Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Peasant Studies Volume 42, 2015 - Issue 6: Brazilian Agrarian Social Movements. Guest Editors: Rebecca Tarlau, and Anthony Pahnke
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,226
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Institutionalizing economies of opposition: explaining and evaluating the success of the MST's cooperatives and agroecological repeasantization

Anthony PahnkeCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 1087-1107 | Published online: 12 May 2015

References

Secondary sources: book and articles

  • Alvarez, S.E., E. Dagnino, and A. Escobar. eds. 1998. Cultures of politics/politics of cultures: Re-visioning Latin American social movements, 293. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Amaral et al. 2008. Democratic Brazil revisited. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Aminzade, R. ed. 2001. Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Anderson, K., and A. Valdés. eds. 2008. Distortions to agricultural incentives in Latin America. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
  • Appadurai, A. 2001. Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization 13, no. 2: 23–43. doi: 10.1177/095624780101300203
  • Araújo, P.F.C., A.L.M. de Barros, J.R.M. de Barros, and R. Shirota. 2007. Política de crédito para a agricultura brasileira. Revista de 27: 27–51.
  • Avritzer, L. 2006. New public spheres in Brazil: Local democracy and deliberative politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30, no. 3: 623–637. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00692.x
  • Barros, G.S.A.C. 2008. Brazil: The challenges in becoming an agricultural superpower. In Brazil as an economic superpower, eds. L. Brainard and L. Martinez-Diaz, 81–109. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
  • Bevir, M. 2007. Encyclopedia of governance. London: Sage Publications.
  • Binmore, K. 2007. Game theory: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Birdsall, N., and F. Fukuyama. 2011. Post-Washington consensus-development after the Crisis, The. Foreign Aff 90: 45–53.
  • Cardoso, R. 1992. Popular Movements in the Context of the Consolidation of Democracy in Brazil. In The making of social movements in Latin America: Identity, strategy, and democracy, eds. Arturo Escobar and Sonia E. Alvarez, 317. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Cardoso, F.H. 1997. Reforma agrária: compromisso de todos. Vol. 28. Brasilia, Brasil: Presidência da República, Secretaria de Comunicação Social.
  • Carter, M., and H.M. de Carvalho. 2009. A luta na terra: fonte de crescimento, inovação, e desafio constante ao MST. In Combatendo a desigualdade social: o MST e a reforma agrária no Brasil, ed. UNESP. São Paulo.
  • Carvalho, H.M. 2006. In ed. B.D. Santos, Another production is possible: Beyond the capitalist canon. Vol. 2. Verso.
  • Collier, R., and S. Handlin, eds. 2009. Reorganizing popular politics: Participation and the new interest regime in Latin America. Unversity Park, PA: Penn State Press.
  • Confederação Nacional das Associações dos Servidores do Incra (CNASI). 2011. INCRA - Instrumento basico de realizacao da reforma agraria e do ordenamento da estrutura fundiara e ser mantido e fortalecido. Ministerio de Desenvolvimento Agrario, Brazil.
  • Correa, V., and F. Silva 2009. Perfil das liberações dos recursos do PRONAF entre 1999–2006: ocorreu alguma modificação a partir da incorporação dos grupos A e B. In Congresso Brasileiro de economia Adminstração e sociología rural. Vol. 47.
  • Dagnino, E. 2007. Citizenship: A perverse confluence. Development in practice 17, no. 4–5: 549–556. doi: 10.1080/09614520701469534
  • De Souza, J.R. 2010. Reforma agrária e crédito agrícola : os resultados de assentamentos rurais frente à inepta política de crédito para a reforma agrária no Brasil (PROCERA). Sao Paulo: UNESP.
  • Damico, F. S., and A. M. Nassar. 2007. Agricultural expansion and policies in Brazil. In US Agricultural Policy and the 2007 Farm Bill, ed. K. Arha, T. Josling, D. A. Sumner, and B. H. Thomson. Stanford University: Woods Institute for the Environment.
  • Fernandes, B. M., Welch, C. A., and Gonçalves, E. C. 2010. Agrofuel policies in Brazil: paradigmatic and territorial disputes. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 793–819. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512459
  • Foucault, M., G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, eds. 1991. The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, M., M. Senellart, and F. Ewald, eds. 2009. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the college de France 1977–1978. Vol. 4. London: Macmillan.
  • Frieden, J.A. 1991. Debt, development, and democracy: Modern political economy and Latin America, 1965–1985. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Goldstone, J.A. 1991. Revolution and rebellion in the early modern world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Gonçalves, S. 2008. Campesinato, Resistência e Emancipação: o modelo agroecológico adotado pelo MST no Estado do Paraná. (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Estadual Paulista).
  • Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York. NY: International Publishers.
  • Haggard, S. 1990. Pathways from the periphery: The politics of growth in the newly industrializing countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on politics 2, no. 4: 725–740. doi: 10.1017/S1537592704040472
  • Holloway, John. 2002. Changing the world without taking power. London: Pluto Press.
  • Holloway, John. 2010. Crack capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
  • INCRA 2010. PRONERA results, unpublished.
  • INEP. 2010. Censo Escolar.
  • Jasper, J.M. 2006. Getting your way: Strategic dilemmas in real life.
  • Jungmann, R. 2001. Brasil rural na virada do milênio. In Brasil rural na virada do milênio: a visão de pesquisadores e jornalistas. Brasilia: Ministerio de Desenvolvimento Agrario.
