Messy hectares: questions about the epistemology of land grabbing data

References

• Aguilar-Robledo, M. 2009. Contested terrain: the rise and decline of surveying in New Spain, 1500–1800. Journal of Latin American Geography, 8(2), 23–47. doi: 10.1353/lag.0.0058
   Google Scholar
• Anseeuw, W., M. Boche, T. Breu, M. Giger, J. Lay, P. Messerli and K. Nolte. 2012. Transnational land deals for agriculture in the global south. Analytical report based on the Land Matrix Database [online]. CDE/CIRAD/GIGA. Available from: http://landportal.info/landmatrix/media/img/analytical-report.pdf [Accessed 18 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Anseeuw, W., L. Cotula and M. Taylor. 2012. Expectations and implications of the rush for land: understanding the opportunities and risks at stake in Africa. In: T. Allan, M. Keulertz, S. Sojamo and J. Warner, eds. Handbook of land and water grabs in Africa: foreign direct investment and food and water security. London: Routledge, pp. 421–435.
   Google Scholar
• Anseeuw, W., L.A. Wily, L. Cotula and M. Taylor. 2012. Land rights and the rush for land: findings of the Global Commercial Pressures on Land Research Project [online]. International Land Coalition. Available from: http://www.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/publication/1205/ILC%20GSR%20report_ENG.pdf [Accessed 8 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, W. 1979. Jugerum and caballería in New Spain. Agricultural History, 53(2), 423–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., J.C. Franco, S. Gómez, C. Kay and M. Spoor. 2012. Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3–4), 845–872. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.679931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., C. Kay, S. Gómez, and J. Wilkinson. 2012. Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement, 33(4), 402–416. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2012.745394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräutigam, D. 2013. Chinese engagement in African agriculture: fiction and fact. In: T. Allan, M. Keulertz, S. Sojamo and J. Warner, eds. Handbook of land and water grabs in Africa: foreign direct investment and food and water security. New York: Routledge, pp. 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, P. 2012. The Land Matrix: much ado about nothing [online]. Farmlandgrab.org. Available from: http://farmlandgrab.org/post/view/20405 [Accessed 12 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Brito, B. and P. Barreto. 2011. Did land regularization advance in the Amazon? Two years of the legal land program. Executive summary [online]. Imazon. Available from: http://www.imazon.org.br/publications/books/did-land-regularization-advance-in-the-amazon-two-years-of-the-legal-land-program-executive-summary-en/at_download/file [Accessed 25 March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, M. 1995. Examen de libros. Mesoamérica, 16(29), 233–247.
   Google Scholar
• Chichava, S., J. Duran, L. Cabral, A. Shankland, L. Buckley, L. Tang and Y. Zhang. 2013. Chinese and Brazilian cooperation with African agriculture: the case of Mozambique [online]. Future Agricultures Working Paper 049. Available from: http://www.future-agricultures.org/publications/research-and-analysis/working-papers/doc_download/1637-chinese-and-brazilian-cooperation-with-african-agriculture-the-case-of-mozambique [Accessed 10 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Collier, G. 1975. Are marginal farmlands marginal to their farmers? In: S. Platter, ed. Formal models in economic anthropology. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association, pp. 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Collin, M. 2013. Governance, land grabs and tricky statistics. February 14, 2013. Aid thoughts: digesting the difficult decisions of development [online]. Available from: http://aidthoughts.org/?p=3645 [Accessed 14 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, L. 2012. The international political economy of the global land rush: a critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 649–680. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.674940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, S. and A. Mittal. 2009. The great land grab: rush for world's farmland threatens food security for the poor [online]. The Oakland Institute. Available from: http://www.oaklandinstitute.org/sites/oaklandinstitute.org/files/LandGrab_final_web.pdf [Accessed 22 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, K.W. and D. Byerlee. 2011. Rising global interest in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? [online]. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTARD/Resources/ESW_Sept7_final_final.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H. 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. 2011. How not to think of land-grabbing: three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 249–279. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Soto, H. 1989. The other path: the economic answer to terrorism. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. 2011. The surge in land deals: when others are grabbing their land [online]. The Economist, 5 May. Available from: http://www.economist.com/node/18648855 [Accessed 12 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1980. Agricultural modernization in smallholding areas of Mexico: a case study in the Sierra Norte de Puebla. Latin American Perspectives, 7(4), 29–49. doi: 10.1177/0094582X8000700403
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1992. The logic of the latifundio: the large estates of northwestern Costa Rica since the late nineteenth century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. and M.A. Seligson. 1994. Land inequality: a comparison of census data and property records in twentieth-century southern Costa Rica. Hispanic American Historical Review, 74(3), 445–491. doi: 10.2307/2517892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaitán Lara, D. 2010. Conflictos de tierras comunales en Santa Cruz Chiquimulilla, Santa Rosa durante el régimen colonial. Estudios – Revista de Antropología, Arqueología e Historia. Anuario de la Escuela de Historia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, 187–205.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, K. 2012. ‘Our land, our lives’: time out on the global land rush [online]. Oxfam International. Available from: http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/bn-land-lives-freeze-041012-en_1.pdf [Accessed 30 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Gitelman, L. and V. Jackson. 2013. Introduction. In: L. Gitelman, ed. ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, S. 2011. Acaparamiento de tierras. reflexiones sobre la dinámica reciente del mercado de la tierra en América Latina [online]. Food and Agriculture Organization. Available from: http://www.rlc.fao.org/fileadmin/content/events/semtierras/estudios/gomez.pdf [Accessed 2 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Gordillo, G. 2004. Landscapes of devils: tensions of place and memory in the Argentinean Chaco. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2008. Seized: the 2008 landgrab for food and financial security [online]. Available from: http://www.grain.org/briefings_files/landgrab-2008-en.pdf [Accessed 30 November 2008].
