s10460-009-9218-5
  • McMichael, P. 2010. Agrofuels in the food regime. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), 609–629. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512450
  • Mennicken, A. 2008. Connecting worlds: The translation of international auditing standards into post-Soviet audit practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 384–414. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.06.001
  • Miller, C.A. 2007. Democratization, international knowledge institutions, and global governance. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 20(2), 325–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00359.x
  • Miller, P. and T. O'Leary. 1987. Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 235–265. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90039-0
  • Miller, P. and N. Rose. 1990. Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1080/03085149000000001
  • Mol, A.P.J. 2007. Boundless biofuels? Between environmental sustainability and vulnerability. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(4), 297–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00446.x
  • Mosse, D. 2005. Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice. London: Pluto Press.
  • Nalepa, R.A. and D.M. Bauer. 2012. Marginal lands: The role of remote sensing in constructing landscapes for agrofuel development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 403–422. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.665890
  • Mutersbaugh, T. 2005. Fighting standards with standards: Harmonization, rents, and social accountability in certified agrofood networks. Environment and Planning A, 37(11), 2033–2051. doi: 10.1068/a37369
  • ODI. 2008. Biofuels and development: Will the EU help or hinder? Briefing Paper 32.
  • Ottaway, M. 2001. Corporatism goes global: International organizations, nongovernmental organizations, networks, and transnational business. Global Governance, 7(3), 265–292.
  • Pattberg, P. 2005. The Forest Stewardship Council: risk and potential of private forest governance. The Journal of Environment and Development, 14(3), 356–374.
  • Peck, J. and A. Tickell. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00247
  • Perry, M., R. Le Heron, D. Hayward and I. Cooper. 1997. Growing discipline through total quality management in a New Zealand horticulture region. Journal of Rural Studies, 13(3), 289–304. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00016-8
  • Ponte, S. 2002. The ‘Latte Revolution’? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Development, 30(7), 1099–1122. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00032-3
  • Ponte, S. 2008. Greener than thou: The political economy of fish ecolabeling and its local manifestations in South Africa. World Development, 36(1), 159–175. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.014
  • Raikes, P. and P. Gibbon. 2000. ‘Globalisation’ and African export crop agriculture. Journal of Peasant Studies, 27(2), 50–93. doi: 10.1080/03066150008438732
  • Reardon, T., J.-M. Codron, L. Busch, J. Bingen and C. Harris. 2001. Global change in agrifood grades and standards: Agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2(3–4), 421–435. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00035-0
  • Sadler, D. and S. Lloyd. 2009. Neo-liberalising corporate social responsibility: A political economy of corporate citizenship. Geoforum, 40, 613–622. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.03.008
  • Scarlat, N. and J.-F. Dallemand. 2011. Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.039
  • Schepers, D. 2010. Challenges to legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 279–290. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0154-5
  • Scoones, I. 2009. The politics of global assessments: The case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 547–571. doi: 10.1080/03066150903155008
  • Shamir, R. 2008. The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03085140701760833
  • Shore, C. and S. Wright. 1997. Anthropology of policy: Critical perspectives on governance and power. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Shreck, A. 2005. Resistance, redistribution, and power in the fair trade banana initiative. Agriculture aand Human Values, 22(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1007/s10460-004-7227-y
  • Taylor, P.L. 2005. In the market but not of it: Fair trade coffee and forest stewardship council certification as market-based social change. World Development, 33(1), 129–147. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.007
  • Timmermans, S. and M. Berg. 1997. Standardization in action: achieving local universality through medical protocols. Social Studies of Science, 27(2), 273–305. doi: 10.1177/030631297027002003
  • Upham, P., J. Tomei and L. Dendler. 2011. Governance and legitimacy aspects of the UK biofuel carbon and sustainability reporting system. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2669–2678. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.036
  • Visseren-Hamakers, I.J. and P. Glasbergen. 2007. Partnerships in forest governance. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 408–419. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.003
  • Wall, E., A. Weersink and C. Swanton. 2001. Agriculture and ISO 14000. Food Policy, 26(1), 35–48. doi: 10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00025-7
  • Wedel, J. R., C. Shore, G. Feldman and S. Lathrop. 2005. Toward an anthropology of public policy. The Annals of the Americal Academy, 600(1), 30–51. doi: 10.1177/0002716205276734
  • Weir, L., P. O'Malley and C. Shearing. 1997. Governmentality, criticism, politics. Economy and Society, 26(4), 501–517. doi: 10.1080/03085149700000026
  • Wilkinson, J. 2011. From fair trade to responsible soy: Social movements and the qualification of agrofood markets. Environment and Planning A, 43, 2012–2026. doi: 10.1068/a43254
  • Woods, J. 2006. Science and technology options for harnessing bioenergy's potential. In: Hazell, P. and R. Pachauri. (2006) Bioenergy and agriculture: promises and challenges. Vol 14, 2020. Washington, DC: IFPRI, pp. 13–14.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.