  • Kriesi, H. ed. 1995. New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Vol. 5. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Leite, S.P. 2004. Impactos dos assentamentos: um estudo sobre o meio rural brasileiro. Vol. 6. Livraria: UNESP.
  • Lofland, J. 1996. Social movement organizations: Guide to research on insurgent realities. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Maney, G.M., R.V. Kutz-flamenbaum, and D.A. Rohlinger. eds. 2012. Strategies for social change. Vol. 37. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • McAdam, D.T.S. and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • McCarthy, J.D., and M.N. Zald. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American journal of sociology 82, no. 6: 1212–1241. doi: 10.1086/226464
  • MDAa. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário (Ministry of Agrarian Development). 2014. http://portal.mda.gov.br/portal/saf/programas/pronaf/2258856 (accessed March 7, 2014).
  • MDAb. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário (Ministry of Agrarian Development). 2014. Credito Rural PRONAF. http://comunidades.mda.gov.br/o/880418 (accessed March 7, 2014).
  • Meyer, D.S., and S.G. Tarrow. eds. 1998. The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
  • Mitchell, T. 2006. Society, economy and the state effect. In The anthropology of the state: A reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Nettl, J.P. 1968. The state as a conceptual variable. World Politics 20, no. 4: 559–92. doi: 10.2307/2009684
  • North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ondetti, G.A. 2008. Land, protest, and politics: The landless movement and the struggle for agrarian reform in Brazil. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
  • Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34, no. 3: 380–404. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00247
  • Piven, F.F., and R.A. Cloward. 1979. Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. Vol. 697. New York, NY: Random House Digital, Inc.
  • Plummer, D.M. 2008. Leadership development and formação in Brazil's Landless Workers Movement (MST) (Doctoral dissertation, The City University of New York).
  • Ronit, K., and V. Schneider. 1999. Global governance through private organizations. Governance 12, no. 3: 243–266. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00102
  • Rose, Nikolas. 1996. “Governing “advanced” liberal democracies.” In Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government, eds. A. Barry, T. Osborne, and N.S. Rose. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  • Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global governance, 13–43. Chicago, IL.
  • Scherer-Warren, I. 1987. Uma Revolucão no cotidiano? Os novos movimentos sociais na America Latina. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
  • Schmidt et al. 1998. Primeiro Censo da reforma agraria do Brasil.
  • Schmitter, P.C. 2002. Participation in governance arrangements: Is there any reason to expect it will achieve sustainable and innovative policies in a multi-level context. In Participatory governance. Political and societal implications, eds. J. Grote and B. Gbikpi, 51–69. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
  • Schneider, S., and P.A. Niederle. 2010. Resistance strategies and diversification of rural livelihoods: The construction of autonomy among Brazilian family farmers. The journal of peasant studies 37, no. 2: 379–405. doi: 10.1080/03066151003595168
  • Scott, J.C. 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
  • Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
  • Shepsle, K.A., and B.R. Weingast, eds. 1995. Positive theories of congressional institutions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Snow, D.A., S.A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, eds. 2008. The Blackwell companion to social movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Staggenborg, S. 1988. The consequences of professionalization and formalization in the pro-choice movement. American Sociological Review 53, no. 4: 585–605. doi: 10.2307/2095851
  • Starr, A., M.E. Martínez-Torres, and P. Rosset. 2011. Participatory democracy in action practices of the Zapatistas and the Movimento Sem Terra. Latin American Perspectives 38, no. 1: 102–119. doi: 10.1177/0094582X10384214
  • Stiglitz, J.E. 2008. Is there a post-Washington consensus consensus? In The Washington Consensus reconsidered: Towards a new global governance, ed. N. Serra and J.E. Stiglitz, 41–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tarrow, S. 1998. Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tilly, C. 1978. From mobilization to revolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Tilly, C., P.B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol. 1985. War making and state making as organized crime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tribunal das Contas da Uniao. 2010. Relatório e Parecer Prévio sobre as Contas do Governo da República – Exercício de 2009.
  • Van der Ploeg, J.D. 2009. The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London, UK: Routledge Press.
  • Wampler, B. 2007. Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, and accountability. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
  • Weber, H. 2002. The imposition of a global development architecture: The example of microcredit. Review of International Studies 28, no. 3: 537–555. doi: 10.1017/S0260210502005375
  • Williamson, J. 1990. What Washington means by policy reform. In Latin American adjustment: How much has happened, ed. J. Williamson, 7–20. Institute for International Economics.
  • Wolford, W. 2010. Participatory democracy by default: Land reform, social movements and the state in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 1: 91–109. doi: 10.1080/03066150903498770

Primary sources: Interviews, fieldnotes, documents

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.