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2012. Interview with GRAIN on the ProSavana Project [online]. Available from: http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4633-interview-with-grain-on-the-prosavana-project [Accessed 30 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. 2012. Land. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R. 2000. The social organization of the IMF's mission work: an examination of international auditing. In: M. Strathern, ed. Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge, pp. 21–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, K. 2012. Promising information: democracy, development, and the remapping of Latin America. Economy and Society, 41(2), 127–150. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.607365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, E. 2012. Land grabs versus land sovereignty. Food First Backgrounder, 18(4), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• ILC [International Land Coalition]. 2012. Commercial pressures on land [online]. Available from: http://www.commercialpressuresonland.org/land-matrix [Accessed 10 November 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Jerven, M. 2013. Poor numbers: how we are misled by African development statistics and what to do about it. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kipling, R. 1907. From sea to sea: letters of travel. Vol. 2. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kugelman, M. 2012. Introduction. In: M. Kugelman and S.L. Levenstein, eds. Global farms race: land grabs, agricultural investment, and the scramble for food security. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kugelman, M. 2013. The global farmland rush. The New York Times, 6 February, p. A25.
   Google Scholar
• Kula, W. 1986. Measures and men. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Land Matrix. 2012. Land Matrix [online]. Available from: http://landportal.info/landmatrix [Accessed 10 November 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Marston, S.A. 2000. The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219–242. doi: 10.1191/030913200674086272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, L., G.J. Veldwisch and J. Franco. 2012. Introduction to the special issue: water grabbing? Focus on the (re)appropriation of finite water resources. Water Alternatives, 5(2), 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• O Pais. 2012. Pro-Savana não vai confiscar terras de camponeses [online]. O Pais, 27 December. Available from: http://www.opais.co.mz/index.php/sociedade/45-sociedade/23527-pro-savana-nao-vai-confiscar-terras-de-camponeses.html [Accessed 20 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Ots Capdequí, J.M. 1959. España en América: el régimen de tierras en la época colonial. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam GB. 2011. Land and power: the growing scandal surrounding the new wave of investments in land [online]. Oxfam Briefing Paper 151. Available from: http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/download?Id=428754&dl=http://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/oxfam/bitstream/10546/142858/32/bp151-land-power-rights-acquisitions-220911-en.pdf [Accessed 21 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Oya, C. 2013. Facts, methods and assumptions on land grabs: a methodological reflection on land databases and the land grab literature ‘rush‘. Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(3), 501–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, F. 2012. The land grabbers: the new fight over who owns the earth. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, F. 2013. Splash and grab: the global scramble for water [online]. New Scientist, no. 2906 (4 March). Available from: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21729066.400-splash-and-grab-the-global-scramble-for-water.html [Accessed 8 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Rice, A. 2009. Is there such a thing as agro-imperialism? [online]. The New York Times Magazine, 22 November. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/magazine/22land-t.html?pagewanted=all [Accessed 23 November 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Rulli, M.C., A. Saviori and P. D'Odorico. 2013. Global land and water grabbing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(3), 892–897. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213163110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrank, A. 2006a. Case-based research. In: E. Perecman and S.R. Curran, eds. A handbook for social science field research: essays and bibliographic sources on research design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Schrank, A. 2006b. Essentials for the case study method. In: E. Perecman and S.R. Curran, eds. A handbook for social science field research: essays and bibliographic sources on research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N.N. 2012. Antifragile: things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• UNAC. 2012. Land grabbing for agribusiness in Mozambique: UNAC statement on the ProSavana Programme [online]. União Nacional de Camponeses Moçambique. Available from: http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/main-issues-mainmenu-27/agrarian-reform-mainmenu-36/1321-land-grabbing-for-agribusiness-on-mozambique-unac-statement-on-the-prosavana-programme [Accessed 20 November 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Verdery, K. 2003. The vanishing hectare: property and value in postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Braun, J. and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2009. ‘Land grabbing’ by foreign investors in developing countries: risks and opportunities. IFPRI Policy Brief, 13(April), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Warman, A. 2003. Corn & capitalism: how a botanical bastard grew to global dominance. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, B., S.M. Borras Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones and W. Wolford. 2012. The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 619–647. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.691879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wily, L.A. 2012a. Enclosure revisited: putting the global land rush in historical perspective. In: T. Allan, M. Keulertz, S. Sojamo and J. Warner, eds. Handbook of land and water grabs in Africa: foreign direct investment and food and water security. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wily, L.A. 2012b. The global land rush: what this means for customary land rights [online]. Rights and resources. Available from: http://www.rightsandresources.org/documents/quarantined/files/turningpoint/RightsToResourcesInCrisis.Briefs1thru5.pdf [Accessed 13 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2007. World development report 2008: agriculture for development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H.-P. 1955. Fact-finding with rural people. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar